|
|
|
|
|
Home
Support Bollyn.com
October 2, 2010 My research and writing is supported solely by donations from my readers. If you appreciate the material found in my research articles about 9/11 -- send a donation. Your support is needed. * * * * * Il primo ricercatore è Cristopher Bollyn, giornalista investigativo...
My research and analysis of 9-11 is very different from what you will find anywhere in the controlled mainstream media or alternative press. My 9-11 material will not be discussed in any of the 9-11 conferences or media coverage in the coming week not because it is incorrect or biased in any way. The only reason my 9-11 writings are not discussed in the media is because they get much too close to the truth, which is something nobody in the media wants to go anywhere near.
The controlled media is lying through its teeth to the American people just like the C.I.A., the F.B.I., and the so-called "elected" members of Congress and the U.S. government. Any person or agency who is party to deceiving the American people is clearly not on their side. These liars are the domestic enemies of the American republic. To deceive the people into sending their sons, husbands, fathers, and daughters to fight wars of aggression is criminal and treasonous. "The fact that you are giving your book [Solving 9-11] away for free, which I'm sure you worked very hard at, is even all the more impressive. May your work enlighten everyone." Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit. My research and writings are available on this website thanks to the contributions of concerned citizens who donate to my work. Thousands of people visit my website, read, copy and repost my material. My recent article "How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11" , for example, is currently found on thousands of websites -- but very few readers contribute. In Luce’s day, a cadre of gorgeous, brilliant women from the Seven Sisters colleges backstopped this modern-day rendering plant as fact-checkers. In the late 1970s, about half the fact-checkers were men, so in addition to pouring vodka I checked facts, a process that left me bleakly cynical about journalistic accuracy. We would publish whole stories that were lies — Francois Mitterrand’s plan to destroy the French economy was a recurring theme — but at least the names were spelled correctly. If you find my material worth reading, such as my article about U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein's connections to the Rothschilds, the Mossad, and the Israeli defendants in the 9-11 litigation he supervises, please donate to help support my website. HOW TO USE THIS WEBSITE - Bollyn.com provides its readers with important information that is simply not available on television, in the mainstream media, or on other websites. The most recent articles are on the front page. The archived articles of more than 8 years of 9-11 research, which make up the second volume of my book Solving 9-11, are being organized and can be found and printed from the Table of Contents. The List of Articles is a useful index that can be sorted chronologically or alphabetically. One can simply browse by subject using the tabs in the left-hand margin. I have recently added the articles from 2007 and articles to a new section about my trial. Photographs will be added. HOW TO SUPPORT MY WORK - I am not compensated for my research and do not carry any advertising on my site, but my efforts take time and money. Support from my readers is what keeps this website going. If you find my work worthwhile, please donate to Bollyn.com today by clicking on the donation button in the left-hand margin or send a donation via PayPal (choose the "personal gift" method) to bollyn@bollynbooks.com -- Thank you for your support.
Who are the thousand--that is to say, who are "the Country"? In a monarchy, the king and his family are the country; in a republic it is the common voice of the people. Each of you, for himself, by himself and on his own responsibility, must speak. And it is a solemn and weighty responsibility, and not lightly to be flung aside at the bullying of pulpit, press, government, or the empty catchphrases of politicians.
Each must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, and which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your convictions is to be an unqualified and inexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let man label you as they may. If you alone of all the nation shall decide one way, and that way be the right way according to your convictions of the right, you have done your duty by yourself and by your country - hold up your head! You have nothing to be ashamed of.
A Note of Gratitude
October 1, 2010 It's difficult to express the complete admiration and gratitude I have for the amount and quality of your work over the past decade. Your critical and enquiring attitude from the very beginning of the 9-11 tragedy is quite remarkable, and thank God, diligence and courage still inform your work today. Thanks to those who contributed to my work in April, especially T.S. in Oregon, R.W. in California, E.H. in Ontario, T.N. in Australia, N.S.A. in Illinois, S.H. in Virginia, G.S. in Australia, S.D. in Florida, M.B. in Albuquerque, J.R. in Illinois, M.C. in Bristol, T.N. in Australia, M.J. in Washington, J.K. in Kansas City, G.S. in Indiana, R.M. in Novato, A.S. in Texarkana, and M.L. in America. Thank you all very much!
Try me, good King, but let me have a Lawful Trial, and let not my sworn Enemies sit as my Accusers and Judges; yes, let me receive an open Trial, for my Truth shall fear no open shame; then shall you see, either mine Innocency cleared, your Suspicion and Conscience satisfied, the Ignominy and Slander of the World stopped, or my Guilt openly declared.
Sincere thanks for the donations received in February, especially from V.M. in Canada, J.A. in Kuwait, R.L. in New Zealand, R.D. in Michigan, E.H. in Ontario, T.B. in Saskatchewan, S.Ö. in Sweden, P.C. in Tokyo, S.C. in Tucson, P.D. in Washington, D.C., A.G. in New Jersey, D.A. in Toronto, T.M. in Louisiana, S.R. in Illinois, W.R. in Denver, and M.K. in Hoffman Estates.
Many thanks to those who donated in January: E.H. in Ontario, L.L. in New Mexico, S.K. in Illinois, J.S. in New Zealand, M.B. in Albuquerque, N.M. in Nova Scotia, B.B. in Cambridge, M.P. in Connecticut, J.P. in Cicero, J.W. in Cincinnati, and A.S. in Palm Desert. Mr. Bollyn: All the best... I also received this very nice Christmas greeting: I wish to add some brief words of encouragement for the marvelous work you have undertaken on behalf of all of us who value our freedom. Thank you for your courage, your integrity and your amazing tenacity in exposing the evil which is gripping our planet.
At times our own light goes out and is rekindled by a spark from another person. Each of us has cause to think with deep gratitude of those who have lighted the flame within us. I am very grateful to those who have donated in support of my work in December, especially S.C. in Missouri, A.S. in Panama, G.S. in Australia, T.B. in Saskatchewan, N.R. in New York, E.H. in Canada, P.C. in Japan, J.S. in California, A.S. in London, G.S. in Indiana, M.L. in Maryland, J.B. in Arkansas, S.D. in Aberdeenshire, J.L. in Sacramento, J.R. in Illinois, and T.M. in Germany. Many thanks to you all and those who supported my work in 2009. I couldn't do it without your help. I received this encouraging note from a new supporter: I would like to thank YOU for your brave and continuous effort to bring the painful truth to light. I admire your tireless research and linguistic intelligence. I shared with my husband the other day, that you are the only person out there who writes and explains the tragic 9/11 events so cohesively with plenty of scientific evidence and ‘to the point’, that it will be hard for anyone to dismiss it as yet another conspiracy theory. Don't worry, I won't give up. It is always nice to hear from supporters. We are all in this together and it really is a collective effort to find the truth and save our nation(s). And a big thanks to those who donated in October, especially J.F. in Colorado, K.D. in New York, T.B. in Saskatchewan, D.G. in Connecticut, V.C. in Ireland, E.H. in Canada, A.S. in Scotland, J.M. in Illinois, R.A. in Philadelphia, and G.S. in Australia. My sincere thanks to you all. Your support is greatly appreciated. In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it—and the glow from that fire can truly light the world. And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man. This note of appreciation came from a supporter in Canada: ... from a reader in France: Thanks for your brave investigations to bring light on Truth. You stand out among the best. Many thanks for your contributations to a Cassandra-like society...It is thanks to the likes of you et al that one learns of the manipulation/control of society. May you be protected by the good (especially in the security service). At a time of Depression, which affects all the good (and the stupid), I admire your intelligence in assessing the current debacle. I am heartened that sincere people consider my work "honorable" and donate to support my efforts. I am very grateful for those who supported my 9-11 research in the month of September, especially D.A. in Toronto, G.W. in Germany, D.M., H.M., and K.B. in California, R.L. in Minnesota, J.A. in Michigan, R.W. in Arizona, K.M. in Australia, M.B. in New Mexico, D.M. in Denver, T.N. in Australia, S.M. in Omaha, M.P., J.A., R.H., and E.H. in Canada, J.D. in England, J.S. in San Marcos, W.F. in New York, J.C. in Long Beach, P.C. in Tokyo, W.H. in The Netherlands, M.P. in Connecticut, D.B. in Wyoming, J.D. in Illinois, J.H. in Quebec, J.M. in Oregon, G.S. in Queensland, L.B. in Tucson, E.J. in Chicago, E.B. in Palm Springs, J.B. in Arkansas, and M.S. in Louisiana. Thank you all very much. Feeling gratitude and not expressing it is like wrapping a present and not giving it. These kind words of encouragement came with a generous donation: There is no better place that I can place my money than with you. Dollars become credible currency when placed in your hands. Please keep up the fine, fine work, and accept my gratitude for your devotion to this supremely important part of our lives. Your efforts are unique and singular. A reader in South Africa sent this note after reading the first 12 chapters of my book, Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World: I have just read the 12 chapters of your 9-11 book. I am gobsmacked! Your research is overwhelmingly precise and alarmingly accurate. It took me four days, (with research) and even though I am well researched on the Zionazis, I was flabbergasted at the attention to detail so far. We, as inhabitants of this planet, will be forever grateful for your time and dedication to this cause, and, in time, will owe you a huge debt of gratitude in the future. Thank you for your incredible work. A supporter in Hawaii sent me this nice note: Aloha, Chris,
9/11: Towards a UN inquiry commission
October 2, 2010
Norwegian and U.S. Soldiers Kill for Thrills in Afghanistan
September 30, 2010 Search for the truth is the noblest occupation of man; its publication is a duty. Norwegians and Scandinavians are shocked and appalled to read that Norwegian soldiers actually enjoy killing Afghan resistance fighters, who are fighting the foreign occupation of their country. The Norwegian magazine Alfa coming out this week carries an article with interviews with Norwegian snipers who brag about killing Afghans from more than 2,500 meters. The Norwegian report mirrors a grisly ABC News report of U.S. troops "Killing for Sport" innocent Afghan civilians and cutting off parts of their bodies. These reports reveal the false morality of the criminal war in Afghanistan.
Alfa magazine appears to be of that peculiar genre of magazines for men that mixes sex with war and violence. Although the issue of Alfa has not yet hit the newstands the story has already caused an uproar in Norway, a land that suffered a brutal occupation under the Nazi regime during the Second World War. This presents the fundamental ethical problem that I posed to the Norwegian government several years ago when it became clear to the public that Norwegian soldiers were not promoting democracy or building schools in Afghanistan - they were simply killing people.
The Norwegian mission that Simonsen commands is called the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) but what are they really constructing? What is the real purpose for the 500 Norwegian soldiers who are on a mission to kill Afghans in the province of Afghanistan that borders Turkmenistan? Could it be that greedy Norwegian oil oligarchs (read Statoil) are invested in the criminal scheme to occupy Afghanistan in order to build the TAPI gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to India - for Israel's Mossad gangsters? (See my articles below.)
"A GREAT SENSE OF HUMOR"
How can any Christian nation that suffered a brutal occupation in its modern history take part in the illegal occupation of Afghanistan? How could Norwegians be part of the "coalition of the killing"? The Norwegian government did not deign to respond to my question, although I am only trying to help them out of a very bad situation. Of the 4 Scandinavian and Baltic nations I asked about being involved in combat in Afghanistan, only Finland responded with a protest saying that ISAF soldiers were not involved in combat operations - a complete lie. When queried about the news reports, the Finnish spokesman refused to discuss the subject any further.
No, Ms Faremo, the soldiers' comments should not be "left in the dark". Their statements simply reflect the brutal reality of the murderous mission they were sent on by Norwegian government officials like you. How can killing be anything but murder in such a criminal war? What is truly unacceptable is Norway's participation in the pre-planned war of aggression in Afghanistan. The story that first made it quite clear that Norwegian soldiers were fighting in Afghanistan concerned German helicopter pilots who went back to base in the evening rather than continue fighting Afghans. The Norwegians complained that they could have gone on killing if the Germans had not returned to base at dusk.
Author's Note - As an American with Norwegian ancestors I have a great deal of respect for Norway and Norwegian culture. My criticism of Norway's current participation in the war in Afghanistan should not be misconstrued as anti-Norwegian.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Iranian President Calls for 9/11 Investigation
September 27, 2010 All values, even the freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism. A radical is one who speaks the truth. Address by H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Universe, and peace and blessing be upon our Master and Peophet, Mohammad, and his pure Household, and his noble Companions and on all divine messengers. Oh, God, hasten the arrival of Iman Al-Mahdi and grant him good health and victory and make us his followers and those who attest to his rightfulness. Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am grateful to the Almighty God who granted me the opportunity to appear before this world assembly once again. I wish to begin by commemorating those who lost their lives in the horrible flood in Pakistan and express my heartfelt sympathy with the families who lost their loved ones, as well as with the people and the government of Pakistan. I urge everyone to assist their fellow men and women as a humane duty. Let me thank H.E. Mr. Ali Abdussalam Treki, the President of the sixty-fourth session of the United Nations General Assembly, for all his efforts during his tenure. I also would like to congratulate H.E. Mr. Joseph Deiss, the President of the sixty-fifth session of the United Nations General Assembly and wish him all success. In the past years, I spoke to you about some of the hopes and concerns, including family crises, security, human dignity, world economy, climate change as well as the aspiration for justice and [a] lasting peace. After about one hundred years of domination, the system of Capitalism and the existing world order has proved to be unable to provide appropriate solution to the problems of societies, thus coming to an end. I shall try to examine the two main causes of this failure and picture some features of the ideal future order. A) Attitudes and Beliefs As you are well aware, the divine prophets had the mission to call everyone to monotheism, love and justice and show mankind the path to prosperity. They invite men to contemplation and knowledge in order to better appreciate the truth and to avoid atheism and egoism. The very nature of the message of all prophets is one and the same. Every messenger endorsed the messenger before him and gave glad tidings about the prophet to come, and presented a more complete version of the religion in accordance with the capacity of the man at the time. This continued up to the last messenger of God who presented the perfect and all inclusive religion. In opposition to that, the egotist and the greedy stood up against this clear call, revolting against the message. Nimrod countered Hazrat Abraham, Pharaoh countered Hazrat Moses and the greedy countered Hazrat Jesus Christ and Hazrat Mohammad (Peace be upon them all). In the recent centuries, the human ethics and values have been rejected as a cause for backwardness. They were even portrayed as opposing wisdom and science because of the earlier infliction on man by the proclaimers of religion in the dark ages of the West. Man's disconnection from Heaven detached him from his true self. Man with his potentials for understanding the secrets of the universe, his instinct for seeking truth, his aspirations for justice and perfection, his quest for beauty and purity and his capacity to represent God on earth was reduced to a creature limited to the materialistic world with a mission to maximize individualistic pleasures. Human instinct, then, replaced true human nature. Human beings and nations were considered rivals and the happiness of an individual or a nation was defined in collision with, and elimination [of] or [the] suppression of others. Constructive evolutionary cooperation was replaced with a destructive struggle for survival. The lust for capital and domination replaced monotheism which is the gate to love and unity. This widespread clash of the egoist with the divine values gave way to slavery and colonialism. A large portion of the world came under the domination of a few western States. Tens of millions of people were taken to slavery and tens of millions of families were shattered as a result. All the resources, the rights and the cultures of the colonized nations were plundered. Lands were occupied and the indigenous people were humiliated and mass- murdered. Yet, nations rose up, colonialism was alienated and the independence of the nations was recognized. Thus, the hope for respect, prosperity and security was revived amongst nations. In the beginning of the past century, nice talks about freedom, human rights and democracy created hopes for healing the deep wounds of the past. Today, however, not only those dreams are not realized, but memories, even at times worse than before, have been recorded. As a result of the two World Wars, the occupation of Palestine, the Korean and the Vietnam Wars, the Iraqi war against Iran, the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq as well as many wars in Africa, hundreds of millions of people were killed, wounded or displaced. Terrorism, illicit drugs, poverty and the social gaps increased. The dictatorial and coup d'etat governments in Latin America committed unprecedented crimes with the support of the West. Instead of disarmament, the proliferation and stockpiling of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons expanded, putting the world under a bigger threat. As a result, the very same old goals of colonialists and the slave masters were, this time around, pursued with a new facade. B) The Global Management and Ruling Structures The League of Nations and, then, the United Nations were established with the promise to bring about peace, security and the realization of human rights, which in fact meant a global management. One can analyze the current governance of the world by examining three events: First, the event of the 11 September 2001 which has affected the whole world for almost a decade. All of a sudden, the news of the attack on the twin towers was broadcast using numerous footages of the incident. Almost all governments and known figures strongly condemned this incident. But then a propaganda machine came into full force; it was implied that the whole world was exposed to a huge danger, namely terrorism, and that the only way to save the world would be to deploy forces into Afghanistan. Eventually Afghanistan, and shortly thereafter, Iraq were occupied. Please take note: It was said that some three thousands people were killed on 11 September for which we are all very saddened. Yet, up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced, and the conflict is still going on and expanding. In identifying those responsible for the attack, there were three viewpoints. 1- That a very powerful and complex terrorist group, able to successfully cross all layers of the American intelligence and security, carried out the attack. This is the main viewpoint advocated by American statesmen. 2- That some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order also to save the Zionist regime. The majority of the American people as well as other nations and politicians agree with this view. 3- It was carried out by a terrorist group but the American government supported and took advantage of the situation. Apparently, this viewpoint has fewer proponents. The main evidence linking the incident was a few passports found in the huge volume of rubble and a video of an individual whose place of domicile was unknown, but it was announced that he had been involved in oil deals with some American officials. It was also covered up and said that due to the explosion and fire no trace of the suicide attackers was found. There remain, however, a few questions [to] be answered: 1- Would it not have been sensible that first a thorough investigation should have been conducted by independent groups to conclusively identify the elements involved in the attack and then map out a rational plan to take measures against them? 2- Assuming the viewpoint of the American government, is it rational to launch a classic war through widespread deployment of troops that led to the death of hundreds of thousands of people to counter a terrorist group? 3- Was it not possible to act the way Iran countered the Riggi terrorist group, who killed and wounded 400 innocent people in Iran. In the Iranian operation, no innocent person was hurt. It is proposed that the United Nations set up an independent fact-finding group for the event of 11 September so that in the future expressing views about it is not forbidden. I wish to announce here that next year the Islamic Republic of Iran will host a conference to study terrorism and the means to confront it. I invite officials, scholars, thinkers, researchers and research institutes of all countries to attend this conference. Second, is the occupation of the Palestinian territories The oppressed people of Palestine have lived under the rule of an occupying regime for 60 years, been deprived of freedom, security and the right to self-determination, while the occupiers are given recognition. On a daily basis, the houses are being destroyed over the heads of innocent women and children. People are deprived of water, food and medicine in their own homeland. The Zionists have imposed five all-out wars on the neighboring countries and on the Palestinian people. The Zionists committed the most horrible crimes against the defenseless people in the wars against Lebanon and Gaza. The Zionist regime attacked a humanitarian flotilla in a blatant defiance of all international norms and kill[ed] civilians. This regime, which enjoys the absolute support of some western countries, regularly threatens the countries in the region and continues publicly announced assassination of Palestinian figures and others, while Palestinian defenders and those opposing this regime are pressured, labeled as terrorists and anti Semites. All values, even the freedom of expression, in Europe and in the United States are being sacrificed at the altar of Zionism. Solutions are doomed to fail because the right of the Palestinian people is not taken into account. Would we have witnessed such horrendous crimes if instead of recognizing the occupation, the sovereign right of the Palestinian people had been recognized? Our unambiguous proposition is the return of the Palestinian refugees to their home land and the reference to the vote of the people of Palestine to exercise their sovereignty and decide on the type of governance. Third, is the nuclear energy Nuclear energy is clean and cheap and a heavenly gift which is amongst the most suitable alternatives to cut the pollutions emanating from fossil fuels. The Non- Proliferation Treaty (NPT) allows all member States to use nuclear energy without limits and the International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA] is mandated to provide member States with technical and legal support. The nuclear bomb is the worst inhumane weapon and must totally be eliminated. The NPT prohibits its development and stockpiling and calls for nuclear disarmament. Nonetheless, note what some of the permanent members of the Security Council and nuclear bomb holders have done: They have equated nuclear energy with the nuclear bomb, and have distanced this energy from the reach of most of nations by establishing monopolies and pressuring the IAEA. While at the same time, they have continued to maintain, expand and upgrade their own nuclear arsenals. This has entailed the following: Not only the nuclear disarmament has not been realized, but also nuclear bombs have been proliferated in some regions, including by the occupying and intimidating Zionist regime. I would like here to propose that the year 2011 be proclaimed the year of nuclear disarmament and "Nuclear Energy for all, Nuclear Weapons for None". In all these cases, the United Nations has been unable to take any effective course of action. Unfortunately, in the decade proclaimed as the "International Decade for the Culture of Peace", hundreds of thousands were killed and injured as a result of war, aggression and occupation, and hostilities and antagonism increased. Ladies and Gentlemen, Very recently the world witnessed the ugly and inhumane act of burning the Holy Quran. The Holy Quran is the Divine Book and the eternal miracle of the Prophet of lslam. It calls for worshipping the One God, justice, compassion toward people, development and progress, reflection and thinking, defending the oppressed and resisting against the oppressors; and it names with respect the previous Messengers of God, like Noah, Abraham, Isaaq, Joseph, Moses and Jesus Christ (Peace be Upon them all) and endorses them. They burned Quran to burn all these truths and good judgments. However, the truth could not be burned. Quran is eternal because God and truth are everlasting. This act and any other act which widen the gap and distances between nations is evil. We should wisely avoid playing into the hands of Satan. On behalf of the Iranian nation I pay respect to all Divine Books and their followers. This is the Quran and this is the Bible. I pay respect to both of them. Esteemed Friends, For years, the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations. The cause of the United Nation's ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized. In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes. The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute? Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue? Dear Friends, The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations [are] able to participate in the global governance actively and constructively. The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination. The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and [the] administration of justice. It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization's structure. The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process. Ladies and Gentlemen, I announce clearly that the occupation of other countries under the pretext of freedom and democracy is an unforgivable crime. The world needs the logic of compassion and justice and inclusive participation instead of [the] logic of force, domination, unilateralism, war and intimidation. The world needs to be governed by virtuous people like the Divine Prophets. The two vast geographical spheres, namely Africa and Latin America, have gone through historic developments during the past decades. The new approaches in these two continents, which are based on increasing level of integration and unity as well as on localizing the growth and development models, have born considerable fruits to the peoples of those regions. The awareness and wisdom of the leaders of these two continents has overcome the regional problems and crises without the domineering interference of non-regional powers. The Islamic Republic of Iran has expanded its relations with the Latin America and Africa in all aspects in recent years. And about the glorious Iran, The Tehran Declaration was a hugely constructive step in confidence building efforts which was made possible through the admirable good will by the governments of Brazil and Turkey along with the sincere cooperation of the Iranian government. Although the Declaration received inappropriate reaction by some and was followed by an unlawful resolution, it is still valid. We have observed the regulations of the IAEA more than our commitments, yet, we have never submitted to illegally imposed pressures nor will we ever do so. It has been said that they want to pressure Iran into a dialogue. Well, firstly, Iran has always been ready for a dialogue based on respect and justice. Secondly, methods based on disrespecting nations have long become ineffective. Those who have used intimidation and sanctions in response to the clear logic of the Iranian nation are in real terms destroying the remaining credibility of the Security Council and the trust of nations for this body, proving once and again how unjust is the function of the Council. When they threaten a great nation such as Iran which is known throughout history for its scientists, poets, artists and philosophers and whose culture and civilization is synonymous to purity, submission to God and seeking justice, how can they ever expect that other nations grow confidence on them? It goes without saying that domineering methods in managing the world has failed. Not only has the era of slavery and colonialism and dominating the world passed, the path to the reviving old Empires are blocked, too. We have announced that we stand ready for a serious and free debate with the American Statesmen to express our transparent views on issues of importance to the world in this very venue. It is proposed here that in order to have a constructive dialogue, an annual free debate be organized within the General Assembly. In conclusion, Friends and Colleagues, The Iranian nation and the majority of the world's nations and governments are against the current discriminatory management of the world. The inhumane nature of this management has put it at a dead-end and requires a major overhaul. Reforming the world's affairs and bringing about tranquility and prosperity requires the participation of all, pure thoughts and the divine and humane management. We are all of the idea that: Justice is the basic element for peace, durable security and the spread of love among peoples and nations. It is in the justice that mankind seeks the realization of his aspirations, rights and dignity, since he is wary of oppression, humiliation and ill treatment. The true nature of mankind is manifested in the love for other fellow humans and love for all the good in the world. Love is the best foundation for establishing relation amongst people and amongst nations. As Vahshi Bafqi, the great Iranian poet, says: "From the fountain of youth, drink thousand sips You'll still die if you don't have love's grip" In making a world full of purity, safety and prosperity people are not rivals, but companions. Those who see their happiness but in the sorrow of others and their welfare and safety but in others' insecurity, those who see themselves superior to others, are out of the path of humanity and are in evil's course. Economy and materialistic means are only some tools to serve others, to create friendship and strengthen human connections for spiritual perfection. They are not tools for show-off or means of dominating others. Men and women complements each other and family unit with pure, loving and long-lasting relation of the spouses in its center is the guarantee for the continuity and the bringing up generations, for true pleasures, for spreading love and for reforming of the societies. Woman is a reflection of God's beauty and is the source of love and caring. She is the guardian of purity and exquisiteness of the society. The tendency to toughen the souls and behaviors of women deprives them from their very basic right of being a loving mother and a caring wife. It would result in a more violent society with irreversible defects. Freedom is a divine right that should serve peace and human perfection. Pure thoughts and the will of the righteous are keys to the gates of a pure life full of hope, liveliness and beauty. This is the promise of God that the earth will be inherited by the pure and the righteous. And the people free from selfishness will take up the management of the world. Then, there will be no trace of sorrow, discrimination, poverty, insecurity and aggression. The time for true happiness and for the blossoming of the true nature of humankind, the way God has intended, will arrive. All those seeking for justice and all the free spirits have been waiting for this moment and have promised such glorious time. The complete human, the true servant of God and the true friend of the mankind whose father was from the generation of the beloved Prophet of Islam and whose mother was from the true believers of the Jesus Christ, shall wait along with Jesus the son of Marry and the other righteous to appear on those brilliant times and assist the humanity. In welcoming them we should join ranks and seek justice. Praise to Love and worship, praise to justice and freedom, praise to the true humanity, the complete human, the true companion of the humankind and peace be upon you and all the righteous and the pure. Thank you. Source:
Islamic Republic of Iran Permanent Mission to the United Nations
Who was behind the destruction of the WTC steel?
September 30, 2010 My forthcoming research article will expose the people involved in the Mossad-run network behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. I have found that the network that arranged for the destruction of the steel - critical evidence from the crime scene - was organized by Israel's Mossad and their Zionist agents, the real culprits behind the false-flag terrorism that changed the world. This article will be the final chapter of my book, Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World.
An organization called the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN) is calling for the public to demand that the district attorney of New York County investigate and prosecute those responsible for the destruction of the evidence from the crime scene. This is from their open letter/petition of June 23, 2010 to the district attorney's office: Cy Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York County The supporting documentation provided in this letter/petition from NYC CAN includes the following: “In the month that lapsed between the terrorist attacks and the deployment of the [FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT Team)], a significant amount of steel debris—including most of the steel from the upper floors—was removed from the rubble pile, cut into smaller sections, and either melted at the recycling plant or shipped out of the U.S. Some of the critical pieces of steel—including the suspension trusses from the top of the towers and the internal support columns—were gone before the first BPAT team member ever reached the site. Fortunately, an NSF-funded independent researcher, recognizing that valuable evidence was being destroyed, attempted to intervene with the City of New York to save the valuable artifacts, but the city was unwilling to suspend the recycling contract.”
By September 28, the DDC is publicly known to have been aware of the BPAT’s request for the steel to be saved, however, the decision to recycle the steel stood. I strongly support the NYC CAN petition to prosecute those behind the criminal destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center. My forthcoming article will reveal the key people involved in the terror network behind this crime. In the meantime, I recommend visiting the website of NYC CAN to understand the basis of their appeal for justice and the extent of the criminal destruction of evidence from the World Trade Center: http://www.nyccan.org/join.php
Video of Missile Hitting the Pentagon
September 21, 2010 There is nothing so powerful as truth, and often nothing so strange. A newly released video supposedly containing footage from 9/11 shows a cruise missile, painted to look like a small American Airlines plane, and other footage of a missile hitting the Pentagon. The footage of the missile striking the building also apparently shows an illuminated laser spot on the wall of the Pentagon into which the missile strikes, exactly like we see in the World Trade Center videos. Although the video may very well be fake, partly or completely, if it is genuine it would only further disprove the government version of what happened at the Pentagon.
REAL OR DISINFO?
September 17, 2010 "The Taliban are winning, we are losing."
Nearly twice as many Americans have died fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan than were lost in the 9/11 attacks. The total cost of these long wars will be in the trillions of dollars...The entire national security system has suffered as a result of the wrong-headed actions of the Bush administration in Iraq and the Obama administration in Afghanistan.
The Zionist Gang Behind New York's 9-11 Conference
September 13, 2010 Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. Lenny Charles Labanco is the executive producer of the conference "How the World Changed After 9/11" that was held in New York City on September 11-12. Labanco is the owner of the tax exempt "charitable" organization doing business as INN World Report Inc. Lenny, who is married to a Brazilian Jew named Miriam Tetelbom, was unwilling to discuss the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the terrorism of 9/11 during his two-day conference at Tribeca's Walker Stage. To understand why the evidence of Israeli/Zionist involvement was not on the agenda, one need only look behind the scenes to see the super-Zionists and Orthodox Jews who own and control the Walker Stage -- and Leonard Charles Labanco's I.N.N. World News, a tax exempt non-profit television station.
When a supporter of Bollyn.com wrote to me recently about a 9-11 conference in Manhattan, I was interested in finding out more about the people behind the event. The reader wrote: My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/ I was initially intrigued by the fact that Lenny Charles, the "executive producer" of "How the World Changed After 9/11" seemed to share the same last name as Dan Charles, the young Jew from Colorado who took over the erstwhile Reform Party shortly after Pat Buchanan's presidential campaign in 2000. As a former delegate from Illinois for the Reform Party, I remember how Dan Charles ran desperately to obtain any position possible during the party's national conference in Nashville. He was rejected for the top three positions and finally managed to be elected Treasurer of the party. From that position, Dan Charles soon took over control of America's leading third party and renamed it the America First Party (AFP). Since Charles took control the party has been completely ineffective. To derail the movement appears to have been Charles' mission.
