GLOBAL ANALYSIS

Back to Archive Print Donate
Send email link
to this report

BUSH CABINET SIGNS ILLEGAL COLLECTIVE DOCUMENT

FALSE COVER FOR CORRUPT TRADING OF WANTA FUNDS

Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:49

BUSH CABINET MEMBERS SIGN ILLEGAL MUTUAL PROTECTION DOCUMENT
‘AUTHORISING’ THEM TO DIVERT AMBASSADOR WANTA’S $4.5 TRILLION

ENTIRE BUSH II CABINET SIGNS ITS OWN SELF-INDICTMENT

EXISTENCE OF THIS INCRIMINATING DOCUMENT LEAKED TO US
BY DISGUSTED U.S. REPUBLICAN PARTY SOURCES

BANKS CONTINUE AS CO-CONSPIRATORS WITH THE CRIMINAL U.S. CABINET

SITUATION RESEMBLES NAZI GERMANY MORE AND MORE EVERY DAY

By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org. Press NEWS and the ARCHIVE Button on the www.worldreports.org Home Page for Wanta Crisis reports since April 2006. [Note: The CLICK HERE panel is now labelled NEWS].


Pending further developments [PLEASE NOTE] following our posting dated 10th February, we are in a position to add the following information about the criminal financial operations of this US Federal Government:

It became known after we posted and late last week that:

1. Members of the Bush II Cabinet had signed an illegal ‘mutual self-protection document’ among themselves purporting to provide for them to be able to trade Ambassador Leo Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion without his permission. The fact that they signed this illegal document collectively does not make it and the transactions exploiting Wanta’s funds ‘covered’ by it, legal.

2. Before signing the document, Mr Robert M. Kimmitt, the Deputy US Treasury Secretary, was asked whether the Cabinet members could go ahead and sign it. According to an investigator reporting to Mr Cottrell, Robert Kimmitt responded with words to the following effect: ‘As long as we’re all in it, we can go ahead’. It appears that this document was hurriedly prepared and signed with foreknowledge that the Wanta $4.5 trillion would continue to be diverted, even though by Wednesday 7th February they were already located in the JPMorganChase custodial account.

This means that JPMorganChase is a knowing co-conspirator in committing Treason against the United States and its population [see below].

3. In other words, these USG operatives believe that if they collectively agree among themselves, and pledge accordingly, to commit these financial crimes, they have erected a form of mutual protection society which they may erroneously believe to be impregnable and reliable.

EXISTENCE OF CABINET DOCUMENT LEAKED BY REPUBLICANS
The existence of this document was deliberately leaked to the Principals, Ambassador Leo Wanta and Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., by a disgusted and appalled member of the Republican Party. If this leak had not occurred, of course, we would not necessarily have known about the document, which in one sense resembles the Wannsee accord reached and signed when Hitler and his henchmen collectively committed themselves to implement the Luciferian policy of annihilating the Jews.

The historical sense in which this Bush II Cabinet ‘mutual self-protection document’ resembles its notorious Wannsee predecessor is that a group of officials collectively signed their own indictment. In both cases, their arrogance was such that they chose to overlook this straightforward reality.

NO LEGAL EXPLANATION OFFERED FOR CABINET’S SEIZURE OF FUNDS
The existence of this document represents the self-indictment of President Bush Jr.’s Cabinet. We can now state without any likelihood of contradiction that all the members of the Bush II Cabinet are criminals, because on 11th February 2007, the entire Cabinet were informed by legal letter that their behaviour appears to represent an individual and collective act of Treason and a knowing and intentional violation and subrogation of the law.

As revealed below, they were all offered an opportunity to proffer a legal explanation for their illegal seizure, diversion and exploitation of Wanta’s $4.5 trillion, but failed to take up this offer.

This means that they do not even pretend to possess any legal justification for their criminal financial behaviour under their so-called ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation and the Nazi-style ‘General Powers’ it purports to provide them with.

It is stated with confidence that Treason applies because, taking the Bush II Administration at its word, and in the context of its own rhetoric, the United States is conducting a WAR on terror. That is the language it uses: so let us not dispute their rhetoric here. (The fact that this ‘war on terror’ is considered by multiple experts both in the United States and abroad to be a Nazi-style fabrication devised in order to provide a pretext for legitimising US wars aimed at stealing the assets of other countries, is not the issue we are addressing). It’s the Administration’s rhetoric that is relevant.

