Back to Archive
Print
Donate
Send email link
to this report
ROUND-UP OF RECENT REVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTS
THE BELL TOLLS FOR THE CRIMINALIST CADRES AND THEY KNOW IT
Tuesday 24 November 2009 21:30
• FINANCING OF AL-QAEDA BY U.S. INTELLIGENCE: ARCHIVE: 26TH NOVEMBER 2009
Plus: Fraudulent conversion of private debt at Fed into public debt under cover of Fed audit.
THIS report, dated 24th November, has been reposted as it was overtaken by the later report...
• PREFACE: STRAIGHTFORWARD FACTS ABOUT THESE REPORTS
• THE PURGE TAKING PLACE TODAY WAS THWARTED IN 2007
• U.S. LOCOMOTIVE PLANT’S DELIVERIES TO CHINA ‘FOR FREE’
• WRECKAGE PERPETRATED BY A SMALL CLIQUE OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS
• REVIEW OF RECENT EVENTS IN THE LIGHT OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
• CHINESE CONTINUE TO HOLD THE WRIT AND LIEN IN RESERVE
• FORT HOOD OPERATION TO RECOVER BOXES ‘SUCCESSFUL’
• COLLABORATION OF THE U.S. MILITARY WITH THE CHINESE
• THE DOUBLE CARTEL OIL PRICE-RIGGING MECHANISM
• PRICE-RIGGING THROUGH THE INTER CONTINENTAL EXCHANGE
• THE REAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IN NUMBERS
• U.S. MILITARY AT FORT HOOD ACTED IN ‘NATIONAL INTEREST’
• BOEING FLEET FLOWN TO CHINA TO COLLECT MORE BOXES
• BUSH SR. ‘ALLOWED’ TO FLY TO GERMANY: FOR A REASON
• THE WORLD WAR II GERMAN BONDS HELD AT FORT HOOD
• OBAMA AND CLINTON COULD NOT HAVE TRAVELLED TO CHINA OTHERWISE
• CONGRESSMEN APPEAR TO TAKE THEIR CUE FROM THE CHINESE DEMAND
• OTHER PROMINENT OPERATIVES SAID TO BE 'ON THE SKIDS'
• DESPICABLE AMERICAN TREATMENT OF ITS ‘CLOSEST ALLY’
• BRITAIN SHOULD EXTRICATE ITSELF FROM U.S. ENTANGLEMENTS
• THEMES WE PIONEERED ARE BECOMING MAINSTREAM NOW
• UK MILITARY POWER SHOULD BE USED ONLY IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST
• BRITISH GOVERNMENT AT LAST STARTS MOVE TOWARDS AFGHAN EXIT
• INTERNATIONALIST AGENDA HIJACKS NATIONAL POWER
• OFFICIALLY CONDONED CRIMINAL OPS. IN AFGHANISTAN
• U.S. STATES' FINANCIAL CRISES, AND BIDEN’S CAR CRASHES
• THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR THESE ‘ACCIDENTS’
• BLAIR NIXED AS EUROPEAN PRESIDENT BY KISSINGER’S PAL
• POINTEDLY TIMED QUERIES RAISED ABOUT BLAIR’S DEALINGS
• BLAIR’S OCCULT NOMENKLATURE FOR HIS COMPANIES
• ‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW UNDERSTANDS WHY BLAIR WANTED THE JOB
• HIGH OFFICE OFFERS PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION
• THE TWIST BEHIND THE CHILCOT INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR
• THE EDITOR’S ENCOUNTER WITH A PENTAGON SPY
• THE SOVIET SHIPS THAT REMOVED THE IRAQI WMD
• WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE IRAQI WMD WAS SUPPRESSED
• PENTAGON AGENT TASKED TO FIND OUT WHAT WE KNEW
• BLAIR TO BE MADE THE SCAPEGOAT FOR OTHERS
• SAME CYNICAL PROCEDURE IS BEING APPLIED TO IRAN
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPERATING MORE ILLEGALLY THAN EVER
• BRITISH BANKS BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO BY AN IMPOSTOR
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION ACCOUNTS ARE FRAUDULENT
• THEREFORE, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
• DESPITE ALL THIS, A PAN-EUROPEAN GESTAPO IS BEING PLOTTED
• GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS ARE ‘INDISSOLUBLE’
• ‘IT DOESN’T MATTER THAT IT’S NOT TRUE. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT’S OUT THERE’.
• WARNING: Despite signs of movement towards resolution, summarised in this report, we remain braced for the likelihood of very dirty tricks at this late stage of the proceedings.
• FURTHER WARNING: We diagnose a sinister implied criminal intent to reignite the corrupt off-balance sheet, untaxed Fraudulent Finance derivatives trading using the collateral provided by the recovered Chinese 1933 and 1934 USD currency boxes as base for the 'new' fiat dollar money, so that a vast new eruption of funny money accruals arising from fraudulent trades achieved via new platforms that are being hastily put together by people who have no idea what they are doing, is anticipated, planned or intended. Any such development will lead straight into a global financial catastrophe within a short space of time, given that Governments, already strapped because of their rash bail-out operations in the present crisis, will be UNABLE to provide lifelines when this next generation of Fraudulent Finance 'blows', as it most certainly will, much faster than last time.
MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.
• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.
• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice are comprehensively debunked in the Editor's study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website. Also, the Editor's study entitled The European Union Collective, which proves that the EU is a long-range strategic entrapment operation to reduce European countries to satrap status within a German empire using economic strategy for relentless economic warfare purposes, can be bought here.
• Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's ongoing global financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. Just press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard. Or press the live Donate link at the top right-hand corner of this page. See also the ADVERTISEMENT below.
• See the second white panel for details of our latest distributed intelligence publications. This has its own Archive, giving details of earlier publications.
• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation, are appended at the foot of this report, below the legal data. See also our catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press the ARCHIVE. Order your intelligence subscriptions and our 'politically incorrect' intelligence books online from this website.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
PREFACE: STRAIGHTFORWARD FACTS ABOUT THESE REPORTS
Before we go any further several basic issues about these reports need to be revisited, given the propensity of some critics to blame the messenger.
• First, we have been operating in a dense fog of deliberate disinformation, lies and diversionary tactics perpetrated by compartmentalised agents of influence and operatives working for various competing US and foreign interests and structures with conflicting agendas and axes to grind – all concerning MONEY. By definition, therefore, separating truth from falsehood remains a continuing challenge – especially since certain well-known malevolent websites are tasked to specialise not in seeking to convey accurate insights and information, but rather in cynically and deliberately sowing diversionary confusion in accordance with instructions to maximise the potential for obfuscation of the criminality and fraud, and the cowardly failure of authorities to eradicate them.
It is self-evident that information published in these reports is derived from published sources in the public domain, from private written communications or from oral communications made to us by sources believed, through experience, to be reliable. However given that every conversation is listened to and recorded, with transcripts of some conversations still sent to the White House, and given that all who are genuinely engaged in exposing the criminality may be subject to attempted stings by the criminal cadres being exposed, one can never rule out the possibility of being misled.
At the same time, it may be too simplistic, on occasion, to categorise specified information as misleading. This is because you will recall that these people are ALL double-minded. Therefore, they may leak certain information for a dual purpose: first, to advance a particular Agency objective or discrediting agenda; and secondly, at the same time, to lay a trail which could be used to provide deniability in another, parallel context.
A case in point was the recent ‘Malik dimension’ leak to us, which actually occurred BEFORE the Fort Hood events. As indicated in outline in the report dated 12th November, following that trail leads straight to the criminal financing of Al-Qaeda and the World Class DVD-CIA criminal George Herbert Walker Bush. Equipped with this heads-up, certain operatives have rushed in to ‘confirm’ this fact – one of them being the libellant, Heneghan.
Now why would that be?
Stay tuned, as the late Sherman Skolnik used to say. It is because Marvelous Investments Limited, with which Mr Wanta and Heneghan, as well as Mrs Hillary Clinton and Eva Teleki, were involved, likewise leads to the financing of Al-Qaeda. So you see, the leaking of the ‘Malik dimension’ ahead of Fort Hood served two purposes simultaneously: it pointed fingers at George Bush Sr., while at the same time it provided, in readiness, an apparent alternative (diversionary) explanation for the Marvelous Investments Limited trail, should that operation be blown, as it will be.
Incidentally, some people have correctly pointed out that the horrific Russell Hermann sequence is an ‘old story’. That is true: but it’s not the point – which was that it highlighted a typically murderous and avaricious ‘grabitisation’ operation by George Bush Sr., and his notorious Texan ‘gopher’, one James Baker III. It is unconscionable that murderers and accessories to the fact of murder should be protected from the consequences of their crimes just because they once held high office – a consideration which, of course, applies to most of these odious operatives. Hermann was among a number of operatives involved with Iran-Contra who were horizontalised for their pains.
Despite the deliberately sustained fog of diversionary disinformation and claptrap, an experienced Editor with four decades of experience can be relied upon to possess adequate skills to be able to determine, usually with success, what is true and what may be false – especially when he has been lied to, deceived and double-crossed with the frequency suffered by this Editor, as well as being routinely threatened as has been happening with some regularity of late.
Sources usually found by us to be reliable are themselves, prone to be deceived from time to time; indeed, it is our experience that a run of accurate (and separately confirmed) information from such sources may, without warning, suddenly be followed by ‘information’ that is subsequently found to be without foundation.
This happens occasionally because the source is itself being compromised, as the disinformation apparat knows who the source talks to, and targets us through that source accordingly. Again, we have pretty good filters, but while the fog remains dense, hazards remain.
• Secondly, it should be recalled that these US criminal operatives never imagined, in their worst nightmares, that there would ever be any opposition. They thought that the funny fraudulent money bonanza would continue for ever. They had got away with murder for so long that they thought they were immune. Indeed, they imagined (and a tiny proportion of them still do) that the clock can be turned right back to before 10th-12th September 2008, i.e. to dirty business as usual. These people cannot believe that anyone has stood up to them and that their time is up.
