Matrix Files
Where You Have Taken The Red Pill

Links with * work

German New Medicine©
The following is from Learning GNM where one can learn more about this incredible knowledge.

German New Medicine is not only a new paradigm of medicine, it is also a new consciousness. It is the awareness that our organism possesses an inexhaustible creativity and remarkable self-healing capabilities. It is the recognition that each cell of our body is endowed with a biological wisdom we share with all living beings. It was discovered by a German doctor, Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer, who refined it over many decades through patient observation and over 40,000 case histories of which 6,500 are court verified.

Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer was born on May 17, 1935 in Mettmann, Germany. He spent his childhood with his paternal grandparents in East Frisia. In 1953, he began to study medicine, theology, and physics at the University of Tuebingen. At the age of 22, he completed his master's degree in theology and then, four years later, received his professional license as a doctor of medicine. The following years he practiced at various university clinics in Germany.

In 1972, Dr. Hamer completed his specialization in internal medicine and began to work at the University clinic in Tuebingen as an internist in charge of cancer patients. At the same time, he ran a private practice with his wife Dr. Sigrid Hamer, whom he had met during their studies in Tuebingen. He also showed an extraordinary talent for inventing medical devices. Among others, he owns the patent for a non-traumatic scalpel (Hamer Scalpel) which cuts twenty times sharper than a razor blade, a special bone saw for plastic surgery, and a massage table that automatically adjusts to the body's contours.

His inventions provided Dr. Hamer and his family with the financial means to move to Italy, where he realized his plan to treat the sick in the slums of Rome free of charge. On August 18th, 1978, while in Rome, the Hamers received the shocking news that their son Dirk had been accidentally shot by the Italian Prince Victor Emanuel of Savoy. On December 7th, 1978, Dirk succumbed to the injuries and died in his father's arms. Dirk is buried under the city wall at the pyramid in Rome.

Shortly after Dirk's death, Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Since he had never been seriously ill, he postulated that the development of his cancer could be directly related to the unexpected loss of his son. In fact, he would eventually, in honor of Dirk, call this unexpected shock a DHS or "Dirk Hamer Syndrome".

Dirk's death and his own experience with cancer set Dr. Hamer on an extraordinary scientific journey.

At the time head internist of a cancer clinic at the University of Munich, he began to investigate his cancer patients' histories and soon learned that, like him, they all had experienced an unexpected shock of one sort or another. But he took his research even further. Pursuing the hypothesis that all bodily processes are controlled from the brain, he analyzed his patients' brain scans and compared them with their medical records and personal histories. To his amazement, he found a clear correlation between certain types of "conflict shocks", how these shocks manifest themselves on the organ level as specific symptoms and how all this is connected to the brain. Until then, no studies had examined the role of the brain as the mediator between the psyche and a diseased organ.

Dr. Hamer established that every disease originates from a shock or trauma that catches an individual completely by surprise. The moment the unexpected conflict occurs, the shock strikes a specific, predetermined area in the brain causing a lesion (later called Hamer Focus or HH - Hamerscher Herd), visible on a brain scan as a set of sharp concentric rings. Before Dr. Hamer identified these ringed lesions on a brain scan, radiologists considered them as artifacts created by a glitch in the machine. But Siemens, a manufacturer of computer tomography equipment, certified that these target lesions cannot be artifacts because even when the tomography is repeated and taken from different angles, the same ring formation always appears in the same location.

The brain cells that receive the shock (DHS) send a biochemical signal to the corresponding body cells causing the growth of a tumor, a meltdown of tissue, or functional loss, depending on which part of the brain is involved. The reason why specific conflicts are irrefutably tied to specific areas in the brain is that during the development of the human organism each brain area was programmed to respond instantly to situations that could threaten survival. While the brainstem, the oldest part of the brain, is programmed with primordial conflicts related to breathing (death-fright conflicts) reproduction (procreation conflicts) and food (morsel conflicts), the cerebrum, the youngest part of the brain, correlates to more advanced matters (separation conflicts, territorial conflicts). Dr. Hamer also discovered that every disease progresses in two phases: first, a conflict-active phase, characterized by emotional distress, a lack of appetite, and sleeplessness, and then, provided the conflict can be resolved, a healing phase. This is the period in which the psyche, the brain and the affected organ undergo the phase of recovery, an often difficult process marked by fatigue, headaches, inflammation, "infections", and pain.