IN TIME OF WAR, THOSE GUILTY OF TREASON ARE SHOT
Of course, in time of war, the penalty for those who commit Treason, is the ultimate penalty. In the Second World War, bankers who were found to be in breach of pertinent wartime regulations were literally taken out and shot.

The entire US Cabinet were asked to respond within 48 hours of receipt of the legal letter, failing which, the letter explained, 'it will be assumed that your failure to act is a knowing and intentional violation and subrogation of the law’.

BUSH CABINET, BY DEFAULT, CONCURS WITH WHAT PRINCIPALS SAY
There was no response, so the entire Bush Cabinet has not only signed its own self-indictment, but has also agreed with these statements. This state of affairs represents an extreme deterioration of the situation arising from the Bush II Administration’s deliberate, repeated, and egregious violation of the law in diverting, stealing, manipulating, leveraging, hypothecating and otherwise misusing $4.5 trillion tagged in the name of, and earmarked as belonging to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta and his AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., in accordance with the formal agreement signed in May 2006 inter alia by the President of the United States, Supreme Court Judges, senior US legislators, and officials representing the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.

As we reported on 10th February, the Secretary of Homeland Security, Mr Michael Chertoff, whose Department as noted is a signatory of the May 2006 Settlement accord with the Ambassador, told an investigator on 9th February:

‘Yes, I am the one who took the money, and I ain’t gonna pay it to AmeriTrust, Inc., not this week, not next week, or ever. With regard to the sanctions against me, kiss my a..’. When told about the possibility that he will be arrested, his response to the investigator was: ‘F… YOU’.

It will have been noticed that this uncouth official response did not represent disagreement with the investigator’s assertion.

CHERTOFF’S OUTBURST = OFFICIAL ADMISSION OF CULPABILITY
On the contrary, this outburst represented an admission by the Department of Homeland Security, a (repeat) signatory to the May 2006 Wanta Settlement accord, of its culpability – as well as being the first official acknowledgement by the Bush Administration that it has illegally diverted Ambassador Wanta’s private funds. Moreover, that acknowledgement may explain the hasty preparation of the Cabinet’s collective ‘self-protection document’, exposed above.

It was realised that Mr Chertoff had let the cat out of the bag: so the illegal document was cobbled together as a means of providing the Cabinet, so its members may have believed, with ‘blanket protection’. In fact it does nothing of the sort: rather the existence of the document makes it plain that these crooks are struggling to protect themselves from the hellish onslaught to come.

Like a terrified and maddened flock of sheep, they have herded themselves into a sheep-pen labelled ‘SELF-INCRIMINATION’.

It also follows of course that Mr Chertoff’s signature on any agreement, like those of Mr Henry M. Paulson Jr. and President George W. Bush Jr. himself, is worthless and meaningless, as is the myth of the ‘Full Faith and Credit of the United States’ and the reputation of the US Treasury for integrity, which is in shreds. This is not just our opinion, but reflects that of the Governments of all the other Group of Eight countries – with the possible exception of the United Kingdom, which has been identified now as a partner in egregious financial crimes with the Government of the United States.

THE BIG PROBLEM THEY FACE: THIS IS AN INTERNATIONAL CRISIS
No doubt these US operatives may originally (but no longer: see below) have naively imagined that their ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation somehow protects them from the consequences of their individual and now collectivised criminal actions. It is not hard for observers to work this one out. But if that was their original deceitful game-plan, they have failed to take account of the fact that this is not just an American domestic crisis (without historical parallel in terms of gravity, by the way), but an international crisis, involving many powerful governments which are beyond incandescent with the open-ended, brazen criminality of these ruthless and merciless US officials and operatives.

Therefore, as will soon become apparent, they are not in control of events – a state of affairs that is causing them acute anxiety behind their foul-mouthed bravado. For we must assume that Michael Chertoff’s outburst reflects the opinion of the entire Cabinet.

The fact, reported on 10th February, that ten foreign operatives, including the Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Chancellor of Germany, are subjects of International Court of Justice arrest warrants, does not mitigate the situation facing the Bush II Cabinet in any way. Or will we discover that these foreign operatives have signed the illegal document as well?

LEGAL LETTER TO THE ENTIRE AMERICAN CABINET
Irrespective, it is against this background that the following legal letter was sent by a prominent Republican Party lawyer to the entire American Cabinet on February 11, 2007. The importance of this letter is that, since (typically) none of the Bush II Cabinet members have chosen to respond to it, all of them individually and collectively acknowledge that they are engaged in a knowing and intentional violation and subrogation of the law – or rather, of US laws, including those we have listed in past reports and which are reiterated below*, just in case anyone has forgotten that the Rule of Law has collapsed in the United States.

As stated above, the legal letter given below asks for written advice, within 48 hours, that either one or all of the recipients of the letter have a legal basis to prevent delivery of the tagged and earmarked funds belonging to Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta/AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., failing which it would be assumed that their failure to respond confirms a knowing and intentional violation and subrogation of the law.

INACTION CONFIRMS CABINET HAS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR SEIZURE
No written response was forthcoming: so the entire Bush II Cabinet, individually and collectively, acknowledges that it and its members have no legal basis for withholding Wanta’s funds – NOT EVEN A LEGAL BASIS ARISING OUT OF THEIR SO-CALLED ANTI-TERRORISM LEGISLATION (Patriot Act II etc). This also means that individually and collectively, the Bush II Cabinet and all its members acknowledge that they are jointly and severally in breach of the Rule of Law, and thus of the Law of Treason, the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O., and of H.R. 3723 and the other laws listed earlier and repeated below*.

TREASON: BUSH CABINET HAS INDICTED ITSELF THREE TIMES OVER
In other words, the entire US Cabinet has self-indicted itself three times over:

• First, by condoning and not correcting Mr Chertoff’s open admission of official culpability;

• Secondly, by signing the illegal Cabinet document which its members may have naively imagined provides them with mutual self-protection, but which does nothing of the kind; and:

• Thirdly, by ignoring the lawyer’s invitation for them to bring forward a legal explanation as to why the Cabinet might be entitled to withhold payment of the tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion to the Ambassador and his corporation.

No such explanation was proffered, because of course none exists.

Thomas E. Henry
Attorney at Law
Omaha, Nebraska 68124


February 11, 2007-02-13

President George W. Bush, President of the United States of America
Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States of America

And the following named members of the President’s Cabinet:

• Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
• Secretary Condoleeza Rice
• Secretary Michael Chertoff
• Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
• Secretary Dirk Kempthorne
• Secretary Robert M. Gates
• Secretary Mike Johanns
• Secretary Carlos Gutierrez
• Secretary Margaret Spellings
• Secretary Jim Nicholson
• Secretary Alphonso Jackson
• Secretary Samuel P. Bodman
• Secretary Mary E. Peters
• Secretary Elaine Chao
• Secretary Michael O. Leavitt

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
White House
Washington, S.C., USA 20500

Re:
Apparent circumvention and avoidance, by both public and private individuals and entities acting either individually, jointly and/or in conspiracy with others, that prevent completion of Agreed Upon Financial Settlement regarding Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta and AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.:

Dear Mr President, Mr Vice President and named members of the President’s Cabinet:

It has been brought to our attention that one or more of the recipients of this letter acting individually, jointly or in conspiracy/concert with others are improperly acting under “Color of Public Office” preventing finalization of the referenced “Financial Settlement”.

The term “Financial Settlement” is used generically for reference purposes and should not be considered an admission modifying the character of the private business transaction previously documented between Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., one or more foreign governments/private interests and one or more “USG” public and private sector interests.

Each of you are and/or should be aware that the mentioned private business transaction would generate substantial United States dollars paid to the United States Treasury. At a time in American history when large financial resources are needed to fight the “War on Terrorism” any act and/or failure to act that negates payment to the United States Treasury would appear to be an act of “Treason”.

Burdening the United States’ taxpayers with additional debt, failing to address the needs of Social Security/Medicare and other economic needs of our great nation in deference to some misguided personal interest that prevents completion of the mentioned private business financial transaction compounds the inference of “Treason” and/or gross malfeasance in public office.

The Principals who are to be direct and/or fiduciary recipients of the proceeds derived from the private business transaction have accepted obligations to pay commitments to several foreign entities (public and private) and several “USG” entities (public and private). Intervention and blockage of this private transaction places one or more private and public relationships at jeopardy. Each and every party is/and or should be aware of the historical and current protocol agreements and contractual obligations that underpin the referenced financial commitments (public/private/foreign/domestic) identified herein.

The individual, agency, public, private, nominated official and elected official violation of the “Rule of Law” referenced herein amounts to a violation of the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, and the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, specifically R.I.C.O. and applicable international and national money laundering restrictions. In addition it is further asserted here that the mentioned “acting in concert” by each of you individually, jointly and severally, subjects the participating parties to a claim of violating H.R. 3723 as the same pertains to private business transactions being protected under both private and criminal penalties.

In the event that either one or all of the named recipients of this letter may not be aware of the historical background leading to the culmination of the financial obligations referenced herein it is respectfully suggested that you obtain such information from official sources and not accept verbal explanations from any party (irrespective of the position of the party making the verbal representation).

Absent written advice, within forty-eight hours (48 hours), that either one or all of the recipients of this letter have a legal basis to prevent delivery of the funds pursuant to the mentioned “financial settlement”, it will be assumed that your failure to act is a knowing and intentional violation and subrogation of the law. This matter requires your immediate attention and implementation of corrective action to enable mitigation of a very volatile situation with the potential of serious impact on the global economy and the stability of the United States Dollar in the world market.

Respectfully submitted,
Signed,
Thomas E. Henry.


PERVERSE COLLECTIVE CRIMINAL ANAESTHESIA
It is possible that the members of President Bush’s Cabinet may be under the illusion that the illegal document that they have signed which purports to enable them to trade Ambassador Leo Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion without his permission, may allow them by some weird reasoning to ignore the extreme legal and geopolitical difficulties in which they find themselves as a consequence of their criminal behaviour.

They may believe that their Generals, like General Alfred Jodl, will continue, as hitherto, to tell them what they prefer to hear; and they may have in mind covering their tracks by launching a conflagration in the Middle East.

Any such thinking and intention, which is now the subject of worldwide alarm, would be liable to ensure that Russia, China, Germany and France would oppose their Hitlerian aggression and would be forced to reserve their right to retaliate as necessary. Humanity has been here before:

• 9/11 = the Reichstag Fire;
• The unprovoked invasion of Iraq (a bank raid) = Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia;
• The US Generals’ feckless inactivity in the face of this madness = the ambivalence of General Alfred Jodl and the German General Staff; and:
• The threat to attack Iran = Hitler’s intended aggression against Poland.

A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY WORSE THAN HITLER + STALIN
To cover their criminal tracks, desperate criminals embark upon desperate gambles. However, as the United States’ experience in Iraq and Afghanistan should have taught these reckless fools, if you launch a war, you cannot be sure how it will turn out. An attack launched against Iran as cover for the serial financial criminality perpetrated by these operatives, risks triggering World War III – and will, according not least to the respected Australian medical scientist Dr Helen Caldicott, have a devastating long-term impact on human life resulting from the release of radiation from the targeted nuclear facilities. Should any attack be undertaken with nuclear weapons, as some of President Bush’s ‘neo-Conservative’ (=Trotskyite) advisers propose, the populations of many countries would suffer from generations of radioactive particles infesting the air, water and food chains – representing a criminal attack against humanity far surpassing the serial atrocities of the German Nazi and Soviet Communist regimes combined.

At a conference last year, Dr Caldicott explained the horrific long-term consequences for the Iraqi population arising from the use by the US military of depleted uranium in explosive ammunition. She pointed out that ‘depleted’ does not mean that the lethality of the radiation is reduced in any way. On the contrary, each time such ammunition is used, radioactive particles are released in the air and are absorbed into people’s lungs. We have yet to observe the horrific civilian casualty rate arising from the American invasion, or the true casualty rate among US troops.

Blair, for whom an International Court of Justice arrest warrant has been issued, implicating him in this financial criminality, is responsible for having dragooned the United Kingdom into the barbaric, Hitlerian invasion of Iraq on the basis of a falsified pretext (which ignored the reality that Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction and the associated equipment were removed from Iraqi territory on board two Soviet ships which sailed from Umm Qasr some weeks prior to the invasion).

The British are now reported to be helping the American military to offload missiles at Basra, intended to flatten Iranian cities. Any pretence, therefore, that Britain is standing aside from this madness, will therefore be false, if these reports are accurate.

It would be easier for the world if the Bush II Cabinet came belatedly to its senses, and saved both its own members’ skins and those of the rest of humanity by immediately paying America’s most distinguished patriot, Ambassador Leo Wanta, the $4.5 trillion they have diverted and stolen these past seven months – not least because payment of the Settlement funds will trigger the associated 75-year ‘gag order’, beneath which their financial crimes might just, even at this very late stage, be permitted to be hidden. Failing a late outbreak of common sense, Lucifer, whose only product is death (spiritual and physical), and who is having a ball, will probably prevail.

U.S. DOLLAR COLLAPSE AND HYPERINFLATION MAY BE IMMINENT
And the US dollar, which is taking fright at all this, will collapse. When world confidence snaps, the American people will quickly find that there is only a limited supply of gas at gas stations, because the oil exporters are no longer willing to accept e.g. US Treasury 'Diamond Certificates' with a face value of $1.0 billion (costing the Bureau of Engraving and Printing $3.0 to produce) and which have no value while in the hands of the US authorities – but which suddenly (by 'magic') acquire $1.0 billion worth of purchasing power in the hands of the oil producers concerned. Thus the United States will have imported $1.0 billion of oil for $3.0.

That stale confidence trick, or 'Ponzi Game', may be about to implode – thanks exclusively to the treasonable madness of the Bush II Cabinet and their co-conspirators, who may have imagined that the 'funny money' they have been generating from their illegal trades using Wanta's funds can be stashed away, without comprehending that it will wind up being worthless.

For the hyperinflation that will engulf the United States when confidence snaps will whiplash very rapidly, thanks to such 'globalist' tricks as 'just-in-time delivery', which will ensure that the much higher prices charged in foreign currencies for US imports will be translated with minimal delay to domestic prices. We will elaborate on what will happen when international confidence snaps, in a future posting. It may be snapping 'as we speak'.


* US laws breached by President Bush Jr., Richard Cheney, Henry M. Paulson, Robert M. Kimmitt, Michael Chertoff, other officials previously named in these reports, all members of G. W. Bush's Cabinet listed in the letter cited above, and the Boards of Directors of Goldman Sachs and Co, Bank of America, Citibank Group, Wachovia Bank, JPMorganChase, Bank of Nova Scotia, Chemical Bank, First Union Bank and other US and foreign institutions, including the Bank of England, which have been illegally exploiting Ambassador Wanta’s tagged and earmarked $4.5 trillion Settlement money, always intended for the benefit of the American people and for the paying down of the US Treasury’s background debt:

• Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
• Anti-Drug Abuse Act
• Applicable international money laundering restrictions
• Bank Secrecy Act
• Crimes, General Provisions, Accessory After the Fact [Title 18, USC]
• Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act
• Economic Espionage Act
• Hobbs Act
• Imparting or Conveying False Information [Title 18, USC]
• Maloney Act
• Misprision of Felony [Title 18, USC]
• Money-Laundering Control Act
• Money-Laundering Suppression Act
• Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
• Provisions pertaining to private business transactions
being protected under both private and criminal penalties [H.R. 3723]
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [R.I.C.O.]
• Securities Act 1933
• Securities Act 1934
• Terrorism Prevention Act
• Treason legislation, especially in time of war


Exodus 20, verse 16: 'Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour'.

Psalm 127, verse 1: 'Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain'.

Psalm 53, verse 1: 'The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God'.

Psalm 37, verses 1-2: 'Fret not thyself because of evildoers, neither be thou envious against the workers of iniquity. For they shall soon be cut down like the grass, and wither as the green herb'.

Psalm 37, verses 12-13: 'The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth. The Lord shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming'.

Psalm 64, verse 2: 'Hide me from the secret counsel of the wicked; from the insurrection of the workers of iniquity'.

Psalm 82, verse 5: 'They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course'.

Psalm 38, verses 35-36: 'I have seen the wicked in great power, and spreading himself like a green bay tree. Yet he passed away, and lo, he was not; yea, I sought him, but he could not be found'.

Psalm 46, verse 10; 'Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth'.

Psalm 51, verse 17: 'The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise'.

Psalm 119, verse 165: 'Great peace have they which love thy law: and nothing shall offend them'.

Matthew 10, verse 26: The words of Jesus: 'Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known'.

Mark 4, verse 22: The words of Jesus: 'For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was anything kept secret, but that it should come abroad'.

Luke 8, verse 17: The words of Jesus: 'For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither anything hid, that shall not be known, and come abroad'.

George Orwell: 'In an age of deceit, speaking the truth is a revolutionary act'.

J. Edgar Hoover: 'The individual is handicapped coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists'.

Martin Luther King: 'Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere'.

US friend: 'You are to be congratulated on a masterful piece of research in exposing the treason and the biggest heist in history'.

Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta: Diplomatic Passport Numbers 04362 & 12535 a.k.a. Frank B. Ingram [FBI] (Sector V) SA32NV; and a.k.a. Rick Reynolds, SA233MS. AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc: Federal EIN Number 20-3866855; Virginia State Corporation Identification Number: 0617454-4; Virginia State Department of Taxation Identification Number: 30203866855F001