Back to Archive Print Donate
Send email link
to this report

MISPRISION OF FELONY LETTER TO WISCONSIN JUDGE

JUDGE JAMES L. MARTIN APPRAISED OF THE WANTAGATE SCANDAL

Saturday 27 October 2007 04:12

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for 'Wantagate' reports since April 2006. [Note: A new panel giving details of our latest publications as they are made available, has been added].

Please Make a Donation to help fund Christopher Story's ongoing financial corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the necessary resolution of the worst financial corruption and global financial crisis in history. This website has been calling the shots, because of the hijacking of Wanta's Settlement.

Emails addressed to us which lack coordinates identifying the sender will be trashed unread. The Editor publishes all his coordinates, as has always been the case, as he has nothing to hide.


LETTER PLACING THE WISCONSIN JUDGE ON NOTICE THAT HE MUST ACT
The Editor of International Currency Review sent the following letter to Judge James L. Martin on Friday, October 26th 2007. The purpose of this letter is to place the Dane County Circuit Court on notice that we are not prepared to wait until the end of the solar system for a proper resolution of the Wisconsin tax fabrication ('Tax Gestapo') abuse scandal, which resulted in Ambassador Leo Wanta being convicted on a trumped-up Wisconsin State tax evasion charge orchestrated by former WI Governor Tommy Thompson on behalf of the Bush-Clinton 'Box Gang' of organised criminals, who are in the process of being exposed.

Even now, as George W. Bush Jr. is being exposed for the reckless criminal that he is, he is currently engaged in repeated thefts of vast sums of money, which he is attempting to send to Dubai, where his collaborating spouse Laura is acting as his banking associate. SEE THE UPDATE
TO THE REPORT DATED 25TH OCTOBER:

VAST ACCRUALS GENERATED OUT OF THE QUEEN'S GOLD.

Judge Martin wrote to the Editor of this service on 3rd July, basically saying that he and his Court were prepared to do NOTHING to resolve the 'Wisconsingate' crisis. The problem these people have is that 'rectification' of Leo Wanta's illegal incarceration, house arrest and probation will necessitate the reversal of his conviction, the arrest and jailing of significant numbers of current and former elected officials and of State personnel, and (in this Editor's view) the payment to the Ambassador of huge financial compensation for the suffering he has endured in the GULAG for nothing, and for the loss of 14+2 years of his life, just so that the official, intelligence and banking cleptocracy could ransack his financial assets, which he was to have repatriated ON THE BOOKS for the benefit of the American people.

This is, as all familiar with this website and with International Currency Review will by now be well aware, the biggest financial corruption crisis in world history.

It must not be forgotten that 'Wisconsingate' is a central element of this crisis and IT HAS TO BE ADDRESSED. We shall see whether Judge Martin takes the HINT, or whether the collapse of the Rule of Law in the United States is now absolute. HE MUST ACT, OR CEASE TO BE 'HONORABLE'.

TEXT OF THE EDITOR'S LETTER TO JUDGE JAMES L. MARTIN:

The Honorable Judge James L Martin
Dane County Circuit Court, Branch 17, 215 South Hamilton Street, Madison, WI 53703-3290

Dear Judge Martin

Re: State of Wisconsin v. Leo E. Wanta: Case Number: 92 CF 683:

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 3rd July 2007, for which I thank you. This was written in response to the information (packet of materials) that I sent to Judge Torphy, whom we knew had retired, but who obviously provided the necessary link with the matter in hand.

I have been informed by Steven Goodwin, the Trustee of my loan funds that were furnished to ‘purchase’ the ending of Leo Wanta’s illegal probation, and were paid over to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections by him in person on 21st July 2005, that the documents we hold ‘should’ be sufficient to prove that Restitution has been paid.

We hold the official receipt issued by Probation Agent Michelle Riel for my funds on that date, which is marked ‘Rest’, meaning ‘Restitution’, and on the basis of that payment, Ambassador Leo Wanta was given an Absolute Discharge effective 14th November 2005. Notwithstanding this fact, the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue have continued to dun the Ambassador for spurious tax demands. The full details of this scandal will be found on my website www.worldreports.org: please refer to the ‘Wisconsingate’ posting dated 6th August 2007, via the easily-accessed Archive.

The details of fraudulent tax demands and such matters as the fraudulent ‘division’ of a Delinquent Tax Warrant into two components, are thoroughly delineated in that comprehensive report. They are also explained in the packet of materials.

The Ambassador owes the Department of Revenue no money whatsoever, and never did, as is quite plainly exposed in my website analysis.

I provided the funding on loan to procure the Ambassador’s release pro bono publico, not least in view of (a) the extreme importance of this distinguished servant of the United States and humanity generally, and (b) in the light of the cruelty and illegality of his unnecessary suffering in the US correctional system, when he committed no crime.

This scandal needs to be investigated from top to bottom and I am asking you, please, whether you will take up the matter, beginning with the provision of the necessary ‘Satisfaction of Restitution’ document from the Court, which is required to prevent the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue continuing to issue fabricated tax demands which have nothing whatsoever to do with the Ambassador, and which represent a clear apparent abuse of power:

See the www.worldreports.org report [Archive: 6th August 2007].

For your information, given that all that we have had to do on behalf of the Ambassador is 100% transparent, I am posting this letter on our website. I anticipate that the Court may agree that the appropriate belated ‘Satisfaction of Restitution’ document, which will provide me with a proper accounting for my funds, may soon be forthcoming.