It follows, therefore, that what we have all been observing (and recording) is an INCREMENTAL operation, a salami tactics process of attrition. Impatient armchair observers may demand instant results. That is absurd. After all, we are confronting the worst outbreak of organised, revolutionary Fraudulent Finance since Lenin and Stalin engaged in criminal financial operations against the Russian Government before 1917, when Stalin started out with his raid on the Post Office in Tbilisi, Georgia (1906), and relieving it of a large quantity of state bonds.
Does that by any chance sound familiar?
And we are observing the exposure, on a monumental scale, of precisely the same kind of base criminalist behaviour that the old Nazi Gauleiters presided over in Grossdeutschland during the Second World War – when the Rule of Law collapsed and the Gauleiters took the law into their own hands, seizing assets by force and mass-murdering their owners for self-enrichment purposes. This theme is developed in the current issue of Global Analyst [Volume 3, #3].
• Thirdly, the Bush/Greenspan criminal technique deployed all along has been to dangle the prospect of great riches in front of the noses of ordinary men and officials, against a contextual background in which an ‘everyone is doing it’ collapse of ethical standards came to prevail.
This proved to be highly ‘successful’, as the myriad Ponzi operations against Americans who forgot about the Prudent Man Rule have shown – enabling the directorate of these scams, headed by the DVD serpent and its Mossad collaborators themselves, to steal the principal invested by the Ponzi victims and then to orchestrate what must surely be the most cruel and cynical agitprop operation to keep such victims guessing, ever perpetrated by agents of a corrupt government against its own population. This cynical, deceitful agitprop operation continues to this day.
• Finally, as noted above, the criminalists never imagined that they would be confronted, let alone cornered. It is therefore a fact that they have NEVER recovered from being faced down. Contrary to appearances at times, they have remained perpetually on the defensive – so that every time they clambered up off the floor, they have been slapped down harder than previously.
As a consequence they have been dazed, walking around in confusion, unsure what nailed boot will descend on them next, unable to sleep soundly at night, fearful of the Day of Reckoning – and yet determined, given their criminal mentality, to continue their resistance to the inevitable: which is that they ARE being taken down, and they WILL (as we predicted a long while ago) be made to pay for what they have done. It just takes time and superhuman patience.
In the meantime, an orchestrated campaign of ‘Black’ propaganda against The Queen is being perpetrated by US cadres whose serial criminality and thievery has been exposed, and who find themselves having to face a reality they never thought could arise. This orchestrated campaign encapsulates the lie that the $6.2 trillion of sovereign LOAN money was a ‘replacement for’ the stolen $4.5 trillion referenced in earlier reports – whereas it had nothing to do with those stolen funds at all. As we alone reported, the $6.2 trillion was indeed placed into ‘lockdown’ on 10th-12th September 2008 and made inaccessible for illicit trading operations, as it had not been used for the purpose for which it was intended: namely the on-the-books Dollar Refunding Programme, which generates on-balance sheet, taxable accruals: whereas the financial terrorists who have been in charge are incurring $1.0 trillion of unnecessary Treasury debt per annum or more because they couldn't bear the thought of the discontinuity affecting their Fraudulent Finance operations being made permanent, so that the huge speculative institutions will have to find something else to do.
The campaign to denigrate The Queen represents a desperate, and failing, 'Black' operation to try to confuse the issue by perpetuating the lie that the $6.2 trillion ‘replaced’ the $4.5 trillion, which was never the case. It is noted that this lie is being ‘shouted’ at us: in big black capital letters – on Goebbels’ principle that if a lie is repeated often and loud enough, it becomes fact.
• This childish behaviour has simply revealed how desperate and beside themselves these losers are, now that their duplicity and criminality has been faced down. They don't know what to do, so they are shouting like naughty boys in a nursery where all discipline collapsed long ago.
THE PURGE TAKING PLACE TODAY WAS THWARTED IN 2007
Late on 21st November, after the Editor had reported the threat to burn our building down, we were told on the transatlantic line that every one of these perpetrators needs to be arrested, clothed in bright orange like Stanford, chained together, frog-marched in front of the world’s TV cameras (Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts, Links, Rechts) and publicly humiliated before being herded under US military conditions to one of the multiple bleak Gulag concentration camp areas prepared for the US revolution, where the gates should be slammed in their faces while they are locked up in standing room-only cubicles where they can spend the rest of their diminishing days contemplating the life cycle of the North American cockroach and any other primitive form of life that may inhabit the latrines of the facilities in question.
This of course, should have happened two years ago. But the purge that started then, was aborted, as the Bush wing of the 'Box Gang' was still in power: as a consequence of which, the whole world was pushed to the brink of collapse, just as the US dollar faces collapse if this stupid resistance is allowed to continue much longer.
We are very confident (at the time of posting) that it won’t, because of the recent pattern of events which will now be explained to the best of our current knowledge, and because of the long delayed remedy which awaits implementation.
U.S. LOCOMOTIVE PLANT’S DELIVERIES TO CHINA ‘FOR FREE’
First, though, recall that following the libels perpetrated against the Editor of this service by the criminal disinformation operative Heneghan that had to be featured at the top of the preceding report, we added some outline details about an order received by a GE Transportation plant in Pennsylvania for 300 locomotive kits. China now owns 47% of the United States’ total debt.
This Lawrence Park Township and Grove City locomotive manufacturing plant owned by General Electric Company is engaged in completing 1,480 layoffs, announced at the end of September, by the end of this month. The order from China, confirmed on Monday 16th November (i.e. during Obama’s trip to China) for 300 locomotive ‘kits’ (consisting of high-value components such as the control systems) following an order placed by China in 2005 for a similar number of ‘kits’, reflects inter alia the Chinese demand for concrete deliveries, for redemption against a proportion of the (now worthless) derivatives junk in which GE specialised (as reported when we were analysing the methodology underlying the Fraudulent Finance crisis).
In other words, the Chinese, owners of 47% of the US (corporate) debt, have asked the Americans, in this instance, to manufacture and supply the ‘brains’ for a batch of 300 Evolution Series China Mainland locomotives – effectively for ‘nothing’.
Instead of GE’s junk derivatives paper being redeemed in ‘real’ dollars, in which China is drowning, the shrewd Chinese, who being America’s biggest creditor, hold the whip hand (as well as the Writ of Execution and the lien: see below), have demanded practical railway hardware.
How will the US GE plants be financed while this manufacturing order is being fulfilled? Answer: Finally, via ‘stimulus money’ (which hasn’t been distributed yet, as the official criminals were using it for their ‘platform operations’). ‘At the present time, we are still holding out a lot of hope from the stimulus’, Jim Fifer, President of Local 506 of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, told the local press on 17th November 2009 (1).
WRECKAGE PERPETRATED BY A SMALL CLIQUE OF FINANCIAL TERRORISTS
The foregoing shows the extreme consequences of the bovine resistance of a few arrogant US operatives elevated far above their capabilities who appeared, at this writing, STILL not to have understood that their resistance to the inevitable is now futile.
Because we have it on impeccable authority that the decision has now been taken to expose the criminality, and for the resistance to be crushed. As we aren’t in the driving seat, obviously we can’t prescribe how this should be done (our preference would be as described above). But we expect the exposures to be absolutely devastating, and that they will hit these people between the eyes when they weren’t expecting it – as usual. They never expected ANY opposition.
REVIEW OF RECENT EVENTS IN THE LIGHT OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
So let us now review what has happened – just over two years after Citibank was comprehensively exposed by this service as a criminal enterprise [see Archive].
And the first place to start is to recall that, as stated at the top of the report dated 12th November, with effect from one minute past midnight on Monday morning 9th November (9/11), the US military were placed on high alert.
The reason for this alert became apparent on Veterans’ (Armistice) Day, 11th November 2009, when violence erupted at the huge Fort Hood military territory in Texas, just 30 miles or so from George Bush Jr.’s ranch at Crawford. As our subscriber and correspondent, the Texas attorney who works with Fort Hood, testified in his correspondence to the Editor, events on that occasion did not ‘add up’ at all. His testimony will be found in the report dated 12th November [see Archive].
That was the date by which the Chinese parties were to have exercised their lien on the American Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the White House, in accordance with their World Court authority to do so. The holder of a Writ of Execution can effectively ‘wave the Writ’ in front of the delinquent creditor by way of a threat, forcing the issue without in fact proceeding with the Writ of Execution or lien, although it retains the power to do so. This obvious consideration raises the question: was the Writ sequence a sort of decoy, while other ‘remedies’ were being finalised?
CHINESE CONTINUE TO HOLD THE WRIT AND LIEN IN RESERVE
The answer to that question is both Yes and No. The Chinese parties continue to hold the Writ of Execution and the lien and remain conspicuously in charge of proceedings, to the humiliation of the criminalist idiots who have been cornered due to their own self-interested greed and the lust of the corrupt elements within the US Intelligence Power for independent sources of funny money to fund its Black Operations and other disruptive initiatives around the world ostensibly on behalf of the Executive Power and the energy corporations, but in reality on behalf of itself.
Having long since usurped total power in the United States (recall our metaphor of the three flanks of the Power Pyramid), the Intelligence Power refuses to relinquish its control; so an international showdown (predicted by this service) became inevitable. The first international violence phase of this showdown occurred at Fort Hood on 11th November 2009.
FORT HOOD OPERATION TO RECOVER BOXES ‘SUCCESSFUL’
As we were able to report in the preceding presentation, a Chinese secret police representative has confirmed that the Fort Hood operation was ‘successful’ from their perspective – a fact that has subsequently been reconfirmed to us by other reliable sources. This means that, as we know, the Chinese successfully retrieved the currency boxes that had been held under guard at Fort Hood for the past 15 years.
COLLABORATION OF THE U.S. MILITARY WITH THE CHINESE
Self-evidently, the Chinese cadres could not have achieved ‘success’ without the cooperation of the US military at Fort Hood – indicating a ‘sudden’ community of interests between the Pentagon and the Chinese parties (as well as with the British Monarchical Power) in the grim context of the decisive thrust of the Writ of Execution and the Chinese lien over the US Treasury, the US Federal Reserve, the White House and a vast swathe, by extension, of the financial and real economies – arising entirely as a consequence of the serial and endless criminality of successive arrogant US Administrations, the obtuse insistence of the Intelligence Power in seeking to retain its previously unchallenged ability to generate vast funny money resources enabling it to retain its hegemony over the Government: and giving it the illicit resources with which to intermeddle catastrophically all over the world, where its successive botched operations on behalf of the White House and the energy corporations have wreaked havoc everywhere, so far with impunity.
THE DOUBLE CARTEL OIL PRICE-RIGGING MECHANISM
The US Intelligence Power’s hegemony all these years has been attributable to a combination of penetration of the CIA by DVD (Nazi Abwehr) cadres and to the scamming requirements of the US energy corporations, which operate a price cartel behind the cover provided by the ‘front’ cartel, The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which was created at the Baghdad Conference held on 10th-14th September 1960, by Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.
The five founding members of OPEC were later joined by nine other participants: Qatar, 1961; Indonesia, 1962 [suspended January 2009]; Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 1962; the United Arab Emirates, 1967; Algeria, 1969; Nigeria, 1971; Ecuador, 1973 [suspended December 1992 to October 2007]; Angola, 2007; and Gabon, 1975, 1994. Russia has for a number of years operated within OPEC with ‘observer status’.
The OPEC cartel provides cover, as indicated, for the oil corporations, which cannot rig prices domestically in the United States due to strong anti-monopoly laws. So, as is the case with almost every abuse perpetrated by the US Intelligence Power and its masters, they sought to establish a means of rigging prices externally. This operation was completed by US Treasury Secretary William Simon’s achievement, brokered by the triple agent and DVD chief Dr Henry (Heinz) Kissinger in June 1974, when the denomination of all oil invoices in US dollars was ‘confirmed’ – while special arrangements were reached with the US Treasury for ‘add-on’ US Treasury securities to be made available off-market for absorption by the monetary authorities of the oil-producing states, such as the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA).
In the 1970s, our financial journal International Currency Review exposed this accord as the secret Saudi-American Agreement: and it is this precedent which underlies the subsequent catastrophic institutionalisation of the one-way debt escalation system which is about to be put into reverse with the imminent new US Dollar Refunding Programme arrangements.
PRICE-RIGGING THROUGH THE INTER CONTINENTAL EXCHANGE
To buttress the somewhat ‘unreliable’ oil price-rigging mechanism operated by the oil corporations behind the cover provided by OPEC, a new price falsification mechanism was established in 2000 by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, British Petroleum, Total, Shell Oil, Deutsche Bank and Société Générale, called the Inter Continental Exchange (ICE). This is an online commodities and futures virtual marketplace which exists outside the United States and operates, like the two oil cartels themselves, beyond the constraints of the US anti-monopoly and anti-cartel legislation.
Following a Congressional investigation in 2003, the ICE was found to be facilitating ‘round-trip’ trades – in which one firm sells energy to another, whereupon the second entity sells the same amount of energy back to the first corporation, at the same time and at exactly the same price. Although no commodity ever changes hands, the transactions send signals to the market, falsify the price structure, and artificially augment corporate revenues: CARTELISED SPECULATION.
• Under overt Communism and in places like revolutionary Iraq and Iran, speculators used to be hanged from lamp posts or specially erected gibbets, as used to happen in mediaeval England.
When Congress investigated a firm called DMS Energy, the corporation admitted that 80% of its trades in 2001 were ‘round-trip’ trades, which meant that 80% of its trades in that year were false trades. No oil changed hands, but balance sheets showed ballooning revenues. The expert analyst Philip Davis, who has exposed this recently, says that the purpose of these trades (apart from padding balance sheets) is to inflate commodity prices.
According to Davis. After the ICE had turned commodity trading into “a speculative casino game where pricing was notional and contracts could be sold by people who never produced a thing, to people who didn’t need the things that were not produced”, Goldman Sachs were able to triple the price of commodities in the space of five years. At the present stage of the massively contracted world economy, oil prices have RISEN – despite a very sharp fall in consumption. In other words, a parallel virtual scamming operation has developed in the commodity markets, operating in parallel with the Fraudulent Finance scams that we have been reporting on for years.
THE REAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE IN NUMBERS
It makes no sense, of course, for oil prices to rise when demand implodes – as has been the case worldwide. This is obvious from a glance at export and import data. Over the year to the second quarter of 2009, exports by VOLUME contracted in the following listed countries by the proportions shown after the name of each country:
Austria, – 17.2%; Belgium, – 18.7%; Canada, – 18.4%; Czech Republic, – 16.6%; Denmark, – 13.5%; Finland, – 30.2%; France, – 12.9%; Germany, – 18.6%; Greece, – 10.9%; Hungary, – 14.1%; Italy, – 23.9%; Japan, – 29.2%; Mexico, – 24.3%; Netherlands, – 12.2%; Norway, – 8.9%; Poland, – 13.4%; Portugal, – 17.1%; Spain, – 15.7%; Sweden – 15.2%; Switzerland, – 15.8%; United Kingdom, – 13.0%; United States, – 15.0%.
Obviously, a similar picture was reflected in collapsing imports of goods and services by volume. Against the background of such coruscating data alone, there is no way that oil prices could have risen without a price falsification operation. The same happened, notoriously, in 2008.
U.S. MILITARY AT FORT HOOD ACTED IN ‘NATIONAL INTEREST’
The US military elements that collaborated with the Chinese secret police et al. at Fort Hood did so plainly ‘in the national interest’, given that the Chinese authorities held, and continue to hold, the whip hand given their possession of the Writ of Execution and their prospective lien on the US Treasury. For their part, the Chinese were also working in the US national interest, as well as in their own and the international interest, in bring this crisis to a head, inter alia at Fort Hood.
BOEING FLEET FLOWN TO CHINA TO COLLECT MORE BOXES
Meanwhile, when Barack Hussein Obama appeared in Alaska on veterans’ Day, Air Force One was joined by three or more cargo Boeing aircraft, which we are told took off from Fairbanks en route to China ‘with’ the President’s aircraft. These cargo planes reportedly (as has since been confirmed by several sources to us) collected further heavy boxes containing currency, gold coins and other assets in China which, together with the 1933 and 1934 US currency boxes that were retrieved from Fort Hood, where the Bush Sr.-led ‘Box Gang’ had managed to keep them under guard since they were originally stolen 15 years earlier – in 1994 – were to be merged to provide the backing for the US dollar under the new, reformed settlement that is in the process of being implemented.
These facts alone confirm that the ‘Box Gang’ may have been defeated – a development enhanced by reports (which, again, have since been separately confirmed to us) that Mrs Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State pro tem., ‘rolled over’ on the Bushes and possibly on others (including her CIA husband?), as a consequence of which she appears temporarily to be ‘off the hook’ (but she probably shouldn’t count on that remaining the case for long).
BUSH SR. ‘ALLOWED’ TO FLY TO GERMANY: FOR A REASON
As previously reported, George Bush Sr., was ‘allowed’ to travel to Germany (having been given back his passport for the purpose), where he hob-nobbed with his partners-in-crime, the former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachëv, former Chancellor Helmut Kohl (in a wheelchair), and Joseph Ackermann, CEO of Deutschebank, all of whom are ‘partners’ in Barrington Group Investments, AG, now known as Deutsche AG, of St Gallen, Switzerland (Marc Rich, aka Hans Brand territory).
The occasion of the 20th anniversary of the ‘fall’ of the Berlin Wall was the pretext that provided cover for this trip, which was ‘allowed’ so that distributions and bribes that Bush Sr. was evidently known to be intending to order, with the assistance of Ackermann and other German (DVD) banking associates at institutions such as Dresdner Bank, could be intensively traced, and the Bush assets thereby traced to accounts in the Caribbean could be seized (as reported).
Some of these bank accounts were identified earlier in facsimiles of transactions for George Bush Sr. published in International Currency Review. There are new, unconfirmed reports of US Boeing flights from Colombia to Switzerland, which are believed to be connected with the removal of Bush-linked drug-trafficking proceeds and 'assets' from that corrupted country to Swiss 'safekeeping', a further development which obviously begs many highly disturbing questions, if these reports are confirmed. For the time being, this unconfirmed development would appear to be another phase of the same operation, which presupposes the wholesale dismantling of Bush Sr.'s power and control, although even that deduction remains uncertain at this juncture. It's possible that this 'dismantling' may be in process, with his 'agreement': in other words, that a sordid deal has been struck.
It was established almost immediately after the violence at Fort Hood that Mr George Bush Sr. was present on-site. We also published a report originating with the Los Angeles Times that George W. Bush made a hurried ‘secret’ visit to Fort Hood from his Crawford ranch on the day of the violence, and that Bush Jr. and his wife Laura paid a further visit to Fort Hood on the following day.
We asked the rhetorical question: has George Bush Sr. been horizontalised – given that several informants indicated that this was the intention. We also pointed out that experience had shown that whenever such a possibility has been mooted, it tends to be standard deception practice for the individual concerned to surface a few days later – usually in a ‘humanitarian’ context. This is exactly what happened, when Bush Sr. ostensibly appeared, complete with his walking stick, at a ‘charity event’ in Indianapolis. We have been advised on good authority, nonetheless, that the question of whether Senior has been horizontalised or not, remains ‘up in the air’.
• The CIA operates an arrangement with Hollywood specialists which is believed to function like an employment agency, with look-alikes kept on the books ready to be rented out for 'double' work at high fees. These arrangements are supplemented by the make-up skills of a handful of Hollywood make-up specialists. However we ourselves do not waste time in speculation concerning 'doubles' unless the deception appears obvious, as on that hilarious occasion when a Cheney appeared on a platform wearing a ten-gallon hat so that his features could not be seen clearly.
THE WORLD WAR II GERMAN BONDS HELD AT FORT HOOD
Bush Sr.’s involvement all along, beyond his financial criminality generally, has been associated in part with the known existence at Fort Hood of closely guarded German World War II ‘reparations’ bonds, which we understand that the United States ‘will never seek to redeem’.
This was certainly the ‘line’ a few years ago. It is interesting to speculate whether, given the now drastically altered situation, some arrangement might have been implemented behind the scenes whereby the colossal overhang of derivatives held for instance by Deutsche Bank, Bush Sr.’s main ‘trading partner bank’, may have been redeemed against repatriation of some or all of these bonds. If so, that would of course mean that the US Treasury is stuffed beyond the gills with ‘its own’ worthless derivatives trash – making the urgent provision of new backing for the US dollar indispensable in order for a collapse to be avoided.
The Chinese were able to pull off Fort Hood with the cooperation of elements of the US military because in so doing the exercise of their lien on the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve, etc, was sidestepped – while at the same time, the Chinese continue to hold this lien in reserve, to ensure completion of the operations to the satisfaction of all parties – with the exception of the diehards at the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve, Citibank, the CIA and elsewhere who appear not to have realised, as late as last week, that the game is up. In other words, the completely demented Obama-Geithner-Bernanke attempt to continue the off-balance sheet, untaxed, illicit Fraudulent Finance carousel, long after the discontinuity of 10th-12th September 2009, has run into the sand.
OBAMA AND CLINTON COULD NOT HAVE TRAVELLED TO CHINA OTHERWISE
Manifestly, too, Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton could not possibly have travelled to China if these arrangements were not in hand, pre-arranged, and guaranteed to be ‘successful’, as the Chinese secret policeman revealed. That consideration alone makes it clear that this ‘resolution sequence’ was a carefully planned operation from the get-go – which has in fact transformed the situation – not least given that the ‘Box Gang’ impediments appear to have been removed. We were informed over the weekend of 21st-22nd November that all impediments to the payments due to the CMKX victims also appeared to have been removed (but CMKX victims and parties must investigate this matter for themselves and not rely on this statement, even though we believe it to be correct).
Yet notwithstanding all this, following Barack Obama’s return from China, when he was able, we believe, to give the ‘all-clear’, further resistance to the settlements was encountered from the US Treasury Secretary, Mr Geithner, who was loudly urged by Congressmen to resign from his post. This was significant, as sources had informed us that the Chinese had lectured Mr Obama on the need for ‘heads to roll’: the way it was put to us by several sources was that ‘the Chinese want prominent figures to pay for this’.
CONGRESSMEN APPEAR TO TAKE THEIR CUE FROM THE CHINESE DEMAND
As if like clockwork, The Wall Street Journal reported on 19th November that the TEXAS Republican Kevin Brady, a pillar of the 'conservative right-wing', cross-examining the US Treasury Secretary Mr Timothy Geithner at a Joint Economic Committee hearing in Congress, had informed the Treasury Secretary that Republicans, Democrats and indeed the American people had lost confidence in Mr Geithner: would he please now resign? Mr Geithner retorted: 'It is a great privilege to serve this President. I agree with almost nothing you said'. He then tried to blame the Republicans for the mess that he himself has immensely exacerbated: 'You gave this President an economy falling off the cliff'. Quite so Mr Geithner: but YOU have made it far worse by attempting to rescue the deficit-financing model so that the illicit Fraudulent Finance carousel can continue.
The exchange got nastier:
Brady: 'Remind me, Mr Secretary, what post were you holding when President Obama took office?'
Geithner: 'I was the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York'. [Unstated: '... where I presided over the accumulation of a colossal overhang of now worthless derivatives 'assets' that are nominally 'worth' over $500 trillion [probably much more: Ed.] which I'm trying to 'save''].
Mr Brady then accused Geithner of 'shirking responsibility for the design of this bailout'.
Later the same day, Oregon Democrat Peter DeFazio, a 'progressive', accused Geithner of paying more attention to Wall Street than to Main Street, during an MSNBC interview with Ed Schultz. He ended by calling for both Larry Summers and Geithner to be fired. The point of mentioning all this is that these interventions 'just happen' to have followed a known Chinese demand, during Obama's visit, for senior scalps to be seen to be removed from the heads of their wearers.
OTHER PROMINENT OPERATIVES SAID TO BE 'ON THE SKIDS'
In addition to the likelihood that Geithner will have to go, we are also being told that Mr Rahm Emanuel, the Mossad Irgun Chief of Staff at the White House, and others, may be removed, as may Leon Panetta, the CIA’s Director of Central Intelligence, who ‘works with’ Rahm Emanuel.
These criminal finance terrorists have all passed their sell-by date, having tried to perpetuate the debilitating Fraudulent Finance and debt-financing carousel against the interests of the American people, the US Republic, the defrauded Chinese, the scammed British Monarchical Power, other sovereign scamees, and the international community, which has faced the prospect of the outright collapse of the US dollar system. Whether the secret Fascist intention all along was to collapse the international financial system in order to enable the criminalist clique to buy up the entire world’s resources and assets at firesale prices, will probably never be known.
DESPICABLE AMERICAN TREATMENT OF ITS ‘CLOSEST ALLY’
Certainly the behaviour of the US military during this crisis has been fully consistent with the Nazi Fascist mentality, as was leaked via The Daily Telegraph on 23rd November 2009 (3), in a front page report revealing the antagonism, contempt and tensions prevailing between the British military and the Americans in the Iraqi theatre. Immediately ahead of the Chalcot Inquiry which started on 24th November (in London) into the Iraqi conflict, classified documents were leaked to the newspaper, in which the British Chief of Staff in Iraq, J K Tanner, had described his American military counterparts as ‘a group of Martians’ for whom ‘dialogue is alien’.
The British Chief of Staff in Iraq thereby confirmed our long-held assessment that the hyped, so-called ‘special relationship’ between Britain and the United States is treated with utter contempt by the conspicuously failing so-called ‘sole superpower’, by adding: ‘Despite our so-called ‘special relationship’, I reckon we were treated no differently to the Portuguese’.
The unspeakable Nazi mentality (see Heneghan) is never, ever wrong, and is ready at all times to justify or cover up iniquity by spewing out further lies, creating what we have described in the past as an ‘inverted pyramid’ of lies which grows so tall that it has to be propped up on either flank by scaffolding that eventually collapses along with the inverted pyramid itself (which is exactly what is happening in real-time ‘as we speak’). Another feature of the Nazi mentality is that it cannot abide being shown to be in error: since the Nazi mentality is permanently right, infallible like the Pope, it can never make mistakes: so to point out the error of its ways is a monstrous usurpation, a slur on its integrity and an abomination worthy only of permanent excoriation.
Colonel Tanner’s superior, Major General Andrew Stewart, the senior British Commanding Officer in Iraq, described in the documents how he had to spend ‘a significant amount of my time’ ‘evading’ and ‘refusing’ arrogant orders from his US superiors.
On one occasion, after he had refused to obey an order, the British Ambassador in Washington, Sir David Manning, was summoned like a naughty schoolboy to the American State Department for a diplomatic reprimand of the kind usually delivered to ‘rogue states’ such as Zimbabwe or Sudan. Since, of course, the United States has reduced itself, given its illegal and barbaric behaviour, to the status of a ‘rogue state’, the irony of such behaviour requires no elaboration.
Such frank statements were made during official debriefing interviews conducted by the British Ministry of Defence with Army commanders who had just returned from Operations Telic 2 and 3, conducted between May 2003 and May 2004. With the sensitive Chilcot Inquiry starting on 24th November, a set of classified transcripts of the interviews, along with ‘post-operational reports’ by British commanders, mysteriously arrived in the hands of the British newspaper, which has made a name for itself by specialising recently in investigative exposures.
General Stewart thought that ‘our ability to influence US policy in Iraq seemed to be minimal’. Incredibly, there was not even a secure communications link between his Basra HQ and the US Commander, General Rick Sanchez, in Baghdad. Colonel Tanner said that ‘Sanchez only visited us once in seven months’ adding that he himself only spoke with his own US counterpart at the US Corps HQ in the Green Zone once over the same period. British commanders said, too, that they were not even told, let alone consulted on, major switches in US policy (which were happening all the time) that had significant implications for the British military and their troops.
Thus, when the Americans decided to arrest a key lieutenant of the Shi’a leader Muqtada al-Sadr, which triggered an uprising throughout the British sector, ‘it was not co-ordinated with us and no one was told that it was going to happen’, according to Brigadier Nick Carter, senior British field commander at the time. ‘Had we known, we would at least have been able to prepare the ground’. Instead, ‘the consequence was that my whole area of operations went up in smoke, as a result of coalition operations that were out of my control or knowledge’.
Colonel Tanner elaborated: ‘The whole system was appalling. We experienced real difficulty in dealing with American military and civilian organizations who, partly through arrogance and partly through bureaucracy, dictate that there is only one way: the American way’.
• For ‘American’ here, read: NAZI.
‘We managed to get on better with our European partners and at times with the Arabs than with the Americans. Europeans chat to each other, whereas dialogue is alien to the US military. Dealing with them corporately is akin to dealing with a group of Martians. If it isn’t on the PowerPoint slide, then it doesn’t happen’.
BRITAIN SHOULD EXTRICATE ITSELF FROM U.S. ENTANGLEMENTS
Of course this leaked anecdotal information further confirms our assessment that while the Americans wallow in the consequences of their serial criminality, their so-called ‘closest ally’, Britain, should extricate itself from their influence as far as this is practically possible.
When this was suggested to an associate (whom the Editor has had to reprimand for her non-stop subversive criticism of Barack Obama who, whether we like it or not, occupies the position that he occupies – just as the criminal Bushes and Clinton did before him), she retorted:
‘That’s just what Obama wants’.
To which the straightforward answer is as follows: we cannot be dragged down indefinitely by a criminal, rogue régime which thinks it can behave like Hitler and allows its Intelligence Power and Military Power to rampage around the world wreaking havoc everywhere.
The United States is paying and will continue to pay for its failure to curb and bring under control the criminalised elements within the Intelligence Power, and for its arrogance in assuming that it can do as it likes in a world that does not consist exclusively of Americans.
The American people, in this veteran Americanist’s experience, are the most generous and loyal friends on earth. But their government and its criminal structures ‘suck’, and they have behaved abominably on the world stage for decades. The arrogance of their official structures is beyond intolerable; and as we can see, even elements within those structures now recognise that things have gone too far. This is the beginning of a long and bumpy road towards US recovery: but as for the ‘moral high ground’, that has been forfeited for ever.
THEMES WE PIONEERED ARE BECOMING MAINSTREAM NOW
It is evident that many of the themes that we have espoused in these reports are now becoming accepted long after we first espoused them. For instance, as indicated above, not only is the so-called ‘special relationship’ now, at last, questioned by the British military, but so is the intolerable position that our military forces have been catapulted into generally.
We refer to the sterile ‘internationalisation’ of military power – invariably in pursuit of a SECRET internationalist agenda which has little to do with the British national interest (although Britain has no national interests, as they have all been ‘collectivised’, in theory, within the fake parallel (and illegal: see below) governance system that we refer to as the European Union Collective).
The New Underworld Order prescribes that national military power is collectivised in order to advance the interests of the promoters of the ‘One World’ agenda, which is of course leading the whole world into chaos. British forces, paid for by the taxpayer, exist exclusively to provide the British people and the nation’s assets with military power and defence. They do NOT exist in order to pursue an internationalist agenda, which has been the case since NATO was hijacked for this purpose amid much pomp and circumstance in the 1990s.
UK MILITARY POWER SHOULD BE USED ONLY IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST
Britain should make it clear both to the Americans and to NATO that it’s military power will be deployed in future exclusively in British national interests, and that the British people will be informed of the national interests that justify that deployment.
This is one of the issues underlying the Chilcot Inquiry into Britain’s participation in the Iraq War, which has the potential to add to the rolling exposures of the criminality already taking place.
Of course, since the UK civil servants and other ‘experts’ who will be participating in this Public Inquiry are likely all to be fully paid-up members of the discredited internationalist clIque, this theme will probably remain a sub-text of the investigations.
Even so, the ludicrous anomalies and lengths to which the Blair Government went to disguise the purposes of the Iraq invasion to the British people, will be laid bare for all observers who are not sitting on their brains, to see for themselves. What needs to follow this Inquiry is a comprehensive reappraisal of Britain’s military role. In this connection, all emotional issues must be set aside. The sole criterion must be that stated above: Britain’s military will NOT cooperate in ANY venture which does not DIRECTLY serve British national interests, whatever the consequences.
BRITISH GOVERNMENT AT LAST STARTS MOVE TOWARDS AFGHAN EXIT
This of course brings us to Afghanistan. Although our letter to the Ministry of Defence requesting an explanation for British military participation in Afghanistan was contemptuously ignored, and our warning that if the letter was ignored we would be compelled to assume that our assumption that we are in Afghanistan to control and exploit the heroin trade (whatever other new pretexts may be wheeled out at any time) is correct, there has since been conspicuous ‘movement’ on this score.
Specifically:
• On 14th November, Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, pronounced that British troops could not stay in Afghanistan for ever. Speaking in a BBC Radio 4 interview, Mr Brown said: ‘You cannot be an occupying army for ever. Our strategy will be Afghan control over their own affairs. That will take some time but then British troops will start coming home’ (4).
• Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary, in an interview with The Times, London, on the same day, called for ‘greater clarity’ over Afghanistan. ‘We need to get a grip on it’ (5). Thank you, Mr Hain. We asked the Ministry of Defence for ‘clarity’ in the summer of 2008 and got no answer.
The public would not, Peter Hain added, tolerate a long campaign. Of course, what these cynical UK Ministers have been worried about is the constant parade of funerals in pretty Wiltshire villages and coffins for burial, which make the front pages almost every time nowadays – sending a signal to the Government that enough is enough. All that Ministers care about, of course, is perceptions: and what the public perceives is that a large number of young British soldiers are dying for a cause that has never been explained to them. Of course it hasn’t.
INTERNATIONALIST AGENDA HIJACKS NATIONAL POWER
Because Afghanistan is another example of the internationalist agenda hijacking Britain’s military power for its own purposes. But in fact it’s worse than that. What has in fact occurred is that the internationalist power-projection agenda over which NATO waxed so proud in 1990 has itself been hijacked – in pursuit of secret US oil and drug-running agendas masquerading as international peacekeeping. Several of our publications distributed from London on 20th November 2009 carry that photograph of a US soldier guarding a poppy field. In the somewhat obscure background to that prhotograph, we discovered, under a printer’s eye-glass, that the heroin poppy field shown was surrounded by a tall breezeblock wall. This made it clear that the poppy crop, or some of it, is being grown in closely guarded, walled fields. Why is this happening?
OFFICIALLY CONDONED CRIMINAL OPS. IN AFGHANISTAN
Because the Dark Forces ‘need’ the drug-trafficking proceeds to ensure the continued liquidity of the interbank market – as confirmed by the head of the Vienna-based United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDOC), Antonio Maria Costa, in his interview with the Austrian journal Profil in January 2009 that we have 'profiled' numerous times this year.
Do the likes of Gordon Brown and Peter Hain know this? If they don’t, they are incompetent and in dereliction of their duty of competence in serving the British people.
If they do, they are co-conspirators and accessories to the fact of GENOCIDE, as profiting through drug-trafficking is GENOCIDE. Because the British Ministry of Defence refused to respond to the Editor’s letter, it is clear that the British Government is engaged, and not only in Afghanistan [see below], in criminal operations, which is a state of affairs that cannot be tolerated.
• A former Foreign Office Minister, Kim Howells, has stated that British troops should be withdrawn (6). Given that British troops are dying in order to assist the criminalised American Military and Intelligence Powers with their drug-trafficking agenda, we agree. It should happen NOW.
• Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Party, has added his voice to suggestions that the British Government’s Afghanistan policy is unsustainable (7).
Of course it is. Note, however, that NO REASONS have been given by the personalities on the public stage who have started to acknowledge that our questioning of the Afghanistan policy is justified. This is because of the dangers they all face in having themselves aided and abetted a criminal operation to enable the US Military and Intelligence Powers to take over, control and exploit the Afghan heroin poppy trade.
These dangers are increasing daily for them, as this entire gigantic edifice of corruption crumbles, and especially when they start to see top people being dragged before the Chilcot Inquiry into the background to the Iraq War. Quite rightly, they anticipate that a precedent has been set for a similar public investigation into Britain’s participation in the war in Afghanistan,
U.S. STATES' FINANCIAL CRISES, AND BIDEN’S CAR CRASHES
Before we turn to developments in the ‘European theatre’, we can usefully place two publicised developments in the United States on this record:
(1): The financial crises in Pennsylvania and California attributable in part to the hijacking of the stimulus money for illicit 'platform trading' operations by the crooks at the US Treasury, have been replicated in the following States, according to the Pew Center: Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and Wisconsin. In California, State agencies issued IOUs earlier this year to try to pay their bills. A number of institutions refused to redeem the bills.
(2): Vice President Joseph Biden’s transportation cadres have been engaged in a series of ‘accidents’ in recent weeks. Specifically:
• At about 2:30 am on Wednesday 11th November 2009 two US Secret Service armoured vehicles used to protect Vice President Joseph Biden struck and killed a pedestrian in Temple Hills, at the intersection of Suitland Parkway and Naylor Road, according to US Park Police (that's right, the outfit that ‘botched’ the investigation into the ‘suiciding’ of Vincent Foster, you will recall).
The unnamed adult male pedestrian was then transported to Prince George’s Hospital Center in Cheverly with multiple critical injuries, and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. The vehicles are part of a fleet used to protect the Vice President, and were used to convey Mr Biden during a visit to Fort Lewis, Washington State. The vehicles had been airlifted by military planes back to Andrews Air Force Base, and were heading back to a garage at the time of the incident.
The Veep had travelled to the state to attend a memorial service for seven US soldiers who were killed in Afghanistan on 27th October in a vehicle (8). The troops died, of course, in the line of duty (assisting the criminalised Military and Intelligence Powers to annexe, control and exploit the huge heroin crop, so that more of the troops’ fellow Americans will die, too).
Biden was reported to have returned to his residence at the US Naval Observatory much earlier and was not involved in the incident. The identity of the victim was withheld.
• On Monday 16th November, according to the Albuquerque Journal, a Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Deputy escorting Vice President Biden’s motorcade hit a pedestrian (9). Mr Biden was said to have been in Albuquerque for a $1,000-a-plate luncheon for first-term Democratic Party Representatives at the city’s Hotel Andaluz. The reports on this incident were confused, but centred on allegations that a woman drove around police vehicles blocking an intersection and collided with the Deputy’s car. Albuquerque has been the scene of similar incidents before.
In August 2007, a Rio Rancho motorcycle officer who was part of President Bush’s motorcade died in a collision, and another officer was injured during a motorcade in February 2006.
• On Tuesday 17th November, two NYPD officers assigned to Vice President Joe Biden’s advance security team were hurt in a crash at about 5:30pm in Manhattan, and one other person was hurt in the incident. Three police vehicles – a marked police vehicle, an unmarked car and a bomb squad vehicle – were moving westbound on 49th Street, crossing 10th Avenue. The marked car blocked the intersection with its lights and sirens on, for the other two vehicles to cross. A New York City livery cab didn’t stop (according to the NYPD) and was then hit by the unmarked police car. The passenger in the cab was not hurt, but the cab driver was taken to hospital with neck and back injuries, while two police officers were also taken to hospital for minor injuries.
As for the Veep, he was travelling to appear on ‘The Daily Show with Jon Stewart'. He wasn’t near the accident and wasn’t hurt.
THE UNDERLYING REASON FOR THESE ‘ACCIDENTS’
We find Vice President Biden, if anything, even creepier and more sinister than his predecessor, the MK-ULTRA apparatchik and notorious Financial Terrorist, Richard B. Cheney. Two serious traffic accidents in two days, and three within a week, suggests that something’s ‘not quite right here’. Let’s consider what the problem could be.
The answer suggests itself almost immediately. Why is it necessary for the holders of the highest offices in the United States to be driven around in armoured vehicles, and at high speed in built-up areas? The cover answer, of course, will invariably be: to protect them against terrorist attack and assassination (given the Kennedy precedent). But another explanation, hidden behind this knee-jerk response, is this: these people are crooks and terrorists themselves.
Crooks involved in organised crime are in constant danger of horizontalisation.
This much was crystal clear when former President George W. Bush appeared in London for an official visit. A vast army of arrogant American intelligence officers, snipers, SWAT team specialists and other thuggists took over parts of London. What an advertisement for ‘democracy’!
BLAIR NIXED AS EUROPEAN PRESIDENT BY KISSINGER’S PAL
While the resolution of the dollar and settlements crisis appeared to be coming together amid extreme ongoing tension behind the scenes [see above], developments in Europe have shed an interesting light on the European head of the two-headed serpent directed against the ‘Main Enemy’, Britain and the United States.
As will be recalled, the former, discredited British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, was ‘pre-picked’ to become President of the illegal [see below] European Union Collective – a post that he sought with some desperation, not only because it would flatter his immensely inflated ego, but, more to the point, because it would provide him with the urgently needed protection that he needs in order to avoid arrest and indictment inter alia for war crimes, and probably for financial crimes as well.
In the event, the French and Germans – who ‘run’ the EU as a joint venture, under the terms of their Treaty of the Elysée of January 1963 which has no expiry date and requires the two powers to reach ‘an analogous position’ ahead of all international decisions and conferences with which they are involved – balked at the idea of the arrogant Blair (with his ‘star quality’) eclipsing them on the fake EU stage, although (see below) they had good reasons for their reticence. Instead of Blair and a host of other non-entities, they chose the Belgian Prime Minister, Herman Van Rompuy (11).
And what do you suppose is this previously obscure Belgian apparatchik’s ‘qualification’?
Why, he’s a friend of Dr Henry (‘Heinz’ or ‘Henny’) Kissinger – the triple agent serving as the DVD manipulator-in-chief and probable controller of George H. W. Bush Sr. (if he’s still vertical) – the operative whose unmatched arrogance is such that he has never bothered to correct his heavy guttural German accent, to this day.
• Geddit?
POINTEDLY TIMED QUERIES RAISED ABOUT BLAIR’S DEALINGS
Now, in order to ‘make quite sure’ that there was no chance of Blair being ‘elected’, care was taken by a British intelligence cadre, we think, to leak compromising financially-related information about the former British Prime Minister’s exotic business companies and partnerships. Specifically, on 15th November, The Sunday Telegraph reported that Blair had failed to register a highly complex Maxwell-style network of businesses with the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (ACOBA), yet another watchdog or quango (Quasi-Government Enterprise) set up to monitor the propensity for former corrupt Ministers to cash in on their inside knowledge after leaving office.
It transpired that Blair established a network of entities called Windrush Ventures as soon as he left office. According to a City accountant who has studied the relevant Blair accounts that are filed at Companies House, in Cardiff, the structure has been set up ‘in a way that discourages clarity’. He elaborated: ‘The situation is further muddled because the companies file accounts for different time periods. This is a common tactic to confuse people as to what is going on. You cannot be sure what transactions are occurring in what period’.
As Windrush Ventures No. 3, a profitmaking partnership owned by Mr. Blair, was established as a limited partnership, it does not have to publish accounts. However, through the other Windrush accounts, it is possible to show how Windrush Ventures No. 3 had an income of millions of pounds, including large sums for ‘philanthropic and charitable works’. Forensic analysis revealed a $2.4 million ‘grant’ from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ‘intended for Sierra Leone’, and a further £1.5 million ‘for Rwanda’ from the Gatsby Charitable Foundation set up by Lord Sainsbury, a former Minister in Blair’s Government.
Meanwhile the accounts of Windrush Ventures No. 2, a limited liability partnership, show that it received £6,436,000 ‘in connection with management services that it has provided to Windrush Ventures No. 3’. And Windrush Ventures No. 2 also received a ‘share of the net profits of the LP [Windrush Ventures No. 3], amounting to £350,000’.
The accounts further show that Windrush Ventures No. 2 then ‘paid £6,436,000 for management services that were provided by… Windrush Ventures Limited’.
This entity is ‘said to pay the rent on' Mr. Blair’s grand offices in Grosvenor Square, the location of the American Embassy, in Central London. Sparse accounts for Windrush Ventures No. 1 filed at Companies House show that its ‘ultimate owner is A. C. L. Blair’ and that it was established on 27th June 2007, the day that Mr Anthony Charles Linton Blair left Number Ten Downing Street.
Further investigations have revealed that a separate network of Tony Blair-owned limited liability partnerships and limited companies, called Firerush Ventures, has also been identified. WIND and FIRE: two highly evocative ESOTERIC words which cannot possibly have been chosen in ignorance of the signal that they send to ‘the initiated’ 'Black' World – namely, the Illuminati. (12).
BLAIR’S OCCULT NOMENKLATURE FOR HIS COMPANIES
Thus it has transpired that the former British Prime Minister uses occult nomenclature to label his ventures, and that he has established complex Maxwell-style networks of interrelated partnerships and companies for what purpose: to hide certain illicit and dubious accruals arising from payments received for going along with the Bush Crime Family's war plans, or for 'facilitating' the collective European treaty before the current one [see Archive: 12th October 2005], by any chance?
It will be recalled that former criminalist President William Jefferson Clinton’s ‘Foundation’, which had to be exposed late last year when the CIA-wife of the former President had to scramble to be appointed Secretary of State by Obama in order to be ‘assured’ of ‘protection’, was found to hold millions in assets paid to ‘it’ by every category of Illuminati hidey-hole under the sun – including, scandalously, the Princess Diana Memorial Fund.
‘MAINSTREAM’ NOW UNDERSTANDS WHY BLAIR WANTED THE JOB
We can now state that a component of the British ‘mainstream’ newspaper press is showing signs of ‘understanding’ what it has conspicuously sidestepped ever since these investigations began, and before. On 22nd November, the Sunday Telegraph carried an exposé explaining, in outline, the consequences for Mr Blair of the fact that he had been bypassed in his quest for ‘protection’ as President of the European Union Collective. The newspaper suddenly sounded like this service:
'The former Prime Minister had been intriguing and plotting to be appointed European President ever since he left Number 10 Downing Street more than two years ago'.
'There are several reasons why he desperately wanted the job, but perhaps the main one concerns the immunity from prosecution seemingly enjoyed by all politicians in high office' (13).
• BINGO! Do you hear the clatter of scales falling from ‘mainstream’ eyes here?
HIGH OFFICE OFFERS PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION
What does this now tell us LOUD AND CLEAR – and in the ‘mainstream’ for Heaven’s sake, so that armchair critics who enjoy sniping us and finger-pointing that ‘because it’s not in the mainstream, it can’t be true’ have, all of a sudden, LOST their fraudulent cause for 'complaint'?
• Why, it informs us, does it not, that THERE’S ONE LAW FOR THE HOI POLLOI, THE GOYIM, and another for holders of high office. Which we know from our long-term study of the abuse of power in the United States. But now we Brits have this truth thrust before our eyes, by the ‘mainstream’, no less. In other words, all those engaged in furthering the criminal, anti-nation state, collectivist, internationalist agenda, are GRANTED IMPLIED IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION, which means that they can perpetrate egregious financial and other crimes with impunity, so they imagine.
One small problem. As we know, serpents in a nest and rats in a sack have a tendency to turn and bite or destroy each other. Therefore, when an operative in this Black Firmament has reached his sell-by date, he is unceremoniously, and ruthlessly, sacrificed and thrown, to mix metaphors again, to the wolves. There is no love lost between thieves, and there is no love, in any case, to lose.
• These people not only collaborate closely at all times, but stand ready to hate each others’ guts: the familiar George H. W. Bush/DVD-CIA ‘bait and switch’ technique.
The Sunday Telegraph’s article elaborated: ‘Blair is well aware that if he had become President of the European Council, it would have been very hard to bring him to account’.
So Blair’s Windrush and Firerush Ventures were aired in the newspaper’s daily namesake just to make sure that any residual chance of the European Collective appointing this operative, sank to nil. The Sunday newspaper then delved, of course, into the implications of the imminent Chilcot Inquiry into the background to the Iraq War.
THE TWIST BEHIND THE CHILCOT INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR
Now underlying this matter there lurks an even more extraordinary twist – one that we published, via our intelligence newsletter Arab-Asian Affairs, starting in the autumn of 2003 (14).
If matters now proceed as expected, the central allegation under review is or will be whether the former Prime Minister lied to the British people, when he said that Britain had to go to war against Iraq because the Iraqi leader possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
Blair delivered a ‘brilliant and passionate speech in the House of Commons on March 18, 2003, that won over doubters that Britain had no other option but to join the United States in its invasion of Iraq – a military operation that culminated in the greatest humiliation for British forces since Suez in 1956’, according to The Sunday Telegraph. And the reason that Blair gave in his Commons speech was that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
‘Without his doom-laden warnings about WMDs, Blair would never have won that Commons vote and Britain would never have gone to war’, The Sunday Telegraph elaborated.
THE EDITOR’S ENCOUNTER WITH A PENTAGON SPY
In the final quarter of 2004, the veteran British journalist and author (of books on Maxwell and Mossad), Gordon Thomas, agitated for this Editor to meet a Pentagon-related operative named Demchuk, known as ‘The Visitor’ in Washington circles, without explaining why. Gordon Thomas insisted that ‘he is very keen to meet you’, but the Editor refused. Thomas responded that ‘he’s perfectly safe: he’s been checked out by MI-6’; and in the end, against his better judgment (harder to crack nowadays), the Editor relented.
