GLOBAL ANALYSIS

Back to Archive Print Donate
Send email link
to this report

U.S. FRAUD SCHEME LAUNCHED MONDAY IN BIG TROUBLE

QUESTION: WHAT IS THE ‘PRICE’ OF FRAUDULENT ‘ASSETS’ THAT HAVE NO VALUE?

Thursday 26 March 2009 00:01

MISPLACED WALL STREET GLEE AT FRAUD AGAINST U.S. TAXPAYERS

MID-SEPTEMBER ‘LOCKDOWN’ RECONFIRMED AS MOMENT OF TRUTH

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW DECONSTRUCTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCE

MERKEL ORDERED REVENGE MURDER OF BRITISH TROOPS IN NORTHERN IRELAND

REVIVING THE CARCASS OF THE EXPIRED DERIVATIVES SECTOR

OBAMA SIGNS LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH UP FOR ROLLING TRADING PROGRAM

PERVERSE U.S. OFFICIAL STRATEGY DOOMED TO FAILURE

BEST INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BRAINS AREN’T BUYING IT

GOVERNMENT ARRANGED FOR THE BANKS TO STIFF THE CHINESE

BANKS USE BASEL-II AND TARP AS THEIR PRETEXT FOR ILLEGAL SEIZURE

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPT BANKS WORKING TOGETHER

SO, WHAT ARE THE CHINESE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS CRISIS?

BRITISH AND CHINESE HAVE BEEN TOO POLITE FOR TOO LONG

CONGRESS CANNOT CHANGE BASEL-II RULES! THAT’S THE POINT

BANKS ‘BLACKMAILING’ GOVERNMENT: BY PRIOR AGREEMENT

TOP OFFICERS OF THE BIG BANKS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED

HOW THE CHINESE REACT TO THIS U.S. SCAM IS WHAT MATTERS NOW

G-20 MEETING IN LONDON WILL BE A FLOP

CRIMINALISTS DON’T CARE ABOUT PONZI VICTIM SUICIDES

THE MAD INTENTION: TO MAKE THE ENTIRE FAKE DERIVATIVES SECTOR WHOLE AGAIN

IS THIS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE?

IT’S NOT ‘THE ECONOMY, STUPID’: ITS ‘THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID’


• MADOFF 'VICTIMS' LIST: Two reports were posted on 6th February 2009 containing the entire list of customers of Bernard L. Madoff Securities, Inc.. Because the list is so huge, we divided it into two segments: Clients A-N; and clients O-Z, plus a Miscellaneous Section. See: Archive. Our list is the easiest to load and clearest of the lists that have been reproduced privately on the Internet.

• We have just published: International Currency Review Volume 34, #2 on Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption. Also just published are issues of our titles Economic Intelligence Review, London Currency Report, Interest Rate Service and Arab-Asian Affairs. For further details, please check the second white panel on the Home Page.

• Globalist hegemony ideology and practice is comprehensively debunked in the Editor's study entitled The New Underworld Order, which can be ordered via the books section of this website. If you want to see what may well happen if the angle of decline steepens much further, you could do worse than also order a copy of The Red Terror in Russia, by the contemporary Russian eyewitness Sergei Melgounov, another Edward Harle Limited book available direct from this website.

• ADVERTISEMENT: Details of the Internet Security Solution software offered by this service in conjunction with a donation are appended at the very foot of this report, below the legal data. See also the catalogue by clicking on World Reports Limited and scrolling down to the bottom.

• DONATIONS: You can help finance these exposures (which the Editor has to prepare on top of his normal publishing responsibilities) by sending us a donation. Press Make a Donation, which is live, and it takes you straight to our ultra-safe ordering system, which accepts Visa and MasterCard.



By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review and associated intelligence publications and information services. See this site for details and ordering facility.

• CORRESPONDENCE TO THE EDITOR: We routinely, automatically DELETE all emails which OMIT any element of the requested coordinates. We are not prepared to deal with anonymous spooks and other cowards who are too scared to provide their coordinates, for identification.

• The CONTACT US facility is found in the red box throughout this combined website.

NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:


MISPLACED WALL STREET GLEE AT FRAUD AGAINST U.S. TAXPAYERS
On Monday 23rd March, as everyone knows, the Dow Jones Industrial Average soared by 6.8%, or 497.48 points, after details were released of how the Geithner Treasury proposes to relieve the criminal banks of the proceeds of their Fraudulent Finance operations, also known as ‘troubled assets’. TV screens were plastered with the unsavoury spectacle of brokers hugging each other, clasping hands and slapping each other on the back with joy.

Wall Street was ecstatic over the latest instalment of the gigantic fraud which the Obama-Biden-Geithner cabal have concocted to achieve the real objective of reigniting the derivatives trading carousel to inject value into worthless assets, lurking behind the public consumption objective of ‘freeing up the banks to start lending again’.

And, as usual, investors were jumping to knee-jerk conclusions, as was made clear by the crass reporting of this episode by The New York Times, which included comments such as the following attributed to T. Timothy Ryan Jr., President of the Securities and Financial Markets Association, who said the opposite of the truth of the matter:

‘For the first time in seven months, I can say they’ve done it right’.

MID-SEPTEMBER ‘LOCKDOWN’ RECONFIRMED AS MOMENT OF TRUTH
Before we continue, note the ‘seven months’ period mentioned here. Seven months takes us back to 10th-12th September 2008, when the $14.0 trillion of sovereign and HM The Queen’s LOAN funds were placed into ‘lockdown’ following the advice that we felt compelled to provide concerning the outrageous ongoing exploitation of The Queen’s LOAN money, which had been languishing within the Treasury Custodial Account network since it was sent over by the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007 to Bank of New York Mellon, whereupon the funds were hijacked for carousel financing purposes contrary to the instructions of the owner(s) of the funds.

The entire $14.0 trillion was finally removed from access by US parties altogether on 29th January 2009, after it had become clear that President B. Obama was in breach of the undertakings that he signed during his European trip last year, to effect the releases and proceed with the transparent Group of Seven-Approved Dollar private sector System Refunding Programme agreed upon by the G-7 financial powers in 2007 and 2008.

The Editor’s ‘exchange’ between Her Majesty The Queen and President Obama, published with the report dated 24th March 2009, summarises the present ‘state of play’ with respect to the proposal to proceed with the Refunding Programme independently of US Government intermeddling, from London. It is appended to this report as an Appendix for your convenience.

Mr Timothy Ryan Jr.’s reference to ‘seven months’ indicates what we know to be the case, namely that the ‘lockdown’ of the $14.0 trillion was the crucial factor that triggered the showdown.

It is also clear that because that happened, the White House, both under Bush II and Obama, are wilfully determined to ‘do it their way’ in accordance with the wishes of the money center banks – ‘their way’ involving the revalidation and revaluation of derivatives assets that are worth nothing because they are all NON-RECOURSE. This is clearly demonstrated, with the aid of charts, in the latest issue of International Currency Review [Volume 34, #2], which was mailed worldwide on 18th March 2009, just as the worst criminal event recorded to date in this crisis, apart from the stealing of The Queen’s gold, was about to ‘pop’ (see below).

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW DECONSTRUCTION OF FRAUDULENT FINANCE
To the extent that we have been able to clarify matters here, it is therefore a fact that every major government, institution and central bank in the world that matters has our deconstruction, in words and pictures, of the Fraudulent Finance Ponzi carousel – so that any attempt to smother reality is a complete impossibility. The issue’s theme is Systemic Fraudulent Finance and The Legalisation of Financial Corruption – which is exactly what the Geithner Treasury and the Obama White House are attempting to achieve. There is no change whatsoever from the previous Administration.

Now, the pack of hedge fund ‘big noises’ who have said they will ‘support’ the Geithner Fraudulent Finance Upgrade is headed by Bill Gross, of Pimco, which ‘works for’ George Bush Sr.’s criminal network, and therefore meets the requirements of the Nazi bank which stands behind this crisis – namely Deutsche Bank. It will be recalled that the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is bribed by Bush Sr. to protect his network’s assets within the German banking system.

MERKEL ORDERED REVENGE MURDER OF BRITISH TROOPS IN NORTHERN IRELAND
So it was no surprise to us when, all of a sudden a few weeks ago, a number of British troops in Northern Ireland were shot dead in cold blood at point-blank range. Why did this suddenly happen? Because, we are advised by UK intelligence sources, the German Chancellor, in deference to DVD, Dachau, gave the instructions for the Irish terrorist network, an instrument of long-range German Abwehr pressure against the United Kingdom, to be re-activated.

And why did Frau Merkel give these instructions?

Because the DVD and their associates inside Deutsche Bank had worked out that the events of 10th-12th September last year represented the gravest threat to the DVD’s operations and to its primary institution, Deutsche Bank, since the Second World War,

In parenthesis, it will be readily recalled that immediately after the 7/7 bombing of the London Underground and a bus in Central London, the order for which was given by the former French President Chirac on behalf of the Franco-German alliance, i.e. DVD, the Germans were told by a furious British Government (even though Tony Blair was totally compromised by both the Bush Crime Family and the European Union: see our report dated 12th October 2005: Archive) that if these terrorist acts, including the atrocities that were still ongoing in Northern Ireland, which unpenetrated components of UK intelligence knew were controlled ultimately by DVD, did not cease forthwith, Britain would initiate measures to exit from the European Union Collective.

Rather than risk facing the collapse of their long-range strategic deception entrapment operation calling itself the European Union, the Germans complied, and called off their controlled ‘assets’ in the Irish theatre. These were deliberately and provocatively reactivated by Chancellor Merkel the other day, in revenge for the deadly blow inflicted on the German hegemony project, by the events of 10th-12th September 2008 reported by this service.

REVIVING THE CARCASS OF THE EXPIRED DERIVATIVES SECTOR
Meanwhile the Obama-Geithner team are trying to rebuild the carcass of the exposed derivatives giga-pyramid-selling scam, despite the now deeply embedded and widely held knowledge that derivative so-called ‘Structured Products’ are worthless, and represent dead trash.

They are doing this by printing money and by creating debt out of thin air, while simultaneously operating a carousel platform which was triggered after the US Treasury found a foreign bank corrupt enough to agree to provide the foreign ‘wrap’ needed to reignite Fraudulent Finance trading under the radar, using monies that were ‘sequestered’ after the withdrawal of the $14.0 trillion on 29th January 2009, to form the basis for the secret trading operations which have been running for several weeks now at full tilt behind the scenes.

OBAMA SIGNS LOMBARD ODIER DARIER HENTSCH UP FOR ROLLING TRADING PROGRAM
The foreign bank was selected and signed up when President B. Obama arrived in Ottawa, Canada, on 19th February 2009, accompanied by the Chairman of his National Economic Council, Lawrence Summers, and the National Security Adviser, General Jim Jones. The visit, lasting seven hours, was Obama’s first trip abroad. A former US Ambassador to Canada, Gordon Griffin, made the following revealing statement about the visit:

‘There is an important “beyond Canada” component to this. Ottawa is providing a global platform’, he said. But he did not elaborate. Let us, therefore, elaborate in his stead.

The ‘important “beyond Canada”’ dimension’ referred obliquely to the signing of Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, a very old Swiss bank, as the master counterparty for the hidden carousel trades that have been activated since shortly after that visit.

In other words, it took the Obama Administration just three weeks to find a corrupt foreign bank to do its dirty work – a display of wilful intent to engage in Fraudulent Finance on a gigantic scale (see below) in gross defiance of the Group of Seven, which had long since agreed the cost-free formula for reliquefying the US banks on-the-books – a formula which would cost the US Treasury and the taxpayer NOTHING because it would yield private sector TAXABLE REVENUE.

PERVERSE U.S. OFFICIAL STRATEGY DOOMED TO FAILURE
Instead of adopting this strategy, President Obama has knowingly adopted the perverse route to perdition, in deference to the blackmailing behaviour of the US banks: accordingly, since Obama is prepared to have the Federal Reserve lend untold volumes of fiat money creating Treasury debt in the background, he is deliberately and knowingly mortgaging the future of several generations of Americans, when he could have adopted the correct course and salvaged not only the American banking system, and economy, but the country’s battered reputation as a pariah state.

But he decided otherwise.

The Editor is perfectly well aware of allegations being made against the President of the United States, in all dimensions; but as a frequent visitor and friend of America, he considers that it would be unseemly for a ‘foreigner’ to engage in the polemical debate that is raging under that heading.

Furthermore, as a visitor, it is incumbent upon him to try to be polite about the Head of State, which is why he gave Mr Obama the ‘benefit of the doubt’ in the report dated 24th March 2009. It is not our job to enter into acrimonious internal debates that do not directly impinge upon the key vexatious INTERNATIONAL ISSUES that we have every right and a duty to our subscribers, to address. Some Americans who complained about the Editor’s ‘benefit of the doubt’ comment may have failed to take proper account of the Editor’s position here.

However given the grave INTERNATIONAL consequences of the doomed policies that President Obama is pursuing, we now have no hesitation, especially in the light of what transpired on Monday 23rd March – to be elaborated below – in stating that President Obama is engaged in Financial and Economic Fraud, not only against the American people, but against the Rest of the World, as well. We hope that this statement clarifies our position once and for all.

BEST INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BRAINS AREN’T BUYING IT
Cutting a swathe through The New York Times’ coverage on Tuesday 24th March of the obscene outbreak of selfish euphoria on Wall Street on Monday, the following sober observations by Daniel Alpert, a Managing Director of the hedge fund Westwood Capital, stood out (in a secondary article):

‘We see another $1.5 to $2 trillion of as yet unrecognized losses from US assets still to hit global financial sector balance sheets and challenge its institutions. The near daily announcements over the past two weeks, by money center banks and finance companies, that they are making money this year on an operating income basis, have become borderline irresponsible, relative to the known continued deteriorations in value of the assets on their balance sheets and the continuing impact of a worsening recession’.

In other words, everyone’s under water: so what are they talking about?

Bearing in mind that the object of the White House exercise is FIRST OF ALL to reignite and re-start the derivatives carousel right across the board – an intention of extreme perversity, as we've explained – here is a deconstruction of events from 18th March 09 onwards, showing how ruthless these criminals are and why they can now be considered as dangerous as their evil predecessors.

Restarting the moribund (since 10th-12th September 2008) derivatives fraudulent money machine necessitates velocity of transactions once the pump has been primed: otherwise, in this carousel trading system, everything stalls. What the criminalist financiers NEED to reignite the system is LOADS OF NEW MONEY. This is why Geithner has come up with this scheme for new public-private partnerships, financed by fiat money generated by the Federal Reserve out of thin air but creating permanent real official debt on the other side of the balance sheet, so that the ‘private sector’ can provide the ‘new money’ that the criminalist financiers need to restart their giga-trading platform.

GOVERNMENT ARRANGED FOR THE BANKS TO STIFF THE CHINESE
We now understand that, as explained in the report dated 24th March, the Chinese parties were paid $13 trillion, between Wednesday 18th and Friday 20th March 2009, although given that the phrase ‘source of funds’ is strictly taboo now, neither we nor our sources are able to identify the complete provenance of this enormous volume of money – representing the ‘first instalment’ of the colossal sum that the Chinese are owed as explained in the preceding report.

But the Chinese parties then made the fatal mistake of agreeing to place some of these funds into a sort of ‘public-private partnership’ arrangement in the context of the latest Geithner wheeze which sent Wall Street investors into paroxysms of misplaced delight on 23rd March.

Guess what happened?

• The banks held onto the money. The banks would not release the funds repositioned with them by the Chinese parties, for the purpose for which the funds are intended. The US money center banks basically said: ‘We’re not paying anyone’.

BANKS USE BASEL-II AND TARP AS THEIR PRETEXT FOR ILLEGAL SEIZURE
Now the current Basel-II full disclosure regulations and the TARP legislation preclude the creating of non-securities such as derivatives 'products' for buy-sell trading operations by the new public-private partnership in which the Chinese parties were enticed to participate – thereby ‘enabling’ the banks to refuse to cooperate and to use this state of affairs as their excuse for holding onto the reinvested Chinese funds.

So, even as the Chinese parties were left understandably fuming and livid with anger at having AGAIN been defrauded by the crooks in the White House and the US Treasury, Timothy Geithner and Dr Ben Bernanke appeared before the House Banking Committee on Tuesday 24th March to ‘plead’ for changes in the banking regulations to permit ‘looser’ requirements – in other words, to ‘ask’ Congress to junk Basel-II (unspoken) so that the newly invested Chinese money could be legally deployed for the purpose intended by the Chinese after their arms had been twisted when they had demanded payment, or else they would exercise their lien over the Federal Reserve.

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPT BANKS WORKING TOGETHER
Before we go any further, it needs to be understood that the criminal enterprise banks and the US Government ARE WORKING TOGETHER. This week, the big banks are the culprits. Last week, the authorities were the culprits. But now that it is the big BANKS who are illegally holding onto the Chinese money: after all, if it cannot legally (under Basel-II/TARP) be deployed for the derivatives trading purposes intended (which was a disastrous mistake on the part of the Chinese), the proper course of action for the banks would be to send the money back. But, being criminal enterprises, they have of course held onto it instead. Which was the whole purpose of the exercise.

Because the Government and the banks work together, the US authorities twisted the arms of the Chinese and persuaded them to participate in transactions KNOWING THEM TO BE ILLEGAL. To go through the motions of appearing to be ‘kosher’, Geithner and Bernanke appeared the next day before the House Banking Committee to ask the US Congress to ‘loosen the regs’ so that inter alia (unspoken, as indicated above) the Chinese derivatives trades can go ahead in the context of the latest instalment of the Geithner shambles. All very clever, very cynical, ruthless, and criminal.

SO, WHAT ARE THE CHINESE GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS CRISIS?
The central issue arising from this deplorable state of affairs can therefore be summarised in the form of the following questions:

• What are the Chinese parties intending to do, given that they have yet again been double-crossed by the US authorities but cannot blame the US authorities directly because the problem has 'arisen within the banks'?

• And how long will the Chinese parties give the Americans before they take drastic action, as is their right, to obtain satisfaction following this latest display of outrageous criminal US official and commercial banking behaviour?

BRITISH AND CHINESE HAVE BEEN TOO POLITE FOR TOO LONG
If this Editor may now be permitted to indulge here in unsolicited advice, both the Chinese and the British parties have, in our view, been far too accommodating all along, as this crisis has expanded. The British are too accommodating because at the highest levels, business is still conducted on the basis of gentlemanly exchanges, and everyone is TOO POLITE.

• When dealing with gangsters, politeness is taken for weakness, which is why the British, too, have been repeatedly taken to the cleaners by these crooks.

The Chinese, too, are extremely polite: we know this from the impeccable manners and behaviour towards us of the Chinese Government subscribers to our printed publications. It is not for us to advise (but we hereby do so!) that when dealing with the organized criminal gangsters who have long since usurped power in the United States, politeness is a waste of time. It has its place at the beginning of a conversation: but the deceived and double-crossed Chinese parties need not now adhere to traditional, civilised cultural values when the magnitude of the crimes committed against them is known by both sides. On the contrary, a much harder line, and a willingness to adopt harsh countermeasures, is indispensable. These crooks have their weak spots, and the Chinese parties have more than enough intellectual resources to analyse their mentality correctly.

CONGRESS CANNOT CHANGE BASEL-II RULES! THAT’S THE POINT
Now it stands to reason that if the House Banking Committee were to have agreed to implement regulatory changes that fly in the face of Basel-II rules, any such changes, if agreed upon, would take weeks or months to travel through Congress. But the Committee could hardly consider any such departure. So what is the net result?

The banks get to keep a sizeable proportion of the Chinese trillions, which, you won’t be surprised to hear, they will be trading inside the Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch-wrapped derivatives carousel that was started up with the direct approval and very probably under the SIGNATURE of President Barack Hussein Obama – who, along with his Vice President Joseph Biden, has been talking up the Geithner Fraudulent Finance proposals that caused such an outbreak of unfettered joy on Wall Street. Which is another way of saying that President Barack Obama, Mr Timothy Geithner, Dr Ben Bernanke and Vice President Joe Biden, are co-conspirators in massive frauds.

Because in respect of the refusal of the banks to release the Chinese money that they have now effectively stolen, these operatives aided and abetted this latest outrageous theft, and it is clear from Obama’s visit to Canada, where he signed up Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, that they knew precisely what they were doing all along.

BANKS ‘BLACKMAILING’ GOVERNMENT: BY PRIOR AGREEMENT
There is another way of looking at this – namely, that the banks are effectively BLACKMAILING the US Administration in accordance with the following equation:

• Get the regulations (Basel-II) loosened, and then we’ll think about releasing the Chinese monies. Unspoken: We may or may not also think about releasing other monies, especially $3.0 trillion to a US paymaster, that we were supposed to have released on 23rd March but conveniently managed to avoid doing. Also unspoken: We'll do what we think is best for us and no-one else.

Because of course on Monday 23rd March, when payouts were widely expected, NOBODY WAS PAID because the banks kept all the money. The banks are holding a gun to the White House.

But on the other hand, the White House is quite content with this state of affairs because although that’s the way it looks, in reality the White House and the US Treasury are in cahoots with the banks because the primary object of everything Obama is doing is to reignite the derivatives carousel, which is the very opposite policy he should be pursuing.

TOP OFFICERS OF THE BIG BANKS SHOULD HAVE BEEN ARRESTED
The official response to the US money center banks’ seizure of the Chinese and other funds should have been to arrest all the senior officers of all the banks in question, and to do so in front of the TV cameras. Instead of which, co-conspirator Mr Timothy Geithner and co-conspirator Dr. Bernanke, against whom papers were served some time ago, appeared before the House Banking Committee to ask Congress’s assistance in making it possible for the banks to 'enable the Chinese funds to be put to the use for which they were intended'. (Not really).

Except that, having got their fingers burned yet again, the Chinese parties should surely have decided by now that there is no way they will participate in ANY further US dollar transactions whatsoever – which may be why JPMorganChase has announced that it is disposing of certain shares in ICB, a Chinese institution (code for: the Chinese told them to get out of their laundry).

If we boil all this down further, we can see not only that:

• This operation against the Chinese was a deliberate dialectical operation coordinated between the Obama-Geithner team and the money center banks;

but also that:

• The banks have annexed a great deal of Chinese (and other) money that they will now be trading illegally, while at the same time they are anticipating a ‘get out of jail free card’ for their ‘virtuous’ behaviour in being ‘unable’ to release the Chinese funds for buy-sell fraudulent derivatives trade operations because to engage in such derivatives transactions (which they do all the time anyway) under Basel-II rules, would be fraud, commanding substantial jail sentences.

Geithner is a co-conspirator and a fraudster in appearing before Congress to try to get it to agree to changing the law, knowing full well that the Congress will have great difficulty conceding that it should water down Basel-II – not least because if that were to happen, all foreign banks would be precluded from dealing with the US banks under the Bank for International Settlements-brokered arrangements. Therefore, the appearance before the House Banking Committee of Geithner and Bernanke to argue for changes which Congress cannot in all ‘conscience’ (sic) possibly deliver, represented in itself a fraudulent charade.

HOW THE CHINESE REACT TO THIS U.S. SCAM IS WHAT MATTERS NOW
As we understood the situation on 25th March, the Chinese parties appear not yet to have decided how to react to this latest American official provocation. However there seems every prospect that if this hideous logjam is not broken, the Chinese will recall all debts from the dollar system. They are also talking in public about the dollar being replaced by a new international currency based on the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) composite unit – something that cannot possibly be agreed overnight, and will take a long time to come to fruition, if it ever does. But open Chinese official talk along these lines is intended to raise the temperature of the ‘debate’,

Once again, diplomatic behaviour seems quite out of place here. It would be preferable for the Chinese to publicise what has been going on. The Editor cannot see why the power of genuine publicity cannot be put to good use in intergovernmental relations.

Instead of fighting these swine behind diplomatic cover stories such as the tensions in the South China Sea, why not go public with the necessary criminal information?

In the unlikely event of this further unsolicited advice being taken, the proper course of action must be to publicise precise details of the relevant aborted transactions (dates, precise times, references and so on) so that nothing can be challenged.

Given the extreme gravity of these abominations, publicising them might do more to bring these American official crooks and criminal banking enterprises to their senses (if they have any) than any other course the Chinese could take.

G-20 MEETING IN LONDON WILL BE A FLOP
By extension, we can now safely predict that the next conference on the calendar, the Group of 20 meeting in the London area, will be a bitter flop. The wronged Chinese parties have no incentive left to assist these US criminals out of the mess they have willfully expanded under President B. Obama. And here’s another point to bear in mind.

These crooks are only too delighted when observers such as the Editor of this service focus, for instance, on the Madoff scandal, the Stanford dimension, or the Friehling indictment.

Why? Because these developments represent, for these criminal operatives, something called COLLATERAL DAMAGE. They couldn’t care less about Madoff or his victims, or about Stanford ditto (although they took good care to murder Stanford’s sole accountant on 1st January 2009, the day after his contract with Stanford expired). So, while we are publishing reports about these PAST Fraudulent Finance operations, the criminalists in power and in the criminal banks are well away with their new Fraudulent Finance operations.

CRIMINALISTS DON’T CARE ABOUT PONZI VICTIM SUICIDES
The other day the Editor received yet another email from one of the 320,000 Ponzi victims, asking whether, in the Editor’s opinion, the money ‘due’ on the ‘humanitarian’ or ‘prosperity’ programs would ever be paid. In the first place, this is an unfair question: it is not the Editor’s responsibility to offer ‘opinions’ on other people’s problems (although the Editor does know the true answer to that question). But more to the point, the correspondent reminded the Editor of what he already knows – that many Ponzi victims have committed suicide, died in despair, suffered family breakdowns or other traumas as a direct consequence of the despicable behaviour of these criminals, who appear to have stolen ALL their money – consistently with the classic Ponzi scamming model. We started explaining this in the first quarter of 2007, long before the word Ponzi became almost as common as deleted expletives following the Madoff explosion: but the affected victims didn’t want to know.

But the point here is this: do these unspeakable criminals care a fig about the fact that an unknown number of these unfortunate people have committed suicide or died in despair?

Need we stress that the criminal operatives, having their consciences seared through with a hot iron, are completely indifferent to the suffering they have caused? True Christians know that these people will perish in hell for eternity – a fact that many of the perpetrators themselves also know full well, which is one reason why, psychologically, the fools think they have nothing left to lose by carrying on with their corrupt ‘business as usual’.

THE MAD INTENTION: TO MAKE THE ENTIRE DERIVATIVES SECTOR WHOLE AGAIN
With the Lombard Odier-wrapped illicit derivatives trading programme in full swing and being showered with what ‘new money’ the crooks have been able to generate and steal, the criminal official intention is to rebuild the broken derivatives sector, with the assistance of ‘bought and paid for’ corrupt hedge fund operators and money managers (not all of whom are professional sheisters obviously), and to keep the carousel going and building, fed with new money filched from gullible investors, whether borrowed on permissive terms from the Federal Reserve or not, with a view to making the entire derivatives mountain of around $700 trillion (excluding double-counting) ‘whole’ – notwithstanding the reality that hardly any of these derivatives ‘Structured Products’ contain ANY real value at all, since almost all of them are NON-RECOURSE.

This is all explained in the latest issue of International Currency Review, and also in Economic Intelligence Review [see second white panel], as well as in the four-page leaflet containing the three main charts which is being distributed in Washington, DC, and elsewhere.

All that our latest subscriber printed materials do is to point out the stark reality of the fact that these false constructs (derivatives) are by definition totally fraudulent and devoid of value, so that retrospective attempts sponsored by the demented US Government to pass off that they contain value represents a massive, unprecedented fraud on the US taxpayer and future generations of Americans, while at the same time:

• Guaranteeing the accumulation of new mountains of debt arising from the Federal Reserve’s outrageous lending for speculative purposes; and:

• Guaranteeing a hyperinflation. Pundits are now suggesting that this phenomenon will emerge in several years’ time. The Editor’s view is that the choices made by the new bunch of fantasists in charge in Washington are so extreme, So damaging, so wrong-headed and so destabilising, that the hyperinflationary pressures will become apparent much sooner than that – WITHOUT delivering any ‘beneficial’ impact to the ‘real’ economy in the interim.

IS THIS BEING DONE ON PURPOSE?
The decisions made since Obama took office are SO perverse that one is tempted to join those who insist that this is all being done on purpose. The correct answer to such empty speculation is that we don’t know whether this is the case or not.

On the basis of the Christian knowledge that the devil is the author of all lies and confusion, the Editor’s view is that these operatives are wallowing in devilish confusion and have fallen prey to diversionary, self-defeating, complex, elaborate ‘whizz-kid’, knee-jerk ‘solutions’ in a desperate bid to ‘resolve’ the colossal problem created by the corrupted money center banks themselves, which were indulging, until mid-September 2008, in unproductive, illicit, off-balance sheet speculative activity on a scale with no historical precedent.

That suggests that if it had not been for such wasteful,unproductive, untaxed, off-balance sheet speculation, many of the banks in question would be surplus to requirements.

According to Story’s First Law, 'all organisations are run for the benefit of those who are running the organisation'. This, of course, explains why, deprived of the toys that they were playing with, the banks went on strike and have been hoarding and stealing funds ever since – precisely with a view to restarting the speculative, win-win Ponzi Fraudulent Finance that they were wallowing in prior to mid-September 2008, instead of focusing primarily on lubricating the real economy.

BANKS SUPERFLUOUS TO REQUIREMENTS
The smarter solution would have been to allow more than just Lehman Brothers to go to the wall. Wall Street, where the wall is, is supposed to believe in free markets, with no participant being subsidised at the expense of other participants. The new, decadent, twist is that all the relevant participants can have their corporate snouts in the trough, and to hell with the hyperinflationary consequences. The Wall Street institutions and the satellite hedge funds and other intermediaries, along with the banks, are all being subsidized AT THE EXPENSE OF THE REAL ECONOMY.

• It’s called a banker’s ramp.

IT’S NOT ‘THE ECONOMY, STUPID’: ITS ‘THE DERIVATIVES, STUPID’
And to cover all this up, the United States is now governed by a man who takes his cue from Fidel Castro and President Chavez. He thinks his gift of the gab can be relied upon somehow to save him from the devastating and very rapidly approaching adverse consequences of his perverse, wrong-headed decisions, which are holding up the recovery of the Rest of the World.

And he is using this gift of the gab to LIE to the American people that this is all about reviving the real economy, when it isn’t. It’s all about reviving the fraudulent derivatives sector carousel.

AND NOTHING ELSE.


• CMKM UPDATE:
The previously reported theft of the $12.8 billion was orchestrated to achieve three objectives at the same time:

• To dissolve the multi-billion dollar claims and Court Order related to CMKM et al, and to make it clear that the CMKM Attorney(s) have signed the appropriate documentation to secure the funds held at the Depositary Trust Clearing Corporation under Court Order, and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To satisfy the ‘Payee’ et al, by authorising and signing a Presidential Executive Order (15th January 2009) – thereby circumventing public disclosure (and possible physical threat when George W. Bush was no longer President of the United States) and STEAL THE MONEY.

• To STEAL the $12.8 billion via Presidential Order/Court Claim – and funds sitting under the control of the DTCC – with the intent to send the money to Carlyle et al., without any repercussions – via Bank of America, Tyler, Texas, and then to Canada.

• LORD MYNERS UPDATE:
Some time ago we reported that Lord Myners, the City (of London) Minister in the Gordon Brown Government, had publicly suggested that City bankers engaged in Fraudulent Finance should be prosecuted. We then received a prompt message to the effect that ‘they’ would be grateful if we did not ‘go on about this’. There was no explanation, as usual.

It has since emerged that Lord Myners, who was selected to head up the British Government’s investigation into tax havens, chaired a hedge fund group operating through Jersey, Channel Islands. Jersey is used by fund managers to keep profits offshore so as to avoid British tax.

Before becoming a Government Minister, Lord Myners was appointed to head a company that took over Liberty Ermitage Jersey, controlling investments worth about $2.0 billion. Myners made his fortune with Gartmore, a prominent City fund management outfit, the Jersey, C.I., offshoot of which handled millions of pounds for more than 4,100 overseas investors.

Lord Myners was also involved with Aspen Re, a reinsurance firm located in Bermuda, thereby saving large sums in tax annually. A UK Treasury spokesman said on 23rd March:

‘All of his past business roles are a matter of public record and he has made a full declaration of the interests. The experience he brings continues to be hugely valuable to the Government at a time when we are working to restore and rebuild the banking sector’.

In other words, the British Government is relying, in part, on the toxic experience of a hedge fund manager, familiar with the Fraudulent Finance sector of course, to advise them on how to REBUILD the banking sector which has been devastated by its indulgence in Fraudulent Finance.

Maybe when he called for British bankers who have been engaged in Fraudulent Finance to be prosecuted, he was going too far for the likes of certain interests. It is normally the case that these people reinvent themselves as ‘whiter than white’ (‘Blankfeinism’), but it would appear that Lord Myners' linen might not necessarily emerge gleaming white from the wash.


APPENDIX ONE:
Observations from The New York Times on the latest instalment of 'Geithnerism' [25th March 2009]:

• Can banks that received Government bailouts use taxpayer money to bid on toxic assets, in the hope of making a profit? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Can banks sell some assets and then use the proceeds, leveraged by generous Government financing, to buy more of the same? [Correct answer: NO – Ed.].

• Might investment houses be tempted to overpay, if doing this buoys up the value of their own investments? [TARP provides for an Oversight Review Committee with clawback powers to compel restitution if too much is paid. This explains why Goldman Sachs is rushing to pay back the billions it received from the Government so that it is not bound by the TARP restrictions. No-one is asking about ‘source of funds’: whence the Goldman billions for repaying the Government? – Ed.].

• In the end, it will be the taxpayer who will be largely footing the bill.
[Not ‘in the end’: straight away – Ed.].

• Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, in an interview with Reuters, called the program “very badly flawed” and said it offered “perverse incentives” that amounted to “robbery of the American people”. [Couldn't have said it better ourselves – Ed.].

• Bert Ely, a prominent banking consultant, said investors would be cautious because many crucial details were still missing – the size and terms of loans they would receive from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, for example, and the amount of equity they would be allowed to put in, and whether banks would be allowed to walk away if they did not like the price at auction. “Today we know a lot more than we did yesterday, right?” Mr Ely said. “I’m being facetious!”.

• Many questioned the auction mechanism to sell toxic assets off from banks’ balance sheets. Price, most experts agree, is the biggest sticking point. The banks want to sell high. Potential investors want to buy low. [There is STILL no indication of how the fake ‘assets’ that are to be bought initially, will be priced – Ed.].

• Banking executives said that that their institutions would not want to unload ‘assets’ at fire-sale prices, a step that would compel many of the banks to raise sizeable amounts of additional capital. [Even though ‘fire-sale’ prices would be much too expensive given that the assets are fraudulent to begin with and therefore worth $0. $0 + $0 = $0, usually – Ed.].

• Under the accounting rules, banks must carry securities on their books at market prices. Most financial firms have already marked down these ‘assets’ to prices that might be low enough to lure buyers. But banks need not carry ordinary loans at market value. Instead, they are allowed to hold them at their higher values until they are repaid. So, for many commercial banks, selling loans now, at distressed prices would almost certainly lead to large losses. Such losses might raise questions about how some banks will fare in a so-called stress test that Federal regulators are in the process of applying to about 20 lenders.

“I don’t see how they are going to get the banks to sell”, said an executive at a large bank.
There are going to be substantial write-downs taken to get them off the books”.
[In other words, 'Geithnerism' CHANGES NOTHING. It doesn’t ‘amend reality’].

INTENTION HAD BEEN TO GET STARTED WITH CHINESE MONEY
After the Chinese parties had made the grave mistake of caving in to cynical pressure from the US authorities to participate in the latest instalment of ‘Geithnerism’, the Chinese would presumably have indicated their willingness for some of their funds to be used to purchase ‘toxic’ assets. The banks would have said: ‘But at what price?’ The Chinese would have responded: ‘Well if you don’t know the start-up buying price, we want our money back’. At which point the banks said: NO WAY.

APPENDIX TWO [excerpted from the report dated 24th March 2009]:
FACE-TO-FACE EXCHANGE BETWEEN PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE QUEEN

Her Majesty: Good morning, Mr President, how very nice to meet you.

President Obama: It’s a pleasure to be here, Your Majesty.

HMQ: Mr President, I was concerned to hear about a small matter of $52 billion of my guarantees that apparently went missing recently.

PO: I understand that these were restored, M’am.

HMQ: Yes, but why were the guarantees diverted or stolen in the first place? Were any of my guarantees used for purposes for which they were not intended?

PO: I don’t know M’am. I imagine not.

HMQ: Mr President, you are aware, are you not, that after my LOAN funds within a total amount of $6.2 trillion languished within your banking system within the Treasury Custodial Account network at several money center banks for 19 months, to no avail, I was compelled, on 29th January 2009, to order the withdrawal of these funds, which were made available via the Bank of England on 19th-20th June 2007 to finance the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System Refunding Programme by means of transparent private market trading transactions?

PO: I am, M’am.

HMQ: Mr President, are you aware of the REASON that I had to order these funds to be withdrawn?

PO: Not entirely, Your Majesty. Please explain.

HMQ: Mr President, when you toured European countries last year, you signed documents in which, I understand, you pledged to release all the blocked or hijacked funds and to proceed, if I am not mistaken, with the G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme. I had been led to believe that, in the light of your undertakings, you would indeed honour your commitments.

PO: My advisers decided that I should adopt alternative strategies, I am afraid.

HMQ: But Mr President, a signed commitment is a signed commitment, you know! Furthermore, my own expert advisers inform me that the ‘alternative strategies’ that your officials have adopted are designed to revalidate and revalue fundamentally worthless false derivative ‘assets’ while at the same time accumulating vast new mountains of real debt with which generations of Americans will be burdened in the future – a state of affairs which could have been entirely avoided if you had implemented the Group of Seven-Approved Dollar System private sector Refunding Programme for which I provided the necessary funds on LOAN, and which you undertook to do last year.

PO: Unfortunately, M’am, I was advised that our banks would not be prepared to cooperate in the proposed G-7-Approved private sector Refunding Programme.

HMQ: But Mr President, you carry the privilege of being the most powerful human being on earth! You have the power to insist upon the implementation of what was agreed by the world’s leading financial powers in 2007 and 2008! In addition, I made available a very large sum of money pro bono publico on a LOAN basis to finance this project, which I told the Group of Seven powers in 2007 was necessary ‘for the sake of the whole of humanity’. Moreover the Group of Seven-Approved private sector Refunding Plan would have cost the US Treasury NOTHING, while showering it with windfall tax revenues for a long time to come! What on earth persuaded you to disregard this very simple and straightforward solution to your problems, which are OUR problems, too?

PO: Uh, I hear what you say, M’am. It looks as though the various patchwork schemes developed by Timothy Geithner are going nowhere anyway. I’ll reconsider the situation.

HMQ: Ah, but Mr President, as you know my LOAN funds were withdrawn on 29th January after it had become clear that your Administration was not about to honour its undertakings in this regard. I am advised that there is now a proposal that the G-7-Approved Refunding Programme should be run out of London. Very conveniently, there is a provision in British tax law whereby funds that are resident within the British jurisdiction for 24 hours, are taxable.

My Government finds it most attractive that windfall tax accruals should arise from such ongoing, transparent on-the-books trading activity. Of course, since the Refunding Programme will remain an American private sector operation, your Treasury will likewise receive immense ongoing accruals from tax. So, by running the transparent private sector Refunding Programme from London, we will be able to help you, after all. Don’t you think the daffodils in my garden are gorgeous this year?

PO (looking out of the Palace window at the magnificent display of British daffodils): Yes, Your Majesty, they are gorgeous. Don’t you think so, Michelle?


LIST OF U.S. STATUTES, SECURITIES REGULATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF WHICH THE CRIMINALISTS, ASSOCIATES AND ALL THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REMAIN IN BREACH:

LEGAL TUTORIAL: The Steps of Common Fraud:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scanter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., 'Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• “FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent or person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary', Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

U.S. SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH INSTITUTIONS
HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE IN BREACH [SEE REPORTS]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

U.S. LAWS ROUTINELY BREACHED BY THE CRIMINAL OPERATIVES AND INSTITUTIONS:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminalist activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war.


• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review and associated intelligence services cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


ADVERTISEMENT: INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION

NON-U.S. INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION CD AVAILABLE: FAR BETTER THAN NORTON ETC
It has now been established that the National Security Agency (NSA) works with/controls Microsoft, Norton, McAfee, and others, in pursuit of the Pentagon's vast BIG BROTHER objective, directed from the 'highest' levels (not the levels usually referred to) which seek to have every computer in the world talk direct to the Pentagon or to NSA's master computers.

This should come as no real surprise since the cynical spooks even assert this 'in-your-face' by advertising 'INTEL INSIDE', which says exactly what it means. More specifically, NSA have made great strides in this direction by having a back door built into Microsoft VISTA. Certain computers, especially those labelled with the logo of the 'fully collaborating' firm Hewlett Packard, have hard-core setups which facilitate the remote monitoring and controlling of personal computers by NSA, Fort Meade. We now understand that if you are using VISTA* you MUST NOT enable 'file and printer sharing' under any circumstances. If you say 'YES', so to speak, to 'file and printer sharing', your computer becomes a slave at once to NSA's master computers. DO NOT ENABLE SHARING.

Unfortunately, this abomination is so far advanced that this may not be the only precaution that needs to be taken. As long as Microsoft continues its extensive cooperation with NSA and the NSC (National Security Council), the spying system which assists the criminalised structures, and thus hitherto the Bush-Clinton 'Box Gang' and its connections, with their fraudulent finance operations, NSA may be able to steal data from your computer. The colossal scourge of data theft is associated with this state of affairs: data stolen usually include Credit Card data, which the kleptocracy regards as almost as good as real estate for hypothecation purposes. Even so, you can make life very much more problematical for these utterly odious people by NOT USING U.S.-sourced so-called Internet Security and anti-virus software. Having been attacked and abused so often, we offer a solution.

We use a proprietary FOREIGN Internet Security program which devours every PC Trojan, worm, scam, porn attack and virus that the National Security Agency (NSA) throws at us. We are offering this program (CD) to our clients and friends, at a premium. The program comes with our very strong recommendation, but at the same time, if you buy from us, you will be helping us finance ongoing exposures of the DVD's World Revolution and the financial corruption that has been financing it.

The familiar US proprietary Internet Security programs are by-products of US counterintelligence, and are intended NOT to solve your Internet security problems, but to spy on you and to report what you write about, to centralised US electronic facilities set up for the purpose. You can now BREAK FREE from this syndrome while at the same time helping us to MAINTAIN THE VERY HEAVY PRESSURE UPON THE CRIMINALISTS WE HAVE BEEN EXPOSING, by ordering this highest quality FOREIGN (i.e., non-US) INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION that we have started advertising on this website. This offer has been developed in response to attacks we have suffered from the NSA nerds who appear to have a collective mental age of about five years, judging by their output.

• To access details about the INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION, just press THE LIVE LINK YOU HAVE JUST READ, or else press SERIALS in the red panel below. This opens up our mini-catalogue of printed intelligence publications. Scroll right down to the foot of that section, where you will see details of this service. When you buy this special product, you will also, as we clearly state above, be paying a special premium by way of a donation to help us finance these exposures.

The premium contains a donation for our exposure work and also covers our recommendation based on the Editor's own experience that this INTERNET SECURITY SOLUTION will make your Internet life much easier. Some versions have a 'Preview before downloading' feature.

*VISTA: Virtual Instant Surveillance Tactical Application.