GLOBAL ANALYSIS

Back to Archive Print Donate
Send email link
to this report

PROVOST MARSHAL IS NOW INVOLVED IN WANTA SCANDAL

POWER TO ARREST PRESIDENT, CHENEY AND TOP BANKERS

Thursday 1 November 2007 02:19

ESCALATION OF THE WANTAGATE CRISIS BRINGS U.S. TO BRINK OF CHAOS

Note: While the Editor was placing this report up on this website, NSA geeks intervened to prevent access to our website altogether. The Editor therefore had to leave his office in New York late at night to find other means of placing this report into the public domain. Interfering with a foreign website is a criminal offence, indicating that NSA is acting for the organised criminal operatives who are stealing Wanta's money, and are NOT working in the interests of the American people.

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

• Please Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story's ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.

• Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide.

CITIBANK, MORGAN STANLEY CONSPIRING TO CONTINUE WITHHOLDING PAYMENT?
In a show of criminal defiance, Citibank/Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Henry M. Paulson Jr., the US Treasury Secretary, and the White House appear to be STILL conspiring to steal and hold on to the $4.5 trillion belonging to Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta, and are hiding behind a blackout which has been imposed to convey the impression that the Settlement is being implemented.

But the real intention of the information blackout is to steal the funds.

CITIBANK RECONFIRMS THAT IT IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
On Friday 26th October, the Ambassador and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the Ambassador’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., and others, attended at the offices of Citibank, 153 East 53rd Street, in midtown New York. The Ambassador and his colleagues were made to stand for some time in the waiting area where there are no seats.

The Principals contacted Alma Radner, referenced in our report dated 4th October 2007, and asked to see Mr William R Rhodes, the Chairman of Citibank. Ms Radner put Mr Cottrell in touch with Mr Bill Ferguson at the bank, and, standing in the reception area surrounded by security guards, Mr Cottrell then and there conducted an extremely detailed conversation with Mr Ferguson within the hearing of all present concerning all relevant facts surrounding this matter, from which it was perfectly clear that Mr Ferguson knew perfectly well who the Principals were and that he and his colleagues knew all about the $4.5 trillion Wanta funds illegally retained by Citibank.

Given our exposure of Citibank/Citigroup as a criminal enterprise in our report dated 4th October, this was perhaps hardly surprising.

OFFICIAL 'A' KNOWS EVERYTHING, OFFICIAL 'B' KNOWS ZILCH
Following this conversation, Mr Ferguson said he would send down to the seatless area a Mr Richard Lava, the head of securities. When this officer arrived, he professed to know nothing about any Master Custodial account per the instructions of 22nd September issued by Mr Rhodes.

It will be recalled that Mr Rhodes' instructions and 'terms' were read over the telephone to the Principals but were unprofessionally never confirmed to them in writing [4th October report].

When shown the relevant documents by Mr Cottrell proving the arrangements, Mr Lava made some desultory notes, condescendingly said that he would get back to the Principals, and then failed to do so. This alone shows that undertakings by Citibank are worthless.

Citibank’s proposal had been that the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion should be transferred in a two-stage procedure, first into a Master Custodial account with Citibank, and thence to Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta's Morgan Stanley securities account.

This would enable Citibank to charge a hefty transfer fee.

WANTA FUNDS ILLEGALLY HELD AT CITIBANK, 339 PARK AVENUE, NEW YORK CITY
However the Ambassador’s $4.5 trillion funds are resident in a Citibank suspense account held at Citibank’s offices at 399 Park Avenue in midtown New York. Citibank must complete the relevant Treasury Direct instructions to disgorge these funds directly to the Morgan Stanley securities account for the Ambassador and his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. No fee is chargeable for this service under the Treasury Direct instructions, which Citibank has failed to implement.

One ‘reason’ that Citibank has now belatedly given for this failure is that it requires a transfer fee for moving the funds into a Morgan Stanley Master Custodial account with Citibank, in spite of the fact that as indicated above, this is not necessary because it holds the funds under the Treasury Direct instructions, retaining them them lawlessly in a suspense account.

Under Treasury Direct, as indicated, the Principals are not required to pay Citibank any fee.

Instead of fulfilling these instructions, Citibank has illegally ‘captured’ the funds contrary to those Treasury Direct instructions, by failing to transfer them onwards to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley. This is indisputably outright, confirmed criminal theft.

CITIBANK MUST PAY $350 BILLION+ INTEREST UNDER U.C.C. REGULATIONS
Uniform Commercial Code: Article 4A – Funds Transfer: Section 4A-305:
LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER:

(a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank… results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest… to the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution.

As stated in our report dated 4th October, we then calculated that the amount of interest payable to the beneficiary by Citibank, given its delay in paying out the diverted funds since June 2006, was around $350 billion. This amount is rising BY THE DAY, and is now approaching $400 billion.

SIMILAR RECKLESS AND IRRESPONSIBLE RUNAROUND AT MORGAN STANLEY
Separately, also on Friday 26th October, Ambassador Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and others, appeared at the New York downtown office of Morgan Stanley, 1585 Broadway, and asked to see the Chairman, Mr John J. Mack. Staff at the securities house at first lied that Mr Mack was out of the country. It subsequently transpired that he was in the building.

When presented by the Principals with the relevant paperwork confirming the existence of the Ambassador’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley, staff members indicated that they did not yet have access to the funds.

As indicated above, the $4.5 trillion funds belonging to Ambassador Wanta, paid to him by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006, and hijacked and then stolen and diverted under the direction of Henry M. Paulson from June 2006 onwards, are held in a Citibank suspense account at Citigroup, at the Citibank offices at 399 Park Avenue, in midtown New York.

On Friday evening, Morgan Stanley conducted a test run for the payment and associated transactions but the securities house’s legal counsel let it be known simultaneously that the bank was not ready with the relevant paperwork, an excuse for non-payment that has been reiterated countless times ever since Paulson first stole the funds.

SPURIOUS EXCUSES TROTTED OUT TO JUSTIFY THE CONTINUING THEFT
On Monday 29th October, every reason under the sun was brought forward to explain why the Ambassador was not being paid. All such excuses were spurious, such as that the necessary paperwork wasn’t ready, the institutions weren’t adequately prepared, and so forth.

Citibank’s excuse that that it was looking for its transfer fee, which of course is not payable under the illegally uncompleted Treasury Direct instructions, was nevertheless at once countered by the Ambassador, who offered to leave $100 billion in a Master Custodial account with Citibank.

THE PROVOST MARSHAL VISITS CITIBANK
On Tuesday 30th October, the Provost Marshal, who has the power to arrest the President of the United States for criminal conduct, visited Citibank, and ostensibly as a consequence of his visit, everything was set ready for payment of the $4.5 trillion to be made into the AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., securities account at Morgan Stanley on Wednesday 31st October, with no delays.

These arrangements were masked by an intensification of the blanket information blackout, the purpose of which, as indicated, appears to be not to provide added security, but rather to obfuscate matters so that the theft of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion can continue. No doubt the perpetrators hoped that we wouldn’t notice this obvious deception. They were wrong, as usual.

CHINESE AUTHORITIES ORDER PAULSON TO PAY OVER THE STOLEN $4.5 TRIILLION
On Tuesday, too, the Chinese authorities ordered Henry M. Paulson – who is now allegedly in a situation where he cannot travel to Europe without being arrested – to pay the stolen funds that they sent over in May 2006, to Ambassador Wanta forthwith.

At about 5.00pm on Wednesday 31st October Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, telephoned the Editor of this service to state that Morgan Stanley had indicated that a telephone call would be forthcoming on this day, to confirm that the funds had been remitted at long last to the Morgan Stanley securities account.

No such telephone call had been received. It was all a pack of lies and deceit.

Mr Cottrell therefore provided this service with the information contained in this report.

PROVOST MARSHAL SAID TO BE SHOCKED AT THIS STAGGERING U.S. CRIMINALITY
The Provost Marshal is reported (from very reliable US legal community sources) to have commented that he did not believe that such extreme criminality was taking place, until he was made aware of it for himself in the context of his visit to Citibank on Tuesday.

The same legal sources inform us that, given the failure of Citibank to release the funds to the Ambassador’s corporate securities account with Morgan Stanley as of 6.00pm on Wednesday 31st October, the Provost Marshal is understood to be standing by to enforce his powers.

CONGRESS, NEGROPONTE ADVISED: MISPRISION OF FELONY
On 30th and 31st October, Ambassador Wanta variously telephoned the following parties to advise them that the theft of his funds is continuing: John Negroponte, Deputy Secretary of State; and the offices of Senators Biden and Reid, and of Congressmen Skeleton and Lantos.

In each of these calls the Ambassador stressed that Citibank, Morgan Stanley, Henry M. Paulson and the White House appeared to be engaged in a conspiracy to continue stealing the funds and to prevent the Ambassador paying $1.575 trillion in windfall taxes to the US Treasury. This payment is to be made direct to the Deputy US Treasury Secretary, Robert M. Kimmitt.

All recipients of the Ambassador’s latest telephone calls are thus appraised of relevant information under the Misprision of Felony law of the United States, and any failure on their part to report the matter as appropriate renders them co-conspirators and parties to the theft, as well as being Accessories to the Fact of the ongoing egregious felonies.

JOHN J. MACK ADMONISHED BY HIS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
It is understood that Mr John Mack was admonished about this matter by his firm’s Executive Committee. But both Mr Mack, the Chairman of Morgan Stanley, and William R. Rhodes, CEO of Citibank, are, on the basis of the foregoing narrative, parties to the biggest single monetary theft in world history*, in collaboration with their criminal co-conspirator, Henry M. Paulson Jr.

* With the exception of the theft of HM The Queen's gold, which is part of the same scandal.

CRIMINAL OPERATIVES ARE INSULTING POWERFUL FORCES
All three are criminally thumbing their noses at the following parties:

• The Provost Marshal, who has ordered the payment to be made.

• The Chinese Government, which has demanded that its money be remitted to the Ambassador’s account with immediate effect.

• The American people, whose interests are served by the $1.575 trillion delayed tax remittance and by the fact that implementation of The Wanta Plan will refinance the United States’ collapsing finances and will trigger a period of sustained prosperity both for America and for the whole world.

• H.M. The Queen, who asked the Group of Eight countries at their meeting in Germany last June, to ensure that the Lee Wanta Settlement is completed ‘for the good of the whole of humanity’, and linked this demand to the prompt return of her stolen gold, which has at long last recently been restored to her ownership. It is understood that the US criminal cadres traded The Queen's gold for up to 16 weeks, generating about 100% per week from their illegitimate operations. Their secret accounts, traced by special software, were then frozen. According to our sources, the illegitimate accruals will be paid to Her Majesty The Queen and to a few other parties associated with her gold business. The Queen's gold was stolen by US official criminal cadres on 29-30 March 2007 during a suspicious unnannounced UK banking blackout, with corrupt assistance from Bank of England insiders. The US criminal operatives will not receive a single red cent from this theft.

• The international community generally, and the Group of Seven nations in particular, as well as Russia, which rely upon The Wanta Plan to stabilise the world economy. Furthermore, under the Reagan Protocols, which are linked to the Wanta Settlement, Russia is owed $20 billion, while Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Greece are owed $5.0 billion each.

• The International Monetary Fund, which is supposed to be supervising the associated settlements. Its position in this overall scandal appears to leave much to be desired.

• And: Some 300,000 parties to settlements which the criminal cadres have illegally linked to the Wanta Settlement (whereas the Wanta Settlement has nothing to do with those payments and ought to have been made independently in June 2006) who are due to be paid and have been waiting in some cases for over 20 years for settlement, and who have been defrauded by the organised criminal operatives who are stealing their monies. None of these parties can be paid until the stolen Wanta Settlement had been remitted, as explained on this website in July this year.

THEIR PERPETUAL LAWLESS ARROGANCE IS WITHOUT PARALLEL
Since it is inconceivable that Messrs Mack, Rhodes and Paulson are in ignorance of the US Statutes and securities regulations that we have repeatedly listed on this website since last February, and of which they and others are in one way or another in breach, it must yet again be assumed that these people believe that they are above the law, along with their friends George W. Bush Jr. and Richard B. Cheney, and can do as they please with funds that do not belong to them.

Sovereign immunity does not apply to criminal conduct, in this case the theft of personal property associated with a private transaction.

Citibank and Morgan Stanley appear to be collaborating with the Treasury and the White House, as before, to avoid, to further delay or to negate payment of the $4.5 trillion belonging to Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta. It follows that both these institutions are fundamentally untrustworthy and that any trustee holding funds in any branch or headquarters building of either institution, and who is aware of these reports, is in severe danger now of being sued by its beneficiaries for placing their funds at risk within these two institutions.

The reason for this is that neither can be trusted to carry out instructions, while Citibank/Citigroup, being a criminal enterprise, is, on their record in this case, liable to steal the funds.

We are making sure, by publishing this report, that the whole world (beyond our 50+ million readers of these narratives worldwide) will be left in no doubt of these realities.

PROVOST MARSHAL HAS POWERS TO ARREST THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
As for the Provost Marshal, failing IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT, he must, without further ado, arrest the following criminal thieves:

• John Mack, Chairman of Morgan Stanley

• William R. Rhodes, Chairman of Citibank

• Henry M. Paulson Jr., US Treasury Secretary

• Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States

• George W. Bush Jr., President of the United States

These operatives are all co-conspirators in the ongoing theft of $4.5 trillion private transaction funds belonging to Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta, paid to him by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006, which they have NO RIGHT to retain for their own purposes or for any other purpose.

We reiterate: THIS IS THE BIGGEST SINGLE MONETARY THEFT IN WORLD HISTORY, with the exception of the related theft of HM The Queen's gold, which has finally been restored to her.

PAYMENT, OR ARRESTS + PAYMENT, OR U.S COLLAPSE
One of two things has to happen in order to prevent the collapse of the US dollar becoming catastrophic, and affecting the entire world economy (as we warned in our posting dated 2nd September 2006), due to this ongoing, long-running US criminal theft:

• Either the delayed $4.5 trillion payment is remitted IMMEDIATELY to the Morgan Stanley securities account held in the name of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, and the Ambassador.

• OR: The above arrests have to take place. As indicated, it is understood that the failure to release Ambassador Wanta’s funds on 31st October, and the continuing cynical messing around with the Ambassador’s private property related above, has convinced the Provost Marshal that he must deploy his powers to the full, with no further delay.

The world will judge over the next hours and days whether the United States is to remain a Great Power, or whether its headlong disintegration starts NOW. You have been warned.

• See our report dated 2nd September 2006 for our prediction of what would happen to the US financial economy if the crooks continued to steal the $4.5 trillion Wanta Settlement.


PS. There may be a cynical, criminal intention, to try to ‘outlast’ the Ambassador and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. We will jointly see to it that this does not happen.


LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

• “ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

• “THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

• “FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

• “The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

• To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

• ‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

• “Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

• NASD Rule 3120, et al.
• NASD Rule 2330, et al
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
• SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
• NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
• NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
• 97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.


U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.


Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

• Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.