Firmly anchored in the science of embryology and in full accordance with evolutionary logic, Dr. Hamer called his findings "The Five Biological Laws of the New Medicine". Over the years, he was able to confirm his discoveries with over 40,000 case studies.

Dr. Hamer's research radically upsets the many existing theories of conventional medicine. His explanation of disease as a meaningful interplay between the psyche, the brain and the corresponding organ refutes the view that disease occurs by chance or as a result of a mistake of Nature. Based on sound scientific criteria, German New Medicine shatters the myths of malignant cancer cells or of malevolent microbes and identifies "infectious diseases" as well as cancerous tumors as age-old emergency measures designed to save the organism and not, as we have been taught, to destroy it. Diseases such as cancer lose their frightening image and are recognized as meaningful biological survival programs every human being is born with.

In October 1981, Dr. Hamer submitted his research to the University of Tuebingen as a post-doctoral thesis. The objective was to have his findings tested on equivalent cases so that the New Medicine could be taught to all medical students and that patients could benefit from the discoveries as soon as possible. But to his great surprise, the University committee rejected his work and refused to evaluate his thesis. This is an unprecedented case in the history of universities! There was yet another surprise. Shortly after he had handed in his thesis, Dr. Hamer was given the ultimatum to either deny his findings or his contract would not be renewed. It was extremely difficult for him to understand why he was being expelled from the clinic for presenting well-substantiated scientific findings. Dr. Hamer stood his ground. After his dismissal, he retreated to his private practice where he continued his research. Several attempts to open a private clinic failed because of concerted efforts opposing it. Letters of Dr. Hamer's patients to health officials remained unanswered or were returned with the comment: "Not applicable!". To this day, the firm position of the authorities has not changed.

In 1985, after 29 years of marriage and the raising of four children, Sigrid Hamer died. She had never really recovered from the grief over the death of her son and the relentless intimidation by the Savoy family.

The harassment of Dr. Hamer culminated in 1989, when a court sentence stopped him from practicing medicine. Despite the fact that his scientific work had never been disproved, he lost, at the age of 54, his medical license on the grounds that he refused to renounce his findings on the origin of cancer and to conform to the principles of official medicine. Deprived of a medical license, Dr. Hamer now relied on other doctors to obtain brain scans and patients' records. But he was determined to continue his work. By 1987 Dr. Hamer had already analyzed over 10,000 cases and was able to expand his discovery of the Five Biological Laws to practically all diseases known in medicine. Meanwhile, the press and the medical establishment stopped at nothing to attack him and his work. Tabloid journalists and medical "experts" portray Dr. Hamer as a charlatan, a self-proclaimed miracle healer, a cult leader, an irrational outsider, or an insane criminal who denies cancer patients the 'life-saving' conventional treatments.

As a result of the ongoing concerted effort to suppress Dr. Hamer's medical discoveries, doctors as well as the populace at large have not been given a chance to benefit from the knowledge of GNM, and - for over 30 years- millions of patients have been denied to be treated according to German New Medicine with its humane, non-invasive approach.

In 1997, Dr. Hamer was arrested and sentenced to 19 months in prison for having given three people free medical information without a medical license. By contrast, in 1991, thirteen years after he had killed Dirk Hamer, Victor Emanuel of Savoy had been sentenced to a mere 6 months probation for the illegal possession of a weapon. When Dr. Hamer was arrested, the police searched his patient files. Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial that after more than five years, of 6500 patients with mostly 'terminal' cancer, 6000 were still alive. And so, ironically, it was his opponents that provided the actual statistics attesting to German New Medicine's remarkable success rate. Yet, to this day, the University of Tuebingen refuses, despite court orders in 1986 and 1994, to test Dr. Hamer's scientific work. Similarly, official medicine refuses to endorse GNM despite its numerous verifications by both physicians and professorial associations.