An arrangement was made for the Editor to meet this fellow, believe it or not, in the fishing tackle department of a sports shop on Fifth Avenue in New York City. He'd be wearing a raincoat.
Sure enough, there he was at the very end of the store, at the appointed time. His suggestion was that we should repair to the Algonquin Hotel – where he proceeded to pump the Editor about the renegade, fugitive (since incarcerated) Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operative, Mark Delmart Vreeland. This US ONI operative had been the single response that the Editor had received after publishing the first evaluation of the Bush-DVD Financial Frauds, with documents, in International Currency Review, Volume 28, Number 4 – which had been released in March 2003, just ahead of the invasion of Iraq (the worst possible timing in one sense, but pertinent in another).
As we have reported elsewhere, Vreeland contacted the Editor (from Yukon, where he had been hiding out, it later transpired), in May 2003. In pursuit of these investigations, the Editor had rashly agreed to meet Vreeland, at Penn Station, New York City: but on arrival, he changed the venue to Niagara Falls, Canada (a standard procedure by these people). Vreeland scammed the Editor of this service throughout this venture, but that’s a separate story.
THE SOVIET SHIPS THAT REMOVED THE IRAQI WMD
Anyway, after pumping the Editor on Vreeland at the Algonquin Hotel, the US Pentagon-linked operative kept in touch. He expressed particular interest in our exposure in Arab-Asian Affairs (September 2003) of the fact that the Iraqis DID possess weapons of mass destruction, and that these WMDs were dismantled and removed shortly ahead of the invasion, in two Soviet ships that sailed from the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr.
The open source of this intelligence was a senior Romanian defector (the former intelligence chief, Ion Mihai Pacepa), who had explained, in the public domain, that all Soviet-linked countries had a programme, which the Romanians called their ‘Sarindar programme’, for dismantling WMDs should pressure from the West exceed a certain safety level – as had clearly occurred in the case of Iraq.
Now the US operative could perfectly well have conducted this simple research – which the Editor backed up, by the way, with data publicised by Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) itself – without relying on this Editor’s services. At a later stage, he asked for copies of all our publications, which he said he would ensure were paid for: and of course he never paid us a cent.
In March 2005, he appeared to be most annoyed when the Editor handed him, in Washington DC, the new issue of International Currency Review in which much more detail about the Fraudulent Finance operations presided over by Bush and Greenspan, was exposed. Earlier, he had arranged to meet the Editor for breakfast at the Savoy Hotel in London, but he never turned up (a technique they use to establish whether one is a reliable source or not). When he had full made use of us, he severed the connection. Which is also 'what they do'.
The open domain information that we published in 2003 was that Saddam Hussein’s régime had indeed possessed weapons of mass destruction, but that the Iraqi WMD installations and assets had been removed ahead of the invasion, in accordance with the Iraqi version of the ‘Sarindar programme’. So, why was our elaborated version of this open domain information not picked up by the ‘mainstream’ (even if they had pinched it from us without attribution, as often occurs)?
WHY THE REMOVAL OF THE IRAQI WMD WAS SUPPRESSED
Here’s your answer: BECAUSE the weapons of mass destruction in question had been supplied extensively by the United States, under the direction of Saddam Hussein’s former financial trading partner, George Herbert Walker Bush – who had performed his usual ‘bait and switch’ operation against Saddam in 1990, when April Glaspie, the incongruous female US Ambassador to Baghdad, had ‘winked’ at Saddam in the sense that she had implied (duplicitously, of course) that the United States would turn a blind eye should Saddam Hussein proceed with his intention to annexe Kuwait.
PENTAGON AGENT TASKED TO FIND OUT WHAT WE KNEW
What Demchuk was trying to find out, then, was not the truth of the matter, which he would have known, but rather what WE knew about all this, and whether there was any actual danger that our knowledge might expose the duplicity of the US Government in this matter.
Meanwhile, in line with the unusual arrogant disdain displayed by the US authorities for the British, the British Prime Minister was left with the CORRECT knowledge that Saddam Hussein’s régime DID possess weapons of mass destruction, which his intelligence subordinates had FAILED TO INFORM HIM had been removed aboard the Soviet ships sailing from Umm Qasr (February 2003).
The British intelligence officials who appear to have misled Blair were headed by the chief of MI-6, the Germanophile Sir John Scarlett, who has just retired, but will appear before the Chilcot Inquiry. The Sunday Telegraph’s report noted that Blair has a ‘haunted look’ about him. This is because, although he became a co-conspirator and an accessory to the fact of unspeakable crimes, the actual reality is that he was, as usual, SET UP by the Americans – under George W. Bush.
BLAIR TO BE MADE THE SCAPEGOAT FOR OTHERS
Co-conspiring to set up Blair were senior officials within MI-6, who must have known what a simple outside Editor could find out for himself in the public domain.
• And what will their primary motivation be before the Chilcot Inquiry? It will be to confirm Blair as the SCAPEGOAT for THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORIAL duplicity and deception in collaboration with the US criminalist operatives in the White House.
Given the above, it will be very interesting to observe whether any of this surfaces at the Chilcot Inquiry, whether the name ‘Sarindar’ again appears in the public domain – and whether the Inquiry summons the Editor of this service to reiterate what has just been published above.
• If none of these indicators appear, you will know that the Chilcot Inquiry is itself intended to deceive: not to tease out the truth, but rather to bury it. And the purpose of THAT will be to protect the Bush Crime Family and the criminality of the Bush and Reagan Administrations in arming Iraq.
SAME CYNICAL PROCEDURE IS BEING APPLIED TO IRAN
YES, the purpose of any such intent will be to continue the cover-up of the complicity of the Nazi cadres within the US structures in equipping the Iraqi régime with weapons of mass destruction – in order to be in a position to seize Iraq later, on the false pretext that Iraq posed a threat to humanity: EXACTLY THE SAME PROCEDURE that is now being applied to Iran today.
That’s why the Iranian President is a soi-disant Jew-hating Jew. His real name, by his own open admission, is Sabourjian – which means ‘maker of the prayer shawls’: the Farsi name for the Jewish shawl used for prayer. The suffix ‘jian’ means ‘Jew’. President Ahmadinejad himself acknowledged this in an odd incident when he displayed his passport, openly revealing this information to the cameras. Iranian sources with whom we are in touch have separately confirmed to us that this information is accurate, and is now well known in Iran.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPERATING MORE ILLEGALLY THAN EVER
Having selected Kissinger’s friend, the Belgian Prime Minister, as President of the European Union Collective, the European Commission, under the reappointed little fellow José Manuel Barroso, is continuing to represent itself before the world as a legitimate system of governance, contrary to the following realities which the ‘mainstream’ largely chooses to ignore:
• Effective 31st October 2009, the entire European Commission had to resign at the end of its term. This is standard practice. However little Sr. Barroso was somehow ‘reappointed’. In the meantime, the European Commissioners have remained ILLEGALLY at their posts, pending (so it is said) the appointment by the 27 so-called ‘Member States’, through Barroso, of new Commissioners.
The illegality of this behaviour is pooh-poohed by the Europhiles and internationalists as simply a practical measure, and that the Commissioners in place will not be taking any ‘major’ decisions (implying that they can take ‘minor’ decisions, even though ALL decisions they take have no legal force: not that ANY European law, regulation or rule has any legitimacy at all: see below).
BRITISH BANKS BEING TOLD WHAT TO DO BY AN IMPOSTOR
In fact, however, a Dutch harridan called Nellie Kroes, the Competition Commissioner (defunct), has CONTINUED ordering Lloyds TSB Bank and the Royal Bank of Scotland around as though she still retains powers as a Commissioner, which is NOT THE CASE: see above.
• Quite apart from anything else, once the wrangling over who is to hold what portfolio has been concluded, the new European Commissioners must go through an 'approval' process before the European Parliament (just as happens before the US Senate), a piece of meaningless theatre that nevertheless takes several months to complete. Prior to their confirmation approvals, European Commissioners have no powers as their appointments haven't been 'ratified'.
Moreover the instructions that this Dutch woman has been dispensing, represent what has been called ‘the economics of the madhouse’: she has been telling the banks in question to sell off their most profitable businesses, contrary to the interests of the British taxpayer. The taxpayer-owned UK institutions would be well within their rights to disregard every single instruction or goading that comes from Brussels for months, even if it is channelled through the British Government.
However all these people at high level are confused: they talk only among themselves, so they never emerge from the comfort zone of their illusions, about ‘Europe’ or anything else.
Beyond this, of course, lurks the reality, previously exposed here, of the fact that the European Commission’s accounts have not been approved by the EU’s own Court of Auditors for the past 14 years running. The political appointees at the Court of Auditors and their officials cannot sign off on European Commission accounts, as in doing so they would lay themselves open to prosecution for aiding and abetting financial fraud.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ACCOUNTS ARE FRAUDULENT
In order for this intolerable state of affairs to be rectified, an army of independent accountants needs to crawl through each year’s EC accounts, starting with the last approved set of accounts 15 years ago (1994), identifying every single transaction that may appear to be dubious or fraudulent, establishing the truth of the matter, arranging for the perpetrators of frauds, both internally within the Commission and externally, to be referred on to law enforcement, and progressing laboriously through each set of accounts until they reach the most recent – approving each set of accounts in succession until they can proclaim that the EC’s accounts have been placed back in order – with all stolen funds and frauds, along with those responsible, exposed and reported for indictment.
THEREFORE, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
Will this happen? Of course not. THEREFORE, the European Commission is a criminal enterprise.
The incoming Commission will simply carry on where its corrupt predecessors left off. Given this intolerable state of affairs, this service has recommended that all UK VAT taxation receipts must be diverted with immediate effect into a British Treasury account established for this purpose.
The Editor informed a London conference on 31st October 2009 about this: and received THREE standing ovations. The way to deal with these people is to use the same techniques against their criminality that we have used successfully against the American financial criminals: EXPOSURE.
It remains the case, of course, that the EU's Lisbon Treaty is illegal, for reasons explained earlier, including the careless handling of the Irish ballot boxes contrary to proper practice. At the last count, FOUR cases questioning the legality of the Referendum were pending before the Irish Supreme Court, which could overthrow the Irish Referendum outcome, even though it has been signed off by Ireland's internationalist President. [All Irish Presidents are fully paid-up members of the self-appointed internationalist cadres, given that Ireland has been penetrated since the early 20th century by pan-German forces seeking to destabilise the 'Main Enemy', Britain].
DESPITE ALL THIS, A PAN-EUROPEAN GESTAPO IS BEING PLOTTED
The illegal Lisbon Treaty (as illegal as all its many predecessors, which were procured by means of corrupt payola payments: see the first report in our Archive, dated 12th October 2005), provides for the establishment of a Europe-wide Gestapo – which will please the STASI operative Frau Merkel, Bush Sr.’s agent, given that the STASI were/are Gestapo in a different (Communist) guise.
Under a section of the Treaty which had not even been quasi-ratified at the time, EC officials set up a Committee on Internal Security (COSI) (16) which is to ‘coordinate policy between the national law enforcement and EU organisations’. Its ultimate purpose is to evolve into an EU Home Office with authority over the satrap ‘Member States’ security services and police.
If the Germanophile Sir John Scarlett were still in charge, that would be ‘just fine’ with him. But whether MI-5 and MI-6 will be prepared to go along with this further stage of the ‘coup d’état by instalments’ against this component of 'the Main Enemy', (17), remains to be seen.
GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS ARE ‘INDISSOLUBLE’
To conclude (almost), you may be interested to learn the following rather obscure fact.
On 10th June 2009, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Federal Republic of Germany, addressed a meeting in Moscow on the scintillating theme… ‘Russia and Germany: Common History Never Ends’.
The German Vice-Chancellor’s speech opened with the following proclamation:
‘German-Russian relations have for centuries been those of close association, even a symbiotic relationship extending far beyond family relations…’.
Echoing Mikhail Gorbachëv, Bush Sr.’s ‘partner’ with former German Chancellor Kohl in Barrington Investment Group, AG (Deutsche AG), Steinmeier elaborated:
‘Let us work together on a new partnership for security and stability [stretching] from Vancouver to Vladivostok…… We should leave behind the obsolete stereotypes of the 20th century and even the 19th century’ (18). In other words, let's build a SINGLE POLITICAL SPACE UNDER OUR CONTROL.
The phrase 'Vancouver to Vladivostok' was repeated like a Goebbels-era lie by Gorbachev when he was in the Soviet driving seat. In other words, Germany and Russia, are ‘on the same page’, aided and abetted by France under the terms of the Treaty of the Elysée with Germany. It may have been generally forgotten, too, that former President Chirac, of Jewish extraction like his successor, was Chairman of a Trilateral Commission consisting of Russia, Germany and France: yet another engine promoting The New Underworld Order fuelled by open-ended corruption. Unsurprisingly, a cloud of corruption hangs over Chirac, just as it hangs over Blair, the Bushes and the Clintons.
And as for Frau Merkel, as we have repeatedly pointed out, she was the Secretary, in her youth, of the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Kommunist Yugend at Karl-Marx University.
• So she has no problem whatsoever in collaborating with the covert Soviets.
‘IT DOESN’T MATTER THAT IT’S NOT TRUE. WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT’S OUT THERE’.
Finally, you may possibly recall these cynical words of the aforementioned veteran British journalist and author, Gordon Thomas. He told the Editor this late in 2004, after informing him that MI-6 had lied to the British media that Christopher Story was involved in the aborted attempted putsch in Equatorial Guinea (involving Sir Mark Thatcher, Simon Mann, and other dubious characters).
Subsequently, Demchuk, introduced to the Editor by gordon Thomas [see above] attempted to entrap the Editor in some venture in Monaco involving Bernie Ecclestone, Blair’s associate; but when the Editor expressed blank amazement on being advised of this by phone, Mr Demchuk was taken aback. Because the Editor said: ‘You’d better go back to your source because I have no idea what you’re talking about’. Whereupon Demchuk, after a pause, commented: ‘That’s worrying, in view of where this came from'.
We have assumed that it came from MI-6 (although there is a possibility that Gordon Thomas, who has published, as indicated, books on Mossad and Maxwell, may have cited MI-6 when he really meant Mossad). Either way, the point had been well and truly made by criminal intelligence sources that it is permissible to bear false witness against an investigative reporter and Editor, and that spreading lies about him to the media is permissible.
It is not: it is a criminal offence, and in conveying these lies, both Demchuk and Gordon Thomas stand accused of bearing false witness, aiding and abetting an operation to entrap and deceive the Editor of this service, and attempting to close down private investigations which have yielded, in the event, spectacular results.
Indeed the stupidity of the foregoing behaviour can be summarised in the following statement: it was partly because pressure was brought to bear on this Editor as described in part above, that we have persisted with our enquiries. As Gordon Thomas explained: ‘They think you may be dangerous as you have the documents and you control your own publications’.
Thomas thereby acknowledged that ‘they’ had something truly monumental to hide: and so it has proved. We will have more to say about the similar, equally desperate, lies disseminated about the Editor of this service by the self-discrediting US ‘bloggist’, Thomas Heneghan, and the reasons for them, in due course. But a further shoe has to drop first.
Notes and References:
(1): Erie Times-News, Tuesday, 17th November 2009: ‘China places GE order: Local plant strikes deal for 300 kits’, page 1.
(2): ‘The $2.5 trillion global oil scam’, www.ngoilgas.com/news, analysis by Philip Davis: a global oil scam that mades Madoff look like a petty thief.
(3): ‘US military chiefs are like Martians, say British officers’,
The Daily Telegraph, 23rd November 2009, page 1.
(4): ‘Afghan mission cannot go on for ever, says Brown’,
The Daily Telegraph, 14th November 2009, page 4.
(5): ‘Hain’s concerns expose Cabinet alarm over Afghan war deaths: Minister breaks ranks to question strategy’, The Times, 14th November 2009, page 5.
(6):The Times, 14th November 2009, page 5, op. cit.
(7): The Daily Telegraph, 14th November 2009, page 4, op. cit.
(8): ‘Man killed by VP’s Secret Service vehicles, Scott McCabe,
The Examiner, 12th November 2009: smccabe@washingtonexaminer.com.
(9): ‘Biden escort involved in wreck’, Albuquerque Journal, 16th November 2009.
(10): ‘VP Biden’s Security involved in Crash’, MYFOXNY.COM, 18th November 2009.
(11): ‘Brown went for second best ‘as way of splitting the Tories’,
The Times, 21st November 2009, page 12.
(12): ‘Questions over Blair and his business ventures’,
The Sunday Telegraph, 15th November 2009, page 14.
(13): ‘Iraq Report: Secret papers reveal blunders and concealment’,
The Sunday Telegraph, 22nd November 2009.
(14): ‘The Iraqi ‘Sarindar’ Programme’, Arab-Asian Affairs, ISSN 0196-3538,
Volume 27, Number 8, September 2003.
(15): ‘Ahmadinejad’s Jewish Background’, Arab-Asian Affairs, ISSN 0196-3538,
Volume 33, Number 2, October 2009.
(16): ‘Treaty allows EU to set up ‘secret police committee’',
The Sunday Telegraph, 4th October 2009.
(17): Henry Ashby Turner Jr., ‘Hitler’s Thirty Days to Power: January 1933’, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, Reading, MA, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, 1996:
‘Only by banning the Communist deputies and by resorting to intimidation and mendacity did Hitler secure on March 23 the necessary two-thirds vote in the new Reichstag for an Enabling Act that transferred legislative authority to his Cabinet, ostensibly for four years. A wave of Nazi purges followed, as one institution after another was subjugated. Arbitrary rule replaced government by law in what has aptly been termed a “coup d’état by instalments”'.
'By summer, all parties except the Nazis had been dissolved, Hugenberg had been forced out of the Cabinet, and Hitler had relegated Papen to insignificance by winning the trust of the President. Even earlier, Göring had wrested from Papen control over the government of the largest state, Prussia. Well before the Nazi leader assumed the powers of the Presidency upon the death of Hindenburg in August 1934, he had become dictator of Germany’: page 164.
The phrase ‘coup d’état by instalments” was coined by a US-resident German, Konrad Heiden, Der Fehrer, Boston, 1944, page 579. What Hitler procured – by subterfuge and mendacity, exactly as has been the case throughout with the European Union Collective – was the transfer to his Cabinet, and thence to himself, of GENERAL POWERS. This is precisely what happened, for instance, when Britain joined the EEC in 1972. The legislation in question served the purposes of an Enabling Act. This act of treachery was perpetrated by Edward Heath, a long-standing agent for Germany: see the first report in this series: 12th October 2005: Atchive].
(18): ‘Russia and Germany: Common History Never Ends’, Text of a speech delivered by Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Federal Republic of Germany, on 10th June 2009 in Moscow: International Affairs, 14 Gorokhavskii per, Moscow 103064, Russian Federation, Volume 55, Number 5, 2009.
LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:
LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:
Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:
• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.
• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.
Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:
THEFT BY DECEPTION:
• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.
• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.
• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., 'Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:
• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.
• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.
Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary', Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.
U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:
• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.
U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:
• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.
• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.
We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.
ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION
YOU CAN ORDER THIS DIRECT FROM THIS WEBSITE. Summary:
Press Internet Security Solution or go to the World Reports Limited serials catalogue and scroll down until you come to this product. Then proceed through the simple and ultra-safe ordering procedure [Visa or MasterCard only]. Send a donation as you order this RECOMMENDED solution.
NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon's vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the 'highest' levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA's master computers.
This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this 'in-your-face' by advertising 'INTEL INSIDE', which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the 'fully collaborating' firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable 'file and printer sharing' under any circumstances. If you say 'YES', so to speak, to 'file and printer sharing', your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA's master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.
Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton 'Box Gang' and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.
We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD's World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.
The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.
• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.
The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor's own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. The program has an invaluable 'Preview before downloading' feature.
*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.