WHO IS LEONARD CHARLES LABANCO? I called Lenny Charles to ask him about the 9-11 conference and his relationship with the WexTrust criminal scam, which evidently was connected to the building at 56 Walker Street where Lenny Charles' I.N.N. World News network is based. In response to the reader's original question, I posted the following comments in my Question and Answer section a few days ago: I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist "War on Terror" and the invasion of Afghanistan. Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of "Who did it?" will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph "Yossi" Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN's 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That's what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.)
MY FIRST COMMENTS I don't know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan's Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa. How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud?
In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here. THE ZIONIST CRIMINAL NETWORK BEHIND THE SCENES AT THE WALKER STAGE As a nine-year veteran of 9-11 research, I have participated in many conferences and organized several by myself. I know that it takes a great deal of time and money to put on a conference. The events that I put on were free symposia held at the Schaumburg public library, where the conference hall was free of charge. Lenny's conference, on the other hand, is not free and will be held in the Walker Stage, a nightclub in the high-rent Tribeca district of Manhattan. Lenny is the contact person/manager of Walker Stage at 56 Walker Street, but the property is owned by an outfit called Walker Street Associates, which is listed as a partnership in court papers with only one name given - Guy Morris. "The building is owned by 56 walker llc period, which is Mr. Morris alone." But that is clearly not what the records show, and the data doesn't lie. The records indicate that 56 Walker LLC is a partnership and that Walker Street Associates is owner of the property. I wondered why court documents never named the other partner(s) of Walker Street Associates, whose identities were kept secret and listed as John Doe (1-10). Why has the real ownership of 56 Walker Street been kept such a secret? Why does the owner of Walker Street Associates hide his identity?
New York City "Job Work Record" documents for 2004 clearly indicate that Guy Morris is a listed owner of 56 Walker Street as a partner in Walker Street Associates (See Row 25, Especially Cells BK-BO in this spreadsheet). The SKG Music and Media company of Lenny Charles is also listed as SG, which probably stands for "Smiling Goat, Inc." a television sound stage that records jazz acts at 56 Walker Street. Smiling Goat, whatever that might mean, is listed with the same phone number as Lenny's nightclub, the Walker Sound Stage. Lenny wrote to me saying that 56 Walker Street is owned by Walker Street, LLC. Both Walker Street, LLC and Walker Street Associates have the same phone number and both have used Greenberg Traurig to lobby on behalf of the company. Walker Street LLC and Associates share the same phone number, (212) 925-4023, and address at 47 Walker Street as Menashe Grossman and Elihu Lipkis and his son Mordy, owners of the Shushana Company, a legally-challenged real estate company. Greenberg Traurig, it should be noted, is the high-power law firm behind getting George W. Bush into the White House after the fraudulent election of 2000. When I asked Lenny who he thought was behind 9-11 he said that he would not speculate to provide an answer. I understood from his answer that his 9-11 conference will not address the key question, "Who did it?" Lenny's response and the general lack of focus of his conference made complete sense when I found the mystery owner of Walker Street Associates. THE ZIONIST MIZEL BROTHERS As it turns out, the real owner, president, and general partner of Walker Street Associates is Steven M. Mizel of the Zionist Mizel family of Tulsa and Denver, Colorado. Business reports in the New York Times and court documents reveal that Mizel is the sole owner of the core business of Walker Street Associates. A SEC document from 1996 says: "Walker Street Investors, Inc. (the "Walker Street"), [is] a company wholly-owned by Steven M. Mizel. The New York Times reported on November 29, 1988: WASHINGTON, Nov. 28— Walker Street Associates L.P., an investment partnership, has acquired a 7.4 percent stake in National Intergroup Inc. and said it might propose a leveraged buyout of the Pittsburgh-based holding company, which has interests in steel, oil and pharmaceuticals. MDC HOLDINGS INC. MDC stands for Mizel Development Corporation, which is headed by Steven's brother Larry, who is founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Larry has also served on the national board of the Israeli lobby, AIPAC. Mizel has also founded a Jewish museum and a rather bizarre propaganda institute on terrorism in Denver.
The Mizel brothers are devoted high-level Zionist agents who are national real estate moguls. They own a real estate company called Richmond American Homes. The Mizel brothers are deeply connected to the Silverado Savings and Loan scam and other Zionist financial crimes of our time. Federal whistle blower Stewart Webb, who was married to Kerre Millman, a family member of the Mizer gang, has done a great deal in researching and exposing this criminal network.
The key point is that the devoted Zionist agent Steven M. Mizel is the owner and power behind the scenes at I.N.N. and the Walker Stage. Lenny Charles' 9-11 conference is just another Zionist effort to hijack the memory of 9-11 by misinterpreting the false-flag terror atrocity that changed the world without asking who really did it or discussing the evidence of Israeli/Zionist involvement. By organizing a high-profile conference in Manhattan on the ninth anniversary of 9-11, Lenny and his Zionist criminal backers seek to hijack and control the discussion of 9-11, but all they have succeeded in doing is to expose the Zionist criminal network behind 9-11 in even greater relief and detail. to be continued... Sources and Recommended Reading: Courtney Mizel Green at Michael Milken Institute, April 26, 2010 Larry A. Mizel Relationship Map Lenny Charles interview with Harold Channer, May 28, 2009 "The Mysterious Case of Lenny Charles", RARWRITER.com, September 2010 "Walker Street Buys 7.4% of Intergroup", New York Times, November 29, 1988 Webb, Stew, "When will the Feds arrest Larry Mizel?" June 3, 2010
The BBC's Bias and Israeli Crimes on the High Seas
September 12, 2010 Anthony Lawson sent me this excellent 15-minute video about the Zionist (pro-Israel) bias in the British Broadcasting Corporation's (BBC) program on the Israeli military assault on the Gaza aid flotilla last May. I highly recommend watching the video to understand how the so-called public broadcasting networks of Britain and the United States are used to convey Zionist propaganda. The BBC is like the PBS television and NPR radio broadcasting networks in the United States wrapped into one, but the BBC is actually more global in its reach than its U.S. counterparts. The Rothschild family has a great deal of influence over the BBC, where a member of the family has often served as a governor on its board. Lawson points out the clear editorial bias of the BBC Panorama "Death in the Med", which may not be so clear to Americans who are used to U.S. television news, which is far more blatant and biased in its coverage of Israel. One has to remember that the Israeli assault on the flotilla was completely illegal, i.e. an act of state piracy, and its boarding of the ship with armed soldiers left 9 Turkish civilians dead. One of those was also an American citizen. Pirates committing a massacre have never gotten off so lightly, but then these are Israeli pirates, after all. The audio track of the communications with the ship presented by the Israelis was clearly falsified to include spliced-in comments about Auschwitz and 9/11. Lawson points out the inconsistency of these remarks with the behavior of the Israeli personnel seen in the footage. The Israelis clearly decided to try to vilify the people on the flotilla with the falsified audio track. Anthony Lawson, who produced the video, included these comments: Whatever happened on the Mavi Marmara on the morning of May 31st, 2010, the BBC's Panorama team failed to give a balanced view of it in its so-called documentary, Death in the Med. Even the title sounds more like that of a paperback mystery, rather than a serious analysis of Israel's worst atrocity since Operation Cast Lead.
Syria Wrongly Blamed for Hariri Murder
September 9, 2010
I have reported since shortly after the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri that there was absolutely no evidence that the popular leader had been killed by Syria, which was wrongly blamed by the Zionist-controlled U.S. media and government. Rather, as I wrote in February 2005, the Hariri murder had all the hallmarks of an Israeli targeted killing designed to be blamed on Syria - a false flag terror attack, just like 9-11. My analysis has now been validated by Hariri's son, Saad Hariri, the current prime minister of Lebanon.
Hariri said he made a mistake when he accused Syria of involvement in his father’s murder and condemned false witnesses for misleading probes and “politicizing the murder.” Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri described Hariri’s remarks as “a window to truth and an important window especially regarding false witnesses.”
Sources and Recommended Reading:
My Final Show on RBN - September 7
September 8, 2010 I am not invited to conferences like the INN conference because these are events that are planned and financed by the same Zionist agents who carried out 9-11. These criminals have no desire to discuss the evidence of WHO really carried out the terror atrocity of the century -- because it points directly to their Zionist crminal network.
Hijacking 9-11 to Wage War on Islam
September 6, 2010 “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” The Zionist false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11 was carried out to kick-start the utterly fraudulent "War on Terror", which is really a "war of terrorism" against Islamic nations and people. The wars that have been waged in the aftermath of 9-11 in Afghanistan and Iraq are really just wars of aggression to conquer and occupy nations in order to steal their valuable minerals and wealth. Nine years later, the memory of 9-11 is being hijacked, once again, to try to convince the public that the atrocity was carried out by Muslims in the face of abundant evidence to the contrary. This is an organized propaganda effort, carried out by the real culprits of 9-11 (e.g. Rupert Murdoch and his fellow Rothschild-funded media moguls) in order to bolster support for the criminal and immensely costly wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I have written about this sophisticated Zionist propaganda ploy in my Questions and Answers section, where it is the second question from the top. The manufactured controversy over the proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero is being used to stir up anti-Islamic passions and Islamophobia in the West. The mass produced "Sharia" signs seen in the recent anti-mosque protest in New York City reveal that this is an organized propaganda effort, not unlike others I have seen about 9-11. I seriously doubt that the women in the photos below have any idea what "Sharia" means. The following three photos, which were taken on August 22, 2010 in Manhattan by Seth Wenig of AP, have been published on the front pages of newspapers around the world and are clearly part of the failing campaign to blame 9-11 on Muslims.
Question and Answer Forum
Updated September 4, 2010 A fair number of good questions come through Feedback to Bollyn.com which are likely to be of interest to other readers, so I have created this Q&A forum. The questions follow with the most recent first. The person who asked about the "Ground Zero" Islamic center "controversy" in New York City sent this kind comment: Thank you very much for your excellent answer. But then, everything you have written is excellent and well researched. You are a real hero and an example of courage and honesty. Most Recent Question: My friend sent me this link about an upcoming 9-11 conference in Manhattan. I wish you were on it. Lenny Charles is putting it together. http://www.howtheworldchanged.org/index.html Bollyn Responds: I was not invited to the 9-11 event being put on by Lenny Charles, owner of INN World News. Judging from the invited speakers and panel subjects, I seriously doubt if his 9-11 event at the Walker Stage will discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement, which is the basis of my thesis about the false flag terror that precipitated the Zionist "War on Terror" and the invasion of Afghanistan. Having spoken with Mr. Charles on September 3, I am even more inclined to believe that the question of "Who did it?" will not be delved into. The Orthodox Jewish and Israeli gangsters (e.g. Joseph "Yossi" Shereshevsky, Amnon Cohen, and Avi Benamu) behind the WexTrust Securities scam are the Jewish criminals who financed the current (secret) owners of INN's 56 Walker St. building. Why are the Israeli partners in the WexTrust fraud being protected by the court and media? Although the Israelis involved in the WexTrust scam are kept concealed and protected, this is clearly the real reason why Lenny Charles is reluctant to discuss the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. The Israeli connection is specifically meant NOT to be on the agenda. That's what controlled media means. Even the alternative media is controlled. Who controls Lenny? (The answer to this crucial question is shocking and will be subject of my next article.) I don't know much about Lenny Charles. He said in a 2009 video interview that he is from New Jersey and that he was educated at the El Paso campus of the University of Texas, which is an unusual place for a kid from New Jersey. Lenny says he was a jazz musician for 25 years before starting INN World News, which is based in a high-rent building in Manhattan's Tribeca neighborhood. How does Lenny manage it? Charles is also listed as representing a company called SKG Media and as the contact person for Walker Stage, located at 56 Walker Street in Manhattan. SKG is often used to refer to the media moguls Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen, but are they the money behind Lenny Charles and INN? Walker Stage is a nightclub owned by 56 Walker LLC, whoever that might be. A search for the owner turns up a host of legal cases that involve 56 Walker LLC and people named Avroham and Joseph Shereshevsky and a sprawling octopus company called Wextrust, which has many holding companies such as WexTrust Capital LLC, doing business in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan in Israel and operating mining operations in Africa. How does Lenny Charles and his 56 Walker Street job fit in with all of this gang, which is clearly involved in criminal fraud? In August 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged WexTrust Capital and its affiliates with fraud, alleging that the company ran a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $255 million by targeting members of the Orthodox Jewish community. The S.E.C. said WexTrust’s principals, Steven Byers and Joseph Shereshevsky, deceived at least 1,196 investors since 2002. The defendants diverted at least $100 million to unauthorized purposes, according to the S.E.C.’s complaint. The SEC charge against WexTrust, a Chicago-based company, can be read here. An interactive time line of the case is here.
Bollyn Responds: BUILDING A MONUMENT TO A FALSEHOOD - This is a sophisticated propaganda ploy by the Rothschild/Zionist-controlled U.S. government and media, designed to underline and cement in the public mind the blatant falsehood that Muslims were responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. This project is founded on the false premise of Muslim guilt and is meant to create a permanent monument to the falsehood that 9-11 was carried out by Islamic terrorists. The people behind this project are the high-level Rothschild agents involved in the Zionist false-flag terrorism and cover-up of 9-11, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Rupert Murdoch, whose sprawling media empire has pushed the lies about 9-11and the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The political support from the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton for this monument reveals it to be a nefarious Zionist plot to hijack the discussion about 9-11 by distracting the public from the real evidence and stirring up anti-Muslim feelings as the ninth anniversary nears. The recent knife attack on the Moslem taxi driver in Manhattan is the kind of reaction such evil plots produce.
The Israeli government's plan to destroy two mosques on the West Bank is a similar action of the same strategy, which is meant to cause violence and increase tension and hostility against Islam. The Israeli announcement of the outrageous plan to destroy the mosques, which are on Palestinian administered territory in the West Bank, is clearly designed to scuttle - with violence - the planned peace talks in September. Why else would they even consider taking such a unnecessary, self-defeating, and provocative action at this crucial time, especially during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan? Tibor Rosenbaum, a MOSSAD agent and head of the Geneva based Banque du Credit International. This bank was the forerunner to the notorious Bank of Credit and Commerce international (BCCI) which is a major intelligence drug money laundering bank. 'Life' magazine exposed Rosenbaum's bank as a money launderer for the Meyer Lanksky American organised crime family and Tibor Rosenbaum funded and supported 'Permindex' the MI6 assassination unit which was at the heart of the John F. Kennedy assassination. Source: "MI6 Are The Lords of the Global Drug Trade", by James Casbolt (Former MI6 Agent c. 2006) http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4540
When Rosenbaum’s criminal bank (where Zakheim worked) was exposed in the mainstream media in 1975 (e.g. TIME magazine), Zakheim, an agent of the Rothschilds, was brought to Washington and began his new career as an associate analyst of National Security and International Affairs with the Congressional Budget Office. Who did a background check on Dov Zakheim? Zakheim’s most peculiar move from being a senior executive in a criminal Mossad banking enterprise to a position with the U.S. government happened under the reign of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the Rothschild's senior agent in the U.S. government.
At a restaurant in Iowa we talked with our waitress who had refused to go back to Iraq after the army had made her drive trucks up and down "suicide alley" - after they had coaxed her to sign up with a $10,000 bonus. She had been promised that she would have a safe secretarial job but soon found herself driving in fuel convoys on the most treacherous highway in Iraq. They had lied to her and when she came home for a visit, she refused to go back. The army wanted the $10,000 back. I know men who have committed mass murder. Two that come to mind were young men during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, twenty eight years ago. One was a young Israeli from Kibbutz Afikim in the Jordan Valley, where I worked as a lifeguard at the pool. I had known this fellow since he was about 13. His family had migrated to Israel from Argentina and he was a big and friendly boy, at least until he was forced to fight in Lebanon. Later, he confessed to me about the murders he had committed of whole families in Lebanon during the war. He had been a member of a tank crew and as they drove through Lebanon families would come out of their homes with white flags. He had been commanded to fire at them, which he did. He was very tormented by these unjustified killings and he needed to tell me what he had done. I felt sorry for him. More recently, I met a fellow who was involved in the massacre of Palestinians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila. Again, without asking, this person told me what he had done. When he showed me his scars on his arms and told me that he had been in Sabra and Shatila, I was quite shocked. These massacres are among the most horrific war crimes committed by Israel during my life. This man was only 15 years old when he murdered many innocent people. He is a Maronite Christian who joined the Phalange (with Elie Hobeika's unit) when he was a 13-year-old boy. At that tender age, he was given military training in Israel at Nahariya in 1980. When the Phalange leader Bachir Gemayel was murdered on September 14, 1982, Ariel Sharon sent the Phalange into the Palestinian camps of West Beirut, which the Israeli forces had completely surrounded. The Phalangists, with assistance and support from Israeli forces, massacred with knives thousands of defenseless refugees during a period of three days. The 15-year-old had been deceived by Ariel Sharon and the Israeli Mossad that the Palestinians were responsible for the Gemayel murder. The Israeli military had trained this 13-year-old boy to kill and then used him to murder innocent Palestinians, a crime he will be burdened with forever. Bollyn Responds: This is a good point. First, this boy was only 13 when he was trained by Israelis in Israel. His Phalangist unit was given military training for three months in Nahariya. He was not trained to massacre Palestinians with knives, which is what he and his unit did in Sabra and Shatila. The Israelis cultivated Maronite hatred against the Palestinians with the murder of Bachir Gemayel, as well as previous massacres and killings. Elie Hobeika, the leader of the boy's militia unit, had secret information on what had really gone on in the camps and was ready to tell it to a court in Brussels when he was blown up in a huge car bomb in Lebanon. Of course the actions of the boy were criminal, but I consider the real criminals to be the ones who train 13-year-old Lebanese boys and arrange such massacres in the first place and that responsibility falls squarely on the Israeli military leadership, which was the occupying power controlling access to the camps.
Rothschild was sent into the B'nai B'rith shortly after its founding to launch a ''membership drive" because, as he himself put it, "the members were not all equally well educated and of far different mental capacities." In short, B'nai B'rith was not for just any Jew. Through Rothschild's building job, it was to become an intelligence executive body, whose leaders would subsequently play controlling roles in other British networks, directing the Abolitionist-Slaveholder confrontations of the 1840s and 1850s, the Secession of the South that produced the Civil War, the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, and numerous post-war destabilizations of the American Republic. - “B'nai B'rith, British Weapon Against America”, by Paul Goldstein, The Campaigner, December 1978 Revolutions are usually associated with violence, but they don't have to be. Since 1990, half the nations of Europe and Asia have gone through peaceful revolutions that replaced the former dictatorships of the once mighty Soviet Union. The apartheid regime of South Africa also came to an end without violence. The revolution to restore the sovereignty of the American people certainly need not be violent, and really should not be. This is an excellent question and most appropriate for July 4, when we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which articulates the fundamental political philosophy of the American Revolution. I am in complete agreement with the signers of July 4, 1776: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
I think the American form of government, as enshrined in the Constitution, is a truly excellent system of government. The U.S. Constitution has been adopted by other nations. Switzerland, for example, used the U.S. Constitution as their model and it has worked very well. The primary difference is that in Switzerland the legislative branch has more power than the executive branch. They did not want an all-powerful president, which I think was a wise decision. In the United States, the executive branch has far too much power having taken over powers that rightfully belong with the people's representatives. The right to declare war, for example, belongs to the U.S. Congress - not the president. Question: RE: “Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?”
Sociopaths never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behavior as permissible. They may appear to be charming, but are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims. They have no problem lying and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. They can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises. They are unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them. They believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, and entitled to every wish. They show no sense of personal boundaries and have no concern for their impact on others. They may even state that their goal is to rule the world. Their goal is the enslavement of their victim(s) and they seek to exercise despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life. The sociopath does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed. A sociopath does not perceive that anything is wrong with them. There is a disregard for and violation of the right's of others, those right's considered normal by the local culture (or international law). ASPD is indicated by at least three of the following. I have indicated those behaviors which A. Repeated acts that could lead to arrest. ( B. Conning for pleasure or profit, repeated lying, or the use of aliases. ( C. Failure to plan ahead or being impulsive. ( D. Repeated assaults on others. ( E. Reckless when it comes to their or others safety. (The aggressive and illegal actions of the Israeli state put all Israelis and Jews at risk. They claim to be acting on behalf of the Jewish people but their reckless actions increase the dangers for all Jews, even those who have nothing to do with F. Poor work behavior or failure to honor financial obligations. ( G. Rationalizing the pain they inflict on others. ( If one considers the behavior of the state of Israel, as expressed through the actions and words of its leaders, especially since the late-1970s when the extreme right-wing Likud Party came to power, one can easily see that Israel – as a state – displays all the symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. It should be remembered that the Likud Party of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is the political party of the former Irgun terrorists, headed by such notorious Zionist terrorists as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. A political party founded by mass murderers and terrorists certainly must be seen as having antisocial tendencies. Although many clinicians use the terms psychopath and sociopath interchangeably, a sociopath's criminal behavior is shaped by social forces and is the result of a dysfunctional environment, according to psychopath expert Robert Hare in his book Without Conscience. Orthodox Judaism as defined by the rabbis (i.e. Talmudic teaching) is the basis of the "antisocial religion," which is the origin of the "social forces" and "dysfunctional environment" behind the antisocial personality disorder of the state of The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies. Question: How do you prove if a person has been exposed to Depleted Uranium (DU) and what can a person do about the health problems it causes, such as brittle teeth? Does the Veterans Administration (VA) have a policy to help and compensate veterans? I am a retired Army officer, my son was in Iraq with the first group that went in. He was there for 13 months. His job included evacuation of blown out damaged and destroyed armor vehicles, artillery, and tanks from the battle field along with moving troops in and out the front lines. He has a series of health issues that I believe are a result of his time in Iraq (including brittle teeth since he returned) and it is taking a toll. I find it hard for the VA not to acknowledge there is a problem when there is so much documentation and research on the subject. Something needs to be done to help veterans like my son with this. Health Problems Associated with Depleted Uranium Source: http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/depleted_uranium/index.asp Although the VA claims it has found "no health problems" from DU exposure, the following section on VA Benefits certainly says otherwise: "Veterans who were exposed to depleted uranium during military service may be eligible for health care benefits." The VA also says it provides "disability compensation benefits for disabilities that VA determines are associated with depleted uranium exposure."
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?
Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.
Question of April 14: In human history, are you aware of examples in which the entire population of a country believed in a lie for years, then discovered the lie? Does recognition of truth happen rapidly? What is the usual outcome? What do you predict Mr. Bollyn?
Bollyn Responds: Big lies are really not that unusual, especially when massacres are involved. History is littered with them. The Katyn Massacre comes to mind. The recent crash of the plane of the Polish president and 96 others has brought this extremely painful “Big Lie” back into the spotlight. The Katyn Massacre was the mass murder of some 22,000 Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police, a massacre which had been approved by the entire Soviet Politburo, including Joseph Stalin, Britain's ally in its "unnecessary war" against Germany. Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in 1943 and was immediately blamed - without a single stitch of evidence - by the Allies and Western media for the atrocity. Hitler actually called for an investigation into the killings, although it was not until 1990 that the Soviet Union officially acknowledged and condemned the perpetration of the killings by the Soviet NKVD, and the subsequent cover-up.
The massacre and terror atrocity of 9-11 are very similar to the Katyn Massacre. The blame was wrongly placed on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida - without any evidence - in order to usher in the pre-planned "War on Terror" with an illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and subsequently Iraq. The crucial evidence of the crime of 9-11 was quickly destroyed and a politically controlled non-investigation managed under the direction of Michael Chertoff, a dedicated agent of the actual culprits - Israeli intelligence and their Zionist quislings in the United States.
The Zionist-controlled media ignored the evidence of Israeli involvement and pushed the official version, which is really nothing more than a pack of lies. Nothing good will ever come from such evil deceit, and nothing good has come from the lies surrounding 9-11. For more than 8 years the world has been deceived about what really happened on 11 September 2001 and why we are engaged in the War on Terror - but the truth is coming out. The dam of lies and deceit is breaking and it is no longer possible to hold back the Truth. The culprits and those who have assisted the cover-up are becoming very uncomfortable. The liars and rats of the 9-11 deception will be washed away by the flood waters of Truth.
Comment of April 9: Dear Mr Bollyn. I am one of your fans. I thought you would like this article, in case you did not read it yet. I wonder if Mr. Wilkerson [Col. Lawrence B.] might be one of many "whistle blowers" who come to light in coming weeks and months? George W. Bush 'knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent'  Donald Rumsfeld believed that releasing the innocent detainees would harm the Administration, according to a signed declaration by a top aide to Colin Powell. The accusations were made by Lawrence Wilkerson, a top aide to Colin Powell, the former Republican Secretary of State, in a signed declaration to support a lawsuit filed by a Guantánamo detainee. It is the first time that such allegations have been made by a senior member of the Bush Administration. Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.  Who said never again? Guantanamo is a real concentration camp in our time. Children as young as 12 and 13 and elderly as old as 92 or 93 were taken to Gitmo. Why are the people behind this outrageous crime being protected from prosecution? When will President Obama close the Gitmo Gulag and begin an investigation of the abuses committed there? Why delay what has to be done? Answer: Yes, there will certainly be others coming forward who will expose the lies and deception of 9-11 and the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror." The real question is when and what kind of legal action will follow to investigate and punish those who are really behind 9-11 and the subsequent "War on Terror" that has destroyed so many lives? I recommend Andy Worthington's article of April 14. “Wilkerson Demolishes Bush, Cheney, And Rumsfeld’s Lies About Guantanamo” in The Public Record: For Col. Wilkerson, who remains “extremely concerned that the Armed Forces of the United States, where I spent 31 years of my professional life, were deeply involved in these tragic mistakes,” the need for accountability has a particularly personal meaning, but for the rest of us, it should be no less important that torture was used to justify an illegal war, that it infected the U.S. military, that those who authorized it remain free to continue spreading their poisonous lies (in Dick Cheney’s case, at least), and that men continue to languish in Guantánamo as a result of it — and also as a result of the Obama administration’s unwillingness, or refusal to confront the very facts that Col. Wilkerson has disclosed. Worthington's article is at: Question of April 6: Dear Mr. Bollyn, Question of April 2: I just listened to Dr. Sabrosky's broadcast. He was pretty convincing although I felt he was a little short on details. He seemed to place a great deal of his case on the fall of WTC 7, but never once did he say anything about Larry Silverstein and only one very brief mention of nano-thermite. 9-11 was such a complicated operation and required the cooperation of many people. I'm sure you have told us before, but why was it necessary to bring down WTC 7? The fall of WTC 7 is so obviously controlled demolition, why would those responsible take the risk of exposing their crime by demolishing 7 in this way? There had to have been something in that building that was so important to make it worth their great risk to demolish it. Or did they simply feel so confident that they could do this in plain sight and have complete confidence in their control of our government and media?
IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period. If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering - and the suffering we have inflicted on others - is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault. Answer: In the video clip, Dr. Alan Sabrosky (who says that he has Jewish ancestors) claims he has informed people at the highest levels of the U.S. military that Israeli Mossad criminals are behind 9-11. He says that most of the people in the U.S. military brass were not aware of Israel's role in 9-11 and are truly shocked and enraged when they realize that the U.S. has been duped and deceived by Israeli intelligence. I don't doubt that for a minute. I believe that the 9-11 deception was not understood by the people at the top. This is why the title of my book is Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World. Question of March 17: Just today, Wayne Madsen has disclosed another very important link in the chain of evidence: he reports that an El Al 747 departed from JFK for Tel Aviv at 4:11 p.m. on 9/11/2001 and it was full. Would you please pause for a moment to contemplate the evidentiary significance of confirming the complete list of passengers who embarked for Tel Aviv on that unauthorized flight? Question and Comment: With the information that is now available, why has the insurance company that paid off on Lucky Larry’s [Silverstein] fraudulent World Trade Center terrorism claim not made some kind of effort to get their money back? Hope you can provide some insight on this. I would also like to comment on my view of the state of the world. Obviously things were not “hunky dory” prior to 9-11, but since that fateful day, the criminal network has been given a blank check to do anything. The American populace seems asleep, thinking only of shopping, sports, money – just making it through their own lives. One thing that needs to be understood about the ownership of the WTC towers is that agents of the state of Israel became the de facto owners of the WTC when Silverstein took control of the towers in late July 2001. "Sources in the Port Authority intimated that even though they were still in the vicinity, Silverstein was in control," Haaretz reported in its 2001 article, "Up in smoke". Through the Silverstein takeover, which was supervised by Lewis Eisenberg of the Port Authority, agents of Israeli intelligence gained access and complete control of the WTC property that was the target of their carefully planned terrorist attack.
The Silverstein takeover was essential to the Israeli's evil plan because in order to carry out such a sophisticated false-flag terror operation with complete security, owning the property was a requirement. Here are the three principal agents of the takeover:
Comment of March 8: Chris, just wanted you to see this article....dang, I don't understand people lying about you this way, just wanted you to see it, thank you, and keep up the good work, N. If Bollyn really were an honest truth teller and genuine investigative journalist, he would not be lying like this. And if a supposedly honest journalist is known to be lying about some matters of fact, how can his word be trusted on anything? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. It is interesting that Piper and Eric Hufschmid are doing the exact same thing, albeit in different ways. Hufschmid claims that I have been kidnapped and that my articles are being written by the Mossad, while Piper calls me a liar and intelligence operative. Both of them want to sow suspicion, which once planted in a reader's mind, is very difficult to remove. But, what have I done to deserve this treatment?
It should be noted that Piper sent me a very nasty email in December 2001 as we prepared to go to Moscow for a 9-11 conference. I thought at the time that it couldn't possibly be from Piper and that someone must have hacked into his mailbox, but I now realize that this is exactly how he operates. He acts like he has a license to lie. He has never been a friend of mine.
This is an interesting question, which I will look into. What is very interesting about Barbara Bracher is that she earned her Juris Doctor at Yeshiva University in New York City. Yeshiva University is a private Jewish school which is very Jewish. Why would a young Catholic girl, who had worked for H.B.O. and Stacy Keach in Hollywood, choose to study law at Yeshiva University? It is possible that Barb Olson has Jewish roots and that this is why she chose Yeshiva University. Another odd thing about Barbara Bracher is that she lived in McLean, Virginia in the early 1990s which makes one wonder if she was working for the C.I.A. While Barbara Olson had very close connections to orthodox Jews and Zionism, her husband actually worked to protect the crimes of the state of Israel when he defended the Israeli spy, Jonathan Jay Pollard. How did he get that case - and why did he take it? Ted and Barbara Olson's ties to Israeli intelligence need to be taken into consideration when pondering their roles in the false flag terror of 9-11. In her third year of law school [Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University], Barbara somehow managed to finesse herself into an internship in the Department of Justice in Washington. And, as a very brassy and gutsy intern, she managed to be the only employee of the government of the United States willing, feisty, and fearless enough to personally serve the papers on the PLO mission to the United Nations in New York announcing that it was being expelled from this country—because they were terrorists. How proud Barbara was to tell that story to her friends at Cardozo! Question of March 2: Have you heard that it is very possible that Dr. Steven Jones and his nano-thermite theory could very well be misleading the 9/11 Truth Movement down a false path? Dr. Judy Wood theorizes that a Directed Energy Weapon was used to turn the steel into dust. Her theory is very compelling, and this could very well explain why Steven Jones has gotten so far with his nano-thermite theory.
Comment: I am reading your book, Solving 9/11. Your quote attributed to Menachem Begin "We are the master race" supposedly delivered at a meeting of the Knesset seems far fetched. Did you check the source of that quote? I did a little checking and read that it was invented by Texe Marrs. Do you have any sources for the quote? Thanks, your work is fascinating. Bollyn Responds: The addition of the Begin quote was a recent change. Since the quote cannot be sourced, I have removed it. The text now uses the Begin quote from Kapeliouk’s article: "[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs." - Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the 'Beasts,"' New Statesman, June 25, 1982. Comment from a Gulf War Vet:
Question: Do you post or send articles to Rense and Jones? Did look, can't find much recent. Question: Can't even say in words how much I appreciate such extremely rare honest reporting in these dangerous times! Suggestion: Times are tough--can you add a $5 button to the array of PayPal buttons for donations, since even $10 might be too out of reach for some?
Bollyn on Iranian TV and Radio
August 26, 2010 THE ZIONIST OCCUPATION OF JERUSALEM
Making Sense of the Media Cover-Up of 9-11
August 25, 2010 The theory of the free press is not that the truth will be presented completely or perfectly in any one instance, but that the truth will emerge from free discussion.
Anyone who has looked at the events of 9-11 knows there are basically two competing histories. First, there is the official version, presented by President George W. Bush in a speech given shortly after the attacks and bolstered by the appointed 9-11 commission, that Muslim terrorists were responsible for the death and destruction. This version has since been adopted and supported by the Obama administration and virtually every member of Congress. For nine years, in lockstep with the government, the mass media has followed a strategy of concealment of the facts and evidence that contradict the official version. The media cover-up is meant to protect and bolster the official version of the terror atrocity by preventing the general public from being aware of the facts. By censoring any serious discussion of the evidence, the mass media has protected the criminal scheme and those who carried out the terror atrocity of our time. IS THE PRESS FREE? Paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell. To grasp what is meant by the term "media cover-up", let's start with a simple question: Are the reporters and writers in the mainstream media free to discuss the pertinent facts and evidence of 9-11, or is this discussion being controlled and censored by a hidden hand? By "mainstream media" I simply mean the large national networks of print, television, and radio news outlets. These are the well known commercial and "public" media networks that inform and entertain Americans on a daily basis. For many Americans these mass media outlets actually define their reality. For these people, a subject is not considered "real" until it has been discussed and approved by the talking heads on the news programs they consume. Although 9-11 ranks as one of the most outrageous criminal atrocities of all time, there is a long list of unanswered questions that the mainstream media avoids. As an independent journalist, I have covered many 9-11 events and discoveries that have been completely ignored by the mainstream media. The media's refusal to cover significant 9-11 events has often been the subject of my articles, e.g. "Mass Media Avoids Questions about 9-11" (2002) and "How the Controlled Press Avoids 9-11 Truth" (2005).
IGNORING THE FACTS A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people. In March 2009, Professor Steven E. Jones of Brigham Young University published photographic evidence of an extremely explosive compound of super-thermite, which he discovered in large amounts in the dust of the pulverized Twin Towers. The chips of super-thermite were fragments of a bi-layered coating, made using nanotechnology and applied to the interior surfaces of the Twin Towers.
While this discovery explains the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and the steel pans that held them, it also exposes the falseness of the government claim that burning jet fuel caused the towers to collapse. Like the many unanswered questions about the demolition of the three towers of the World Trade Center, Jones' crucial discovery has been completely avoided by both the government and the media. How can such an important discovery be ignored by the government and media in a free and open society? If the editors and journalists employed by the thousands of newspapers, magazines, television and radio stations across the United States were truly free to discuss the relevant facts and evidence of 9-11, how could it be that not a single national news outlet has covered Dr. Jones' published discovery of super-thermite after two years? The press is the hired agent of a monied system, and set up for no other purpose than to tell lies where their interests are involved. One can trust nobody and nothing. Ehud Olmert, the Israeli mayor of Jerusalem, was in New York City on the very eve of 9-11 and was probably in the city during the attacks, something I discovered several years ago. As the mayor of New York's sister city, Olmert (from the hard-line Likud, the party founded by Zionist terrorists) later made a high-profile sympathy visit to New York City about 10 days after the attacks, yet the Jewish-owned newspapers and tabloids of New York City completely ignored Olmert's visit to their city the day before the attacks, something they and Mayor Rudy Giuliani certainly must have known about. How can this be? Why would the visit by a high-level Israeli politician to New York on the eve of 9-11 be kept out of the press – especially after the fact?
If the press in the United States were truly free, it would mean that thousands of news editors from each and every media outlet have consistently made the same decision that important 9-11 discoveries, events, and facts were not to be discussed in their newspaper, magazine, television or radio network. Because this is not possible, it must be that a hidden hand dictates what is reported about 9-11 in the mainstream media. THE NATURE OF THE HIDDEN HAND The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. Having concluded that the mass media in the United States is controlled, we should ask who controls it, and how. Considering the air-tight media cover-up of 9-11, what can we discern about the nature of the hidden hand controlling the media? Using Socratic dialectic we can ask questions and use logic to identify the nature of the power controlling the media. Our first question would be: Is the control mechanism external or internal? Has an outside force, such as the government, imposed itself upon the media in order to stifle coverage of 9-11, or is the media controlled from within? While governments certainly do suppress and censor media coverage, it is highly unlikely that the U.S. government is behind the media censorship of 9-11. Any government edict of that sort would have been discovered and exposed during the past nine years. Therefore, we can conclude that the control mechanism must be internal and intrinsic to the ownership of the media. Having concluded that the controlling hand is intrinsic to the ownership of the media, we need to determine if the various owners of the major media networks are independent of each other or are they somehow united in a conspiracy to cover-up the truth of 9-11 and deceive the public? Judging from the 9-11 cover-up, which has been complete and universal throughout the mass media for nine years, we can see that the owners are united in purpose and working in concert. That is to say that the owners of the commercial media networks and directors of the public broadcasting system are all working under the same hidden hand. There is no dissent. The controlling power is pervasive throughout the media sphere of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and Europe. Given today's consolidation of the global media, one individual such as Rupert Murdoch of News Corporation may own hundreds of newspapers, magazines, and television stations around the world. But Rupert Murdoch must be controlled by the same hidden hand as the owners of Time Warner (CNN), CBS Corporation, and the other media networks.
What else can we tell about the secret organization that the owners of the media belong to? One of the most conspicuous and peculiar characteristics of the U.S. media is its unquestioning support of Zionism and the state of Israel. Although Israel is a tiny state, about the same size as Slovenia or Albania, it is always discussed in the U.S. mass media, but its overtly racist policies and blatant war crimes are never criticized. The mainstream media in the United States is actually more supportive of the hard-line Zionist policies of Israel's Likud extremists than the Israeli press, which indicates that the secret organization behind the media must be extremely Zionist and pro-Israel by ideology. As explained in my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World, there is a great deal of evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the "false flag" terror attacks of 9-11 – and the criminal destruction of evidence and cover-up that followed. Having concluded that the owners of the mass media networks are bound together in a secret Zionist organization, we can now understand how it is that they are in complete agreement in their refusal to cover or publish anything that would question the official version and shed light on the evidence of Zionist involvement in the terror atrocity that killed thousands of Americans on 9-11. This is evidently what the elders of their secret organization have ordered and what they must do. Is there a secret international Zionist brotherhood of prominent Jewish men? Actually there are several, the largest being the International Order of B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant), which was founded in New York City in 1843. The first lodge was founded by twelve German Jews and sponsored by a Baruch Rothschild, a member of the Rothschild family, who came to America on a mission to organize the creation of a Jewish brotherhood of Freemasons.
There is nothing so despicable as a secret society that is based upon religious prejudice and that will attempt to defeat a man because of his religious beliefs. Such a society is like a cockroach -- it thrives in the dark. So do those who combine for such an end. While the B'nai B'rith is an exclusively Jewish brotherhood closed to all non-Jews, members of the B'nai B'rith are often the highest-level members of other orders of Freemasonry. This means that members of the Jewish secret society are free to join and hold the highest positions in other non-Jewish orders. This relationship of a secret society within a secret society explains how Jewish members of B'nai B'rith can control any other order of Freemasons. This is a pattern that is commonly seen in Zionist history. The Zionist movement has always been run by secret societies. The B'ne Moshe, for example, was the secret order behind the Hoveve Zion (Lovers of Zion) movement, with chapters in Russia and Poland in the late 1800s. The B'ne Moshe was founded in Odessa in 1889 and its statement of policy written by Ahad Ha'Am (a.k.a. Asher Zvi Ginzberg). The order was composed of an "elite body" of Zionists who "would serve their people with complete unselfishness and devotion and prepare it for national rebirth in the ancestral Homeland", according to the Encyclopedia of Zionism and Israel. "Membership was not open to all but was limited to men of high moral caliber. New entrants were inducted in a solemn ceremony and sworn to observe the order's rules and to keep its existence secret." The B'nai B'rith is a secret society very much like the B'ne Moshe. It is an international secret brotherhood of Zionists whose stated goal is to support the state of Israel. The B'nai B'rith is a Masonic-like organization that has more than 500,000 members in 58 nations. Despite the fact that it is an international organization that works on behalf of a foreign state, the B'nai B'rith enjoys the tax exemptions of a non-profit charitable organization. The B'nai B'rith is also the parent organization behind the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which liaises, trains, and informs police departments, prosecutors, and judges across the United States. As an independent journalist writing about 9-11, I was first accused by the ADL in late 2001 of anti-Semitism because of my articles about the evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11. Although I wrote for the Washington-based American Free Press, which was extremely careful about what it published and had never published anything that could be construed as anti-Semitic, the owner of the paper did not sue the ADL for defamation. This is probably because the owner of the paper was himself a Zionist lawyer named Mark Lane.* Later, I received the same kind of treatment from Murdoch's FOX News and CNN in interviews in which they pretended to be interested in the facts about 9-11, but were actually set-up to smear me as an anti-Semite. The CNN television interview was chopped and only presented in small bits so that the listener heard none of the context. An ADL spokesman was spliced in to give the impression that I was an anti-Semite. This show aired the night before my trial was scheduled to begin in January 2007.
When my trial finally began in June 2007, I realized that the B'nai B'rith and the ADL had influence or control over the local police who had attacked me at my home, the Jewish prosecutor, the Jewish judge and his clerk, who instructed the jury. The prosecutor – in the middle of America - had even stated that he was prosecuting me because of my writings. Although the police attack was highly irregular and despite the fact that I had ample evidence of a police conspiracy to attack and injure me, I was powerless to defend myself in a system in which a secret society controls all the levers of power - in the court and the media. When all was said and done, although the police clearly lied on the stand and presented fabricated evidence, I was found guilty on both misdemeanor charges. Having gone through a brutal attack by undercover police and the long hellish process of a rigged trial, I then faced sentencing at the hands of the corrupt Zionist judge, a situation which compelled us to leave our happy home in order to preserve the safety and security of our family. Sources and Recommended Reading Bollyn, "The Mass Media and the 9-11 Cover-Up", Solving 9-11 (Chapter VIII) Bollyn, "How the Controlled Press Avoids 9-11 Truth", August 25, 2005 Bollyn, "The Jewish Secret Society That Controls the U.S. Media", December 1, 2009 Icke, David, "The Zionist Elephant In The Room", David Icke Newsletter, June 14, 2009 Makow, Henry, "Illuminati Created the U.S. to Advance New World Order", March 29, 2010
Firefighters Call for 9-11 Truth
Double Vendetta - The Insanity of the Iran Confrontation
August 11, 2010 WARS BASED ON LIES The United States has waged war in Afghanistan for nearly 9 years based on a pack of lies that Osama Bin Laden, based in Afghanistan, carried out 9/11, while the U.S. government ignores the proof that the World Trade Center was pulverized using an extremely advanced nano-composite form of Super-Thermite.
Continuing the deception of the previous administration, President Barack Obama has adopted the false premise of the illegal war in Afghanistan and escalated the effort to conquer the Central Asian nation. Meanwhile, at the behest of his Zionist masters and based on a new pack of lies, Obama is beating the Zionist drums for war against Iran, a nation that has not aggressed any other nation in living memory. How can we stop the madness?
9/11 Litigation Update - Justice Denied - One Case Left
August 11, 2010 It was murder. We will never get over it. Update Note: On August 5, I spoke with both the father and mother of 9/11 victim Sara Elizabeth Low and was left with the understanding that the Low family case was not settled and that there were two cases remaining. This is, however, evidently not the case. As I have seen in other cases, the 9/11 relatives are under very strict instructions not to talk about their cases - even after they have settled - and they don't. I can't imagine how the families of the 9/11 victims are threatened to stay silent. It must be that they are in fear of being charged with a crime, not unlike the way that U.S. military personnel are silenced about what they do in Iraq and Afghanistan.
There are thousands of American families who lost loved ones on 9/11. All of those families had the right to use the courts to sue the airlines and the "airport security" companies whose failure contributed directly to the deaths of their loved ones, at least according to the official story. Chief among these defendants in the 9/11 tort litigation is Huntleigh
A Boston Herald article, dated 6 March 2010, reported: "A Manhattan judge is being vilified by the grieving family of a Boston flight attendant murdered in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks because they say he has blocked a public trial, forcing them to give up the fight." The family of Sara Low, 28, who died "a hero" battling the terrorists aboard American Airlines Flight 11, announced they have reached an out-of-court settlement.
Bavis was a pro hockey scout for the L.A. Kings who died on United Airlines Flight 175, which left Logan and slammed into the World Trade Center.
The other 95 cases have all settled out of court. The 9/11 tort litigation process has been a legal war of attrition between U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein and the 9/11 relatives, and the Zionist judge has prevailed by eliminating the wrongful death lawsuits one-by-one. Hellerstein's son is an Israeli lawyer who works for a law firm that works for the parent company of ICTS. This presents a clear-cut and criminal conflict of interest for the judge but the lawyers who represent the 9/11 relatives don't seem willing or able to do anything about it. The conflict of interest affects not only the relatives of the 9/11 victims. It taints the entire judicial process surrounding 9/11 and all related terrorism issues, which Hellerstein also oversees.
The Bavis family is a devout Catholic family and Mary said that her "faith and prayers" have helped her in her struggle for the truth. "We'll make it", she said, and expressed her wish that the American public would support the 9/11 relatives who are fighting for a public trial. "We are fighting for the truth," she said, "I hope there are people out there who want the truth."
Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "Giuliani & D'Amato - Tied to Israeli Military Intelligence", October 5, 2007
9/11 & Nine Years of Deception and War
Updated: August 9, 2010
NINE YEARS OF DECEPTION Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Nine years ago this week Larry Silverstein and his partner, the former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, closed the deal on the 99-year lease of the World Trade Center. Silverstein and Lowy, devoted agents of the state of Israel and its Zionist fund-raising organizations in New York, immediately had their leased WTC property and future rental earnings insured against a terror attack exactly like that which occurred only seven weeks later. Having obtained the lease with borrowed funds, Silverstein promptly raised rents forty percent. Unlike the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein actually owned WTC 7, the 47-story building that fell straight down into its footprint at about 5:25 p.m. on 9-11, in what was clearly a controlled demolition. All three towers demolished on 9-11 were under Silverstein's control and although he openly admitted on camera that he had decided to "pull" WTC 7, his revealing comments have never been investigated by the authorities of New York City or the federal government. Whoever placed the super-thermite and other explosive charges in the Twin Towers probably did so during the seven weeks before 9-11, when Silverstein completely controlled access to the towers. Apart from all the other questions, Silverstein has never been held to account for the fact that the escape doors to the roof of both towers had been locked. Why were rooftop evacuations not attempted?
In the following video Silverstein comments on his decision to "pull" WTC 7: CONFRONTING LARRY SILVERSTEIN AND THE ZIONIST CRIMINAL NETWORK While Larry Silverstein is certainly one of the key players in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, it is unlikely that he is one of the high-level architects of the master plan behind the terror atrocity. He is more likely to be a Mossad operative known as a sayan, a devoted Zionist Jew and "useful idiot" who carried out an essential function in a large and complex operation. The master plan behind the "false-flag" terrorism of 9-11 was to deceive the U.S. government and western nations into occupying Afghanistan and waging an open-ended "War on Terror" against those Middle Eastern nations that resist the hegemony of the Rothschild-funded Zionist state of Israel. Ehud Barak, the current defense minister of Israel, was the first person to call for a U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, which he did on the Rothschild-controlled BBC World television network only minutes after the towers were demolished.
"There is a much larger group behind these [9/11 attacks] which is the international banking cartel which controls trillions of dollars and which has an interest in controlling countries in the Middle East which are not under their control." The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is more than 1 trillion U.S. dollars. (See - http://costofwar.com/) The war in Afghanistan has already cost U.S. taxpayers more than 286 thousand million (billion) dollars, while the war in Iraq has burned up some 736 thousand million (billion) dollars. One out of five children in the USA live in poverty and tens of millions are unable to afford health care. The debt of the United States has more than doubled since 2001 and is now so large that all the money taken in by the collection of income tax is not enough to pay the interest on that debt. All of the federal debt and the immense sums that have been wasted on the disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are "borrowed" funds, i.e. money created by commercial banks like those owned by the house of Rothschild, which has a two-hundred year history of instigating war for profit. Zionism, the ideology of Jewish nationalism and racial segregation, was not something that simply cropped up among the Jews of Eastern Europe and the Russian Empire. The ideology of political and religious Zionism was cultivated by the Rothschilds over a period of decades in the Jewish communities of Eastern Europe. The Rothschilds realized that through Zionism they could obtain a Jewish state which could serve their purposes. To spread the Zionist ideology among the Jews of Eastern Europe they employed the secret Masonic organization of Jewish Zionists, the International Order of B'nai B'rith, which they had founded with fellow German Jews in New York in 1843. Benjamin Peixotto, grand master of the International Order of B’nai B’rith in 1863, spent six years in Rumania recruiting Jews to Zionism and Jewish Masonry. In Rumania, Peixotto founded the Society of Zion, a branch organization of the B'nai B'rith. Through these Jewish Masonic organizations, Peixotto was instrumental in bringing many Romanian Jews, like the family of Michael Chertoff, to Cleveland. The Rothschilds fostered the B'nai B'rith and Zionism because they realized that these could be useful tools to increase their wealth and power. A Zionist state in Palestine, beside the Suez Canal, would serve their global interests in the oil-rich and strategic Middle East. Edmond James de Rothschild fostered the Zionist movement from the beginning by sponsoring organizations like the Hovevei Zion (Lovers of Zion) in Poland and other parts of the Russian Empire in the 1880s. Avigdor Gruen, the father of David (Gruen) Ben-Gurion, was a leader in the Rothschild-funded Hovevei Zion movement in Warsaw. Leon Pinsker was another founder of Hovevei Zion and became chairman of the movement with the backing of Baron Edmond James de Rothschild. Avigdor's son, David, grew up to be an ardent Zionist and the "father of the state of Israel." As a college student in Warsaw in 1904, David Gruen joined the Marxist Poale Zion movement and was arrested twice during the Russian Revolution of 1905 before migrating to Palestine the following year. The first Zionist settlement, Rishon Le Zion was founded in 1882 in Palestine by ten Hovevei Zion pioneers from Kharkov, Ukraine. When the first settlers of Rishon Le Zion encountered difficulties, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild took over the administration of the settlement. Rothschild established a winery on the settlement in 1886, where David Ben-Gurion later served as the head of the workers' union long before he became the head of the Haganah (Zionist militia) and Israel's first prime minister. In 1915, Ben-Gurion was expelled from Turkish-ruled Palestine because of his Zionist activities. He was sent to New York City in 1915, where he worked to recruit Jews to serve in the Jewish Legion of the British army. Samuel Mohilever, another founder of the Hovevei Zion movement in Warsaw, was a rabbi and pioneer of religious Zionism. Mohilever convinced Rothschild to financially support the settlement of Ekron. Mohilever, the rabbi of Białystok, worked to promote Zionism by convincing Białystok's Jews to move to Petah Tikva, another Rothschild-sponsored settlement. Mohilever is credited with having merged traditional Jewish orthodoxy with practical Zionism. Edmond de Rothschild spent over $50 million dollars (more than $1 billion in 2010) in sponsoring and supporting 30 Zionist settlements in Palestine. By 1925, the Rothschild name was synonymous with the Zionist settlement activity. When he died in Paris in 1934, Rothschild left a legacy of having reclaimed nearly 500,000 dunams, or 124,000 acres of land in Palestine (1 dunam=1,000 square meters).
The Rothschild group is deeply engaged in gold, diamond, and gas and oil mining operations worldwide. Afghanistan is an extremely wealthy nation in terms of mineral resources and it also occupies a crucial location between the Mossad-controlled gas fields of Turkmenistan and the lucrative markets for that gas in India and China. The real object of the war in Afghanistan is to "pacify" the Afghan resistance so that the long-planned TAPI pipeline (from Turkmenistan to India) can be built across the southern part of the nation (via Kandahar) in order to sell the Israeli-owned gas to India and China. If such a pipeline can be completed it would bring incredible wealth to the Israelis and their Rothschild backers.
The Rothchild family of London and Paris was the main financier and driving force behind the creation of the state of Israel, although most of the family continues to live in its mansions in Europe. An Israeli member of the family, Major General Danny Rothschild, runs the policy and strategy unit at the Mossad think tank/school known as the Inter-Disciplinary Center (IDC) in Herzliya near Tel Aviv.
As the recent disclosure of some 91,000 reports from the war in Afghanistan reveals, the war is far more brutal and criminal than most Americans would have ever thought. These disturbing reports were published on WikiLeaks on the same day that Silverstein obtained the WTC lease - nine years after. The war in Afghanistan is a criminal war and occupation because it is based on the lies that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, supposedly based in Afghanistan, carried out the terrorism of 9-11. This criminal deceit continues, like a tug-of-war, between those who are part of the deception and those who are fighting for the truth of what really happened on 9-11.
President Barack Obama is waging the war in Afghanistan because, he says, the terrorism of 9-11 came from there. The Obama administration, however, refuses to discuss the crucial discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, which reveals that an advanced explosive coating made using nanotechnology was used to pulverize the concrete floors of the Twin Towers. The same officials who support the criminal deception about what happened on 9-11 have used these lies to pull the United States and its allies into the criminal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The former Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, now Secretary General of NATO, for example, wrote an editorial entitled "Moving On in Afghanistan", which was published internationally by the New York Times on July 19, 2010. Rasmussen stressed the false connection between the war in Afghanistan and 9-11: After the tragedy of 9/11, indifference was no longer an option. Engagement was our only choice. Leaving Afghanistan to its own devices would have spelled more instability there, and more terrorist attacks worldwide...Our objective is clear: to ensure that Afghanistan does not again become a safe haven for terrorism. In the tug-of-war over the truth of 9-11, Rasmussen, Obama, and Clinton are really just "the people in between", pulling as they are told to do by those who pay them. They are certainly not the masters of the nine-year-old deception about 9-11, which raises the question, "Who is really behind the deception?" In my book, Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, I explain the details of the Israeli and Zionist role in the false-flag terror atrocity, which was originally planned during the 1970s when Menachem Begin, the arch-terrorist of the Irgun, became prime minister of Israel. While Israeli terrorists like Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Olmert were evidently involved in the terror attacks there must be an even higher master behind them, one which has complete control over the U.S. and British governments and mass media. The ultimate mastermind of 9-11 must also have control over Israeli politicians and their military intelligence, as well as the sprawling Zionist Masonic network headed by the B'nai B'rith. Audacious as the Israeli Mossad is, it would not attack New York City and kill thousands of Americans if it did not have complete backing from the "international banking cartel" that controls the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve System, and the U.S. White House and Congress. There is only one entity that has such power and control - the House of Rothschild. Two steps removed perhaps, but in the position to control every one of the culprits of the 9-11 atrocity and the nine-year cover-up. Sources and Recommended Reading:
Why the 9-11 Trial is Being Blocked
Updated: August 3, 2010 Attorney General Eric Holder on Face the Nation on July 11 gave lame excuses for the U.S. government's failure to hold a trial for the so-called "mastermind" of 9-11. The real reason the U.S. can't hold the trial is because the man they have is neither Khalid Sheikh Mohammed nor the mastermind of 9-11. It is all a pack of lies and they are probably just waiting for him to die so they can close the book on this sordid Zionist atrocity. Is Eric Holder working for the Zionists? THE BLACK HOLE OF GUANTANAMO As the U.S. military prepares for the first war crimes trial under President Barack Obama, its most high-profile case against the planners of the Sept. 11 attacks is stuck in political and legal limbo. This is a government scam I have reported on for years. Here is where I left off last February:
The administration says that it wants to prosecute Sheikh Mohammed and four co-defendants in a federal court in lower Manhattan, close to the site of the World Trade Center attack which killed nearly 3,000 people in 2001. NO SURPRISE After a dinner in New York on Dec. 14, Steven Spinola, president of the Real Estate Board of New York, pulled aside David Axelrod, President Obama’s closest adviser, to convey an urgent plea: move the 9/11 trial out of Manhattan. The Obama administration will not have an open 9-11 trial because it would expose the fraud that the person said to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed is not the terror mastermind of 9-11. He is, in fact, not even Khalid Sheik Mohammed. The person said to be KSM is a "feeble-minded" man named Ahmed Abdul Qudoos. He has been scapegoated and made to fill in for the real KSM, who was killed in Pakistan.
The U.S. government cannot hold an open trial in the United States with the false KSM because there are people in the United States who knew and remember the real KSM, such as his former teachers in North Carolina. As I wrote in 2007: Furthermore, the real KSM was a person who had traveled and worked extensively across Asia and had lived in many foreign countries, from the United States to the Philippines to Bosnia. With this level of education and foreign travel, the real KSM would have a much greater command of the English language than what we find in the transcript. There were no defense attorneys or members of the press allowed to the secret hearing in which the military tribunal heard the confession of the alleged architect of 9/11. "The Detainee served as the head of the Al Qaida military committee and was Osama bin Laden's principal Al Qaida operative who directed the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States," the statement said. “I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z,’’ the detainee said through an interpreter, according to the transcript of the hearing. He also claimed responsibility for the 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center. The detainee sat with an Arabic interpreter to his left and a U.S. military officer who was his official representative to his right. "I not take the oath…" the detainee said in broken English about why he was not taking an oath in the court. "Just to explain for this one, does not mean I'm not saying that I'm lying. When I not take oath does not mean I'm lying." "I understand," the tribunal president said. But how can such meaningless gibberish coming from an unidentified detainee who has not taken an oath be seen by anyone as a credible confession? No photographs accompanied the release of the KSM confession and there are very few photos of the person who is accused of being the terrorist mastermind of our time. To see if the disheveled, hairy, and overweight person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resembled the mechanical engineering student that studied in Greensboro in the 1980s, I contacted the engineering faculty of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University. David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, had the real KSM in several of his classes. Asked about the photos of the person said to be the terror mastermind, Klett said, "I did not recognize that person. I never saw that face before." - Source: "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims", Christopher Bollyn, March 20, 2007 To understand the real reason for the abrupt cancellation of the planned 9-11 trial in Manhattan, read the following article, especially the articles at the bottom about the identity fraud concerning the real KSM. "Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco" Christopher Bollyn, "Why Afghanistan?" September 28, 2009 "Making History With Obama" by Andrew Longstreth, The American Lawyer, June 5, 2008
Is the Obama-Hitler Billboard Correct?
June 15, 2010 "If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." A controversial billboard comparing the "change" of U.S. President Barack Obama with Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin raised a few eyebrows before it was papered over one day after it appeared in Mason City, Iowa. The billboard suggests that Obama is a radical socialist leader similar to Hitler and Lenin. This is, in fact, a true comparison, which is probably why it was papered over so quickly. Obama, Hitler, and Lenin were all initially financed by Rothschild money. If we look at the historical record, we can clearly see that all three leaders were originally puppets of the House of Rothschild. LENIN There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... Leon Trotsky was given $20 million in Jacob Schiff gold to help finance the revolution, which was deposited in a Warburg bank, then transferred to the Nya Banken (The New Bank) in Stockholm, Sweden. According to the Knickerbocker Column in the New York Journal American on February 3, 1949: "Today it is estimated by Jacob's grandson, John Schiff, that the old man sank about $20,000,000 for the final triumph of Bolshevism in Russia." In October, 1917 when the Revolution started, Lenin, who was in Switzerland, negotiated with the German High Command with the help of Max Warburg (head of the Rothschild-affiliated Warburg bank in Frankfurt) to allow him, his wife, and 32 other Bolsheviks to travel across Germany to Sweden, where he was to pick up the money being held for him in the Swedish bank, then go on to Petrograd. He promised to make peace with Germany if he was able to overthrow the new Russian government. Heny Makow has written several in-depth articles on the Rothschild connections to the socialist movements in Russia and Germany. Makow asks, "Why would the [Rothschild] financial elite also want to destroy Russia, which they created?" The transcript of the 1938 NKVD interrogation of C.G. Rakowsky (a.k.a Chaim Rakeover) provides the answer. Rakowsky was an intimate of Trotsky's and former Soviet ambassador to Paris. OBAMA President Obama was cultivated and created as a candidate since the early 1990s by Jewish capital to serve Zionist interests, something I have written a great deal about. It is remarkable that this controversial billboard appeared in Iowa, the same state where the dark horse candidate Obama came from behind to win - after the rigged caucus in which the caucus votes were tallied telephonically by Voxeo, a company connected to Israeli military intelligence. A recent Israeli interview with President Obama shows his Zionist colors well: YONIT LEVI: Now, I must ask you this, Mr. President, there are people in Israel who are anxious about you and who, you know, I’m quoting their sentiments, feel like you don’t have a special connection to Israel. How do you respond to that?
Sources:
Israel's Danny Rothschild and the Plundering of Iceland
July 15, 2010
The Israeli-Rothschild connection to the plundering of Icelandic banks has become clearer and deserves to be noted. On June 23, it was reported that the Tchenguiz Discretionary Trust (TDT is the parent company headed by Victor Tchenguiz in Israel) had agreed to settle by handing over frozen Somerfield cash to administrators of failed Icelandic bank Kaupthing on June 23, 2010.
In August 1984, Rothschild was Assistant to the IDF chief of staff. In 1985, he was appointed Commander of the IDF Units in When General Rothschild visited Florida in 2005 he was described as "a Governor of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the President of the Council for Peace and Security; the Chairman of the Israeli board of the America-Israel Friendship League, and a Director of the Investec Bank."
Danny Rothschild: Honorary Consul General for
Afghanistan - Obama's War for Israel
Updated July 6, 2010 Bruce O. Riedel headed the White House Afghan war strategy team that advised President Obama to send 50,000 more U.S. troops in early 2009. With the chaos and bloodshed in Afghanistan increasing every month, Riedel is often interviewed these days- but never identified as a hired gun of the Israeli operative Haim (Chaim) Saban, who happens to be a close friend and partner-in-crime of Ehud Barak, the Israeli defense chief. Recognizing Obama's Zionist war planners is essential to understanding what the war in Afghanistan is really all about.
A recent article, "The Influencer" in the New Yorker, explains Saban's (i.e. Mossad's) strategy in crafting U.S. foreign policy to benefit Ehud Barak and his gang of Zionist terrorists: Saban's greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel. At a conference in Israel, Saban described his formula. His “three ways to be influential in American politics,” he said, were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets. In 2002, he contributed seven million dollars toward the cost of a new building for the Democratic National Committee—one of the largest known donations ever made to an American political party. That year, he also founded the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution…By far his most important relationship is with Bill and Hillary Clinton. In 2002, Saban donated five million dollars to Bill Clinton’s Presidential library, and he has given more than five million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
In the late ’90s, as co-owner of the Fox Family Channel, Saban was developing shows for children. Simmons, the fire-breathing, blood-spitting frontman of a rock band in costumes and face paint, pitched Saban an idea for a new Saturday-morning cartoon: Kiss meets X-Men, the Marvel comics superhero team. Saban liked the concept well enough to convene a meeting with Avi Arad, then C.E.O. of Marvel’s toy division.
In January 2001, a law suit was filed in Israel's High Court calling for criminal charges to be brought against Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Los Angeles television producer Chaim Saban. The court papers allege that on March 25, 1999, a month and half before Israel's national elections, Saban hosted a campaign fund-raiser in his Beverly Hills home for then prime minister candidate Barak in violation of Israeli election laws. The 35 to 40 guests who attended the parlor meeting were each asked to donate $10,000 to benefit the Barak campaign.
As reported in the Israeli press of 2001: Saban promised to match each donation to Barak, dollar for dollar. On the evening of the fund-raiser Barak flew into L.A. and spoke before the parlor meeting held in Saban's home and contributions were solicited… AFGHANISTAN CHAOS
But why are Norwegian troops in Afghanistan in the first place? Why are tens of thousands of young Europeans, Canadians, Australians, and Americans slogging away in the Hindu Kush? What is the real mission of this international military campaign that has dragged on for nearly 9 years? What deals have been struck, what promises made to those who have sent their fighting men to the bloody quagmire in Afghanistan? THINKING CLEARLY ABOUT AFGHANISTAN To understand why thousands of young Americans and Europeans are fighting and dying in Afghanistan we need to be very clear about the real reasons for this nine-year-old military invasion and occupation. Some straight talk and Socratic dialectic will help us to determine what this war is really about – and what it isn't. President Obama adopted the seven-year-old war (in 2008) and the Bush administration's reasoning for it, claiming that the United States is occupying Afghanistan because of 9-11. The terrorists behind 9-11, according to the Obama and Bush administrations, were members of the Al Qaida organization headed by Osama Bin Laden. This Islamic terrorist organization was based in Afghanistan under the Taliban regime and presented a threat to the whole world, which is why an international coalition was put together to fight against it. The claim that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida were behind 9-11, however, has been proven false. While the U.S. government never actually proved that these parties were involved in the terror attacks, the discovery of large amounts of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center has now exposed this claim to be nothing but a complete fabrication. The government and media version of 9-11 contradicts both the scientific evidence and the laws of physics. It is impossible for both to be valid. The laws of physics and the evidence are true; the government version is clearly false. Al Qaida neither produced nor applied the extremely explosive super-thermite that pulverized the Twin Towers on 9-11. The role of Osama Bin Laden was simply that of the scapegoat in a false-flag operation; neither he nor the Taliban had anything to do with the destruction of the Twin Towers.
If the people who run the C.I.A. and the U.S. government know about the discovery of super-thermite and explosives in the World Trade Center, why do they continue to wage war in Afghanistan? Well, we know Afghanistan's production of opium has increased greatly under the U.S.-led occupation. It was recently reported that use of opiate drugs, including heroin and opium, has doubled in Afghanistan since 2005, with nearly 3 percent of the adult population now addicted. Prior to the U.S. invasion in 2001, the Taliban regime had virtually eradicated the production of opium. Increased production of opium is clearly one of the results of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan, but is that the only reason? Afghanistan is also one of the crown jewels of Asia, extremely well endowed with rare minerals and gems, and situated between Russia, Turkmenistan, China, Pakistan, Iran, and the West. To control Afghanistan is to control one of the wealthiest and most important strategic corridors in the world. This is why the Soviet Union tried to occupy Afghanistan in the 1980s and why the U.S.-led coalition has tried to do the same since 2001. Besides its enormous wealth of rare and strategic minerals, Afghanistan is located between the Israeli-owned gas fields of Turkmenistan and the energy-starved markets of India and China. If Afghanistan were brought under U.S. and Zionist control, the planned TAPI (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India) gas pipeline through Kandahar would bring billions of dollars into Mossad's coffers every year. This is the real reason why Ehud Barak and Haim Saban are pushing for the conquest of Afghanistan. These people will use every trick in the book to see this pipeline built, but how many people must die for Israeli profits? Who are the people behind the crafting of the war policy in Afghanistan? We can easily identify two groups who are pushing the war policy in Afghanistan: the C.I.A. and the Israelis. The C.I.A. is clearly waging its own war in Afghanistan and Pakistan with its use of drone-launched missiles while the Israelis have called for the U.S. invasion of the country from the beginning. Ehud Barak, the current Israeli defense minister, was actually the first person to call for the invasion of Afghanistan, which he did on 9-11, only minutes after the demolition of the World Trade Center, on the BBC. OBAMA'S WAR FOR ISRAEL To understand that the "War on Terror" (with its invasion and occupation of Afghanistan) is a Zionist construct, it is helpful to review the Israeli role in its development and realization: ·PREPARING THE GROUND - The idea of the "War on Terror" and its conceptual framework was first articulated and promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel's Yonatan Institute of Terrorism in the early 1980s in a series of speeches, seminars, articles, and books. The basic idea is that Israel's survival required that the militaries of the United States and Europe be stationed in the Middle East to defeat and occupy the states that support terrorism – on a long-term basis. Terrorism, or a state that supports terrorism, as defined by the Israeli doctrine, is any act (or state) of resistance against Israeli hegemony and aggression. The "War on Terror" doctrine was taught to highest-level U.S. leaders, such as George H.W. Bush, who attended the first conference of the Yonatan Institute of Terrorism in 1979. Netanyahu is a former soldier of Israel's elite Sayeret Matkal and served under Ehud Barak, his commander.
Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan", June 5, 2009 Bollyn, Christopher, "Dying in Vain - Why Afghanistan?" February 8, 2010 Bollyn, Christopher, "The Spoils of War: The Minerals of Afghanistan", January 7, 2002 Bruck, Connie, "The Influencer", The New Yorker, May 10, 2010 "New Law Suit calls for the Arrest of Hollywood Mogul Chaim Saban and Israeli Prime Minister - Fox Kids Worldwide CEO Alleged To Have Aided Barak in Campaign Fund-Raising Plot", IMRA Newsletter (Israel), January 7, 2001 Riedel, Bruce, "The Afghan Gold Rush", Saban Center for Middle East Policy, Brookings Institution, June 16, 2010 Bruce Riedel at INSS: Possible to Win the War in Afghanistan, Institute for National Security Studies (Israel), Tel Aviv, November 17, 2009 Wallace, Amy, "Haim Saban, Power Ranger", August 13, 2008
On the Cusp of the Next Ice Age
July 1, 2010
Are we on the cusp of the next ice age? Having just read Robert W. Felix's exellent books (Not by Fire but by Ice and Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps) I recommend them to anyone who is truly interested in the scientific debate about climate change. Felix provides compelling evidence that we are indeed on the cusp of the next ice age, which will bring profound changes to the planet and every living thing on it.
The Coming American Revolution
June 25, 2010
In a discussion of the recent primary election in South Carolina in which a previously unknown candidate beat the Establishment candidate, I received the following email from a writer who goes by the name Jimi Big Bear. Mr. Big Bear's comments about electronic vote fraud in the United States explain the problem in a way that everyone can understand.
Same thing with the media. It's all owned by just 6 companies - all of them owned/controlled by Zionists. The media collectively has a "box" - one side of the box is "left", "liberal", Democrat starring Mathews, Olberman, etc. The other side of the box is "right", "conservative", Republican starring Limbagh, Hannity, O'Reilly and Coulter, etc. The media makes it SEEM like there are real differences between the two sides, and they go to great lengths to keep us from "seeing" the box, and they all know, pretty much from experience, that if they want to keep getting the big paychecks, that they do NOT want to get out of the box. Don't get out of the box. Don't even talk about the box! Divide and conquer - just as M said. That's what demo[n]cracy is all about - divide and rule. That's why M also said, "Damn the democracy!"
Anyway, the media turned out to be involved in the vote fraud that was going on WAY back then - WAY before electronic voting machines. Janet Reno was involved. Catherine Graham - the Grand Dragon Lady of the Washington Post - and even the friggin League of Women Voters!!!! The Collier brothers were hounded and I believe ultimately murdered (slowly with cancer) by the ESTABLISHMENT'S CIA.
It's not really the Great and Powerful Oz that we need to tremble and grovel in front of - it's just a little Free Mason from Kansas.
Front Page News - Bollyn Interview
Updated July 6, 2010 Kourosh Ziabari, a young Iranian journalist and prodigious writer, recently interviewed me. The interview below is posted on many websites. One very good posting with photos is on Ramallah Online at: http://ramallahonline.com/?p=4447 The interview was also front page news in The Tehran Times of June 24, which ran the complete interview. The headline was "9-11 is an unsolved crime", which is exactly what I repeatedly told CNN, but that was not what CNN wanted to hear. The Tehran Times article is here: http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=221932 Kourosh Ziabari Interviews Christopher Bollyn Christopher Bollyn is an American journalist and researcher. He is widely known for his extensive research articles on the September 11, 2001 attacks which reveal that Israel was complicit in planning and carrying out the terrorist attacks that cost the lives of 2,976 victims and left more than 6,000 injured. The U.S. administration of President George W. Bush blamed the paramilitary group Al Qaida as the main culprit of the attacks and adopted an aggressive policy towards the Muslim nations. It also enacted the USA PATRIOT Act that enabled the U.S. government to search and investigate the telephone and email communications of U.S. citizens under the pretext of discovering and mapping out possible threats to U.S. national security. Bollyn has written on U.S.–Israel relations comprehensively and believes that a powerful corporate cartel of Zionists controls and masterminds the large-scale U.S. foreign policy. What follows is the full text of an in-depth interview with Christopher Bollyn in which we've discussed the post 9-11 "War on Terror" project devised by the Bush administration, the complicity of the state of Israel in the 9-11 attacks, the fate of the Israeli regime in the wake of its growing isolation, the stance of United States administration towards Iran's nuclear dossier, and the double standard it exercises with regards to Israel's military nuclear program. Kourosh Ziabari: Christopher, you've written on the 9/11 attacks and the involvement of the Mossad and CIA in the attacks extensively. The former Italian President Francisco Cossiga has also testified that Mossad and CIA were involved in the attacks. Would you please summarize for our readers the evidence which, according to your research, indicates that Israel created the 9/11 catastrophe? Christopher Bollyn: The earliest evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 was actually revealed in the news on the very day of the terror attacks and shortly thereafter, but never followed up in the mainstream media. First, there was the van of 5 Israelis who were arrested in New Jersey on 9-11. This group, which included two Mossad agents known to U.S. law enforcement, had been observed videotaping the destruction of the Twin Towers with themselves celebrating in front of the camera, flicking their lighters and laughing with the burning towers in the background across the river. These Israelis worked for a fake moving company, Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, New Jersey, which actually turned out to be a Mossad front operation. Dominic Suter, the head of the phony company, was allowed to escape to Israel shortly after 9-11 although he was a terror suspect being investigated by the FBI. The five Israelis, some of whom refused or failed lie detector tests, were caught in possession of multiple passports, box cutters, and a large amount of cash stuffed in their socks. Their van tested positive for explosives when checked by New Jersey police, at least until the FBI took over the investigation. When the five Mossadniks were returned to Israel in November 2001, three of them appeared on a popular television show and openly admitted that their mission had been to document the terror attacks. Who had given them this mission was not discussed. Secondly, there were some 4,000 Israelis who were expected to have been at the World Trade Center, as per the Israeli foreign ministry and the Jerusalem Post, who did not show up for work on 9-11. There were text messages sent on Odigo, an Israeli-owned instant messaging system, warning of the terror attacks several hours before the first plane hit the towers. These warnings were evidently sent in Hebrew and warned of terror attacks at the World Trade Center. Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute." The Odigo story was reported in the Washington Post, but not a single New York newspaper picked it up. The Post reported that the FBI had sent a team to Israel to investigate the content and origin of these messages, but the story was dropped and never investigated any further in the U.S. media. How odd. Both of these stories were reported, but only briefly and then dropped into the memory hole. I began my 9-11 research by investigating these stories. With such clear evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks, I pursued my investigation to see if Israelis or Zionists were involved in other key aspects of the crime or the cover-up, and I found that they were. Indeed, orthodox Jews and Zionists cropped up at every critical point of the operation, which I discuss in detail in my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World. The key U.S. official behind the 9-11 cover-up was Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff, an Israeli citizen and son of a Mossad agent. Chertoff was the head of the criminal division of the Department of Justice at the time and the top boss of the FBI. From this position Chertoff managed the FBI's "non-investigation" of 9-11, and supervised the confiscation and destruction of the critical evidence from the crime scenes, such as videotapes, aircraft debris, and more than 99 percent of the steel from the World Trade Center. The destruction of this crucial evidence is a crime in and of itself. Ziabari: You've come to the conclusion that Israel was the main culprit of the 9/11 attacks; however, your opponents categorize you as a conspiracy theorist. Is this a fair judgment? Bollyn: A conspiracy is a secret plan by a group of people to do something harmful or illegal. There is certainly no question that the terror attacks of 9-11 were planned and carried out by a group of people acting in secret. A conspiracy theorist in this context would be a person who believes that a conspiracy is behind the terrorism attacks that started the so-called "War on Terror." Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have both stated that an Islamic conspiracy, headed by Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, is behind 9-11. Based on this specious and unproven assertion the Bush administration invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 and began a war of occupation which the Obama administration has adopted as its own and continues to fight to this day. President Obama says the U.S. is fighting the war in Afghanistan because of 9-11. I, on the other hand, consider 9-11 to be an unsolved crime and have pursued my investigation based on the available evidence. Since the evidence indicates that Israeli intelligence had prior knowledge of the attacks and because prior knowledge of something like 9-11 is indicative of involvement in the crime, I have worked on the hypothesis that the state of Israel was involved in 9-11 and have pursued my investigation along that line. That does not make me a conspiracy theorist. One of the main reasons I rejected the government claim that Al Qaida was behind 9-11 is because all the evidence indicates that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 were demolished with explosives. The plane crashes did not bring down the Twin Towers and Larry Silverstein's 47-story building, which collapsed a block away without even being hit. When I learned in the summer of 2002 that molten iron had been found at the base of all three towers, I knew I had evidence that the Bush administration's explanation of what had happened to the World Trade Center was false. This important discovery revealed that the public had been lied to by the government about what really happened on 9-11. The publication of the peer-reviewed paper about the discovery of large amounts of active super-thermite in the dust of the demolished World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones and others in March 2009 provides scientific proof that an extremely energetic form of thermite, made with nanotechnology, was responsible for the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors of the Twin Towers, and everything on them. This is what created the immense clouds of hot dust that everyone saw on 9-11. Survivors have said that the dust was burning hot. This is because it contained tiny droplets of molten iron, which were described and shown in the U.S. Geological Survey study of the dust. The hot spots that burned beneath the rubble for three months were hotter than the boiling point of iron and created nanosize particles that were found in large quantities in the smoke rising from the pile. These were all clear indications that thermite had been used to demolish the towers. Logically, the discovery of chips of super-thermite in the dust marked the end of the official version as an acceptable explanation for what happened to the Twin Towers. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor Al Qaida had anything to do with the creation or application of the super-thermite that pulverized the World Trade Center. These facts are becoming clear to a growing number of people. The game is over for the 9-11 cover-up crowd. Ziabari: You introduced Michael Chertoff as the key person responsible for the destruction of 9/11 evidence. Isn't the U.S. administration really aware of the fact that, as you believe, Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks? Have the U.S. statesmen ever referred to the research carried out by you and other scholars who put forward evidence that Israel carried out the 9/11 attacks? Bollyn: In March 2010, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the former Director of Strategic Studies at the U.S. Army War College, said in a radio interview: "It is one hundred percent certain that 9-11 was a Mossad operation, period." Dr. Sabrosky also stated that high-level U.S. military officers know that Israel did it. Dr. Sabrosky is, to my knowledge, the first person from the U.S. military establishment to have publicly supported the hypothesis that Israeli intelligence was behind 9-11. I have not heard of any U.S. statesman refer to my research although I am sure there are many politicians who are aware of it. Ziabari: The war on terrorism project was initially set off following the 9/11 attacks. In other words, the 9/11 attacks played into the hands of the U.S. administration to launch military strikes against Iraq and Afghanistan, as alleged state sponsors of terrorism. Is there any third country which is liable to be targeted next? Is this third country going to be Iran? Bollyn: My hypothesis is that 9-11 was an Israeli-designed "false-flag" operation that was meant to be blamed on Al Qaida in order to kick-start the Zionist-designed "War on Terror." Actually, Iran is probably the main target, at least in the minds of the Zionist war planners. This is because the CIA and the Mossad got kicked out of Iran when Shah Pahlavi was overthrown in 1979. The foreign oil corporations, big capital, and their intelligence agencies want to get Iran back under their control. I always thought that the name "Central Command" or CENTCOM was a strange name for the military command that oversees U.S. operations in the Middle East - central to whom? Iran now finds itself surrounded by U.S. military interventions on three sides and CENTCOM is based in Qatar, right in the middle. Furthermore, Iran has long been the target of a concerted effort led by the Zionists and the controlled press to impose sanctions in an effort to weaken the largest independent nation in the Middle East. This is why they use the issue of Iran's nuclear development, most unfairly, as a club to attack the Iranian government. The Zionist Axis of New York, London, and Tel Aviv refuses to accept that Iran is not under their control. Ziabari: You've published pictures on your website which depict the Jews demonstrating against Tel Aviv, holding placards that read: "The state of Israel does not represent world Jewry". Is the controversial regime of Israel, which is even hated by a large number of its own citizens, going to survive with the trajectory it has adopted? Bollyn: No. I don't see how a small, artificial state run by terrorists and despised by its neighbors and most of the world can possibly survive in the long term. It simply is not sustainable. This is, after all, why 9-11 was carried out - to bring the U.S. military into the Middle East to protect the Zionist hegemony in the region. Public opinion, however, has turned strongly against Israel as a result of a long string of Zionist crimes and atrocities. A state that is so despised simply cannot survive for long. Ziabari: The United States officials regularly reaffirm their commitment to the security of Israel and disallow the international community to hold her accountable for the war crimes it commits. Is it possible for the international bodies, including the United Nations Security Council, to investigate Israel's criminal conduct independently and put on trial the Tel Aviv officials while the United States continually supports the Jewish state? Bollyn: This is the real problem. Zionist influence and control over the U.S. government prevents the international community from reining in the behavior of the nuclear-tipped outlaw state of Israel. The U.S. veto in the U.N. Security Council has effectively protected Israel from sanctions for decades. But the failure to enforce international law and apply corrective measures on the state of Israel has resulted in the creation of a monster-state that is now out of control. Had the system of international law worked as it should Israel would have been forced to adjust its behavior and find a way to live in peace with the Palestinians and its neighbors. Ziabari: What do you think about the recent massacre of peace activists aboard the Freedom Flotilla who were heading towards the Gaza strip to break the siege of the beleaguered enclave? Why did the U.S. and European leaders keep silent in respect of the vicious assault of the Israel Defense Forces on the peace activists? Would the international reaction been the same if Iran had carried out the attack? Bollyn: Of course not. If Iran had committed such a massacre on the high seas it would have been punished severely and immediately by the United Nations and international community. Furthermore, if any other state besides Israel were to impose a blockade on 1.5 million civilians causing extreme hardship and suffering, it would be condemned by every nation in the world. To understand the mild response of the Obama administration to the blockade and the massacre of the nine Turkish peace activists we should recall that Rahm Emanuel, the chief of staff of the Obama White House, was in Israel the week before the attack and met with Benjamin Netanyahu only four days before the Israeli assault on the Freedom Flotilla. It should be noted that Emanuel, an Israeli citizen and the son of an Irgun terrorist, runs the Obama administration. When it comes to the European response, we now have a weak centralized European Union that discourages unilateral actions taken by the member states. Furthermore, European foreign ministers remember very well what happened to Anna Lindh of Sweden who had called for a European boycott of Israel. She was murdered in broad daylight in Stockholm. Ziabari: In one of your recent articles, you've reviewed the bankruptcy of three Icelandic banks and related it to the Israeli regime's plundering of Iceland's economy. Would you please elaborate on this for us and our readers? Bollyn: The bankrupting of Iceland's three biggest banks in the fall of 2008 was caused by a foreign-run operation which involved people connected to the Mossad and the most extreme right-wing politicians from the Likud, including Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert. The First Lady of Iceland also happens to be an Israeli. The operation basically gained control of the privatized and deregulated banks and puffed them up as it sucked money out of them in the form of billions of dollars in unsecured loans. The privatized banks were simply loaded up with debt and pushed off a cliff. The Icelandic banks were lending huge amounts of money to dodgy Jewish financial tycoons left and right - without any collateral of real value. The largest Icelandic bank to fail, Kaupthing, for example, lent more than $2.5 billion to the Tchenguiz operation, which is run by Victor Tchenguiz in Israel. Robert Tchenguiz, who received billions from Kaupthing, was also one of the largest stockholders in the bank. The plundering of the banks of Iceland is very similar to the Bernard Madoff scam, the bank failures, and the huge bail-out that occurred at the same time in the United States. Madoff was the chairman of the Sy Syms business school at Yeshiva University. His partner, the late Sy Syms, was also a long-standing director of the privatized Israel Discount Bank of New York, which has a branch in Switzerland that operates under Swiss bank secrecy laws. Kaupthing also had a bank in Luxembourg that had a Swiss branch in Geneva. When Kaupthing collapsed, their Luxembourg subsidiary with the Swiss branch were taken over by David Rowland, an offshore financier who works closely with Israeli intelligence. When the Icelandic banks collapsed under a mountain of debt, the national government and international lenders were called in to absorb the losses while the bank robbers escaped with the money they stashed in secret bank accounts in Switzerland. Ziabari: The United States frequently attacks Iran over its human rights record and what is claimed to be the undemocratic nature of the Iranian regime. Should we take the Washington's accusations for granted, we come across to the identical situations in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt in which the human right records are far more disappointing and deplorable than Iran; however, the United States maintains close ties with them and never states a single word in protest to their repression of the public freedoms and violations of human rights. How is it possible to justify this double standard? Bollyn: This is the typical double standard seen in U.S. foreign policy. Any behavior is acceptable from a regime that is willing to play ball with big capital, big oil, and Israel. On the other hand, any regime that refuses to go along will find itself ostracized and penalized. The Hamas government of Palestine is a good example. Hamas won the democratic election fair and square, but because it refuses to accept Israeli demands and conditions it has been ostracized. Meanwhile, Mahmoud Abbas is treated as the president of Palestine by the United States although he has not been elected and simply extends his term like a tyrant. Iran is treated in the same way. It is ostracized because it pursues its own national interests and challenges the Anglo-American and Zionist hegemony in the Middle East. This is why the U.S. uses its influence to sanction Iran for its nuclear development program, which is legal and monitored, while completely ignoring Israel's secret nuclear arsenal. We should remember that BP, the oil company that has mucked up the Gulf of Mexico, originally started as the Anglo-Iranian Oil company, with the rights to virtually all the oil of Iran. A BP tanker was the first ship to load up with Iraqi oil after the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq. These are the people who wage war to steal the assets of sovereign nations. Ziabari: What's your anticipation for the prospect of the Israeli regime? It is being isolated in the eyes of nations around the world while being supported by the U.S. and European governments. Will the sponsorship of the U.S. and its EU allies for the state of Israel come to cease one day? Will the Washington – Tel Aviv ties eventually end in altercation and animosity? Bollyn: The state of Israel is an artificial state that is protected and supported by the United States. This support is due to Zionist influence and corruption of the American political system. Were this to change and were Israel to lose the support of the U.S. government it would be unable to survive. The current government in Israel is composed of the most extreme elements of Israeli society, which is increasingly becoming more orthodox and Russian. Zionist moderates have been pushed aside by the most aggressive and unscrupulous extremists. Those who could have made peace have been killed and replaced by terrorists who know only war.
The people of the United States are fed up with these costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East. A growing number are becoming aware that we have been conned into these wars. The growing divide between the people who know they have been lied to and the government who covers up the truth about 9-11 is simply not sustainable. The United States is sitting on a political fault line that may slide at any time. When the truth of 9-11 reaches a critical mass there will be a political earthquake that will sweep the criminals from power. This is why the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is so important, because it marked the end of the government version of 9-11 as an acceptable explanation. When the deception and lies about 9-11 are exposed and the Zionist and Israeli culprits revealed, Israel will be left without a friend in the world. The racist and militant Zionist regime of Israel is bound to pass from the stage of history just like the communist dictatorships of the Soviet Union and the apartheid regime of South Africa. Such deeply unpopular regimes often fall without a shot being fired. They simply collapse because they are rotten to the core and unable to stand any longer.
Who is responsible for the oil spill?
Updated June 23, 2010
Recognizing Badness
June 8, 2010 Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit. The Israeli military assault on the Freedom Flotilla has taken up most of my working hours since May 31. I have not been able to finish the second part of my article about Israel's role in the bankrupting of Iceland or respond to my email. At this point, I just hope the Israelis allow the M/V Rachel Corrie to dock in Gaza and deliver the much-needed supplies to the suffering people of Gaza. I hope the Israelis come to their senses and lift their cruel blockade on the 1.5 million people of Gaza and allow them to live like human beings. Will they allow Rachel Corrie to reach Gaza? Time will tell. The above quotations from Socrates and Jesus are fundamental truths that have been part of human history since Socrates first uttered these words some 400 years before Christ was born. These two expressions of this basic truth are really what my efforts are all about. Having lived in Israel and the Middle East, and having studied the Israeli-Palestinian problem for decades, I came to understand the nature of the state of Israel through having lived with Israelis and Palestinians. I learned about Zionism and Israel through my first-hand experiences with the people, and by having read a great deal about current events and Zionist history. Nothing good will come out of Israel because it is a state like a corrupt tree that produces only evil fruit. This should be abundantly clear to anyone who has read newspapers and followed world events since 1982, when Israel launched its invasion of Lebanon which took the lives of some 30,000 civilians. There is a very rare large format book called Eyewitness Lebanon - Evidence of 91 international correspondents (Morris International, 1983) that contains shocking photographs from news photographers who covered the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
I have never seen this book, which is published in the English language, in the United States. The photographs in this book are evidence of a whole raft of Israeli war crimes, none of which has ever been prosecuted. One, for example, shows the Israelis arresting all the doctors and nurses from the hospitals of Beirut - so they would not treat the thousands of wounded. The Israeli crimes in Lebanon were the first fruits of the Likudniks that came to power when arch-terrorist Menachem Begin became prime minister in the 1970s. The coming to power of the extreme rightwing Likud party was a fundamental change in Israeli politics. The Likud was the political party of the former terrorists of the Irgun, which Begin commanded in the 1940s. These are Zionists who are completely amoral.
This is the faction of Zionist terrorists that runs Israel today, as it has since 1977. Benny Begin, son of Menachem, is at the top of the Israeli government along with the sons and daughters of the Zionist terrorists who created the state of Israel in the 1940s. Bibi Netanyahu, for example, is the son of the head of Jabotinsky's New Zionist Organization. For these people war is the desired state and terrorism is the tool to produce it. Peace is neither wanted nor desired.
This is the real reason that Israel attacked the ships of the Freedom Flotilla killing many of the peace activists. This is why there is never any movement in the so-called "peace process." The Israeli government doesn't want peace. This is why, whenever Israel is pushed to make concessions for peace and feels cornered by the international community, it reacts with acts of brutal amoral violence. This is what they have always done. The attacks on the Freedom Flotilla are just the latest manifestations of this most predictable Zionist reaction.
Free Bruno - L.A. 9-11 Truth Activist Faces Charges
June 19, 2010 "9/11 truth is the greatest anti-war message there is."
For more information on Bruno and WeAreChangeLA go to: http://free-bruno.org/
Iceland - The Hallmarks of an Israeli Operation
June 16, 2010 The Israeli Role in the Plundering of Iceland THE HALLMARKS OF AN ISRAELI OPERATION Shortly before the catastrophic collapse of Iceland's three major banks in the fall of 2008, the island nation was ranked as one of the wealthiest and most productive nations in the world. The financial damage caused by the plundering of Iceland's banks is the worst suffered by any country in economic history relative to the size of its economy.
When the privatized banks of Kaupthing, Glitnir, and Landsbanki collapsed in October 2008 they had reportedly amassed debts equivalent to 12 times Iceland's gross domestic product. The looting of the Nordic nation's banks did not happen by accident, but was done through a conspiracy that has the distinct hallmarks of an Israeli intelligence operation. Recognizing these hallmarks is essential to solving the crime and preventing it from occurring to other nations. When the Icelandic banks were privatized in 2002-2003, through "a series of insider dealings," the stage was set for massive amounts of debt to be "uploaded" to the newly-deregulated banks through the acquisition of foreign companies that were net debtors. When they finally collapsed under a mountain of debt, the three major Icelandic banks reportedly held an estimated foreign debt of nearly $100 billion. For a nation the size of Kentucky, with a population of a small U.S. city (about 320,000 like Aurora, Colorado), the banks' debt translates to more than $200,000 per resident. The assets of Icelandic pension funds, a pool of wealth that current U.S. budget czar Peter Orszag studied before the collapse, were expected to shrink by as much as 25 percent. Orszag's involvement in the Icelandic operation is suspicious in light of his previous work in Russia during the period when it was being plundered by Jewish robber barons following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
So, how were the hardy Vikings of Iceland plundered? The Icelandic heist was carried out in the same way as the plundering of the U.S. Treasury in 2008-2009, through an unregulated "economic bubble" scheme very much like a Bernard Madoff investment fund. How the scheme operates is fairly simple. An entity, in this case a private bank, is puffed up to look like it is doing amazingly well. Like Madoff's funds, the appearance of success brings in new investors while keeping the image – and the operation – up and going. The image of wealth and prosperity is, however, only a false front that is used to bring more money into the operation. In reality, the criminals like Madoff running the operation are sucking every last penny they can out of the operation – in this case giving huge unsecured loans to scoundrels like Robert Tchenguiz - "Kaupthing's biggest client as well as director of its largest shareholder." The Tchenguiz formula for property deals is like Larry Silverstein's: borrow heavily to buy the property, and then raise the rent to pay off the loan. (Silverstein, who obtained control of the Twin Towers at the end of July 2001, raised tenants' rents by 40 percent.) Tchenguiz reportedly borrowed more than 1.7 billion Euros (more than $2 billion) from Kaupthing to finance his private investments. But how can a single individual, a foreign national, borrow some $2.5 billion from an Icelandic bank in unsecured loans, causing it to collapse? Tchenguiz, a shameless fraudster, is now trying to sue the Icelandic banks.
The Robert Tchenguiz operation, named Rotch, "is a complex web of about 600 different companies, with Vin-Rotch Properties, the ultimate holding group, based in Panama." Robert and his brother Vincent are directors of more than 300 companies each. The Tchenguiz family was reportedly "the second biggest landlord in Britain" in 2003. How can a playboy who spends much of his time carousing on yachts off St. Tropez run a "complex web of about 600 companies"? He can't, and he doesn't. "At the top of the chain is Rotch Property Group, based in Mayfair," the Telegraph reported in May 2003. "It's biggest shareholder is a Panamanian company called Vin-Rotch Properties and the ultimate controlling party is the Tchenguiz Family Trust," which is known to be run by his father, Victor Tchenguiz in Israel. "From a structural point of view," Robert said, "Rotch is a family business and ultimately owned by our family. The way it's owned – Panama – I don't know if that's of interest to your readers, that's not necessarily something I want to tell them." "The accounts of Rotch are impenetrable," the Times noted, and the family business is "a web of unfathomable companies with tentacles reaching deep." The Tchenguiz operation is actually an Israeli octopus run by Victor and a team in Israel. The whole operation is based on swapping debt, which is loaded onto a chosen victim (like Kaupthing) – which is then shoved off a cliff. Tchenguiz's brother Vincent was quoted in 2005 as saying: "About three-quarters of our business is debt…but it has come down considerably – about 20 percent [i.e. from 95 percent] – over the years. It's about £3 billion at the moment." When the puffed-up operation collapses, the outrageous debts are simply passed on to the state, the central bank, and the people. Kaupthing "failed to recoup a total of £1.47 billion (about $2.5 billion) – equivalent to 45 percent of deposits – advanced to Tchenguiz's operations." Because the Tchenguiz family (of London and Israel) played such a big role in the plundering of Iceland, I call it Operation Tchenguiz (as in Genghis Khan).
OPERATION TCHENGUIZ It was back in the early 1980s while visiting my mother's cousin in Sacramento that I first learned how Israeli criminal gangs robbed banks in America. My relative's husband, who held a senior position at the California Board of Equalization (i.e. the state agency for tax administration), told me about an organized gang that had set up phony jewelry shops in the Los Angeles area. Members of the gang would rifle through the trash bins behind expensive stores on Rodeo Drive in order to find carbon copies from credit card purchases. The gang would then use the pilfered credit card numbers to ring up fake purchases from their fake jewelry stores. The primary losers in this scam were the banks, which lost a great deal of money before the racket was shut down. All of the members of the criminal network, I was told, were Israelis. Shortly thereafter, while on a sojourn in Puerto Rico where I worked as a sailing instructor, I came across a similar Israeli operation engaged in agriculture. I attended a Jewish holiday party held by the Israelis involved in this commercial enterprise. This operation was centered near Ponce on the south shore and was involved in producing melons and fruit. I recall seeing their logo on the produce boxes in the local supermarkets. Two years later, when I was back on the island, I learned that the farming operation had suddenly shut down and the Israelis had left the island owing more than $67 million to local banks.
These are just two of the Israeli criminal financial scams I personally became aware of in the early 1980s in which the primary targets were American banks. There have certainly been other much larger scams of this sort perpetrated by Israelis in the United States. Such organized criminal activity is actually quite typical of Israelis in America. During the past three decades, primarily because the U.S. government has not cracked down on it, the Israeli criminal network has been allowed to grow while increasing the range and complexity of its operations in the United States. Zionist control of the U.S. Department of Justice has enabled Israeli criminals to escape prosecution, which was painfully evident in the official mishandling of the 9-11 investigation by Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff – the son of an Israeli Mossad agent. Chertoff is the person responsible for the "non-investigation" of 9-11 who authorized the wholesale confiscation and destruction of crucial evidence.
The hallmark of an Israeli operation, such as the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11, the Madoff scam, or the government bail-out of A.I.G. and Goldman Sachs, is the presence of Israelis (or Zionist agents) at the key nodal points of the operation. Not only are all the key players in the operation Israelis or Zionists, but so are the investigators, media interpreters, prosecutors, and judges who wrap up the loose ends of the crime. The clearest indication of a major Israeli crime is the presence of a Zionist at the critical points of the operation. In this respect, the plundering of the banks of Iceland is similar to the Madoff scam. The biggest "losers" in the Madoff operation were fellow Zionist crooks, such as orthodox Jewish fraudsters Jacob Ezra Merkin and Sonja Kohn of Bank Medici. Merkin and Kohn operated "feeder funds" that funneled billions of dollars directly into the Madoff pipeline. More than half the money that disappeared in the Madoff pipeline came from such "feeder funds." In this way tens of billions of dollars were sent to secret offshore Zionist-controlled accounts -- where they remain to this day. The controlled media's focus on Madoff's Jewish "victims" serves to divert public attention from the fact that the co-conspirators in the Madoff scam are Zionist orthodox Jews connected to private Israeli banks – with secretive branches in Switzerland (and other offshore tax havens). The focus on high-profile Jews who claim to have lost money in the Madoff scam is meant to mollify public anger against the Zionist-controlled judicial system that is protecting the criminal network behind the Madoff scam -- and its ill-gotten gains. The Icelandic operation has the distinct profile of an Israeli operation. The First Lady of Iceland and Robert Tchenguiz, the largest borrower from Kaupthing, are both from Persian Jewish families of jewelers (with affinities for Genghis Khan) based in Israel, but this is only the tip of the iceberg. While there are many other foreign Jews connected to the Icelandic heist, it is the involvement of Jews with connections to Israeli intelligence that reveals the outline of the Israeli operation. WHO OWNS THE BANK? The superficial reporting in the Zionist-controlled media obscures the Israeli connections. The New York Times, for example, reported on 8 May 2010 that Hreidar Mar Sigurdsson and Magnus Gudmundsson, former executives of Iceland's Kaupthing bank, had been arrested. Kaupthing was the largest of the three Icelandic banks that collapsed in October 2008 "under a mountain of debt, causing the Icelandic currency to crash and sending the economy into a tailspin." "Magnus Gudmundsson, a former Kaupthing executive who now runs a privately held bank in Luxembourg, was also arrested," the Times reported. This raised the obvious question about what kind of bank would be run by a former executive of a bank that had failed so badly as Kaupthing. The private bank that Gudmundsson was running when he was arrested in May was actually the former Kaupthing Luxembourg, a branch that had been taken over in July 2009 and renamed Banque Havilland S.A., after the Guernsey mansion of secretive David "Spotty" Rowland – the new owner of the bank. Kaupthing Luxembourg was bought by Blackfish Capital, "a small British hedge fund" owned by David Rowland, a British tax exile based in the Channel Islands, and his son Jonathan David Rowland, managing director of Citigroup's European Financial Entrepreneurs Group. Despite being a tax exile, David Rowland is the largest contributor to Britain's Conservative Party, which recently won control of the government. When he gave more than £1 million to the party of David Cameron, Rowland said he gave the money because of his concern for "liberty." When the former CEOs of Kaupthing and Banque Havilland were arrested, Icelandic Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir said: "It's crucial that the players in the collapse are held accountable. I'm still of the opinion that the lending practices of Kaupthing were either unethical or illegal." Sigurdardottir said Kaupthing had lent 1.5 trillion kronur ($11.5 billion) in transactions that were "if not illegal, completely unethical." The loans were granted to 10 "interlinked parties." The sale of Kaupthing Luxembourg is a very interesting event for various reasons. First is the media silence in Iceland…Why the silence about one of the most valuable assets Iceland has, not from a financial point of view, but from that of the value of information it has on the whole economic collapse and all the very dubious deals going on at Kaupthing and in fact other banks as well. Did Rowland buy Kaupthing Luxembourg in order to control critical information about where billions of dollars had gone? Was Kaupthing Lux a key conduit in Operation Tchenguiz? David Rowland is connected to Israel in several ways: · Rowland manages the Tchenguiz Depository Trust, a fund belonging to Israel-based Victor Tchenguiz; Jonathan Rowland was the founder (with his father) and CEO of JellyWorks Plc, a private equity fund that invested in budding Internet companies. The company only lasted 8 months from its flotation in December 1999 until it was acquired by Shore Capital in August 2000. David Rowland was the biggest shareholder in Shore when it bought JellyWorks. Rowland's investment of £12 million in the company was bought out for £45 million – a nearly four-fold return. Jonathan Rowland has a vision of becoming a banking dynasty: "I want to run an investment house like the Rothschilds or the Flemings," he says. "There is no one around like that any more." There is also an amazing 9-11 connection. Jonathan Rowland was supposed to be at a meeting at the World Trade Center on 9-11 – but stayed away, just like Larry Silverstein and 4,000 Israelis, saying he had a hangover. As The Independent (U.K.) reported in October 2003: He had a meeting scheduled in the World Trade Center on the morning of 11 September 2001. But having overdone a "quiet drink" the previous night, he was in his hotel room nursing a glass of Alka-Seltzer when the planes hit the twin towers. Was it really a hangover that kept Jonathan Rowland from attending the meeting he had flown across the ocean for – or did he also get a message telling him to stay away from the World Trade Center, like the 4,000 Israelis who were supposed to have been in the Twin Towers on 9-11? Are the Rowland's tied to the network of Israelis suspected of pulling off 9-11? It certainly appears that they are. ZVI MAROM AND THE MOSSAD
The Luxembourg subsidiary of Kaupthing was established in 1998 and has a branch in Geneva, Switzerland. This is the same model as the privatized Israel Discount Bank (IDB), which has a subsidiary in New York and a branch in Switzerland. One of the directors of IDB New York, Seymour Merinsky (aka Sy Syms) was a business partner of Bernard Madoff at Yeshiva University's Syms School of Business. Icelandic investigators have reportedly put two secretive Israeli property tycoons, Moises and Mendi Gertner, orthodox Jewish brothers affiliated with the Mossad's diamond-dealing Benny Steinmetz, under scrutiny. The Gertner brothers reportedly bought a 2.5 percent stake in Kaupthing Bank in June 2008 for 14 billion kronur ($176 million). Why did the Israeli property and diamond-dealing Gertner brothers (co-owners with Israeli right-wing diamond tycoons Benny Steinmetz and Dan Gertler of Nikanor, a copper and cobalt mining operation in the Congo), invest in Kaupthing when it was clearly failing?
Steinmetz and Gertler, founder of the DGI Group, are close to and supported by the Israeli military/intelligence establishment. They are friends of Israel's foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman and prime ministers Ehud Olmert and Benjamin Netanyahu. Why would Israeli diamond and mining tycoons connected to Israeli intelligence invest in an Icelandic bank on the verge of collapse? Were they simply using funds borrowed from the bank to try to prop it up just four months before it collapsed? Simon Halabi, a Syria-born Jew who was another big borrower from Kaupthing, disappeared owing some $75 million to the bank. Halabi, a property tycoon who was estimated to be worth £3 billion in 2007 was declared bankrupt in the High Court of London at the end of March 2010 over a £56.3 million loan he received from the bank's British unit, Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander. Halabi was not present at the hearing and no representations were made on his behalf. Halabi's last address was at a hotel in Switzerland. Why would Simon Halabi be in Switzerland? Most likely because that's where he stashed the money.
Selected Sources: “Gertler’s Bling Bang Torah Gang: Israel and the Ongoing Holocaust in Congo” by Keith Harmon Snow, 9 February 2008
The Israeli Role in the Plundering of Iceland
May 22, 2010 Part One 9/11 - THE TRUTH IS OUT The discovery of large amounts of Super-Thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center is solid scientific proof that the government and media version of 9-11 is nothing but a pack of treasonous lies. The evidence indicates that the Twin Towers were exploded using sophisticated nano-composite forms of Thermite and cutter charges. Thanks to the Internet, the truth about 9-11 is out and understood by millions of people across America and around the world. Although it may come as an unpleasant surprise to some, it is a proven fact that the same network of Zionist Jews is behind the false-flag terrorism of 9-11 and the huge financial crimes of the past few years. Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, for example, the disgraced former CEO of the fraudulent A.I.G., is a member of this criminal network. The first airplane flew directly into the secure computer room of Marsh McClennan (MMC), a Greenberg-owned company (headed by his son Jeffrey) on 9-11. Another Greenberg-owned company, Kroll Security, was responsible for security at the World Trade Center.  Maurice Greenberg is involved in both 9-11 and the A.I.G. bail-out. I have pointed out these connections in "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Network Behind 9-11", a key chapter of my book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World: Kroll Associates was responsible for "revamping security at the World Trade Center after the 1993 terrorist bombing," Douglas Frantz of the New York Times reported in 1994. This is a crucial point because those who controlled security at the WTC are prime suspects in the demolition of the Twin Towers. It was directly into the computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA in the North Tower that the first plane struck -- or was precision-guided -- on 9-11. The light orange flame and whitish smoke that exploded out of the burning computer room of Marsh USA are indicative of a Thermite reaction. Burning jet fuel produces darker orange flames and blackish smoke. John O'Neill, the former chief of counterterrorism with the FBI, who had investigated Al Qaida, was the head of security for the World Trade Center complex, and was reportedly killed on his first day of work - on 9-11. O'Neill had been appointed to this position by the managing director of the Kroll security company, Jerome M. Hauer. Evidently, Kroll continued to manage security for the WTC complex from 1993 until 9-11.  The first plane flew directly into the secure computer room of Greenberg's Marsh McClennan Company. The explosions and white smoke that accompanied the crash are indicative of Thermite having been preplaced in the computer room. Later, Maurice Greenberg's fraudulent insurance company A.I.G. was the key player in the Bush-Obama bail-out of 2008-2009, receiving more than $180 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds. Much of the taxpayer money paid out to A.I.G. was then distributed to equally criminal private investment banks like Goldman Sachs, whose profits from dodgy financial schemes/instruments had been insured by A.I.G. Fear tactics were employed as the U.S. taxpayer was robbed while being told that the bail-out of the network of financial criminals was for the public good. We then find the same Zionist criminal network behind the Bernard Madoff scam in which tens of billions of dollars disappeared into thin air. The fact that Madoff's business partner Sy Syms was also a director of a private Israeli bank called Israel Discount Bank (New York), a bank with a documented history of money laundering and a branch in Switzerland, did not seem to interest Lev Dassin, the Zionist prosecutor. Most remarkably, Dassin, the prosecutor of Madoff, failed to even file charges of conspiracy in a financial criminal case in which more than $26 billion is reported to have disappeared. Behind all of these mega-crimes we find one common denominator: a network of individuals connected to Israeli intelligence, the Mossad. The Israelis are well known to have a penchant for audacity. Seemingly immune from prosecution, the Mossad's crimes have only become more audacious. The evidence of Israeli involvement in these crimes is clear and indisputable. The only reason the Israelis get away with their outrageous crimes is because there is no political will to prosecute them. PLUNDERING ICELAND The looting of much of the wealth of Iceland is one such mega-crime in which we find Israelis involved at the highest level. The First Lady of Iceland, Dorrit Moussaieff, is an Israeli Jew, which adds a significant wrinkle to the whole plot.  The Israeli Dorrit Moussaieff is the "fabulously wealthy socialite wife of the President of Iceland." So why did a "fabulously wealthy" Israeli Jew marry the president of a small Nordic nation in the North Atlantic? Iceland recently arrested several executives of the former Kaupthing bank, the largest Icelandic bank involved in the collapse of the Icelandic economy in the fall of 2008. Kaupthing and a couple other banks were responsible for the looting of much of the wealth of Iceland (and other nations). Two of the former executives of the bank were recently held in solitary confinement to facilitate the Icelandic investigation. Iceland's special prosecutor is investigating a number of former Kaupthing executives for alleged market manipulation and forgery. Before its collapse, Kaupthing lent more than $12 billion in shady deals that were "if not illegal, completely unethical," Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir said. When Kaupthing, Glitnir Bank, and Landsbanki Islands collapsed in October 2008 they had amassed debts equivalent to 12 times Iceland’s gross domestic product. After taking control of the three banks, the government was forced to seek a $4.6 billion International Monetary Fund-led loan to stay afloat. If an intelligence agency of a foreign government were involved in bankrupting Iceland, a member of NATO, it should be considered an act of war. Kaupthing's loan book (leaked on the Internet) shows that around one third of its $20 billion in corporate loans went to a small elite connected to the bank's owners and management. One of Kaupthing's owners and the bank's largest debtor when it collapsed is an Iraqi-Iranian Jew named Robert Tchenguiz (pronounced like Genghis, as in Khan). The bank's leaked loan book shows that Tchenguiz borrowed some $3 billion from the bank to finance his private investments. Tchenguiz and his brother Vincent are London-based business tycoons. Robert was an owner of Kaupthing as one of the largest shareholders in Exista, a company that was the largest shareholder of the bank.  Robert Tchenguiz - "I can't comment on what Hreidar did or didn't do. It is very difficult for me to discuss this. I don't know why he was arrested. I don't know anything about the case."  Tchenguiz siblings Vincent and Lisa Tchenguiz claims that he lost everything with the bank's collapse. "I lost all my money with the collapse of Kaupthing and I am suing the bank so I have to watch what I say," he said recently. High-profile "losers" like the Tchenguiz brothers, who lose billions of dollars, are typical of Mossad financial scams. Like Bernard Madoff, the Tchenguiz brothers claim to have lost billions of dollars, but where did the money really go? As I pointed out in the Madoff scam, the missing billions probably went to secret Zionist-controlled bank accounts, for example at the Swiss branch of Israel Discount Bank where Madoff's friend and business partner Sy Syms (a.k.a. Seymour Merinsky) was a long-time director. In the Tchenguiz case, the Israeli partner-in-crime was probably his father, Victor, whose original surname is reported to be Kedourie Molaaem, and who has lived in Israel since at least 2003. Victor Tchenguiz, an Iraqi Jew from Baghdad, has evidently worked with the Israeli Mossad for decades, and was reported in the British press in 2003 to be "the brains" behind the Tchenguiz business empire: "One reason that Victor Tchenguiz was long supposed to be the brains behind Rotch was that his Ferrari-driving sons didn't seem to spend much time at their desks," Conal Walsh wrote in the Observer of May 25, 2003.  The Tchenguiz kids, Vincent, Lisa, and Robert are well known for living high on other people's money. As the Observer noted in 2003: "The [Iranian Jewish] community is also legendary when it comes to shopping and partying. One reason that Victor Tchenguiz was long supposed to be the brains behind Rotch was that his Ferrari-driving sons didn't seem to spend much time at their desks." About the Israeli connection with the Tchenguiz family, Walsh wrote: Victor Tchenguiz, 80 and now living in Israel, is a larger-than-life figure who apparently traded in his original surname of Kedorie for Tchenguiz, Persian for 'Genghis', in honour of the great Mongol warlord. An Iraqi-born Jew, he reportedly fled Baghdad to avoid persecution in 1948, landing in Iran and swiftly becoming a favourite of the Shah. How Victor did this is unclear - Robert has hinted that he married well - but by the Seventies he was jeweller to Iran's royal family and, it has been reported, in charge of the royal mint. When the Shah was deposed in 1979, Victor fled to London, with his fortune seemingly intact. The British press seems to be quite clueless about Victor Tchenguiz's high-level connections to the Shah of Iran and how he got there, as Chris Blackhurst wrote in his MT interview with Robert Tchenguiz: Somehow, despite being a foreigner, Victor became a member of the Shah's inner circle, becoming the royal jeweller and also head of the country's mint. The family were in the elite of Iranian society - the children were pupils at the International School in Tehran and the sons went to university abroad - Robert to Pepperdine in California. Then the Shah fell. Victor moved the family to London, again displaying enormous dexterity by managing to bring their money over as well. While the press reports are quite sketchy, the name suggests that the Tchenguiz family may originally be Iranian Jews, perhaps named Molayem (i.e. soft), which would fit the unusual "Molaaem" spelling of the family name. Although Victor and Violet met in Baghdad, they were married in Iran after a very short courtship, apparently in 1955 according to a 2009 interview with their daughter Lisa. There would be no reason for Iraqi Jews to be married in Iran if they did not have family there: Lisa's own parents, who are both Iraqi Jews by origin, had a semi-arranged marriage. Her father spotted her mother walking beside the canal in Baghdad, and introduced himself to her father at a café. Several coffees later, the deal was done. 'My mother was at home when her mother came in and told her that she was having an engagement party the following week.' The couple 'dated' for five days, heavily chaperoned, then married in Iran. Fifty-four years later, they are still together and, says Lisa, happily so. It is well known that the Mossad, Israel's intelligence agency, played a key role in supporting the Shah of Iran and his secret police, the SAVAK, as the Wikipedia article on the Mossad notes: Prior to the Iranian Revolution of 1978–79, SAVAK (Organization of National Security and Information), the Iranian secret police and intelligence service was created under the guidance of United States and Israeli intelligence officers in 1957 to protect the regime of the shah by arresting, torturing, and executing the dissidents (especially Leftists). After security relations between the United States and Iran grew more distant in the early 1960s which led the CIA training team to leave Iran, Mossad became increasingly active in Iran, "training SAVAK personnel and carrying out a broad variety of joint operations with SAVAK." As the Jew who headed the Iranian mint and served as court jeweller for the Shah, Victor Tchenguiz would have worked closely with the Mossad. The Mossad connection would explain why Victor lives in Israel while his "billionaire" children and grandchildren all live in Britain. Why would Victor leave his family and home to retire in a country where he has never lived? The evidence suggests that Victor is indeed "the brains" behind the looting of Iceland and probably needed to be in Israel - close to his Israeli partners-in-crime - to pull off the mega-heist. (To be continued...) Sources and Recommended Reading: "I want £200m from The Man From Del Monte in Britain's biggest divorce (but he isn't saying Yes)" by Elizabeth Sanderson, Daily Mail Online (U.K.), February 4, 2010 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1247389/I-want-200m-The-Man-From-Del-Monte-Britains-biggest-divorce-isnt-saying-Yes.html "Robert Tchenguiz: I lost everything with Kaupthing", by Jóna Ann Pétursdóttir, Pressan (Iceland) May 7, 2010 "Persian playboy goes shopping", by Conal Walsh, The Observer, May 25, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2003/may/25/theobserver.observerbusiness6 "The Tchenguiz sister", by Lydia Slater, London Evening Standard (U.K.), May 15, 2009 http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23691957-the-tchenguiz-sister.do Wikipedia article on Mossad
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad "Madoffs Victims", partial list compiled by Barry Ritholtz, December 15, 2008 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/12/madoffs-victims/
Why Do Jews Commit Massacres?
June 12, 2010
I am speaking to them in their own language. The sixth commandment says, 'Thou shalt not kill'. Did you not understand?" "THE BEST OF THE GENTILES - KILL HIM" Humanity is shocked, once again, by the Israeli massacre of nine peace activists on the Gaza-bound Freedom Flotilla on Memorial Day. Eyewitness testimony and the evidence indicate that unarmed victims, including one American teenager, were executed in cold blood.
Like a large criminal gang, most Israeli leaders, including president Shimon Peres, have been involved in the commission of war crimes. Peres, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize (and father of Israel's nuclear weapons arsenal) is actually a colossal criminal. He was, for example, prime minister during the 1996 invasion of Lebanon when Israeli forces targeted the U.N. base near Cana (Qana) killing scores of refugees who had sought shelter with the United Nations.
Massacres and "ethnic cleansing" are central to Zionist history. The Zionist state is built on the land and villages of Palestinians who were either killed outright or forced into exile. Some four hundred Palestinian towns and villages were ethnically cleansed during the Zionist conquest of Palestine in 1947-1948. Israeli forces have continued to perpetrate massacres during the six decades since. Why do Israelis commit so many massacres? When our forces come across civilians during a war or in hot pursuit or in a raid, so long as there is no certainty that those civilians are incapable of harming our forces, then according to the Halakhah they may and even should be killed ... Under no circumstances should an Arab be trusted, even if he makes an impression of being civilized ... In war, when our forces storm the enemy, they are allowed and even enjoined by the Halakhah to kill even good civilians, that is, civilians who are ostensibly good. The late Israeli author named Israel Shahak wrote an essential book about Zionism and Jewish supremacism, entitled Jewish History, Jewish Religion, which revealed the inherent racism of Jewish rabbinical law and how the rabbis of the Israeli military enjoin soldiers to kill non-Jews: The non-Jewish nations have a custom according to which war has its own rules, like those of a game, like the rules of football or basketball. But according to the sayings of our sages, of blessed memory…war for us is not a game but a vital necessity, and only by this standard must we decide how to wage it. On the one hand…we seem to learn that if a Jew murders a Gentile, he is regarded as a murderer and, except for the fact that no court has the right to punish him, the gravity of the deed is like that of any other murder. But we find in the very same authorities in another place…that Rabbi Shim'on used to say: "The best of Gentiles - kill him; the best of snakes dash out its brains."
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Is Israel Doomed?
June 11, 2010
"It is clear the United States is not against nuclear bombs because they have a Zionist regime with nuclear bombs in the region. They are trying to save the Zionist regime, but the Zionist regime will not survive. It is doomed." Is the Zionist regime doomed, as the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on June 11 during a trip to China? Will the state of Israel survive? First, it should be remembered that unpopular political regimes fail and go out of business all the time. Scores of regimes have passed from the scene during the past thirty years and very few are lamenting their passing. About half the nations of Europe have seen complete regime changes since the late 1980s and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Very few people were hurt during this political earthquake that changed the government regimes of some 150 million people. The United States is currently engaged in two extremely costly and drawn out wars of occupation, in Afghanistan and Iraq (on both sides of Iran) in which the goal of the U.S. military is exactly that - regime change. The regime changes in Baghdad or Kabul, however, have clearly not been for the better. The populations of Iraq and Afghanistan have suffered immensely as a result of the U.S.-led regime changes. If the U.S. military were to withdraw from these countries there would certainly be another regime change very quickly as the U.S. quislings were ousted. If Israel were to lose the support of the United States it too would be unable to survive. The Israeli Jews would be forced to leave Palestine, just like Helen Thomas said they should.
Israel's Terror Attack on the USS Liberty
June 9, 2010 Forty-three years ago, on June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty was deliberately attacked by Israel in a blatant false-flag attack that was meant to be blamed on Egypt. Forty-three years later the crew still calls for a proper investigation. It is the only attack on a U.S. ship that has not been investigated by the U.S. Congress.
ON JUNE 8, 1967, while patrolling in international waters in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, USS Liberty (AGTR-5) was savagely attacked without warning or justification by air and naval forces of the state of Israel. Of a crew of 294 officers and men (including three civilians), the ship suffered thirty four (34) killed in action and one hundred seventy three (173) wounded in action. The ship itself, a Forty Million ($40,000,000) Dollar state of the art signals intelligence (SIGINT) platform, was so badly damaged that it never sailed on an operational mission again and was sold in 1970 for $101,666.66 as scrap.
During the air attack, USS Liberty’s crew had difficulty contacting Sixth Fleet to request assistance due to intense communications jamming The initial targets on the ship were the command bridge, communications antennas, and the four .50 caliber machine guns, placed on the ship to repel boarders. After the Israeli fighter aircraft completed their attacks, three Israeli torpedo boats arrived and began a surface attack about 35 minutes after the start of the air attack. The torpedo boats launched a total of five torpedoes, one of which struck the side of USS Liberty, opposite the ship’s research spaces. Twenty-five Americans, in addition to the nine who had been killed in the earlier air attacks, were killed as a result of this explosion. As I document in my online book Solving 9-11 - The Deception that Changed the World, many of the key people involved in the attack on the USS Liberty were also involved in the Israeli false-flag terror operation of 9-11 - and are still running the Zionist outlaw state of Israel. Sources: USS Liberty Veterans Association The USS Liberty Cover Up Bollyn, Christopher, "The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty - Dead in the Water", 14 May 2009 "Dead In The Water - The Sinking of the USS Liberty", Goon Squad, May 2, 2009
Americans Kidnapped, Maimed, and Executed by Israel
Updated June 8, 2010
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know the good from the evil. I remember being asked during the TJP Human Shield Action to Iraq if I was a pacifist, I responded with a quote from Gandhi by saying I am not a passive anything. To the contrary I believe in action, and I also believe in self-defence, 100%, without reservation. I would be incapable of standing by while a tyrant murders my family, and the attack on the Mavri Mamara was like an attack on my Palestinian family. I am proud to have stood shoulder to shoulder with those who refused to let a rogue Israeli military exert their will without a fight. And yes, we fought...
I would especially love to debate with any Israeli leader who accuses us of wrongdoing, it would be my tremendous pleasure to face off with you. All I saw in Israel was cowards with guns, so I am ripe to see you in a new context. I want to debate with you on the largest stage possible. Take that as an open challenge and let us see just how brave Israeli leaders are...
M/V Rachel Corrie HEADING FOR GAZA Despite the violent incident on May 31, another aid ship is currently on its way to Gaza. The Irish-owned M/V Rachel Corrie, carrying Nobel peace laureate Mairéad Corrigan-Maguire and former UN official Denis Halliday, is expected to hit the Israel-imposed exclusion zone by Saturday morning. M/V Rachel Corrie, a vessel named after the 23-year-old American girl killed in Gaza in 2003, is still bound for Gaza. The Rachel Corrie, an Irish ship planning to break Israel's blockade on Gaza was reported early Saturday to be sailing along the North African coast and had recently passed Alexandria in Egypt. Early Saturday morning, a spokesman for the Gaza-based welcoming committee told Agence France Presse the Rachel Corrie had been intercepted and all communications with the ship cut.
"We also feel there is a role for the Irish diaspora here, in the US and elsewhere to lobby politicians over this continued illegal blockade of Gaza, which is causing such hardship to the Palestinian people." M/V Rachel Corrie, an Irish-owned boat laden with humanitarian supplies is continuing its journey towards Gaza despite Israel’s insistence it will not allow any vessel break its blockade on the territory. Source: 'Rachel Corrie' proceeding to Gaza, The Irish Times, June 3, 2010, 18:44
Emily was apparently targeted (a common practice among Israeli soldiers). She lost her left eye. “They clearly saw us,” said Sören Johanssen, a Swedish ISM volunteer standing with Henochowicz. “They clearly saw that we were internationals and it really looked as though they were trying to hit us. They fired many canisters at us in rapid succession. One landed on either side of Emily, then the third one hit her in the face.” Henochowicz is an art student at the prestigious Cooper Union, located in East Village, Manhattan. Her father, Dr. Stuart I. Henochowicz is an Israeli-American who was born in Tel Aviv in 1956.
AMERICAN TEEN KILLED IN ISRAELI MASSACRE
According to the Anatolian news agency, a forensic report states Dogan was shot five times at close range, with four bullets in his head and another in his chest. U.S. citizen among those killed in Israeli flotilla raid, Washington Post, June 3, 2010 The World Protests Israel's Murder, Piracy, and Blockade of Gaza The world has reacted with outrage to the Israeli action with demonstrations in nearly every nation. While the U.S. media and government have ignored the brutality and sheer criminality of the Israeli action, the rest of the world has not. There has been a massive and spontaneous global protest against the Israeli atrocity on the high seas. It seems that this is a turning point in the history of the Zionist state. The people of the world are simply fed up with the Israeli criminal regime. The tide of public opinion has turned against the state of Israel. The European press is calling for Israel to be isolated and the blockade of Gaza to be lifted. There is a huge difference between the way this Israeli atrocity has been covered in the European media and in the controlled press in the United States. The largest European dailies rightly call the Israeli action "state terrorism" and "piracy", while U.S. papers like the New York Times feature Zionist explanations from people like Thomas L. Friedman and the Israeli ambassador Michael Oren.
EHUD BARAK'S ATTACK ON FLOTILLA "A GROSS BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL LAW" "This action, totally contrary to the principles of international law, is inhumane state terrorism. Nobody should think we will keep quiet in the face of this."
Israeli forces have attacked a flotilla of aid-carrying ships aiming to break the country's siege on Gaza. At least 15 people were killed and dozens injured when troops intercepted the convoy of ships dubbed the Freedom Flotilla early on Monday, the Israeli military said. The Israeli action, which is clearly illegal, was carried out under orders from Israel's Minister of Defense Ehud Barak. Barak is also legally responsible for Israeli war crimes committed during Israel's military assault on the Gaza Strip in late 2008 and early 2009. Barak is also suspected of being the Israeli mastermind behind the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. One of the survivors from Mavi Marmara was a member of the Israeli government named Hanan Al-Zoubi. She explained in a press conference in Israel that the military had begun shooting at the vessel before any troops came aboard: “I did not see any passengers carrying a stick, or a sharp object. The Israeli attack gave the impression that something big would happen. The commandos started shooting between quarter and half past four before landing. There was a clear message that our lives are in big danger, and that the goal was not to stop the ship, but more than that.” Al-Zoubi said that the Israeli military failed to treat several seriously wounded people, who bled to death: Al-Zoubi pointed out that the Navy commandos moved the ship to the of port Ashdod. “We arrived at six in the morning.” She added: “We knew that there were 5 bodies and dozens of wounded, among them 7 injured in critical condition. I asked several times to provide them with first aid of emergency, but the military did not cooperate with us. The consequence of not giving them of any kind of relief was that two wounded peace activists bled to death."
The Israeli use of lethal force on the high-profile civilian aid flotilla is not unusual or unexpected. It is actually a typical Israeli response to peaceful actions taken to help the beseiged Palestinian population. The murder of the young American Rachel Corrie with an Israeli military bulldozer in March 2003 comes to mind. Rachel, age 23, was peacefully trying to prevent the Israeli military from bulldozing the home of a Palestinian pharmacist in the Gaza Strip when she was killed - with the blade and tracks of the monstrous machine.
The current Israeli leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak is a government of dangerous Zionist extremists who prefer the use of violence to talking peace. In April 2010 I warned that Netanyahu and Barak are likely to react with an act of terrorism in the face of international criticism: The fact that the U.S. and the international community have now clearly condemned illegal Israeli settlements is piling pressure on Netanyahu and his government of extremists. The crucial question now is how will Netanyahu respond to this pressure? This is a dangerous situation because Zionist zealots, when pressed to make compromises for peace, usually react with violence and terrorism. The flotilla was attacked in international waters, 65 kilometers off the Gaza coast. The Israeli action is clearly an act of piracy on the high seas (not unlike what happens in the waters off the Horn of Africa) in which hundreds of international civilians have been taken hostage. Carl Bildt, the Swedish foreign minister, said the Israeli abduction of the 700 civilians from the flotilla could be described as an act of kidnapping. The Israelis had plenty of time to prepare for a legal and non-violent response when the flotilla reached Gaza, or even territorial waters off the coast of Gaza, but instead of being sensible they chose to launch an outrageous illegal military raid with live ammunition under the cover of darkness -- in international waters. Ehud Barak, the Israeli military chief implicated in the false-flag terrorism of 9-11, is what Socrates would call an utterly immoral arch-criminal, who successfully avoids being criticized and disciplined and punished for his crimes. The arch-criminal's success in avoiding punishment is, however, not at all to his benefit, as Socrates says: "The worst thing in the world, the supreme curse, is to do wrong and not pay the penalty for it." The Free Gaza Movement, the organisers of the flotilla, said Israeli troops opened fire as soon as they stormed the convoy. Our correspondent said that a white surrender flag was raised from the ship and there was no live fire coming from the passengers. Before losing communication with our correspondent, a voice in Hebrew was clearly heard saying: "Everyone shut up". International Outrage: "People certainly have the right to resist if they're being attacked. We taught our Free Gaza Movement people to be non-violent, and the Turks did the same, but if anyone resisted, it was in response to soldiers opening fire on them when they hit the deck." - Greta Berlin, one of the flotilla organisers, rejecting Israel's claim that the activists were the first ones to start shooting. Berlin said there were no weapons on board the boats, and that any violence from the activists would have been in self-defense. "Only a crazy government that has lost all restraint and all connection to reality could do something like that - consider ships carrying humanitarian aid and peace activists from around the world as an enemy and send massive military force to international waters to attack them -- shoot and kill." - Uri Avnery, former Member of the Knesset, Israel, Gush Shalom Movement “The attack clearly shows Israel's aggressive nature and its disrespect to international and humanitarian rules and laws. We call on the international community to take immediate steps against Israel, a rogue state that practices all forms of terrorism and piracy, and instigates tension and instability in the region and in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea.” - Amr Moussa, Secretary General, Arab League “The Palestinian leadership is closely following the developments and the President calls on the United Nations to confront Israel, which is disregarding all international laws and norms. The attack on the Flotilla is an attack against humanity. This incident will have grave consequences in the region and the world.” - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas “The Israeli attack on the aid convoy is a dangerous and crazy step that will exacerbate tensions in the region. Lebanon firmly denounces this attack and calls on the international community, notably major powers... to take action in order to end this continued violation of human rights and threat to international peace.” - Saad Hariri, Prime Minister of Lebanon “The interception on the convoy is unacceptable ... Israel will have to bear the consequences of its actions. We strongly condemn it and await an immediate explanation. By targeting innocent civilians, Israel has once again clearly displayed that it does not value human lives and peaceful initiatives. We forcefully condemn these inhumane activities by Israel. The incident occurred on the open sea -- which is a gross breach of international law -- could cause irrevocable consequences for our relations. We wish to express our condolences to the bereaved families of the deceased, and swift recovery to the wounded.” - Statement from Turkish Foreign Ministry Finis Sources and Recommended Reading: “Gaza flotilla: MV Rachel Corrie heads for Israel coast”, Guardian (U.K.), June 4, 2010 Gordon Duff: What Israel’s Execution Of An American Teen Means, June 4, 2010 Report: Autopsy shows Gaza activists were shot a total of 30 times, Reuters, June 5, 2010 "Godspeed to Gaza", by Israel Shamir http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Godspeed_to_Gaza.htm “Fire Started Before IDF Landing, Wounded bled to Death”, Hanan Al-Zoubi, Arab-Israeli Knesset member from National Democratic Alliance and survivor from M/V Marmara http://www.kawther.info/wpr/2010/06/01/fire-started-before-idf-landing-wounded-bled-to-death#more-8502 "American hit in anti-Israeli protest loses eye," Associated Press, June 2, 2010 "Israel attacks Gaza aid fleet", Al Jazeera, May 31, 2010 http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/05/201053133047995359.html "Outrage over Israel attack", Al Jazeera, May 31, 2010
Why Did Israel Attack Civilians in the Mediterranean?
June 2, 2010 by Thierry Meyssan ISRAEL WEIGHED IN ADVANCE THE CONSEQUENCES of its attack against a humanitarian convoy of ships carrying aid to the Gaza Strip. What were its objectives in triggering a world diplomatic crisis, and why did it defy its Turkish ally as well as its U.S. protector?
Extracts from "Why did Israel attack civilians in the Mediterranean?"
Sources: "Why did Israel attack civilians in the Mediterranean?" by Thierry Meyssan, June 1, 2010
Photos of 9/11 Truth Demonstration at the Israeli Consulate
Updated: May 27, 2010 Please go to Bollyn.com and read Christopher Bollyn's great E-book Solving 9/11 - The Deception that Changed the World. If you do, maybe I'll see you carrying a placard at the next action in front of the Israeli Consulate. On Tuesday, May 18, there was a public demonstration at the Israeli Consulate in Los Angeles by people who are convinced that Israeli intelligence, i.e. the Mossad with Gentile and Jewish agents, carried out the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11. The following photos are from this historic demonstration (the first of its kind) in front of the Israeli Consulate at 6380 Wilshire Blvd. in Los Angeles.
The Importance of Exercising Our Right to Demonstrate
The 9-11 truth demonstration was arranged by Zan, a patriotic American with great moral courage. Zan can be seen in the video below. Zan is showing Americans how they should use their freedom of speech to expose the Israeli role in the deception that changed our nation. We need to stand up and show that we know that Israel was behind 9-11 and that we reject the Zionist logic of terrorism, intimidation, and war. Zan has also written a letter about the protest to TRIBE, a magazine for Jews in Los Angeles. Zan has a great deal of moral courage, which is bravery in the face of fear to fight injustice when others look away or choose to do nothing. Moral courage is the strength in one's heart to take risks to stand up for what is right. People who believe that Israel’s Mossad* did 9/11 will demonstrate in front of the Israeli Consulate at 6380 Wilshire Blvd. in Los Angeles between 2PM and 4PM on Tuesday, May 18th, 2010. (*Accusing the Mossad implies that it was ordered to do 9/11 by Israeli leaders and was aided by allies and helpers in the United States, both Gentile and Jewish.) The following article is about Zan's one-man demonstration in Los Angeles, which was videotaped. The article has been updated with photos of a Zionist Jew attacking Zan on a sidewalk in Los Angeles as he peacefully picketed with a sign that said "Israel - not Muslims - did 9-11". These photos open up the much neglected subject of Zionist violence against American 9-11 truth activists. Like Zan in Los Angeles, I have been subjected to Zionist violence and malicious prosecution for exercising my Constitutional rights while pursuing the truth of what happened on 9-11, as have fellow 9-11 activists in Worcester, Massachusetts. It should be noted that all three victims of Zionist violence (Zan, Bollyn, and Hmura) were attacked for peacefully exercising their Constitutional freedom of speech.
Violence is inherent to Zionism, a racist ideology of Jewish supremacism that seeks to impose itself on the people of Palestine and the Middle East -- and the United States of America. People who support Zionism are supporting a state and ideology that was born in massacres and ethnic cleansing and which requires constant violence just to maintain itself. Having seen the injustice and violence inherent to Zionism during my many trips to Israel and Palestine, I am well aware of the support militant Zionism has among American Jews and misguided Gentiles. I also realized that it is not possible or prudent, as an American Christian, to challenge Zionism in Israel and that the crucial struggle is really for the hearts and minds of my fellow Americans. The false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 were actually a massive manifestation of Zionist violence - against innocent Americans. The struggle is now to bring the facts about who is really behind 9-11 and the "War on Terror" to our fellow Americans and to liberate our nation from unnecessary violence and suffering. Zan, a long-time reader and supporter of Bollyn.com from Los Angeles, shows how one man can make a big difference. Zan exercised his fundamental American right of free speech holding a sign which said: ISRAEL* - NOT MUSLIMS - Zan peacefully held his sign and handed out a four-page flyer to those who wanted it, while standing on a sidewalk near a theatre in Los Angeles where an event put on by the conservative radio station KRLA (a Salem Communications station) was taking place last November. While Zan picketed peacefully with his sign he was attacked by a belligerent and aggressive Jew who is seen in the video saying that his violent attack against Zan was his way of expressing his opinion. Zan wrote this to me: We didn't get video of the man in the long white shirt grabbing my signs, trying to rip them up. Failing that, he threw them on the ground and started haranguing me. The video shows him a little later claiming he had a right to express himself as I had a right to express myself.
The hostile and abusive reactions of some of the people are very interesting and show how difficult it is for many people to accept information that does not square with the Zionist worldview presented by the controlled media in the United States. The Zionist-controlled media defines reality for most people in America. If they have not seen it on CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, or FOX News, and read about it in the New York Times, TIME, Newsweek, and the Washington Post - well, it must not be true. Many Americans accept and parrot the political point of view of their favorite TV or radio personality (e.g. Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, etc.). You often hear people expressing their opinion using the exact same terms and phrases spewed by these highly-paid talking heads. One of the people in the video below displays this when he says that the official version has been proved - by the media! (The controlled media is the last place to expect to find any truth about 9-11.)
Solving 9-11 Most Popular Online Book in Norway
May 26, 2010 Norway is a nation where my book, Solving 9-11, has been available online for readers for the past year. Today I received a note from the online host who wrote an article (in Norwegian) that my book is the most popular book online at Askehaug during the past six months. I certainly hope to visit Norway soon.
Newsweek - "We Would Publish Whole Stories That Were Lies"
June 21, 2010
How Ehud Barak Pulled Off 9-11
Updated - May 5, 2010 Badness always manifests in destruction and corruption, while goodness always manifests in preservation and benefit.
IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation - period. Ehud Barak, Israel's defense minister, has been in the United States for a week of meetings and speeches. He is, in my opinion, the key suspect of being the mastermind of the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11. I am providing this brief article to explain how I think he did it.
Ehud Barak (Brug) was born at Kibbutz Mishmar Hasharon on 12 February 1942. He enlisted in the Israeli Army at age 17, became a career army officer, and helped to found and lead the elite Sayeret Matkal covert operations commando unit. After serving as head of Israeli Intelligence and Central Command during the 1980s, Barak was appointed IDF Chief of Staff, in 1991. Barak was Israel's minister of defense during Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip in 2008-2009. Based on the report of the U.N. Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, written by Justice Richard Goldstone, Barak is legally responsible for a host of war crimes committed during that assault. The United States (and all other nations who have ratified the Geneva Conventions) are obliged to arrest Ehud Barak based on the evidence and findings presented in the Goldstone report.
Socrates' point that unpunished criminals become worse is very much the story of modern Israel. The most serious criminals of the Zionist state have never been punished in any meaningful way by the international community - or the United States. This laissez faire attitude regarding Zionist criminals has only enabled and emboldened the most unscrupulous and aggressive criminals to rise to the top of the Israeli government, where they sit today. The criminal audacity of Israel's leaders is, however, simply not sustainable for the long term because their rampant criminality endangers the Zionist state, its citizens, and even its supporters.
Ehud Barak was prime minister of Israel from July 1999 until March 7, 2001, when he was replaced by Ariel Sharon. I attended an event at the Chicago campus of the University of Illinois where both Barak, then prime minister, and Sharon were involved shortly before the election that brought Sharon to power. The fact that Barak and Sharon had travelled to Chicago together illustrated the utter fakeness of their rivalry. When Sharon assumed power in March 2001, Barak came to America. He supposedly came to the United States to work as a special advisor for Electronic Data Systems and as a partner with SCP Partners, a Mossad-run private equity company focused on "security-related" work - but this was merely his cover. His real assignment was to oversee the terror attacks of 9-11. As a partner with SCP Partners Barak was well placed to supervise the false-flag terror operation. The complex false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 required that the mastermind of the operation be in the country to manage the critical details. One of the key aspects of 9-11 that Barak needed to arrange was the production and application of an advanced form of super-thermite, an extremely powerful explosive produced using nano-technology. In 2001, SCP Partners happened to have a suitable company in their portfolio, a private company called Metallurg Holdings, Inc., which has its office in Wayne, Pennsylvania. Today, SCP has another company called Advanced Metallurgical Group, N.V. (AMG) in its portfolio. AMG and Metallurg actually share the same phone number and address at 435 Devon Park Drive in Wayne. SCP Private Equity Partners L.P. and its management company named Safeguard International, which controls the metallurgical subsidiaries, are also both based at this address. AMG/Safeguard International have several subsidiaries, including one that specializes in the production of atomized aluminum (a crucial component of super-thermite) and others which manufacture specialized coatings of nano-composites.
Rafi Eitan, the octogenarian Mossadnik who ran a spy operation against the United States using Jonathan Pollard, fled to Israel after Pollard was caught in 1985. Eitan was then offered the position as head of state-owned Israel Chemicals Corporation, which also has production and manufacturing facilities in the United States. In 1978, when Israeli intelligence began planning the false-flag terror operation of 9-11 (according to the documented comments of senior Mossadnik Isser Harel), Eitan was serving as Menachem Begin's "advisor on terrorism". This is the real reason that Rafi Eitan remained in the Israeli security cabinet until 2009 - he is one of the architects of 9-11. Four other Israelis visited NUMEC on Sept. 10, 1968, and met with Shapiro [then-NUMEC President Zalman M. Shapiro, a staunch supporter of Israel] to "discuss thermoelectric devices (unclassified)," according to a Sept. 12, 1968, letter from Bruce D. Rice, NUMEC security manager, to Harry R. Walsh, director of AEC security and property management, seeking AEC approval for the visit. The four visitors were: Avraham Hermoni, Ephraim Beigon, Abraham Bendor and Raphael (or, Rafael) Eitan. In their 1991 book, "Dangerous Liaison," Andrew and Leslie Cockburn wrote, "At the time of his visit to Apollo in 1968, Eitan was acting as an agent for Mossad on special assignment to LAKAM ... a shadowy intelligence agency ... born in the 1950s with the express purpose of acquiring nuclear technology by any means." Soon after the men's visit, 587 pounds of weapons-grade uranium reportedly went missing from NUMEC, according to Udall's papers. In a recent article entitled "America’s Loose Nukes in Israel," Grant Smith wrote: "To date, all of the uranium-diversion masterminds, financiers, and beneficiaries have escaped criminal prosecution, even as U.S. taxpayers fund a nuclear waste cleanup at the (now defunct) NUMEC Apollo facility." Eitan's unscrupulous character can be seen in a comment he made to the wife and lawyer for Jonathan Pollard, the captured spy he had managed: Eitan told us the only thing he regrets about the Pollard affair is that he did not 'finish the job' before leaving the States. We asked him what he meant by this. Eitan replied, "If I had been at the embassy when Pollard came to seek asylum, I would have put a bullet through his head. There would have been no Pollard affair."
At SCP Partners Barak worked closely with another Mossadnik named Eitan - Yaron I. Eitan. Although Yaron Eitan looks very much like Rafi Eitan, the relationship between the two Eitans is not known. Rafi Eitan was actually born Raphael Hantman in Mandate Palestine to Noah Hantman from Minsk, Byelorussia. Rafi reportedly has three children, named Yael, Sharon, and Yuval.
Sources and Recommended Reading: "America’s Loose Nukes in Israel", by Grant Smith, April 14, 2010 "Government agencies investigated missing uranium, NUMEC", by Mary Ann Thomas and Ramesh Santanam, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, August 25, 2002
The War in Iraq - Riley and His Story
May 1, 2010
The United States has been at war in Iraq since January 1991, more than 19 years. Started by President George H.W. Bush, the war went through a phase of 12 years of punishing sanctions, no-fly zones, and bombings during the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, until the legally-challenged invasion of 2003 and subsequent war of occupation. Hundreds of thousands of U.S. veterans of this 20-year war now have serious health problems, physical and mental. One of the things I have noticed is the difficulties the men have relating with their families when they are back in the states. As a result of the prolonged and intense psychological stress of war a sense of alienation from their wives and children may occur in some military families.
Monica Haller: Riley and His Story Title page introduction: This is not a book. This is an invitation, a container for unstable images, a model for further action. Here is the formula: Riley and his story. Me and my outrage. You and us. Riley was a friend in college and later served as a nurse at Abu Ghraib prison. This is a container for Riley’s digital pictures and fleeting traumatic memories. Images he could not fully secure or expel and entrusted to me. Art can be a series of acts and challenges. Currently the artwork is an object in your hand—organized, mobile, tactile—a stable site to see information once elusive. The artist can mobilize information by provoking, listening, imagining, organizing and reorganizing. Right now, I am the artist. I want you to see what this war did to Riley. Pay attention. This experience happens right in your lap. To make it happen, you must read compassionately, then actively. Then the experience happens wherever you take this container and whenever you respond to my invitation. You and us, yes. Then you and another. This invitation is a model for veterans, families and friends to speak and share openly with each other. The artwork and artist are adaptable; you, the tactical reader, can use this object for your own device, or you can attend to another archive in need of careful attention. This is not a book. It is an object of deployment. To view images and text from Riley and His Story, click on the following link: http://www.rileyandhisstory.com/PDF/riley_excerpts.pdf
Cook County Cops Busted
April 18, 2010 Here is a vivid example of the brutality of the rogue cops of Cook County. This incident happened in Streamwood, a neighboring village of Hoffman Estates, my hometown. In this case the video clearly shows the cop using excessive force on a person. As typical of such cases, the victim of the beating was charged with resisting arrest, although he clearly did not resist in any way. See video here.
In my case there were at least six similar videos taken by the 7 police cars on the scene showing the illegal undercover police assault against me (by Michael Barber, Timothy Stoy, and Darin Felgenhauer). Evidence of serious police misconduct, all video records of the three-man tactical squad assault at my home in August 2006 were destroyed in violation of Hoffman Estates police regulations. I found evidence that the undercover police attack against me had been planned in advance (for exercising my Constitutional rights) - a federal offense. (See section entitled "The Bollyn Trial" for more information.) See: http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/04/streamwood-cop-charged-with-beating-motorist.html
9-11 Activists Investigating Michael Goff Assaulted
April 15, 2010 The AZL, a group of anti-Zionist activists in Worcester, Massachusetts, has come under attack with threats and assaults after calling for an investigation of Michael Goff, who was the founding manager of Ptech and went on to work for the Mossad-linked company, Guardium. The attacks followed AZL interviews done with me last November, which focused on Michael Goff and his role with Ptech. Ptech's enterprise software is thought to be Israeli intelligence spyware which provides unauthorized access to the data on any networks running Ptech software.
"Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9-11," Singh said. "Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA - that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything - it would have been Ptech along with MITRE." - Indira Singh, a risk consultant and IT specialist who had worked on a Defense Advanced Research Project, and who was employed by J.P. Morgan on 9-11, in risk management, to the 9-11 Citizens' Commission hearings in New York, September 2004. (See: Bollyn article on MITRE below) The AZL podcasts, including their interviews with me, can be listened to on their website at: http://azlroundtable.podbean.com/ The following 25-minute AZL podcast of April 2, 2010 explains what happened to this group of 9-11 activists and who they know to be behind the attacks and threats. From their website: “Mossad Death Threats, Assault on Hmura and the AZL” For background on Bollyn interviews with AZL on Michael Goff, see:
The Dirty Business Behind the 9-11 Clean-up
April 11, 2010
Seeing that an advanced nano-composite form of thermite was used to demolish the buildings, we can now understand that the clean-up was actually a well-planned operation to remove and destroy the evidence of the crime. Every aspect of the well-planned false flag terror atrocity of 9-11 was completely controlled and compartmentalized, the hallmarks of a Mossad (Ehud Barak) operation. Every part of the operation is carried out by people and companies that are controlled by the architects of terrorism. They are all essentially part of the same team - the Israeli terror team - and can be controlled and trusted, from the top down. With this in mind, we begin our review of the people who cleaned up the World Trade Center.
"From 12 September until 11 July," Martin Seigel (sometimes written Marty Siegel), "was director of field operations, overseeing the rescue on behalf of Bovis Landfill, which won the contract to clear the debris," The Observer (U.K.) reported on August 18, 2002. How was Bovis chosen so quickly? one might ask. Martin Seigel began working on the pile of rubble already on September 12, 2001? How did a subsidiary of Bovis Lend Lease, a British-owned company headed by Frank Lampl ("Life President" of the company) win the contract in less than one day? What kind of selection process was used? Why such haste to hire companies to remove the debris - before the bodies are recovered and the evidence is examined? One has to understand that 9-11 was planned well in advance, which means that the removal and destruction of the evidence was also planned to be assigned to companies that could be trusted to follow orders and keep secrets. There is no way that the architects of the false flag terror of 9-11 were going to let honest engineers anywhere near the evidence of the crime. The World Trade Center is owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey so it stands to reason that Bovis Lend Lease was chosen by Lewis Eisenberg then director of the Port Authority (until December 2001). Eisenberg, as chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, personally arranged the privatization of the World Trade Center property and oversaw the negotiations that delivered the leases into the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy. (See - "The Zionists Who Gained from 9-11"). Eisenberg is part of the Zionist circle of 9-11 culprits.
Frank Lampl, the "Life President" of Bovis Lend Lease, is a Jew from Brünn (Brno) who emigrated to Britain in 1968. According to his biography, his son Thomas was studying at Oxford University in 1968 when Frank and his wife decided to leave Czechoslovakia. He joined Bovis in 1971 and rose quickly to become chief executive of Bovis International in 1978. Bovis has done many large jobs in the United States, including the construction management contract for the Atlanta Olympic Games. Sir Frank Lampl (knighted by the Queen) is the first Honorary President of the Czech British Chamber of Commerce, a position he has held since March 2009. He has also established a branch of Bovis in Brno, his hometown in the Czech Republic. Bovis has two locations in Brno, one at the hospital and another near the technical university, where nanotechnology is developed. Lampl's Bovis Lend Lease is a company that has long been engaged in nanotechnology research as well. Since the 1990s, Bovis has been involved in the development of nanotechnology labs, such as those in which the super-thermite used on 9-11 was made. Bovis company archives indicate that the company has been involved in nanotechnology production since at least October 2000. (See: Bovis Lend Lease Launches New Pharmaceutical Business, October 30, 2000.) Senior Architect Sir Frank Lampl is also a friend of Ehud Barak, the Israeli minister of defense who is responsible for the war crimes committed in Gaza in Israel's operation "Cast Lead" of December 2008 and January 2009. Some 1,400 Palestinian civilians were killed in this criminal assault on the people of the Gaza Strip. In October 2009, Sir Frank Lampl, a partner of Forum 2000, sponsored an international conference in which Ehud Barak was one of the key speakers. Why would Ehud Barak, an Israeli terrorist who should be arrested for war crimes, be allowed to speak at an international forum on "Democracy and Freedom" in Prague in 2009? What is the real connection between Israeli criminals and the Czech Republic? Frank Lampl's connection with Ehud Barak is most telling. This is the inner circle of 9-11. These are the key suspects in the false flag terror atrocity of 9-11. Barak is the senior architect of the terror attacks and Lampl was the loyal Zionist Jew who helped destroy the evidence. Sources and Recommended Reading:
The Gang of Czech Jews around the Collapses of 9-11
April 13, 2010
In his recent posting "What did and did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York," Björkman wrote: The Bazant theory can evidently not be verified in a laboratory or in reality for any structure of any size... BAZANT AND THE CZECH JEWS OF 9-11 Is Zdenek Bazant part of the conspiracy to destroy the World Trade Center? Bazant is the Czech Jew who had a scientific paper ready - one day after 9-11 - to provide an explanation for how the Twin Towers were collapsed and pulverized - without explosives. Frank Lampl is the Czech Jew whose company, Bovis Lend Lease, cleaned up the rubble of the World Trade Center, which had been leased by Frank Lowy, another Czech Jew, who had obtained the lease to the towers with Larry Silverstein just 6 weeks before they were destroyed. "Fire Did Not Collapse WTC - Swedish Structural Engineer," January 8, 2008
Fearing 9-11 Protests Netanyahu Cancels U.S. Visit
Updated - April 9, 2010 But when it comes to acts of wickedness against men, and sacrilege against the gods, no expiation is possible. So the offenders pay the penalty, not necessarily imposed by the courts, but they are chased and hounded by the Furies, not with burning firebrands as in the plays, but with the torment of their conscience and the agony of their guilt. FEARING 9-11 PROTESTS NETANYAHU CANCELS U.S. TRIP Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has abruptly cancelled his trip to Washington, planned for next Monday and Tuesday to attend a conference on the spread of nuclear weapons. The Jerusalem Post writes that Netanyahu had suddenly cancelled his visit fearing Israel would be singled out over its own nuclear facilities. I don't think that is the real reason. I have reason to believe that my calls for Americans to protest Israel's involvement in 9-11 played a role in his decision to stay away. The fact that the Arab and Muslim states are calling for action to be taken on Israel's illegal nuclear arsenal is certainly not unexpected nor is it news to anyone (least of all the Israelis) whereas my call for 9-11 activists to protest his visit and bring public and media attention to Israel's role in the atrocity is certainly a new factor. Netanyahu does not want to face public protests raising questions about the Israeli false-flag terror of 9-11. "I'm not concerned that anyone would think that Israel is a terrorist regime," Netanyahu told the Associated Press on April 7. Most of the world, however, sees Netanyahu's Israel as exactly that - a terrorist regime running a terrorist state. Millions of Americans now know that Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu, and their terrorist cronies in Israeli intelligence were behind 9-11.
The Jerusalem Post reports on April 9 that Netanyahu had said he would attend the conference to underline the dangers of terrorists acquiring nuclear weapons, but suddenly called off the trip less than two days after he announced he would take part. Israel's Army Radio reported that US sources informed Israel that a group of participating Arab countries led by Turkey and Egypt plan to use the summit to demand that Israel sign the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) and allow its alleged nuclear capabilities to be placed under international inspection. But there is certainly nothing new about this. It is to be expected at any conference in which nuclear weapons are discussed. In Washington, National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer confirmed that Israel had informed the US that Netanyahu would be staying home, sending his deputy, Intelligence Minister Dan Meridor, instead. Note: Israel's prime minister was scheduled to travel to the United States next Sunday or Monday with his accomplices in Israel's illegal nuclear weapons industry. I have made several calls for Americans to protest against these criminal terrorists loudly and point out Netanyahu's and Israel's involvement in 9-11 and call for his arrest. One day after I called for public protests on R.J. Hender's radio show on RBN, Hender was visited by two FBI agents at his home in Utah. The FBI is clearly out-of-line and acting illegally - like the Gestapo or the KGB - by harassing American patriots. The FBI has been spying on Americans, like me, for years. This outlaw agency is a clear danger to the republic. What was Ehud Olmert doing in New York City on 9-11 and why has this visit been kept secret? There are many more questions that I will put together to bring attention to Israel's central role in 9-11. From: "PM to take part in US nuke summit" by Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post, April 7, 2010 Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu announced on Tuesday that he will return to the US on Monday [April 12], to take part in President Barack Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit, just three weeks after he met with Obama in a meeting widely characterized as extremely difficult. * * * * * SOME DAY AMERICANS WILL AWAKEN to the heavy strategic price their own nation pays for indulging Israeli excesses. Israel may be successful in securing all of Jerusalem within its own borders. But it runs the historic risk of making itself, by a ghastly irony, a pariah state.
HOW CAN NETANYAHU AFFORD TO DEFY OBAMA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW? It is said that one can judge a man by the company he keeps. This is sage advice. It is true that one can judge a person's nature by the kind of people he associates with. This is also how one can identify and understand the connections between the members of the Zionist criminal network behind the terrorism of 9-11 and the massive financial scams of the past few years. As I pointed out when the Bernard Madoff scam surfaced, a small circle of people are involved in both 9-11 and the theft of some $50 billion by Madoff and company. One might wonder how Benjamin Netanyahu can afford to offend and insult the Obama administration so openly? The hubris of Netanyahu comes from his conceit - and the fact that he and his cronies have tucked away billions of stolen dollars, the missing billions from the Madoff scam, for example. THE SILVERSTEIN CONNECTION Benjamin Netanyahu and his former commander, Ehud Barak, are both very close friends and business associates with Larry Silverstein. Silverstein was a business partner on his Israeli tax-free zone project with Larry Tisch of CBS and the late Sy Syms Merns (the former Seymour Merinsky), who passed away in November 2009. Sy Syms, a member of the board of the Israeli Discount Bank of New York, was a close business partner of Bernard Madoff. This is the small circle of Zionist masterminds behind 9-11 and the Madoff rip-off.
See: "Is the Prosecutor Protecting Madoff's Fellow Conspirators?" March 17, 2009 As I wrote about the toothless prosecution of Madoff in May 2009: [Lev] Dassin, the scion of a family of Russian Zionists, is also handling the Madoff and Art Nadel cases. In the Madoff case, Dassin did not file the most obvious charge of conspiracy. He obviously accepted Madoff's statement that he had stolen the $50 billion all by himself and had no accomplices. According to Dassin's complaint against Madoff, his closest business partners, Sy Syms and Jacob Ezra Merkin, who funneled billions of dollars to his investment fund, were completely clueless and out of the loop. They just invested billions of dollars into a black hole. Is that believable? The conspicuous fact that Madoff's partners are the directors and owners of "private" Israeli banks (privatized under then finance minister Bibi Netanyahu) and have branches in Switzerland that are allowed to make use of Swiss secrecy laws is of no interest to Lev Dassin. Golly Lev, so where did the $50 billion go? When the massive Madoff rip-off emerged, I pointed out Madoff's close business connections to Ezra Merkin and Sy Syms Merns [born Seymour Merinsky in Brooklyn, 1926], who was a director of the Israel Discount Bank, an institution well-known for money laundering: The latest massive financial scandal is the giant $50 billion pyramid or ‘Ponzi’ scheme run by a New York Zionist Jew, Bernard Lawrence Madoff. Madoff was chairman of the Syms business school at Yeshiva University with his partner, Sy Merns, a.k.a. Sy Syms, who has been a director at Israel Discount Bank (IDB) since 1991. The IDB bank is well known for its money laundering business. Syms and the Israel discount bank On January 31, 2006, a controlling interest in the Bank was acquired by an investor group led by Matthew Bronfman and Rubin Schron. The deal gave Bronfman ownership of IDB's wholly owned subsidiary, the Israel Discount Bank of New York. Bronfman is a younger brother of Edgar Bronfman Jr., chairman and CEO of Warner Music Group Corp.
See: "Who is Bernie Madoff, the man behind the $50 billion fraud?" by Christopher Bollyn, December 12, 2008 Here a few key extracts from "Up in Smoke": Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center's 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a "friend," and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel - also called soon after the disaster... Silverstein is also a member of the joint American-Israeli commission for housing and community development, which was established by former president Bill Clinton. In the early 1990s, he was involved in projects to build housing for new immigrants. The Israeli political world got to know Silverstein when he tried to create a free-trade zone in the country. He became friendly with Yitzhak Rabin, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon... Silverstein conceived the idea of creating the free-trade zone in 1989. He met with Shimon Peres, who was then the finance minister, and with his deputy, Yossi Beilin, and tried to convince them that the project was an urgent necessity. The idea was that he would be given land in the Negev and would establish tax-free industries there. The Negev would benefit by getting new jobs, and Silverstein would benefit by raking in plenty of money. Peres and Beilin objected: Free-trade zones of the kind envisaged were usually created in the Third World and had the reputation of being slave markets. The local workers earn starvation wages, while the entrepreneurs enjoy full tax exemption and make high profits. Silverstein did not give up. The economic difficulties he encountered in New York forced him to look for an additional source of revenues. In September 1992, he met in New York with the new finance minister in the Rabin government, Avraham Shochat, and again raised the idea of the free-trade zone, claiming it would create 20,000 new jobs and make the Negev flourish. With Silverstein were his partners in the investment group, Larry Tisch, the owner of CBS, and Sy Sims, a major New York discount retailer... Close ties with Netanyahu The ascension to power of Benjamin Netanyahu opened a new chapter in the saga. Silverstein is left-leaning in his political views - he supports the Democratic Party - but after despairing of Rabin and Peres, he believed that Netanyahu, whom he called a hero of the free market, would push the project forward. The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu's stint as Israel's ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. Their ties continued after Netanyahu became prime minister. They met several times and Netanyahu promised to give the project his support... However, Sharon's initiative was stopped dead in its tracks by the elections of May 1999. Still, the change of government did not look ominous to Silverstein - on the contrary. He was friends with the new prime minister, Ehud Barak, too. In 1995, when Barak left the army, Silverstein offered him the job of acting as his representative in Israel, hoping that the former chief of staff, with his ramified connections, would be able to push the project through. Barak turned down the offer, but continued to stay in touch with Silverstein. They met at various social events and Barak introduced him to some of the members of his family. Silverstein had another close contact in Barak's bureau in the person of Isaac Herzog, who handled Silverstein's legal affairs along with Yaakov Ne'eman. "I didn't touch the subject during my period as cabinet secretary," Herzog says. None of this stopped Barak, after his election as prime minister, from trying to help Silverstein advance the project. "They came to Barak," says Shochat, who was then the finance minister again. "Barak examined the subject with all kinds of confidants and also talked to me about it. I told him that I was vehemently against it." Barak drew on the help of Yaakov Terner, the mayor of Be'er Sheva, the "capital of the Negev," who was an ardent supporter of the free-trade zone. WHO IS BIBI NETANYAHU? Joe Lockhart, spokesman for President Bill Clinton, described Benjamin Netanyahu as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth." When Netanyahu addressed the AIPAC conference in Washington, D.C. on March 22, besides the usual Zionist lies about Jerusalem and Iran, he told a lie that exposes the fundamental deception of his worldview: We should be judged by one standard and allegations made against the State of Israel must be grounded in facts. One allegation that is not grounded in fact is the attempt to describe the Jews as foreign colonialists in their own homeland. This is one of the great lies of modern times. In my office, I have a signet ring that was loaned to me by Israel’s Department of Antiquities This ring was found next to the Western wall, but it dates back 2,800 years ago, two hundred years after King David declared Jerusalem as our people’s capital. This ring is a seal of a Jewish official, and his name is inscribed on it in Hebrew. The name is: Netanyahu. Netanyahu Ben-Yoash. That’s my last name. My first name, Benjamin, dates back 1,000 years earlier to Benjamin, the son of Jacob. One of Benjamin’s brothers was named Shimon, which also happens to be the first name of my good friend, Shimon Peres, the President of Israel. Nearly 4,000 years ago, Benjamin, Shimon and their ten brothers roamed the hills of Judea. Benjamin Netanyahu's name, however, is not really Netanyahu and never was. There is, in fact, no real connection between the Jew who owned the ring and the obnoxious Israeli prime minister, and he knows it very well but that doesn't stop him from lying to the AIPAC crowd. His father was born in 1910 in Warsaw, Poland, with the name Benzion Mileikowsky. Like many Zionist immigrants from Poland and Russia, the Mileikowsky family changed the name when they came to Palestine in the 1920s. Shimon Peres is the same. Peres was born Szymon Perski in Wiszniewo, Poland, on August 2, 1923. The Mileikowskys and Perskis of Poland are, indeed, "foreign colonialists" and have no historical or religious right to the land of Palestine.
NETANYAHU - "A LIAR AND A CHEAT"
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported in 2009, the Obama administration knows very well that Netanyahu is "a liar and a cheat": Presumably, former president Bill Clinton did not conceal his opinion of Bibi from his wife. If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has forgotten Bibi's tricks then Dennis Ross, who was the coordinator of the peace process in the Clinton administration and is an advisor to Obama, can refer her to his book "The Missing Peace." There he quotes president Clinton's reaction to Bibi's retreat from a commitment. "At times he was tough," writes Ross, "yelling at Bibi when he retracted an earlier pledge on Palestinian prisoners. 'This is just chicken shit. I'm not going to put up with this kind of bullshit.'" Aaron David Miller, who was Ross' deputy, also documented the days of Bibi and Bill. In his book "The Much Too Promised Land," Miller relates that during their first meeting in the summer of 1996, Bibi lectured the president about the Arab-Israeli issue, prompting Clinton to expostulate when it was over, "Who the fuck does he think he is? Who's the fucking superpower here?" Most definite of all is Joe Lockhart, who was the White House spokesman at the time. In a recorded interview to Clayton Swisher, author of the book "The Truth About Camp David," he described Netanyahu as "one of the most obnoxious individuals you're going to come into - just a liar and a cheat. He could open his mouth and you could have no confidence that anything that came out of it was the truth." Source: "Perfect English or not, Netanyahu shares no common language with Obama" by Akiva Eldar, Haaretz, February 11, 2009
The Obama administration and the international community have finally confronted Israel's illegal settlements, its Wall of Apartheid, and the racism inherent in Zionism. The dispute over illegal Israeli settlements on occupied land puts the Obama administration (and the U.N. and international community) into a political face off with the extreme right-wing regime led by the prime minister from the Likud, Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu. Who will prevail? The U.S. government and the American people need to stand firm against the racism and dangerous fanaticism of Zionists like Netanyahu. How can any American support a state like Israel that is built on a basis of racial and religious segregation? If apartheid was wrong in South Africa, how can it be acceptable in Palestine? In Israel and the occupied territories only Jews have full rights as citizens. Israeli law discriminates against all non-Jews solely on the basis of race. Only a racist could support the de facto apartheid system created by Zionism. Why does the U.S. support the Jewish racism of Israel? Why are U.S. taxpayer dollars being used to build illegal settlements and Israel's hideously ugly wall of separation? It is high time for the American people to boycott Israeli racism and demand that U.S. foreign policy reflect fundamental American principles and values. It should be clear to all that the so-called "Two State Solution" to the problem in Palestine is no solution. The only viable solution, and the only solution the United States should promote, is a non-racist democratic state in the whole of Palestine in which Christians, Muslims, and Jews are all allowed to live as equals under the law. International law, a number of U.N. resolutions, and common sense tell us that the Palestinian refugees must be allowed to return to their homes, villages, and land that were stolen from them by Zionist terrorism. The Zionists were allowed to settle in Palestine with the specific agreement that the rights and interests of the native Palestinian population would not be compromised in any way. The racist laws and policies of the Zionist state must be dismantled. It's that simple. To think that any peaceful compromise can be reached with fanatical Zionism, a racist ideology based on religion, is foolish and dangerous. The idea of a one-state solution is gaining popularity among Palestinians. Dr. Jamil Rabah, Director of the Ramallah-based polling group Near East Consulting, said the growing Palestinian support for a bi-national state was not a result of the potential threat it posed to Israeli Jews.  Hagi Ben Artzi, Benjamin Netanyahu's brother-in-law and a devoted follower of the aptly named rabbi Kook, told the Israeli press that President Barack Obama is an anti-Semite. “Unfortunately, there is an anti-Semitic president in America,” he said. “As a politician who ran for president, he had to hide it, but from time to time, it bursts out from inside. It’s creating a difficult situation for Israel, but we won’t even consider giving up on our deep interests.” Ben Artzi is a religious zealot who believes in "the redemption of Greater Israel." He was an advocate of the extremely racist policies of the late Meir Kahane. To understand the dangerous fanaticism of the Netanyahu-Ben Artzi clan, I recommend "Ben Artzi's last stand" by Vered Levy-Barzilai in Haaretz of April 28, 2004 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=421243 THE ZIONIST CRIME OF APARTHEID The crime of apartheid is defined by the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as inhumane acts of a character similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime." There is no question that Zionism is a racist ideology and Israel is a state that is guilty of the crime of apartheid. Zionism, in fact, cannot exist without apartheid.  The Israeli Wall of Apartheid at Kalandia checkpoint on March 16 - How can Americans support such a blatantly racist regime in Israel? Why is Jewish racism tolerated? "ALL SETTLEMENT ACTIVITY IS ILLEGAL" - U.N. CHIEF BAN KI-MOON During his recent trip to Israel, Vice President Joe Biden and the Obama administration were insulted and embarrassed by the Israeli government's announcement on March 10 that it had approved construction of an additional 1,600 homes in the illegal Israeli settlement named Ramat Shlomo. The so-called Quartet of Middle East peace mediators, made up of representatives from the United Nations, United States, European Union and Russia, urged Israel to freeze all settlement activity after talks in Moscow on March 19. The Quartet issued a formal statement read by UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, which said: "The Quartet urges the government of Israel to freeze all settlement activities… and to refrain from demolitions and evictions. It condemns the decision by the government of Israel to advance planning for new housing units in east Jerusalem." The following day, Saturday March 20, Ban rejected Israel's distinction between East Jerusalem and the West Bank, noting that both are occupied lands. Israeli settlement building anywhere on occupied land is illegal and must be stopped, U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon said after viewing some of the illegal Israeli settlements and the Wall of Apartheid near Jerusalem. "The world has condemned Israel's settlement plans in east Jerusalem," Ban told a news conference after his brief tour. "Let us be clear. All settlement activity is illegal anywhere in occupied territory and must be stopped." Benjamin Netanyahu, however, continues to pretend that there is no legal difference between building on occupied land and construction in Israel. "Construction in Jerusalem is like construction in Tel Aviv and we have clarified that for the American government," Netanyahu said at the start of the weekly cabinet meeting on March 21. Netanyahu is scheduled to leave for Washington Sunday night with Defense Minister Ehud Barak to attend the AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington. Opposition leader Tzipi Livni and Infrastructure Minister Uzi Landau will also attend the convention. Netanyahu, Barak, Livni, and the others should all be arrested on arrival in the United States for war crimes and crimes of terror, such as 9-11. These are the senior Israelis responsible for the false-flag terror atrocity that brought us the fraudulent "War on Terror", which is really a war of terror.  An ultra-orthodox Jew from France shopping for a house in Ramat Shlomo Ramat Shlomo is an orthodox Jewish settlement that has been built on illegally-occupied Palestinian land in what is called East Jerusalem. It is built right next to the Palestinian refugee camp called Shufat, which is surrounded by the Israeli Wall of Apartheid. To understand why the Israelis made such a provocative and insulting announcement during Biden's visit it is essential to understand that the two ministers involved in the decision are both rabbis from the ultra-orthodox Shas party, which is the political party of religious zealots that enabled the extreme right-wing Benjamin Netanyahu to form a coalition government in 2009. The minister who made the announcement that was clearly meant to embarrass the Obama administration is Eli Yishai, Israel's Minister of Internal Affairs and chairman of the ultra-orthodox Shas party. The Interior Minister position is often demanded by Shas in such coalition governments as it allows them to control the building of settlements like Ramat Shlomo. It also lets them decide religion and state issues such as marriage and immigration laws. The Shas party has a very strong base of support among orthodox Jews in New York City. The son of Alvin K. Hellerstein, the orthodox Jewish judge who oversees all 9-11 litigation, for example, lives on an illegal Israeli settlement like Ramat Shlomo. Michael Chertoff, the Israeli national who oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 is another orthodox Jew who comes from a family of Zionist Talmud-thumping rabbis. Orthodox Jews are inclined to be extremely racial in their thinking due to the doctrine of Jewish supremacism they are raised in. This is the real wall that blocks any peaceful settlement of the Israeli conflict with the native Palestinians, who live as second-class citizens on their own land under Zionist occupation.  Rabbi Eli Yishai is Israel's Interior Minister The minister of housing and construction is Ariel Atias, the number two man in the party.  Ariel Atias, Minister of Housing and Construction, actively promotes a policy of racial and religious apartheid.  The Shas party has a history of criminal activity. Aryeh Deri, the former interior minister and chairman of Shas, was sentenced to three years in jail in 1999 for a range of corruption charges and bribery. Here he is seen after his release from prison in July 2002. ISRAEL'S APARTHEID POLICY Israeli Housing Minister Atias openly advocates segregation in Israel in order to create an apartheid state. Israeli construction policies under Minister Atias are designed to separate Jews from non-Jews, and religious Jews from secular Jews. On July 2, 2009, the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reported that at a conference of the Israel Bar Association focused on reforming Israel's Land Administration, Atias had called for the segregation of Israel's Arab population from Jewish Israelis, saying that achieving this separation or apartheid state was "a national duty." Atias, as minister of housing and construction, explained his policy that Israeli land should be marketed to each sector separately, in order to create segregation, not just between Jews and Arabs but also between other sectors, such as ultra-Orthodox and secular Jews. "There is a severe housing crisis among the young ultra-Orthodox couples, and in the general population. I, as an ultra-Orthodox Jew, don't think that religious Jews should have to live in the same neighborhood as secular couples, so as to avoid unnecessary friction. And since some 5,000 to 6,000 religious couples get married every year, a problem arises because they require a certain kind of community life that goes along with their lifestyle." UNDERCOVER HIT SQUADS On March 16, Palestinians from the nearby refugee camp of Shufat protested the illegal plan to build more Israeli homes on their land. News photos from the Israeli military/police response to the protest show how Israel uses undercover police that look and dress like Palestinians. This is important to understand because Israel often uses agents that look and act like Arabs. The Israelis probably used agents like these to create the cut-out for the "hijackers" of the false flag terrorism of 9-11. I find the Israeli use of undercover police in this protest very interesting because this three man team operated in a very similar way to how the three-man squad of military trained undercover cops assaulted me at my home in August 2006. (In my case, however, the cop with the gun would have had his handgun aimed at me on the ground. It would have been Darin Felgenhauer who, as the lethal officer, was prepared to shoot me in case the TASERing made me go berserk.)  Here the undercover cops are operating with protection of uniformed police. How is one to know that these men without uniforms are actually police? This is what I had to deal with when a three-man undercover tactical squad invaded my property in Hoffman Estates, threatened my family, and refused to identify themselves. I was very soon in the same position as the brave Palestinian in these photos.  With a young Palestinian in custody, the Israeli undercover cops give their victim the same kind of treatment I got from an undercover tactical squad in Hoffman Estates. The cop on top of the victim's head would have been Timothy Stoy, who knelt directly on my right temple for more than two minutes while the second cop (Michael Barber) applied the drive stun TASER shock of 50,000 volts to my lower back. The one with the gun would be the lethal officer, Darin Felgenhauer, prepared to deliver the fatal shot.  The Israeli undercover cops act just like the three-man tactical unit who assaulted me in Hoffman Estates on my property in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter. After assaulting me, breaking my right arm, and TASERing me while I was pinned down in handcuffs - the undercover cops, who never identified themselves as police, charged me with assaulting them and resisting arrest. With a Zionist prosecutor, judge, and clerk calling the shots, I was found guilty on both charges and faced a year in Cook County Jail at sentencing. In my case, two of the three undercover cops (Stoy and Felgenhauer) apparently do not even have police uniforms. (See "Evidence of a Police Conspiracy to Injure Bollyn") THE HEART OF THE CONFLICT Dr. Nigel Parsons, a Middle East specialist and senior lecturer in politics, explained why the Israeli plan is so strongly rejected by Palestinians: "This cuts right to the heart of the conflict. This is the essence of the problem - the state of Israel lending institutional support to housing for Jewish settlers while in the same location some of the world's most vulnerable people struggle in overcrowded conditions awaiting an end to the occupation and recognition of their rights… "Restrictions on movement, unemployment, over-crowding, and separation from the West Bank have generated difficult conditions. However, offers of relocation have been refused by camp residents for fear of undermining the Palestinian right of return, a matter for final status negotiations between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation. "In lieu of a final status agreement, Shu'fat captures Palestine in microcosm: an isolated, disempowered indigenous population and an overcrowded refugee camp confront advancing Israeli settlement."  The Shufat refugee camp is inside Israel's apartheid wall on land coveted by Jewish settlers.  Ramat Shlomo and Shufat are on a very large piece of occupied Palestinian land that has been illegally confiscated by the construction of the Israeli Wall of Apartheid. The green line is the legal border; the red and dotted line is the outline of the Wall. Following Biden's visit to Israel, Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, a Zionist Jew, wrote an editorial titled "Driving Drunk in Jerusalem" in which he said that the vice president had missed a chance to send a powerful public signal: He should have snapped his notebook shut, gotten right back on Air Force Two, flown home and left the following scribbled note behind: “Message from America to the Israeli government: Friends don’t let friends drive drunk. And right now, you’re driving drunk. You think you can embarrass your only true ally in the world, to satisfy some domestic political need, with no consequences? You have lost total contact with reality. I couldn't agree more. The U.S. government has to end all support for the criminal and terrorist regime headed by Benjamin Netanyahu. These are, after all, the people who carried out 9-11.  Joe Biden and Benjamin Netanyahu - What is there to laugh about? Sources: “Palestinians increasingly back one-state” by Benjamin Joffe-Walt/The Media Line, March 22, 2010, Jerusalem Post http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=171559 "Driving Drunk in Jerusalem" by Thomas L. Friedman, New York Times, March 13, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/opinion/14friedman.html "Housing Minister: Spread of Arab population must be stopped" by Guy Lieberman, Haaretz, July 2, 2009 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097411.html Israeli Colonisation Of East Jerusalem Cuts To Heart Of Conflict, March 15, 2010 http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/israeli-colonisation-east-jerusalem-cuts-heart-conflict/5/41743 "Big four tell Israel: Don't build in east Jerusalem" by Amy Teibel, The Scotsman, March 20, 2010 http://news.scotsman.com/world/Big-four-tell-Israel-Don39t.6167742.jp
U.S. Military Video of Massacre in Baghdad
May 9, 2010 This article has been archived in the section entitled Middle East.
The Murderous Mossad and 9-11
Updated March 23, 2010 BRITAIN EXPELS MOSSAD BOSS “Expulsion of diplomat sends a strong signal to Israel”, Jeremy Bowen, BBC, March 23, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8583041.stm The Israeli Mossad murder of a commander of the military wing of the Hamas (the democratically elected government of Palestine) is just one more provocation by the right-wing Zionist extremist government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli provocations on the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem are designed to foment a conflict in which the Israelis will escalate the violence. This is an extremely dangerous and illegal strategy which the United States and world should use every effort to arrest and prevent.
Newspapers from the region are in agreement that Israel is acting to escalate the conflict and foment a war in the region: Israel's plan to swallow Palestine has reached a peak... its project is to wipe Palestine from the map... an escalation rather than a settlement is looming in the region. MOSSAD MADNESS The Mossad has been at it again: The recent assassination of a Hamas military leader in Dubai looks conclusively like the Israelis' handiwork. No doubt, they hoped for a little more anonymity in the aftermath--they likely didn't expect the Dubai authorities to be quite so technologically competent...Either we are complicit or we are not--there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations.
There are lessons to be learned from the murder of a Hamas leader in Dubai. The information provided about the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh by the authorities of Dubai has shown the world that their police force is technologically competent and professional. The detailed information provided by the police of Dubai about the suspects involved in the al-Mabouh murder is the result of a police investigation using normal procedures, yet it is far superior to any of the information provided by the FBI about the 19 alleged terrorist hijackers of 9-11, who have been blamed for killing some 3,000 Americans. Are the police of Dubai that much more competent and professional than the FBI or is there another reason why U.S. law enforcement seems so incompetent when dealing with Israeli crimes? The murder of al-Mabouh is, like the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11, evidently a crime committed by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad. In both cases there is clear evidence of Israeli involvement. In the Dubai murder case the authorities have come forward with detailed information and begun an international effort to identify and locate the suspects. In the "non-investigation" of 9-11, on the other hand, headed by Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed while key terrorism suspects like Dominic Suter and Kobi Alexander were allowed to flee to Israel and were not pursued.
The response by law enforcement authorities in the two cases could hardly be more different. Unlike the police of Dubai, when pursuing Israeli criminals the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI are dogs that won't bark - or hunt. Why is that? ISRAEL IN AMERICA To understand why American Jews are willing to commit and cover-up serious crimes, even treason, on behalf of the state of Israel one needs to understand that most religious Jews in America are first obliged to serve Israel - a foreign state. American Jews are, for this reason, conflicted. Their religion obliges them to make "aliya" and live in Israel but most would prefer to stay in the United States. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have chosen to leave "the Jewish state" and now live in the United States. While they are unwilling to leave the comfort of the United States and immigrate to Israel (aliya), most religious Jews in the United States feel strongly compelled to support and defend the state of Israel. To fulfill their obligation to the state of Israel, Zionist Jews in America have created hundreds of organizations to raise funds and support for the Zionist state in Palestine. These organizations are consolidated under an umbrella organization called the Jewish Agency. The Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization are two parts of the same Zionist enterprise that operates in the United States and around the world. The Jewish Agency was the Zionist organization that became the state of Israel in 1948 when a Jewish state was established in Palestine. The Jewish Agency, then headed by David Ben Gurion, literally became the apparatus of the Zionist state and Ben Gurion became the first prime minister of Israel. The Jewish Agency and the Mossad continued to work together after the creation of the state of Israel to bring Jews to the Zionist state. The hard-line Zionists who run Israel today are actually fighting a losing battle with demographics. The Arab population around them is growing quickly while many Israelis are leaving the Jewish state. The Israeli population has become more Russian, more extremist, and less Western in its outlook than at any time since the founding of the state in 1948. Ariel Sharon, the now comatose prime minister who ran Israel in 2001, dreamed of bringing one million Jews to Israel from the United States. In this effort he worked closely with the Jewish Agency. The current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is a dangerous extremist who said 9-11 was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations on the very day of the attacks. Netanyahu has openly advocated mass expulsions of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. During a 1989 lecture at Bar Ilan University, he said: "Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions of the Arabs of the territories." Later, he stated, "I still believe that there are opportunities to expel many people." FEINBERG AND THE JEWISH AGENCY Kenneth Feinberg was the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. He alone was responsible for distributing some $7 billion of taxpayer money to the families of the victims of 9-11. In this he was supported by some 30 lawyers from his law firm and his wife, Diane "Dede" Shaff Feinberg. Diane is also an executive member of the United Israel Appeal and the Jewish Federation of Washington. She also happens to be a member of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency - the parent organization of the Mossad.
The non-investigation of 9-11 was controlled by Michael Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent and an orthodox rabbi. Chertoff oversaw the destruction of the thousands of tons of steel from the World Trade Center - crucial evidence that was shipped to Asian smelters and melted down. While Chertoff supervised the confiscation and destruction of the critical evidence, government appointed doctors "medicated" the grieving relatives with mood-altering Prozac, and Kenneth Feinberg began his war of attrition on the families of the victims of 9-11. As the sole person responsible for distributing the money from the Victims Compensation Fund, Feinberg paid out nearly $7 billion to families in compensation - if they would sign the agreement not to sue the airlines or the Israeli airport security firm involved in 9-11 (Huntleigh USA/ICTS). More than 98 percent of the families accepted the money from the Feinberg-managed fund. The amounts of the payments and the amounts paid to Diane Feinberg and the 30 lawyers are not known. The American people deserve to know how the funds were used and who got paid.
Feinberg's actions were crucial to removing more than 98 percent of the families from the litigation process. Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein have waged a war of attrition against the 9-11 relatives. Of the thousands of families that could have used the courts to find justice and legal discovery for what happened on 9-11, Feinberg was successful in removing 98 percent. Of the 96 families that chose to go to court, all but one or two cases have settled out of court after enduring years of obstruction in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein. Thanks to Feinberg and Hellerstein there may never be a trial for a single victim of 9-11.
Kenneth Feinberg is known for wearing expensive Brioni suits, smoking Cuban cigars, and driving his black Jaguar to his home in Bethesda, Maryland, where he has avoided paying taxes thanks to a few legal loopholes he knows about. Kenneth Feinberg was the co-chair (along with his wife) of a recent Zionist event in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, two prime suspects in the Israeli terrorism of 9-11, participated. Feinberg's role in covering up the truth about 9-11 is connected to his relationship to the state of Israel. Kenneth Feinberg wasn't working pro bono on the 9-11 victims fund out of compassion for the victims of 9-11, or for America. He was doing it to serve Israel and the murderous Mossad. Sources and Recommended Reading: “Middle Eastern anger at Israeli escalations”, BBC News, March 1, 2010 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543120.stm “Benjamin Netanyahu”, Institute for Middle East Understanding, September 29, 2008 http://imeu.net/news/article0014362.shtml Cummins, Chip, "Two Dubai Suspects Traveled to U.S." Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2010 Feinberg, Diane and Kenneth, The Leadership of the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, Washington D.C., November 8-10, 2009 Nahmias, Roee, "Dubai police to Mossad chief: Confess to Mabhouh murder or issue denial", Ynet News.com, February 27, 2010
The Lehman Scam and Fuld's Mossad Connection
March 16, 2010 FULD'S MOSSAD CONNECTION It should be noted that Richard S. Fuld is closely tied to Menachem Atzmon, the Israeli Mossadnik who owned the passenger-screening/airport security company that was behind getting the 19 Arab hijackers on the planes of 9-11. Uzi Ruskin, Menachem Atzmon, and his Mossad-funded comrades took over the failing United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. in 1993 - from Fuld's uncle, Martin Schwab, Richard's mother's brother.
As I wrote in early October 2008 about the criminal activity of A.I.G. and Lehman, crimes which led to the trillion dollar bail-out: Lehman Bros. CEO Dick Fuld, the much despised scion of the "Elder of Zion" Jacob Schwab, stole half a billion dollars at the company he ruined. His grandfather's company, UM&M, was later sold to the Israeli criminal, Menachem Atzmon, culprit of 9-11 and co-criminal with Ehud Olmert. What a small world! Sources: New York Times Obituary for Jacob W. Schwab, Richard S. Fuld's maternal grandfather United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. - Company History "Clunker in possession", Brigid McMenamin, Forbes, April 5, 1999 Bollyn, Christopher, "Who is Bernard Madoff - The Man Behind the $50 Billion Fraud?", December 12, 2008 Bollyn, Christopher, “Americans Outraged by Passage of Bail-Out”, October 4, 2008 http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2008/10/americans-outraged-by-passage-of-bail.html
Dying in Vain - Why Afghanistan?
Updated - February 8, 2010
Have the Americans and Europeans killed in Afghanistan died in vain? That is the case with eight American soldiers killed last October trying to defend a remote outpost in eastern Afghanistan that the military did not deem important enough to reinforce or make more secure. What really is the mission in Afghanistan? Have all these people died in vain? The administration of Barack Hussein Obama II has requested $70 billion (U.S. dollars) more for its war in Afghanistan for 2010 (on top of $230 billion already spent). In comparison, the U.S. will spend only $1.6 billion on Amtrak, the national passenger railroad system. That means that Obama spends about $192 million per day in Afghanistan on a senseless and illegal war, which is more than the U.S. spends in 44 days to provide passenger rail service for 300 million Americans. The U.S. spends more in 9 days on the Afghanistan fiasco than it spends in one year to provide clean and efficient rail service for the entire nation. This is hardly the "change" America wants or needs, Mr. Obama.
Note: Jerry Mazza, an editor of Online Journal, has an excellent article, "Ramping up Afghanistan war to control Caspian oil and gas transport routes" that supports my thesis, first published in October 2001, that the war in Afghanistan is a military campaign to secure pipeline routes for the Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan. The Mazza article is highly recommended and can be read here: http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5354.shtml * * * * * In a nationally televised speech at the U.S. Military Acadamy at West Point, President Barack Hussein Obama announced that he will send another 30,000 American soldiers to Afghanistan. Why is Obama sending so many troops to Central Asia? What is the U.S. military really fighting for in Afghanistan? Why are we still there? Obama's December 1 speech at West Point about the war in Afghanistan presented a "false reading of history" about 9-11. The president's speech on Afghanistan featured a repetition of the fundamental lies about who is really responsible for the terror attacks of 9-11. The 2009 scientific paper on the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center by Dr. Steven E. Jones has exposed these claims to be fabrications and revealed to the world that the Twin Towers were pulverized using an extremely sophisticated and powerful nano-composite explosive. It should be noted that President Obama and his senior staff are fully aware that the U.S. rationale for the invasion of Afghanistan is based on a pack of lies. History will not judge them lightly for such deceit.
Obama repeated the following key lies about 9-11 and Afghanistan during his speech:
Why Afghanistan?By Christopher Bollyn
The discovery of super-Thermite in the dust exposes the government-funded reports as fabrications created to conceal the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. The 9-11 reports produced by the federal agencies FEMA and NIST were written to mislead the public and media about what really happened to the buildings – and the thousands of people trapped within them. This is to say that the U.S. government and controlled media have intentionally deceived the public for eight years. We know that September the 11th, the attacks on New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, were directed from a valley in Afghanistan. We should not have to learn that again. What we are doing is truly protecting the American people by providing for a stable government in Pak… in Afghanistan. About the war in Afghanistan, Wilson repeated the lie he has been telling for years, using the word "truly," as he often does. "This is truly an issue of protecting American families at home by defeating the terrorists overseas," he said.
On 9-11, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime/defense minister/military intelligence chief, was the first person to call for the U.S. to attack Afghanistan. Barak told Rupert Murdoch's Sky Television in London that Western governments needed to make a concerted effort to combat terrorism: "Most obviously my guess is a bin Laden organization...We have to stand firm against such terrorism," Barak said.
Maiman was described as "a leading miner" of Central Asian gas fields by the Jerusalem Post in 2004. Given the fact that he controls the immense gas resources of Turkmenistan, the Israeli Maiman, his Merhav company, and his fellow Mossadniks would all profit immensely -- if and when the U.S.-led coalition were able to "pacify" and control Afghanistan so that the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline could be built allowing the gas of Turkmenistan to be sold to energy-hungry India. The TAPI pipeline project would bring billions of dollars into Mossad coffers every year. This is the real reason for the war in Afghanistan and why the Zionist-controlled Obama administration has increased the war effort in Central Asia. It really has nothing to do with "Islamic terrorism" or 9-11.
Maiman's network reveals the Mossad-controlled companies linked to 9-11 and the war in Afghanistan. Maiman, for example, is an owner and director of Eltek, Ltd. an Israeli manufacturer of printed circuit boards, along with Eytan Barak. Barak is also a director of ICTS International N.V., the Israeli aviation security company that owns Huntleigh USA, the passenger screening company directly involved with the planes and passenger screening operations on 9-11. Barak is a director of ICTS, a member of the supervisory board, audit committee, and compensation committee. Huntleigh is a key defendant in the 9-11 tort litigation but the Mossad-owned company has been protected by the Zionist Alvin K. Hellerstein, the U.S. District Judge who has prevented any 9-11 trial from finding those responsible for the terror atrocity that changed the world. Finis
"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31 Blau, Uri, and Gidi Weitz, "Ehud Barak Ltd.," Ha'aretz, May 31, 2007
The Shanksville Deception of 9-11
Updated February 4, 2010 Something incredibly ugly happened to Flight 93 over rural Pennsylvania on 9-11. A mass murder atrocity could explain why the public was deceived into thinking that a small crater was the crash site while the bodies of the victims and wreckage were actually being picked up from the real debris field hundreds of meters away in the dark woods. How many victims were there anyway? Two hundred? Why was the wreckage of Flight 93 kept hidden?
The people of Somerset, Pennsylvania, are loyal and patriotic Americans, qualities that have been exploited by the perpetrators of 9-11 to conceal the truth of what happened in the sky over the woods of Shanksville on 9-11. Shanksville is the nearest hamlet to the so-called crash site of United Airlines Flight 93, a small crater in a reclaimed mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville. Having been to the area several times since 9-11, I noticed that many of the people were noticably afraid to talk about the things they had seen and noticed around Shanksville on September 11, 2001. Several of them apologized and told me that they had been told by the F.B.I. or other agents of the U.S. government not to talk. From others I got the clear impression that they had been warned not to talk about what they knew. Then there are those who had obviously been told to tell lies. I would consider Bob Leverknight to be a member of the latter group. As I reported from Somerset: I spoke with Bob Leverknight, correspondent with Somerset's Daily American, at the newspaper's office about how Flight 93 disappeared into the crater without leaving a trace. Leverknight, an active member of the Air National Guard, was assigned by the editor to handle my questions. His answers were quite incredible. About the disappearance of the plane, Leverknight said, "It [the ground] liquefied." One of the plane's massive engines, he said, "bounced" off the ground and was found at a very considerable distance -- in the woods. The ground did not liquefy and swallow the plane as Bob Leverknight told me at the office of the Daily American and nothing bounced off the ground. These are just some of the lies that surround the deception of what really happened above Shanksville on 9-11.
THE HIDDEN DEBRIS FIELD The debris of Flight 93 fell in the woods and covered a large area. This is the real debris field and was kept hidden from the view of the public and the press while the bodies and evidence were picked up. The small crater in the reclaimed mine was most likely caused by a missile fired from the Thunderbolt aircraft that was seen circling the area before and after Flight 93 was shot down over the woods.
This crater was made in the middle of the trench to provide a plausible diversion that looked like the scene of a plane crash albeit without any wreckage. The bomb crater was made directly in the middle of the pre-existing trench which indicates that the Shanksville shoot down had been carefully planned in advance. The public was told that the plane had crashed at the site of the crater while the real debris field was located in the woods beginning at a distance of about 100 meters in the woods, around the cottage of Barry Hoover.
The Dayton Daily News of September 12, 2001, described the scene: The impact of the crash left a crater estimated by authorities to be about 10 feet deep and 20 feet wide. It appeared the plane first hit on the downward slope of a hillside and then slid at least 200 yards, scorching a dense area of trees and corn fields. Officials would allow reporters no closer than 300 yards to the scene. From that vantage point, the crater appeared to be barren. Little debris could be seen, and there were no signs of victims. "We haven't seen anything bigger than a phone book, certainly nothing that would resemble a part of a plane," said Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police. But one Lambertsville resident, Barry Hoover, who lives a half-mile from the site, said he saw debris scattered at least a mile wide. "There was stuff everywhere back there. It made you want to drop to your knees and cry for those people," Hoover said. PENNSYLVANIA CRASH MAY BE KEY TO TRAGEDY - 'Black box' could give clues to disaster The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also described the wreckage at the Hoover property: No people on the ground were killed in that crash. But the shock waves set off by the impact of that crash heavily damaged Hoover's home, which lies, literally, a stone's throw from the crater gouged into the earth by the doomed plane. To clarify the location of Barry Hoover's cottage in relation to the crater "crash site" I spoke with Reverend Larry Hoover, a Lutheran minister and father of Barry. Larry Hoover owns the two houses on his property that begins with the treeline at the edge of the reclaimed mine. The cottage his son Barry lived in is about "one football field" (100 meters) into the woods from the crater, Larry Hoover said. Larry's house is about "three football fields" from the crater, he said. He said that luggage had been found around his house while body parts had been found more around Barry's cottage. The Hoover property is about 7 to 9 acres, he said. The debris was found on property belonging to three people, including the owner of the reclaimed mine. Rev. Hoover said that he noticed that the garage door of Barry's house had been blown inside out and backwards, something he thought quite remarkable. I wanted to know why the existence of the real debris field deep in the woods had been kept hidden so I asked Reverend Hoover, "Why have you been quiet about what happened on your property on 9-11?" "We tried to cooperate," he said. I knew what he meant without pressing the point. The FBI agents had given similar orders all over Shanksville and Somerset County. The Hoovers had been asked not to talk about what had happened on 9-11. The public was told that the plane had crashed into the reclaimed mine while the real debris field was cleaned up in complete secrecy in the woods around the Hoover cabins. Why has the real debris field been kept secret? There can only be one explanation: the truth about what happened to Flight 93 could not be revealed to the public. The evidence indicates that Flight 93 was shot out of the sky with a blast that sounded like "an atomic bomb," as one witness told me: Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, said she was the first person to reach the crater. Lensbouer said that the crater was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described the sound as "an explosion, like an atomic bomb" -- not a crash. If Flight 93 was shot down with such precision, and the truth concealed with an elaborate deception, there are several crucial questions I would ask: Exactly how many people were on Flight 93? Did Flight 93 really land in Cleveland on 9-11 and were passengers from other flights put onto the flight before it was shot down? Is this what really happened to the passengers of Flights 11 and 175? Why was Wally Miller, the Somerset County Coroner, forced to turn over the "crash" site to the FBI? Why did he abdicate his responsibility for the site and the recovery of the bodies, his obligation under state law? Why was he not even allowed to be involved in the identification of the remains of the passengers of Flight 93, whose death certificates he duly signed? The evidence certainly indicates that something extremely ugly happened over Shanksville on 9-11 and the evidence of the atrocity was strewn about the woods surrounding the Hoover property. There was only one small survivor from the catastrophe that occurred at Barry Hoover's cottage on 9-11. Woody, Barry Hoover's cat, survived and is still living, eight years later. In 2005, I interviewed Viola Saylor of Lambertsville who had seen an aircraft that looked like an A-10 Thunderbolt over Shanksville on 9-11. The following eyewitness accounts of seeing a Thunderbolt are from my article of July 15, 2005, “Eyewitnesses Saw Military Aircraft at Scene of Flight 93”.
Susan Mcelwain, a local teacher, also reported seeing a white "military" plane at the scene of the crash before witnessing an explosion. Mcelwain told the Daily Mirror (U.K.) what she saw: It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50 feet above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound. Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened. I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down. There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look. The plane Mcelwain describes sounds like the Warthog seen by Saylor over Lambertsville. "It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side," Mcelwain said. "I haven't found one like it on the Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000 feet up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did." Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93", May 12, 2006
The Axelrod Factor: Why Obama Fails to Deliver
Updated February 3, 2010 After one year in office, President Barack Obama has failed to deliver on any of his key campaign promises. Public opinion of the Obama White House has clearly changed. Obama has only succeeded in protecting the outrageous 9-11 deception, wasting billions of dollars in bailing out Maurice Greenberg's criminal enterprise A.I.G. and the corrupt investment banks he insured, and increasing the killing and suffering in the Middle East and Central Asia. To understand why Obama seems unable to deliver we need to know much more about his Senior Advisor David Axelrod -- the man who made Obama president.
"Who is Barack Obama?" Bob Herbert of the New York Times asks, "Americans are still looking for the answer, and if they don’t get it soon — or if they don’t like the answer — the president’s current political problems will look like a walk in the park." "Mr. Obama promised during the campaign that he would be a different kind of president, one who would preside over a more open, more high-minded administration that would be far more in touch with the economic needs of ordinary working Americans. But no sooner was he elected than he put together an economic team that would protect, above all, the interests of Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry, the health insurance companies, and so on," Herbert wrote in his editorial of January 25 entitled, "A Credibility Gap."
"Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation," Herbert concluded. "They want to know who their president really is." THE AXELROD PRESIDENCY It is safe to say that the U.S. government today is a far cry from what the framers of the Constitution intended. Congress has lost its control over our currency and completely abdicated its role as the only branch that can declare war. These powers now belong to the president, directly or indirectly. The executive branch has gained immense power at the expense of the legislative branch, our representatives in Congress. The result is that our presidents have much more power than envisioned by the Founding Fathers. The real power of the U.S. government is centralized in the person of the president, who has more power than a king or czar. To control the United States one need only control the president. The president is controlled by the people around him, his chief of staff and senior advisors. This is why it is essential to understand who advises the president because these are the people who shape the policies of the White House. To understand the Obama presidency one needs to know the people who made Barack Obama president. Chief among the people behind the Obama presidency is David Axelrod, Obama's friend, senior advisor, and chief media and political strategist. If one were to look behind the televised images of Barack Obama, one would find David Axelrod writing the speeches and creating the image of the candidate and the president. While Barack Obama is the face of the current administration, the policies, words, and images are creations of David Axelrod. So overwhelming is his influence on the White House that it would be fair to call this the Axelrod Presidency.
WHO IS DAVID AXELROD? The most peculiar thing about David Axelrod is that although he is clearly one of the most powerful men in the government of the United States, for most Americans he remains an unknown factor. The controlled media does nothing to help us understand who Axelrod is. How can that be? How is it that Axelrod represents the executive branch of the U.S. government on television and speaks to the media daily about the policies of the U.S. government and nobody cares to explain who this person is and how he became senior advisor to President Obama? Who is this senior political advisor to the president who said, quite incorrectly, in June 2009 that Iran had nuclear weapons - on national television? Who is Axelrod to say that Iran will face consequences for failing to submit to the extra-judicial dictates of the so-called "international community," as he did at the end of 2009? David Axelrod is a Chicago-based media consultant, advertising man, and corporate lobbyist who makes his living by changing public opinion to support his clients, who are primarily political candidates and major corporations. Axelrod is really a paid lobbyist who uses television advertising to change public opinion on behalf of his clients. Because he has two kinds of clients – political candidates and large corporations - Axelrod started two media companies: AKP&D Message and Media for politicians, and ASK Public Strategies for corporations. While all partners at AKP&D (A is for Axelrod, with John Kupper, David Plouffe, and John Del Cecato) held senior positions on the Obama campaign, it wasn't the only campaign AKP&D worked on. AKP&D also provided services to the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton. Creating a positive image to affect public opinion through television ads is one of the basic services Axelrod provides. To do this he writes most of their speeches. Because he has so many politicians as clients, sometimes he re-uses the same speech. When Obama the candidate used the same speech that Deval Patrick or John Edwards had used earlier, it wasn't plagerism – it was simply Obama reading a recycled Axelrod speech.
David Axelrod is described on the White House website as the former "Senior Partner" at AKP&D, who "managed media strategy and communications for more than 150 local, state, and national campaigns, with a focus on progressive candidates and causes." SourceWatch has information about David Axelrod and his media companies. As a former resident of Cook County who was born and raised in the Chicago area, I can say that the people who Axelrod has helped put into office in Illinois and Chicago are anything but "progressive." Having monitored elections in Cook County, I can say with a high degree of certainty that the Chicago-based political figures that Axelrod has worked with are actually part of a large criminal enterprise. Why would David Axelrod be involved in promoting candidates who are so easily corrupted? Why is a son of Romanian Jewish immigrants working to promote black candidates in cities and states across the country? Who tells Axelrod who to support and what policies to promote? ATTACK DOGS OF ZIONIST TERRORISTS
David Axelrod works very closely with Rahm Emanuel, President Obama's Chief of Staff. Axelrod and Emanuel are the highest level Zionist agents/controllers of the Obama administration. Rahm Emanuel is named after an Israeli terrorist from the Stern Gang and is the son of Benjamin (Auerbach) Emanuel, a former member of the Irgun, the Zionist terrorist organization headed by Menachem Begin. The Irgun was behind the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1946, the worst terrorist bombing in Palestinian history.
While still in their twenties, Axelrod and Emanuel began working together to defeat Senator Charles H. Percy (R-Ill.) in 1984. Percy was a popular senator who had served three terms and risen to become the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Senator Percy had become a powerful adversary of Menachem Begin, the former terrorist leader who had become prime minister of Israel. Begin saw Percy as an enemy in the U.S. Congress because Percy was openly critical of illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories and advised Israel to compromise with the Palestinians. Percy had also criticized Israel's brutal siege of West Beirut during the summer of 1982, saying, "It could turn out to be, if it continues this way, Israel's Vietnam."
When Begin read a report Percy had called for economic measures to be taken to stop Israel's murderous invasion of Lebanon, Begin fired back. "I would like to tell Senator Percy that nobody, nobody is going to bring Israel to her knees. You must have forgotten that Jews do not kneel but to God," an angry Begin told Jewish fund-raisers in Jerusalem. Philip M. Klutznick of Chicago, the former president of B'nai B'rith International and the World Jewish Congress, who had corresponded with both Percy and Prime Minister Begin, was a key Jewish fund-raiser who conspired with Begin and took action to remove Senator Percy from office. Begin wanted Percy removed from his position of power in the U.S. Congress and Klutznick made it happen. When Axelrod and Emanuel went to work for the Paul Simon senate campaign (1984) they were taking orders from Klutznick and working as the political attack dogs for Menachem Begin, one of the most notorious terrorists of history. Axelrod was later commissioned in 1992 by Klutznick to make Barack Obama "our first black president," as his daughter Betty Lu Saltzman said. David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel are clearly not working for America's best interest in the Obama White House. They are the highest-level point men in the White House for an international network of Zionist criminals. The candidates that Axelrod promotes are not progressive. They are controlled. The Zionist strategy in promoting candidates who can be controlled is what I call "Control through Corruption." THE 9-11 CONNECTION One of Axelrod's clients was Michael R. White, who was mayor of Cleveland from 1990 to 2002. Mayor White played a key role in the actions that took place at the Cleveland airport on 9-11, when it was reported that Flight 93 and another plane had made emergency landings and that the passengers had been taken into the NASA facility at the airport where they had been interviewed by FBI agents.
Mayor White headed what is described as the most corrupt administration in Cleveland history. Nate Gray, who is currently in prison, was White's "bagman," and collected bribes for contracts. During a court hearing in September 2008, U.S District Judge James Gwin said Gray still refused to testify "to protect some compatriot."
As I wrote in "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93" in 2006: On August 17, 2005, White's business associate and close friend, Nate Gray, was convicted of 36 criminal counts relating to bribery of public officials in four cities. Two days after the Gray conviction, Brent Larkin, in an editorial in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, wrote: "Now we know that, at the very least, White presided over a government that will forever be remembered as one of the most corrupt in the city's history."
When David Axelrod worked his television magic to get Michael White elected mayor, he was really working for Sam Miller. Miller then used White to serve his purposes. Under Mayor White, Sam Miller's taxes for the property he owned (with the Ratner family of Forest City) in Cleveland fell every year to the point where he was paying very little tax. When White took office in 1990, he cut Miller's property tax by 21 percent. In 1991, Miller's taxes fell another 20 percent. In 1992 his taxes fell another 17.3 percent and in 1994 by 12.4 percent - for a tax cut of 71 percent in four years. During the first four years of White's administration, Miller's assessed property value was lowered by $160 million, saving him and Forest City $56 million. This savings for Miller and Forest City lowered revenues for Cleveland schools and libraries. Axelrod also worked on something called the Gateway Committee (Cleveland Downtown Redevelopment Program), which was a project that the Miller family was very much involved in. David Axelrod is a highest-level Zionist agent controlling the president of the United States. Here he discusses candidate Obama's visit to Israel as he speaks from the King David Hotel. This was the hotel that was bombed by Rahm Emanuel's father and his gang in 1946 killing more than 90 people.
to be continued... Sources and Recommended Reading: Bollyn, Christopher, "The Hollywood Fantasy of Flight 93", May 12, 2006 "Obama’s Credibility Gap" by Bob Herbert, New York Times, January 25, 2010 Bartimole, Roldo, "How Hypocritical Can Sam Miller Get Before We Laugh Him Out of Town", Cleveland Leader, June 26, 2009
Corporatism vs. Democracy in America
January 23, 2010 "In a day when special interests already hold our democracy by the throat, the court has helped them tighten their grip...The hypocrisy here is striking. And the impact of this ruling is frightening." - "Reckless Supreme Court Ruling on Campaign Finance: Special Interests Win, We Lose" Star Ledger Editorial Board (NJ), January 22, 2010 The Supreme Court has handed lobbyists a new weapon. A lobbyist can now tell any elected official: if you vote wrong, my company, labor union or interest group will spend unlimited sums explicitly advertising against your re-election. - David D. Kirkpatrick, New York Times, January 21, 2010 "The Court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the Nation. The path it has taken to reach its outcome will, I fear, do damage to this institution." - Justice John Paul Stevens in his 90-page dissenting opinion "The conceit that corporations must be treated identically to natural persons in the political sphere is not only inaccurate but also inadequate to justify the Court's disposition of this case. In the context of election to public office, the distinction between corporate and human speakers is significant. Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. The cannot vote or run for office. Because they may be managed and controlled by nonresidents, their interests may conflict in fundamental respects with the interests of eligible voters. The financial resources, legal structure, and instrumental orientation of corporations raise legitimate concerns about their role in the electoral process. Our lawmakers have a compelling constitutional basis, if not also a democratic duty, to take measures designed to guard against the potentially deleterious effects of corporate spending in local and national races... The Court operates with a sledge hammer rather than a scalpel when it strikes down one of Congress' most significant efforts to regulate the role that corporations and unions play in electoral politics." The Supreme Court decision allowing corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on political advertising is the death knell for democracy* in America. If voting machines killed the democratic franchise in the United States, this decision by the Supreme Court is a dump truck dumping tons of dirt on its grave. This is the legal acceptance of what can only be called the rule of corporatism in America. American voters do not generally elect their presidents and representatives based not on their real merits or political skills but mainly on the image of the candidate received through television advertising and televised debates, which are controlled by the two major political parties. President Obama (my former senator who failed to respond to my letters) was not elected on his proven merits or political achievements (which are very scanty) but on a carefully crafted image of the candidate created by corporate lobbyist David Axelrod, his senior media strategist and political advisor. This ruling gives corporations an even bigger voice than they already have in politics by allowing them to run televised political ads before an election. This is a extremely flawed interpretation of the freedom of speech and cannot be allowed to stand if the United States is to retain any semblance of being a democratic republic. "Joined by the other three members of the court's liberal wing, Justice Stevens said the majority had committed a grave error in treating corporate speech the same as that of human beings." Corporations are not individuals or citizens. They are super-sized entities that are international in scope and size. Many of them are not beholden to any nation. Corporations simply cannot be equated with citizens as they do not belong to any nation. Corporations are concerned with gaining power and wealth and have core interests that are clearly contrary to the national good or public interest. With this ruling corporations will be able to use their general funds to play a super-size role in any political contest in the nation. How can any candidate of the people compete against someone who has the backing of a huge corporation with a war chest of millions of dollars to spend on advertising and television ads? Corporations have business interests in every congressional district in the nation. This ruling will enable them to exercise a massive influence in every congressional race. “If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech.” Corporations can not be granted the same rights as those enshrined in the First Amendment for citizens of the United States. To rule that corporations have the right of free speech in federal elections and then allow them to spend freely from their immense financial resources on political campaigns at every level across the United States is a most absurd interpretation of the Constitutional right of Freedom of Speech. Justice Kennedy's statement above does not take into account that churches are "associations of citizens" that are fined (taxed) for engaging in political speech. Churches in the United States do not have the right to political speech. Why should corporations, which are often foreign-owned and controlled, be allowed to have the loudest voice in U.S. elections while churches are forced to be silent? This decision destroys the notion that America is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." * The term democracy should not be taken to mean that the United States is a "democracy" in the literal or classical Greek meaning of the word. Switzerland is a democracy in the real meaning of the word. The Swiss citizenry is truly involved in making political decisions for the nation. The United States was created as a republic with democratic elections in which representatives are chosen. The right to choose political representatives through open and transparent elections is the "democratic franchise", something which has completely disappeared in most counties of the United States with the use of computerized electronic voting systems. Recommended Reading: Hasen, Richard L., “Money Grubbers - The Supreme Court kills campaign finance reform”, January 21, 2010
Slaying the Debt Spider
July 20, 2010
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt." "If the American people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." I have recently been listed in something called the Encyclopedia of American Loons, which is being put together (in alphabetical order) by
By definition, a loon is one of the fish-eating, diving birds of the genus Gavia of northern regions, but "loon" is also used informally to mean a person who "is crazy or deranged", which is apparently how Ryan Lake views me. At the bottom of my entry he provides this "diagnosis". Diagnosis: Complete loon and master at interpreting the fact that anyone disagrees with him, for whatever reason, as evidence for the truth of his conspiracy theories. Specific impact uncertain, but his views are apparently relatively widespread and must be considered dangerous. Dangerous to whom? E
9-11 was the product of a Zionist conspiracy (in particular organized by the Rothschild family) – the Zionist conspiracy that controls the SLAYING THE DEBT SPIDER The second part of "The Coming American Revolution" will be my next article. It may be titled "Slaying the Spider" because it will deal with identifying the spider which has woven the web of deception and debt in which we find ourselves and our nation(s) trapped.
Americans are deeply enraged and the revolutionary zeal is clearly palpable. The Our American republic is in an extreme debt crisis that has been caused by the Rothschild bankers who control the world by controlling the money supply and keeping the governments of the world in deep debt. Ellen Hodgson Brown, the author of an excellent book entitled The Web of Debt, says this about the coming revolution in the chapter "Stepping from Scarcity into Abundance": Wars, competition and strife are the inevitable results of this scarcity-driven system. The obvious solution is to eliminate the parasitic banking scheme that is feeding on the world's prosperity. But how? The Witches of Wall Street are not likely to release their vice-like grip without some sort of revolution, and a violent revolution would probably fail, because the world's most feared military machine is already in the hands of the money cartel. Violent revolution would just furnish them with an excuse to test their equipment. I agree with Ellen Brown, who refers to the familiar Wizard of Oz allegory throughout her most readable work, that it is the Debt Spider that must be vanquished. Our nation(s) and our lives are stuck fast in a very sticky web of debt while our minds are trapped tightly in the controlled-media web of deception. These webs both belong to a spider that remains out of sight. Although we can see those who are caught in the web, we don't see the spider. To free ourselves from the ocean of debt that is drowning our nation and killing prosperity we must kill the Debt Spider. How is the Rothschild debt spider to be slain in the real world? Hans Schicht, author of "The Death of Banking and Macro Politics", explains how: If prime ministers and presidents would only be blessed with the most basic knowledge of the perversity of banking, they would not go onto their knees to the Central Banker and ask His Highness for loans…With a little bit of brains they would expropriate all banking institutions.
The first banking institution that needs to be nationalized is the Federal Reserve System. To return the control over the supply and value of money to the As financial writer John Hoefle wrote: This is not an academic question, as the Fed is actively involved in looting the American population for the benefit of giant VULTURE CAPITALISM Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee filed a Petition for Articles of Impeachment against the Federal Reserve Board in 1934. He told Congress: This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it. William Jennings Bryan, the Democratic candidate for the presidency in 1896, won the nomination with his famous "Cross of Gold" speech, in which he aimed his criticism squarely at the international banking cartel. I stand with
|