On September 9th, 2004, Dr. Hamer was arrested at his home in Spain. Following a European extradition order, Dr. Hamer was extradited to France, where he was held in the French prison Fleury-Mérogis. He was sentenced to three years in prison without probation. The charges: "fraud and the complicity in the illegal practice of medicine". He had been charged and found responsible for the deaths of French citizens due to the availability of his publications in French. It should be mentioned that Dr. Hamer had never spoken to any of the individuals in person. He was released from his unjustified incarceration in February 2006 (see details in Caroline Markolin's letter to the International PEN.) In March 2007, Dr. Hamer was forced to leave his Spanish exile. He went to Norway, where he was safe to continue his life's work. Following a stroke, Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer died on July 2nd, 2017 in his home in Sandefjord at the age of 82. He is buried in Erlangen, Germany, where he got married to his beloved wife Sigrid.

7 videos on the German New Medicine Concept

The following videos explain the German New Medicine concept in more detail. The videos are each about 10 minutes long with a total viewing time of 1 hr for all 7.

Disease is Different - Introduction Part 1

7:54 minutes

This introduction presents a case why it may make sense to consider a whole new perspective on disease and health.
Here are the references and sources:

1) Google search for a rough filtering of diseases of unknown cause (Attention, also wrong results available, note description).
2) Study on lung infections, in which exceptionally was looked for the same bacteria in healthy people as in the sick.
3) A report and the original study on the placebo effect in knee surgery by Bruce Moseley.
4) Commonly known theory of how tooth caries arises, and a study with the most common locations in the gaps and on the occlusal surfaces.
5) A report about Leisure Sickness.
6) A report and website on the colateral vessels that form when a coronary vessel is occluded.
7) Wikipedia entry and a study about Peto’s paradox.
8) Myocardial infarction and Breast cancer as examples of typical collections of risk factors and hypotheses.
9) Some of my own reviews.

The Discovery Part 2

8:11 minutes

This section chronicles the discovery of New Medicine and enumerates problems and hurdles in its historical development.
Here are the references and sources:

1) A German newspaper article reporting on the event (from Here the translation to English:

Prince of Savoy now under indictment
Marseille (AP): Prince Viktor Emanuel of Savoy (52) has appealed against the court order to prosecute him after 11 years of investigation for assault with fatalities and unauthorized possession of weapons.
That’s what his lawyer said yesterday in Marseille. The court of Bastia announced the indictment on Wednesday. The son of the last king of Italy had fatally hit an uninvolved German in August 1978 in a dispute with a Roman playboy on the Mediterranean island of Corsica. The student Dirk Hamer, then 19 years old, was asleep aboard a nearby ship as the fired carbine ball hit the side wall.

2) A german podcast with 5BN topic discussing what Dr. Hamer failed scientifically and communicatively.

3) Reviews of the Discovery Dr. Hamers by different doctors (in German and French, images from
Loewenstein, Germany, 07/26/1982, 2+ physicians, 5 patients
Vienna, Austria, 12/09/1988, 4 physicians, 7 patients
Physicians conference Munich, Germany, 03/04/1989, 14 physicians, 27 patients, Page 2
Chambery, France, 04/08/1989, 16 physicians, 10 patients, Page 2
Physicians conference Namur, Belgium, 05/12/1990, 15 physicians, 6 patients
Children’s hospital Gelsenkirchen, Germany, 06/24/1992, 2+ physicians, 24 patients
Burgau, Austria, 01/27/1993, 2 physicians, 12 patients
University of Trnava, Slovakia, 12 physicians, 7 patients
Toulouse, France, 1 physician, 6 patients
Muenster, Germany, 1 physician, 4 patients

=> English Translations of three verifications.

4) Semmelweis reflex
5) Ignaz Semmelweis
6) The media mock Dr. Hamer, excerpt from the 5BN documentation by David Münnich (German), and the court verdict against the University of Tübingen (German).

Meaningful Biological Special Programs Part 3

11:38 minutes

In this part, we examine a radically different view of disease, which is summarized in the 5th Biological Law of Nature and forms the foundation of the New Medicine.

The Biological Conflict Part 4

11:16 minutes

In this part, we show how a meaningful biological special program starts in response to a situation perceived as a biological conflict, a process which is specified in the 1st biological natural law. The conflict content as well as the synchronicity of the 3 levels are also examined.
Here are the references and sources:

1) This song (german) nicely shows a few aspects of the psychic level of a strong conflict-active phase.
2) Fundamentals of the 1st Biological Law of Nature with many illustrations of Hamer Foci.
3) Details of the functional changes at the organic level in part 6 of this series.
4) Fundamentals of the 1st Biological Law of Nature and a critical consideration and important background to the emergence of the 1st biological natural law (German).