I appreciate your kind letter dated 3rd July, but this matter needs further urgent attention and I would ask the Court whether it will now, please, address the issues which I have had to draw to its attention on behalf of the Ambassador.

Yours sincerely,

Christopher Story FRSA,
Managing Director
World Reports Limited

cc. Steven Goodwin Esq.



LEGAL RECAPITULATION FROM OUR REPORT DATED 30TH AUGUST 2007:
Reiteration of the fraudulent transactions involving Bank of New York Mellon – a bank so arrogant and conspicuously indifferent both to its tarnished reputation and to its grotesque breaches of US law and of N.A.S.D./S.E.C. Regulations, that it now takes first prize in the crowded competition for the title of ‘Most arrogant and corrupt financial institution in America’:

Step 1: Fraud in the Inducement: “… is intended to and which does cause one to execute an instrument, or make an agreement… The misrepresentation involved does not mislead one as the paper he signs but rather misleads as to the true facts of a situation, and the false impression it causes is a basis of a decision to sign or render a judgment” Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

Step 2: Fraud in Fact by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft:

“ACTUAL FRAUD. Deceit. Concealing something or making a false representation with an evil intent [scienter] when it causes injury to another…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Fraud’.

“THE TORT OF FRAUDULENT DECEIT… The elements of actionable deceit are: A false representation of a material fact made with knowledge of its falsity, or recklessly, or without reasonable grounds for believing its truth, and with intent to induce reliance thereon, on which plaintiff justifiably relies on his injury…”. Source: Steven H. Gifis, ‘Law Dictionary’, 5th Edition, Happauge: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., 2003, s.v.: ‘Deceit’.

Step 3: Theft by Deception and Fraudulent Conveyance:

THEFT BY DECEPTION:

“FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT… The hiding or suppression of a material fact or circumstance which the party is legally or morally bound to disclose…”.

“The test of whether failure to disclose material facts constitutes fraud is the existence of a duty, legal or equitable, arising from the relation of the parties: failure to disclose a material fact with intent to mislead or defraud under such circumstances being equivalent to an actual ‘fraudulent concealment’…”.

To suspend running of limitations, it means the employment of artifice, planned to prevent inquiry or escape investigation and mislead or hinder acquirement of information disclosing a right of action, and acts relied on must be of an affirmative character and fraudulent…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., Black’s Law Dictionary’, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Concealment’.

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE:

‘FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE… A conveyance or transfer of property, the object of which is to defraud a creditor, or hinder or delay him, or to put such property beyond his reach…”.

“Conveyance made with intent to avoid some duty or debt due by or incumbent on person (entity) making transfer…”.

Source: Black, Henry Campbell, M.A., ‘Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised 4th Edition, St Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968, s.v. ‘Fraudulent Conveyance’.

SECURITIES REGULATIONS OF WHICH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON IS IN BREACH AND OF WHICH THE SIX ‘LEVY BANKS’ MAY LIKEWISE BE VARIOUSLY IN BREACH [CREDIT SUISSE, UBS, DEUTSCHE BANK, BANK OF AMERICA, CITIBANK, THE BANK OF ENGLAND]:

NASD Rule 3120, et al.
NASD Rule 2330, et al
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and SEC Rule 15c3-1
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3110
SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and Procedural Rule 8210
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 2330 and IM-2330
NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and IM-2110-5
NASD Systems and Programme Rules 6950 through 6957

In addition to which Bank of New York Mellon is in violation of:
97-13 Bank Secrecy Act, Recordkeeping Rule for funds transfers and transmittals of funds, et al.

LAWS BREACHED BY CRIMINAL OPERATIVES WHO HAVE HIJACKED AMBASSADOR SIR LEO WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION SETTLEMENT AGREED AT THE HIGHEST U.S. LEVELS IN BAD FAITH IN MAY 2006, AND HAVE CONTINUED THEIR SERIAL CRIMES EVER SINCE:

Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
Anti-Drug Abuse Act
Applicable international money laundering restrictions
Bank Secrecy Act
Conspiracy to commit and cover up murder.
Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
Economic Espionage Act
Hobbs Act
Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
Maloney Act
Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC] (1)
Money-Laundering Control Act
Money-Laundering Suppression Act
Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
Perpetration of repeated egregious felonies by State and Federal public employees and their Departments and agencies, which are co-responsible with the said employees for ONGOING illegal and criminal actions, to sustain fraudulent operations and crimes in order to cover up criminal activities and High Crimes and Misdemeanours by present and former holders of high office under the United States
Provisions pertaining to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
Provisions prohibiting the bribing of foreign officials [F.I.S.A.]
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
Securities Act 1933
Securities Act 1934
Terrorism Prevention Act
Treason legislation, especially in time of war

This list shows to what extent the Bush II Administration condones one Rule of Law for the Rest of Us, and absolute contempt for domestic and international law for the officials and bankers who are illegally diverting and exploiting Wanta’s funds.

The Directors and others listed in Part 1 of the Wantagate Listing of Institution Directors and others posted on 11th June may likewise be Accessories to the Fact of, and/or co-conspirators in, wittingly or unwittingly, the egregious violation of the laws itemised above. This list is reproduced in International Currency Review, Volume 33, #s 1 & 2, September 2007, on pages 163-168.


U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4: MISPRISION OF FELONY:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.


Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001

Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier Wantagate reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.