The Two Phases of an SBS Part 5

15:34 minutes

Here we show how a Meaningful Biological Special Program unfolds and how this knowledge can prove beneficial.
Here are the references and sources:

1) Fundamentals of the 2nd Biological Law of Nature.

2) A few thoughts on localization at the organ level, specifically: Why in the SBS of the mammary glands, does often only one mammary gland experience cell proliferation:

The exact localization in a tissue is at this time more understandable in some organs than in others.
In the case of the skin for example, many conflict nuances are already known; why for example, redness and inflammation occur in the elbow, on the eyelid, on the lip, the fingers, etc.
For other organs, for example, the mammary glands, this has not yet been studied more closely. The localization is basically at the point that is perceived as insufficient for the situation and therefore an adaptation attempt in the form of an SBS is triggered.
In its assignments, the brain appears to be as specific as possible, i.e. it is not the entire body that is affected, but the breast. But not the entire breast, only the mammary glands. But not all mammary glands; only one, or those in a specific area.
One guess is that the affected area is that which is most intensively perceived in the conflictive context. If the baby has, for example, always been breastfed in a certain way, and at the same time always touches a certain point of the mother's breast with its hands, she could link this location most strongly “with the child”.
If her partner has often touched her breasts in a certain way, in the future, these areas could be connected with “the partner”. This assumption is only about the localization within one breast, not about which breast reacts – this also has to do with certain groups of people (see the topics “mother/child and partner side” or “Handedness”).

So if the SBS now initiates an functional increase at that location, the child would naturally suckle there. If the milk is still not enough, presumably more mammary glands would increase their function, to fulfill an actual need – until the child can once again care for itself. Then, the SBS is done and the function normalizes again.
Since in humans, an SBS often starts only to be greeted with no actual child which to nourish, it continues with its initial functional increase. These are my thoughts and current "Theory".

3) Review of an epileptic seizure, predicted with the knowledge of the biphasic nature
4) Various other reports

The Tissue Types Part 6

11:33 minutes

This section identifies the 3 basic tissue types and associates each with a specific SBS.
Here are the references and sources:

1) Fundamentals of the 3rd Biological Law of Nature and the development of the trilaminar germ disc from embryology.
2) More details about the endoderm (German)
3) More details about the old mesoderm (German)
4) More details about the new mesoderm (German)
5) More details about the ektoderm (german)
Some of the information of references 2-5 in English
6) Information on natural, self-determined birthing (with hypnobirthing), many reports and our own birth report (German) of our first and second (follows soon…) child in the birth house Idstein with this method.
My video series For us children from 2020 has exactly this as one of its main foci.

How can you prove the 5BN to yourself Part 7

9:30 minutes

In this last part of the theory, you will be presented with ways in which you can personally test the 5 biological laws. Contrast this to previous medical modalities, which afford the patient no such possibility.

Here are the references and sources:

1) Resolve allergies – own reports:
Pepper allergy
Apple allergy
Coffee allergy
Dust mite allergy

2) Prediction of irregular symptoms – own reports:
Sting on the heart

3) Prediction of one-time symptoms – own reports:
Epileptic seizure
Back pain/lumbago

4) Subsequent comparison in the SBS progress of special symptoms – own reports:

5) Prediction of the duration of symptoms – own reports:
Viral infection / bronchitis

6) Check of the sidedness of symptoms – own reports:

7) Recommendations for deepening the 5BN:
– The multi-referenced website by Caroline Markolin
– The great Book “The Psychic Roots of Diseases” by Björn Eybl – as free download in many languages.
– The 4-hour documentation by David Münnich, which has been viewed almost 3 million times (German, with English subtitles)
– A very good introduction presentation by Dr. Melissa Sell (who is also the speaker of the English version of this series) on Youtube
– A very good introduction book by Mark Hanley (who is also the translator of the English version of this series), searching for the understanding of the cause of disease in the different existing healthcare models.

This page was updated on 27 May 2023 @ 1:00pm EST

©, All rights reserved.

The owner of this site waives his right to be recognized as a Person (or PERSON) before the law. (Article 6, Universal Declaration of Human Rights; Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights)